Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 749–758 | Cite as

Greenhouse gas emissions vary in response to different biochar amendments: an assessment based on two consecutive rice growth cycles

  • Haijun Sun
  • Haiying Lu
  • Yanfang FengEmail author
Research Article
  • 142 Downloads

Abstract

The efficiency of biochar to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emission from rice paddy soils is not consistent. Furthermore, which factor dominates this mitigation efficiency is not clear. In the present 2-year greenhouse experiment, the effects of biochars derived from two feedstocks (wheat straw and saw dust) and two pyrolysis temperatures (500 °C and 700 °C), and applied at two different rates (0.5 wt% and 3 wt%) on methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, and the total global warming potential (GWPt), and GHG intensity (GHGI) were measured. The results showed that biochar applications did not alter GHG emission flux patterns in either rice cycle. In 2015, the N2O emissions were 24.6–71.2% lower under six biochar treatments than under the urea control treatment. Moreover, total CH4 emissions were mitigated by 13.3–92.6% and 27.7–53.5% under six and five biochar treatments in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Overall, lower GWPt and GHGI were observed under most of the biochar treatments compared with the urea control treatment in both rice cycles. The multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) results of the data from both years suggested that the biochar effects on reducing GHG emissions changed with either individual factors or their interactive effects. The responses of the GWPt and GHGI varied mainly with biochar application rate and pyrolysis temperature (P < 0.005); compared with that derived from a relatively low pyrolysis temperature and applied at a relatively low rate, biochar derived from a relatively high pyrolysis temperature and applied at a relatively high rate exerted relatively higher GWPt and GHGI mitigation efficiencies. The influence of the feedstock source was not as prominent as the application rate and pyrolysis temperature, which will expand the scope of biochar applications.

Keywords

Biochar Nitrous oxide Methane GWP GHGI Paddy soil 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The contribution of Ms. Wang YM to relevant experiments is highly appreciated.

Funding

The authors are grateful for the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31601832, 41877090, and 41601320) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20160931, BK20160594).

References

  1. Ali MA, Hoque MA, Kim PJ (2013) Mitigating global warming potentials of methane and nitrous oxide gases from rice paddies under different irrigation regimes. Ambio 42:357–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson CR, Condron LM, Clough TJ, Fiers M, Stewart A, Hill RA, Sherlock RR (2011) Biochar induced soil microbial community change: implications for biogeochemical cycling of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus. Pedobiologia 54:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruun EW, Ambus P, Egsgaard H, Hauggaard-Nielen H (2012) Effects of slow and fast pyrolysis biochar on soil C and N turnover dynamics. Soil Biol Biochem 46:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cayuela ML, Sánchez-Monedero MA, Roig A, Hanley K, Enders A, Lehmann J (2013) Biochar and denitrification in soils: when, how much and why does biochar reduce N2O emissions? Sci Rep 3:1732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deng W, Van Zwieten L, Lin Z, Liu X, Sarmah AK, Wang H (2017) Sugarcane bagasse biochars impact respiration and greenhouse gas emissions from a latosol. J Soils Sediments 17:632–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dong D, Yang M, Wang C, Wang H, Li Y, Luo J, Wu W (2013) Responses of methane emissions and rice yield to applications of biochar and straw in a paddy field. J Soils Sediments 13:1450–1460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dong D, Feng Q, McGrouther K, Yang M, Wang H, Wu W (2015) Effects of biochar amendment on rice growth and nitrogen retention in a waterlogged paddy field. J Soils Sediments 15:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feng Y, Xu Y, Yu Y, Xie Z, Lin X (2012) Mechanisms of biochar decreasing methane emission from Chinese paddy soils. Soil Biol Biochem 46:80–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feng Y, Sun H, Xue L, Liu Y, Gao Q, Lu KP, Yang L (2017) Biochar applied at an appropriate rate can avoid increasing NH3 volatilization dramatically in rice paddy soil. Chemosphere 168:1277–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haefele SM, Konboon Y, Wongboon W, Amarante S, Maarifat AA, Pfeiffer EM, Knoblauch C (2011) Effects and fate of biochar from rice residues in rice-based systems. Field Crops Res 121:430–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harter J, Krause H, Schuettler S, Ruser R, Fromme M, Scholten T, Kappler A, Behrens S (2014) Linking N2O emissions from biochar-amended soil to the structure and function of the N-cycling microbial community. ISME J 8:660–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. He L, Gielen G, Bolan N, Zhang X, Qin H, Huang H, Wang H (2015) Contamination and remediation of phthalic acid esters in agricultural soils in China: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 35:519–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. He Y, Zhou X, Jiang L, Li M, Du Z, Zhou G, Shao J, Wang X, Xu Z, Bai S, Wallace H, Xu C (2017) Effects of biochar application on soil greenhouse gas fluxes: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy 9:743–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. He L, Fan S, Müller K, Wang H, Che L, Xu S, Song Z, Yuan G, Rinklebe J, Tsang DCW, Ok YS, Bolan NS (2018) Comparative analysis biochar and compost-induced degradation of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in soils. Sci Total Environ 625:987–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang P, Ge CJ, Feng D, Yu HM, Luo JW, Li JT, Strong PJ, Sarmah AK, Bolan NS, Wang HL (2018) Effects of metal ions and pH on ofloxacin sorption to cassava residue-derived biochar. Sci Total Environ 616:1384–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate change: changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey DW, Haywood J, Lean J, Lowe DC, Myhre G, Nganga J, Prinn R, Raga G, Schulz M, Dorland RV, Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Jia J, Ma Y, Xiong Z (2012) Net ecosystem carbon budget, net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in intensive vegetable ecosystems in China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 150:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jin J, Wang M, Cao Y, Wu S, Peng L, Li Y, Zhang J, Zhan J, Wong MH, Shan S, Christie P (2017) Cumulative effects of bamboo sawdust addition on pyrolysis of sewage sludge: biochar properties and environmental risk from metals. Bioresour Technol 228:218–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim HK, Kim J, Cho T, Choi JW (2012) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on physicochemical properties of biochar obtained from the fast pyrolysis of pitch pine (Pinusrigina). Bioresour Technol 118:158–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li B, Fan C, Zhang H, Chen Z, Sun L, Xiong Z (2015) Combined effects of nitrogen fertilization and biochar on the net global warming potential, greenhouse gas intensity and net ecosystem economic budget in intensive vegetable agriculture in southeastern China. Atmos Environ 100:10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li YF, Hu SD, Chen JH, Muller K, Li YC, Fu WJ, Lin ZW, Wang HL (2018) Effects of biochar application in forest ecosystems on soil properties and greenhouse gas emissions: a review. J Soils Sediments 18:546–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liang X, Li H, Wang S, Ye Y, Ji Y, Tian G, van Kessel C, Linquist BA (2013) Nitrogen management to reduce yield-scale global warming potential in rice. Field Crops Res 146:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Linquist BA, Adviento-Borte MA, Pittelkow CM, van Kessel C, van Groenigen KJ (2012) Fertilizer management practices and greenhouse gas emissions from rice systems: a quantitative review and analysis. Field Crops Res 135:10–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu J, Shen J, Li Y, Su Y, Ge T, Jones D, Wu J (2014a) Effect of biochar amendment on the net greenhouse gas emission and greenhouse gas intensity in a Chinese double rice cropping system. Eur J Soil Biol 65:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu X, Ye Y, Liu Y, Zhang A, Zhang X, Li L, Pan G, Kibue GW, Zheng J (2014b) Sustainable biochar effects for low carbon crop production: a 5-crop season field experiment on a low fertility soil from Central China. Agric Syst 129:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lu K, Yang X, Gielen G, Bolan N, Ok YS, Niazi NK, Xu S, Yuan G, Chen X, Zhang X, Liu D, Song Z, Liu X, Wang H (2017) Effect of bamboo and rice straw biochars on the mobility and redistribution of heavy metals (cd, cu, Pb and Zn) in contaminated soil. J Environ Manag 186:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malghani S, Gleixner G, Trumbore SE (2013) Chars produced by slow pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization vary in carbon sequestration potential and greenhouse gases emissions. Soil Biol Biochem 62:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mosier AR, Halvorson AD, Reule CA, Liu X (2006) Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in irrigated cropping systems in northeastern Colorado. J Environ Qual 35:1584–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Niazi NK, Bibi I, Shahid M, Ok YS, Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J, Wang H, Murtaza B, Islam E, Nawaz MF, Luttge A (2018) Arsenic removal by Japanese oak wood biochar in aqueous solutions and well water: investigating arsenic fate using integrated spectroscopic and microscopic techniques. Sci Total Environ 621:1642–1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nie CR, Yang X, Niazi NK, Xu XY, Wen YH, Rinklebe J, Ok YS, Xu S, Wang HL (2018) Impact of sugarcane bagasse-derived biochar on heavy metal availability and microbial activity: a field study. Chemosphere 200:274–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paustian K, Lehmann J, Ogle S, Reay D, Robertson GP, Smith P (2017) Climate–smart soils. Nature 532:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Qi F, Kuppusamy S, Naidu R, Bolan NS, Ok YS, Lamb D, Li Y, Yu L, Semple KT, Wang H (2017) Pyrogenic carbon and its role in contaminant immobilization in soils. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 47:795–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Qin P, Wang H, Yang X, He L, Muller K, Shaheen SM, Xu S, Rinklebe J, Tsang DCW, Ok YS, Bolan N, Song Z, Che L, Xu X (2018) Bamboo- and pig-derived biochars reduce leaching losses of dibutyl phthalate, cadmium, and lead from co-contaminated soils. Chemosphere 198:450–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Singh BP, Hatton BJ, Singh B, Cowie AL, Kathuria A (2010) Influence of biochars on nitrous oxide emission and nitrogen leaching from two contrasting soils. J Environ Qual 39:1224–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Singla A, Inubushi K (2014) Effect of biochar on CH4 and N2O emission from soils vegetated with paddy. Paddy Water Environ 12:239–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spokas KA, Reicosky DC (2009) Impacts of sixteen different biochars on soil greenhouse gas production. Ann Environ Sci 3:179–193Google Scholar
  37. Sun H, Zhang H, Wu J, Jiang P, Shi W (2013) Laboratory lysimeter analysis of NH3 and N2O emissions and leaching losses of nitrogen in a rice-wheat rotation system irrigated with N-rice wastewater. Soil Sci 178:316–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sun H, Zhang H, Powlson D, Min J, Shi W (2015) Rice production, nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization as impacted by the nitrification inhibitor 2-chloro-6-(trichloromethyl)-pyridine. Field Crops Res 173:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sun H, Zhang H, Min J, Feng Y, Shi W (2016) Controlled-release fertilizer, floating duckweed, and biochar affect ammonia volatilization and nitrous oxide emission from rice paddy fields irrigated with nitrogen–rich wastewater. Paddy Water Environ 14:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang J, Pan X, Liu Y, Zhang X, Xiong Z (2012) Effects of biochar amendment in two soils on greenhouse gas emissions and crop production. Plant Soil 360:287–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang B, Lehmann J, Hanley K, Hestrin R, Enders A (2015) Adsorption and desorption of ammonium by maple wood biochar as a function of oxidation and pH. Chemosphere 138:120–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang N, Chang Z, Xue L, Yu J, Shi X, Ma L, Li H (2017) Biochar decreases nitrogen oxide and enhances methane emissions via altering microbial community composition of anaerobic paddy soil. Sci Total Environ 581-582:689–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wu W, Yang M, Feng Q, McGrouther K, Wang H, Lu H, Chen Y (2012) Chemical characterization of rice straw-derived biochar for soil amendment. Biomass Bioenergy 47:268–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wu WD, Li JH, Niazi NK, Muller K, Chu YC, Zhang LL, Yuan GD, Lu KP, Song ZL, Wang HL (2016) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on lead immobilization by chemically modified coconut fiber-derived biochars in aqueous environments. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:22890–22896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wu W, Li J, Lan T, Müller K, Niazi NK, Chen X, Xu S, Zheng L, Chu Y, Li J, Yuan G, Wang H (2017) Unraveling sorption of lead in aqueous solutions by chemically modified biochar derived from coconut fiber: a microscopic and spectroscopic investigation. Sci Total Environ 576:766–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Xu T, Lou L, Cao R, Duan D, Chen Y (2012) Effect of bamboo biochar on pentachlorophenol leach ability and bioavailability in agricultural soil. Sci Total Environ 414:727–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang X, Liu J, McGrouther K, Huang H, Lu K, Guo X, He L, Lin X, Che L, Ye Z, Wang H (2016) Effect of biochar on the extractability of heavy metals (cd, cu, Pb, and Zn) and enzyme activity in soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:974–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang X, Lu K, McGrouther K, Che L, Hu G, Wang Q, Liu X, Shen L, Huang H, Ye Z, Wang H (2017) Bioavailability of cd and Zn in soils treated with biochars derived from tobacco stalk and dead pigs. J Soils Sediments 17:751–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yuan J, Xu R, Zhang H (2011) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol 102:3488–3497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang A, Bian R, Pan G, Cui L, Hussain Q, Li L, Zheng J, Zhang X, Han X, Yu X (2012) Effects of biochar amendment on soil quality, crop yield and greenhouse gas emissions in a Chinese rice paddy: a field study of 2 consecutive rice growing cycles. Field Crops Res 127:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang A, Bian R, Hussain Q, Li L, Pan G, Zheng J, Zhang X (2013) Change in net global warming potential of a rice-wheat cropping system with biochar soil amendment in a rice paddy from China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 173:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang A, Bian R, Li L, Wang X, Zhao Y, Hussain Q, Pan G (2015) Enhanced rice production but greatly reduced carbon emission following biochar amendment in metal-polluted rice paddy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:18977–18986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhao X, Min J, Wang S, Shi W, Xing G (2011) Further understanding of nitrous oxide emission from paddy fields under rice/wheat rotation in South China. J Geophys Res 116:G02016Google Scholar
  54. Zhao X, Wang J, Wang S, Xing G (2014) Successive straw biochar application as a strategy to sequester carbon and improve fertility: a pot experiment with two rice/wheat rotations in paddy soil. Plant Soil 378:279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhao Z, Dong S, Jiang X, Liu S, Ji H, Li Y, Han Y, Sha W (2017) Effects of warming and nitrogen deposition on CH4, CO2 and N2O emissions in alpine grassland ecosystems of the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Sci Total Environ 592:565–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zheng J, Stewart CE, Francesca CM (2012) Biochar and nitrogen fertilizer alters soil nitrogen dynamics and greenhouse gas fluxes from two temperate soils. J Environ Qual 41:1361–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhou G, Zhou X, Zhang T, Du Z, He Y, Wang X, Shao J, Cao Y, Xue S, Wang H, Xu C (2017) Biochar increased soil respiration in temperate forests but had no effects in subtropical forests. For Ecol Manag 405:339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of ForestryNanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural SciencesInstitute of Agricultural Resources and EnvironmentNanjingChina
  3. 3.Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern ChinaNanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations