Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 161–170 | Cite as

Effects of different fertilizers on residues of oxytetracycline and microbial activity in soil

  • Junmei Qin
  • Huaye Xiong
  • Haotian Ma
  • Zhaojun LiEmail author
Research Article
  • 422 Downloads

Abstract

Oxytetracycline (OTC), a type of tetracycline, was used widely as feeding additive to promote animal growth in breeding industry in the world. Its residue has been found in soils. Based on potted maize experiments, the influences of OTC on soil enzyme activity, microbial biomass carbon (MBC), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), and soil fertility were investigated during the growth stages of maize receiving different fertilizers (spent mushroom substrate, worm manure, and biochar, among others, with single applications and combined applications with their cooperating microbial inoculants). The results showed that OTC negatively affected the soil enzyme activity, MBC, MBN, and cation exchange capacity (CEC). Enzyme activity, MBC, and MBN were more sensitive to OTC than soil fertility. The significant negative correlations were found between OTC concentrations and catalase, MBC, and CEC (p < 0.05). This indicated that the effects of OTC on soil can be alleviated by different fertilizers, and the effects of T6 (microbial inoculants), T7 (microbial inoculants + worm manure), T8 (microbial inoculants + SMS), and T9 (microbial inoculants + biochar) were the best among those of all treatments. During the mature stage of maize, the content of OTC in the soil of T7 was the lowest compared with other treatments. The results provide a good basis for the development of methods to remediate OTC-contaminated soils.

Keywords

Oxytetracycline Fertilizer Enzyme activity Microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen 

Notes

Funding information

This study was supported by the National Key Technology R&D Program of China (2018YFD0500206) and the Science and Technology Project in Shanxi Province of China (20140311008-4).

References

  1. An J, Chen H, Wei S, Gu J (2015) Antibiotic contamination in animal manure, soil, and sewage sludge in Shenyang, northeast China. Environ Earth Sci 74:5077–5086.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4528-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey C, Spielmeyer A, Frings RM, Hamscher G, Schüttrumpf H (2015) From agricultural fields to surface water systems: the overland transport of veterinary antibiotics. J Soils Sediments 15:1630–1634.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1140-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS (1985) Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 17:837–842.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(85)90144-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cang L, Zhou DM, Wang QY, Wu DY (2009) Effects of electrokinetic treatment of a heavy metal contaminated soil on soil enzyme activities. J Hazard Mater 172:1602–1607.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao J, Wang C, Ji D (2016) Improvement of the soil nitrogen content and maize growth by earthworms and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soils polluted by oxytetracycline. Sci Total Environ 571:926–934.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen K, Zhou JL (2014) Occurrence and behavior of antibiotics in water and sediments from the Huangpu River, Shanghai, China. Chemosphere 95:604–612.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.09.119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen Y, Wang Z, Shen Z, Ou Z, Xu D, Yuan Z, Zhou S (2017) Effects of oxytetracycline on growth and chlorophyll fluorescence in rape (Brassica campestris L.). Pol J Environ Stud 26:995–1001.  https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/67575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng D, Liu X, Zhao S, Cui B, Bai J, Li Z (2017) Influence of the natural colloids on the multi-phase distributions of antibiotics in the surface water from the largest lake in North China. Sci Total Environ 578:649–659.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng D, Feng Y, Liu Y, Li J, Xue J, Li Z (2018) Quantitative models for predicting adsorption of oxytetracycline, ciprofloxacin and sulfamerazine to swine manures with contrasting properties. Sci Total Environ 634:1148–1156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chi Z, Liu R, Zhang H (2010) Potential enzyme toxicity of oxytetracycline to catalase. Sci Total Environ 408:5399–5404.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Di MG, Gismondi A, Canuti L, Scimeca M, Volpe A, Canini A (2014) Tetracycline accumulates in Iberis sempervirens L. through apoplastic transport inducing oxidative stress and growth inhibition. Plant Biol 16:792–800.  https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duan M, Li H, Gu J, Tuo X, Sun W, Qian X, Wang X (2017) Effects of biochar on reducing the abundance of oxytetracycline, antibiotic resistance genes, and human pathogenic bacteria in soil and lettuce. Environ Pollut 224:787–795.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fazal A, Bano A (2016) Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), biochar, and chemical fertilizer under salinity stress. Commun Soil Sci Plan 47:1985–1993.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2016.1216562 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gao M, Song W, Zhou Q, Ma X, Chen X (2013) Interactive effect of oxytetracycline and lead on soil enzymatic activity and microbial biomass. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 36:667–674.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2013.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guo H, Yao J, Cai M, Qin Y, Guo Y, Richnow HH, Blake R, Doni S, Ceccanti B (2012) Effects of petroleum contamination on soil microbial numbers, metabolic activity and urease activity. Chemosphere 87:1273–1280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.01.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hammesfahr U, Heuer H, Manzke B, Smalla K, Thiele-Bruhn S (2008) Impact of the antibiotic sulfadiazine and pig manure on the microbial community structure in agricultural soils. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1583–1591.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang L, Gao X, Liu M, Du G, Guo J, Ntakirutimana T (2012) Correlation among soil microorganisms, soil enzyme activities, and removal rates of pollutants in three constructed wetlands purifying micro-polluted river water. Ecol Eng 46:98–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson JL, Temple KL (1964) Some variables affecting the measurement of “catalase activity” in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 28:207–209.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1964.03615995002800020024x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lavelle P, Martin A (1992) Small-scale and large-scale effects of endogeic earthworms on soil organic matter dynamics in soils of the humid tropics. Soil Biol Biochem 24:1491–1498.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(92)90138-N CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lebrun JD, Trinsoutrot-Gattin I, Vinceslas-Akpa M, Bailleul C, Brault A, Mougin C, Laval K (2012) Assessing impacts of copper on soil enzyme activities in regard to their natural spatiotemporal variation under long-term different land uses. Soil Biol Biochem 49:150–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li YW, Wu XL, Mo CH, Tai YP, Huang XP, Xiang L (2011) Investigation of sulfonamide, tetracycline, and quinolone antibiotics in vegetable farmland soil in the Pearl River Delta area, southern China. J Agric Food Chem 59:7268–7276.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf1047578 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li Y, Wang H, Liu X, Zhao G, Sun Y (2016) Dissipation kinetics of oxytetracycline, tetracycline, and chlortetracycline residues in soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6513-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu S, Yang Z, Wang X, Zhang X, Gao R, Liu X (2007) Effects of Cd and Pb pollution on soil enzymatic activities and soil microbiota. Front Agric China 1:85–89.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-007-0016-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu XM, Qi LI, Liang WJ, Yong J (2008) Distribution of soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass along a latitudinal gradient in farmlands of Songliao Plain, Northeast China. Pedosphere 18:431–440.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(08)60034-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu Y, Feng Y, Cheng D, Xue J, Wakelin S, Li Z (2018) Dynamics of bact erial composition and the fate of antibiotic resistance genes and mobile genetic elements during the co-composting with gentamicin fermentation residue and lovastatin fermentation residue. Bioresour Technol 261:249–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ma J, Zhai G (2014) Antibiotic contamination: a global environment issue. J Bioremed Biodegrad 5:e157.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6199.1000e157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ma T, Pan X, Chen L, Liu W, Christie P, Luo Y, Wu L (2016) Effects of different concentrations and application frequencies of oxytetracycline on soil enzyme activities and microbial community diversity. Eur J Soil Biol 76:53–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martens R (1995) Current methods for measuring microbial biomass C in soil: potentials and limitations. Biol Fert Soils 19:87–99.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Medina E, Paredes C, Bustamante MA, Moral R, Moreno-Caselles J (2012) Relationships between soil physico-chemical, chemical and biological properties in a soil amended with spent mushroom substrate. Geoderma 173-174:152–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oka H, Ito Y, Matsumoto H (2000) Chromatographic analysis of tetracycline antibiotics in foods. J Chromatorgr A 882:109–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(99)01316-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Circular of the United States Department of Agriculture, US Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  32. Oo AN, Iwai CB, Saenjan P (2015) Soil properties and maize growth in saline and nonsaline soils using cassava-industrial waste compost and vemicompost with or without earthworms. Land Degrad Dev 26:300–310.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pan M, Chu LM (2016) Phytotoxicity of veterinary antibiotics to seed germination and root elongation of crops. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 126:228–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.12.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pan M, Chu LM (2017) Occurrence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in soils from wastewater irrigation areas in the Pearl River Delta region, southern China. Sci Total Environ 624:145–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pramanik P, Ghosh GK, Ghosal PK, Banik P (2007) Changes in organic - C, N, P and K and enzyme activities in vermicompost of biodegradable organic wastes under liming and microbial inoculants. Bioresour Technol 98:2485–2494.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Qian H, Hu B, Wang Z, Xi X, Tao H (2007) Effects of validamycin on some enzymatic activities in soil. Environ Monit Assess 125:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9211-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Riaz L, Mahmood T, Kamal A, Shafqat M, Rashid A (2017) Industrial release of fluoroquinolones (FQs) in the waste water bodies with their associated ecological risk in Pakistan. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 52:14–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2017.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rizzo L, Manaia C, Merlin C, Schwartz T, Dagot C, Ploy MC, Michael I, Fatta-Kassinos D (2013) Urban wastewater treatment plants as hotspots for antibiotic resistant bacteria and genes spread into the environment: a review. Sci Total Environ 447:345–360.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saha R, Mishra VK, Majumdar B, Laxminarayana K, Ghosh PK (2010) Effect of integrated nutrient management on soil physical properties and crop productivity under a maize (Zea mays)-mustard (Brassica campestris) cropping sequence in acidic soils of northeast India. Commun Soil Sci Plan Anal 41:2187–2200.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2010.504799 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sarmah AK, Meyer MT, Boxall AB (2006) A global perspective on the use, sales, exposure pathways, occurrence, fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics (VAs) in the environment. Chemosphere 65:725–759.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schoebitz M, López MD, Roldán A (2013) Bioencapsulation of microbial inoculants for better soil–plant fertilization. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 33:751–765.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0142-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shi ZJ, Lu Y, Xu ZG, Fu SL (2008) Enzyme activities of urban soils under different land use in the Shenzhen city, China. Plant Soil Environ 54:341–346.  https://doi.org/10.17221/415-PSE CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Soil Survey Staff (1991) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. US government printing office. Handbook, Washington, p 436Google Scholar
  44. Subbiah BV, Asija JS (1956) A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in the soil. Curr Sci 259–260Google Scholar
  45. Sumner ME, Miller WP (1996) Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 1201–1229Google Scholar
  46. Sun J, Zeng Q, Tsang D, Zhu LZ, Li XD (2017) Antibiotics in the agricultural soils from the Yangtze River Delta, China. Chemosphere 189:301–308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.09.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Boeckel TP, Brower C, Gilbert M, Grenfell BT, Levin SA, Robinson TP, Teillant A, Laxminarayan R (2015) Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:5649–5654.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503141112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vance ED, Brooks PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walkley AJ, Black IA (1934) An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Xu HL (2016) Effects of compound microbial inoculant treated wastewater irrigation on soil nutrients and enzyme activities. Int J Agric Biol Eng 9:100–108.  https://doi.org/10.3965/j.ijabe.20160906.2127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xue B, Zhang R, Wang Y, Liu X, Li J, Zhang G (2013) Antibiotic contamination in a typical developing city in south China: occurrence and ecological risks in the Yongjiang River impacted by tributary discharge and anthropogenic activities. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 92:229–236.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4528-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yang Q, Jing Z, Zhu K, Hao Z (2009) Influence of oxytetracycline on the structure and activity of microbial community in wheat rhizosphere soil. J Environ Sci (China) 21:954–959.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62367-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yang CW, Hsiao WC, Fan CH, Chang BV (2016) Bacterial communities associated with sulfonamide antibiotics degradation in sludge-amended soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:19754–19763.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7187-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang K, Dang H, Tan S, Wang Z, Zhang Q (2010) Vegetation community and soil characteristics of abandoned agricultural land and pine plantation in the Qinling Mountains, China. For Ecol Manag 259:2036–2047.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.02.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang ZJ, Shen JG, Wang H, Liu M, Wu LH, Ping F, He Q, Li HY, Zheng CF, Xu XH (2013) Attenuation of veterinary antibiotics in full-scale vermicomposting of swine manure via the housefly larvae (Musca domestica). Sci Rrp-Uk 4:6844.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06844 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang H, Luo Y, Wu L, Huang Y, Christie P (2015a) Residues and potential ecological risks of veterinary antibiotics in manures and composts associated with protected vegetable farming. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:5908–5918.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3731-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang QQ, Ying GG, Pan CG, Liu YS, Zhao JL (2015b) Comprehensive evaluation of antibiotics emission and fate in the river basins of China: source analysis, multimedia modeling, and linkage to bacterial resistance. Environ Sci Technol 49:6772–6782.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhou LK, Zhang ZM (1980) Analysis methods for soil enzyme activities. J Soil Sci 5:37–38 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  59. Zhu L, Xiao Q, Cheng H, Shi BJ, Shen YF, Li S (2017) Seasonal dynamics of soil microbial activity after biochar addition in a dryland maize field in North-Western China. Ecol Eng 104:141–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.04.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Junmei Qin
    • 1
  • Huaye Xiong
    • 1
  • Haotian Ma
    • 2
  • Zhaojun Li
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Resources and Environment, National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center for Agricultural Resources and EnvironmentShanxi Agricultural UniversityTaiguChina
  2. 2.College of AgricultureShanxi Agricultural UniversityTaiguChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, Ministry of Agriculture, China-New Zealand Joint Laboratory for Soil Molecular Ecology, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional PlanningChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations