Advertisement

Self-assembled three-dimensional double network graphene oxide/polyacrylic acid hybrid aerogel for removal of Cu2+ from aqueous solution

  • Qiaoqiao Han
  • Lei Chen
  • Wenxiao Li
  • Zhiyong Zhou
  • Zhou Fang
  • Zhiwei Xu
  • Xiaoming Qian
Research Article
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) double network graphene oxide/polyacrylic acid (GO/PAA) hybrid aerogels were fabricated under mild conditions from the mixture of GO and acrylic acid (AA) monomers using a one-pot in situ solution polymerization process which included the polymerization of AA and the self-assembly of functional GO sheets. The PAA chains served as not only binder to assemble GO sheets into 3D framework but also modifier to provide more active functional groups. The adsorbents based on such material exhibited superior adsorption performance towards Cu2+ ions in aqueous media due to rich mesopores, high specific surface area, and abundant active sites. This work brings a new vision for assembling 3D porous graphene-based nanomaterials as adsorbents in environmental protection.

Keywords

Graphene oxide Polyacrylic acid Double network architecture Aerogel Adsorption Heavy metal ions 

Notes

Funding information

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51502202) and Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology (No. 17JCTPJC47600).

References

  1. Chen W, Li S, Chen C, Yan L (2011) Self-assembly and embedding of nanoparticles by in situ reduced graphene for preparation of a 3D graphene/nanoparticle aerogel. Adv Mater 23:5679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen M, Zhang C, Li X, Zhang L, Ma Y, Zhang L, Xu X, Xia F, Wang W, Gao J (2013) A one-step method for reduction and self-assembling of graphene oxide into reduced graphene oxide aerogels. J Mater Chem A 1:2869–2877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen L, Xu Z, Li J, Zhou B, Shan M, Li Y, Liu L, Li B, Niu J (2014) Modifying graphite oxide nanostructures in various media by high-energy irradiation. RSC Adv 4:1025–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen X, Zheng X, Wang X, Wang J (2015) Graphene/carbon nanaotube aerogel with ultra-high adsorption capacity for the isolation of hemoglobin. Chem J Chin Univ 36:1498–1504Google Scholar
  5. Chen L, Zheng D-H, Zhang Y, Wang Y-N, Xu Z-R (2017) In situ self-assembled reduced graphene oxide aerogel embedded with nickel oxide nanoparticles for the high-efficiency separation of ovalbumin. J Sep Sci 40:1765–1772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen L, Han Q, Li W, Zhou Z, Fang Z, Xu Z, Wang Z, Qian X (2018) Three-dimensional graphene-based adsorbents in sewage disposal: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25:25840–25861.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2767-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng C, Li S, Zhao J, Li X, Liu Z, Ma L, Zhang X, Sun S, Zhao C (2013) Biomimetic assembly of polydopamine-layer on graphene: mechanisms, versatile 2D and 3D architectures and pollutant disposal. Chem Eng J 228:468–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dakova I, Karadjova I, Ivanov I, Georgieva V, Evtimova B, Georgiev G (2007) Solid phase selective separation and preconcentration of Cu(II) by Cu(II)-imprinted polymethacrylic microbeads. Anal Chim Acta 584:196–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Das TR, Patra S, Madhuri R, Sharma PK (2018) Bismuth oxide decorated graphene oxide nanocomposites synthesized via sonochemical assisted hydrothermal method for adsorption of cationic organic dyes. J Colloid Interface Sci 509:82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Didehban KH, Mohammadi L, Azimvand J (2017) Preparation of RGO/Fe3O4/poly (acrylic acid) hydrogel nanocomposites with improved magnetic, thermal and electrochemical properties. Mater Chem Phys 195:162–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doğan M, Turhan Y, Alkan M, Namli H, Turan P, Demirbaş Ö (2008) Functionalized sepiolite for heavy metal ions adsorption. Desalination 230:248–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dong L, Liu C, Yu F, Ding X, Li T, Hu Q, Liu M, Fang F, Xin H, Wang X (2017) Natural extracted aerogels with inherent anisotropy and their 3D printing assisted biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B 5:6217–6220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fan HT, Fan XL, Guo MM, Wang J, Gao S, Sun T (2012) Sol–gel derived organic–inorganic hybrid sorbent for removal of Pb, Cd and Cu from aqueous solution. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 64:418–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fan Q, Yang Y, Hao Y, Zhao X, Feng Y (2015) Preparation of three-dimensional PANI/GO for the separation of Hg(II) from aqueous solution. J Mol Liq 212:557–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gao F, Gu H, Wang H, Wang X, Xiang B, Guo Z (2015) Magnetic amine-functionalized polyacrylic acid-nanomagnetite for hexavalent chromium removal from polluted water. RSC Adv 5:60208–60219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghorbani M, Shams A, Seyedin O, Lahoori NA (2018) Magnetic ethylene diamine-functionalized graphene oxide as novel sorbent for removal of lead and cadmium ions from wastewater samples. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:5655–5667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ha H, Shanmuganathan K, Ellison CJ (2015) Mechanically stable thermally cross linked poly(acrylic acid)/reduced graphene oxide aerogels. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:6220–6229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hao P, Zhao Z, Leng Y, Tian J, Sang Y, Boughton RI, Wong CP, Liu H, Yang B (2015) Graphene-based nitrogen self-doped hierarchical porous carbon aerogels derived from chitosan for high performance supercapacitors. Nano Energy 15:9–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hao J, Wang Z, Xiao C, Zhao J, Chen L (2018) In situ reduced graphene oxide-based polyurethane sponge hollow tube for continuous oil removal from water surface. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:4837–4845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. He L, Liu D-D, Wang B-B, Xu H-B (2015) Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution by poly(ethyleneimine)-functionalized silica: studies on equilibrium isotherm, kinetics, and thermodynamics of interactions. Res Chem Intermed 41:3913–3928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. He J, Sun F, Han F, Gu J, Ou M, Xu W, Xu X (2018) Preparation of a novel polyacrylic acid and chitosan interpenetrating network hydrogel for removal of U(vi) from aqueous solutions. RSC Adv 8:12684–12691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kabiri S, Tran DNH, Azari S, Losic D (2015) Graphene-diatom silica aerogels for efficient removal of mercury ions from water. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:11815–11823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lei Y, Chen F, Luo Y, Zhang L (2014) Three-dimensional magnetic graphene oxide foam/Fe3O4 nanocomposite as an efficient absorbent for Cr(VI) removal. J Mater Sci 49:4236–4245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li J, Li J, Meng H, Xie S, Zhang B, Li L, Ma H, Zhang J, Yu M (2014) Ultra-light, compressible and fire-resistant graphene aerogel as a highly efficient and recyclable absorbent for organic liquids. J Mater Chem A 2:2934–2941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liang J, Liu Y, Guo L, Li L (2013) Facile one-step synthesis of a 3D macroscopic SnO2-graphene aerogel and its application as a superior anode material for Li-ion batteries. RSC Adv 3:11489–11492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu J, Ge X, Ye X, Wang G, Zhang H, Zhou H, Zhang Y, Zhao H (2016) 3D graphene/delta-MnO2 aerogels for highly efficient and reversible removal of heavy metal ions. J Mater Chem A 4:1970–1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu C, Liu H, Xu A, Tang K, Huang Y, Lu C (2017) In situ reduced and assembled three-dimensional graphene aerogel for efficient dye removal. J Alloys Compd 714:522–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mi X, Huang G, Xie W, Wang W, Liu Y, Gao J (2012) Preparation of graphene oxide aerogel and its adsorption for Cu2+ ions. Carbon 50:4856–4864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nardecchia S, Carriazo D, Luisa Ferrer M, Gutierrez MC, del Monte F (2013) Three dimensional macroporous architectures and aerogels built of carbon nanotubes and/or graphene: synthesis and applications. Chem Soc Rev 42:794–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pu S, Xue S, Yang Z, Hou Y, Zhu R, Chu W (2018) In situ co-precipitation preparation of a superparamagnetic graphene oxide/Fe3O4 nanocomposite as an adsorbent for wastewater purification: synthesis, characterization, kinetics, and isotherm studies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:17310–17320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Qi Y, Yang M, Xu W, He S, Men Y (2017) Natural polysaccharides-modified graphene oxide for adsorption of organic dyes from aqueous solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 486:84–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rahimi E, Mohaghegh N (2017) New hybrid nanocomposite of copper terephthalate MOF-graphene oxide: synthesis, characterization and application as adsorbents for toxic metal ion removal from Sungun acid mine drainage. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:22353–22360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saeed A, Akhter MW, Iqbal M (2005) Removal and recovery of heavy metals from aqueous solution using papaya wood as a new biosorbent. Sep Purif Technol 45:25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shi C, Chen L, Xu Z, Jiao Y, Li Y, Wang C, Shan M, Wang Z, Guo Q (2012) Monitoring influence of chemical preparation procedure on the structure of graphene nanosheets. Physica E 44:1420–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sui Z, Meng Q, Zhang X, Ma R, Cao B (2012) Green synthesis of carbon nanotube-graphene hybrid aerogels and their use as versatile agents for water purification. J Mater Chem 22:8767–8771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sui Z-Y, Cui Y, Zhu J-H, Han B-H (2013) Preparation of three-dimensional graphene oxide-polyethylenimine porous materials as dye and gas adsorbents. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:9172–9179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tan L, Wang Y, Liu Q, Wang J, Jing X, Liu L, Liu J, Song D (2015) Enhanced adsorption of uranium (VI) using a three-dimensional layered double hydroxide/graphene hybrid material. Chem Eng J 259:752–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang D, Li X, Wang J, Yang J, Geng D, Li R, Cai M, Sham T-K, Sun X (2012) Defect-rich crystalline SnO2 immobilized on graphene nanosheets with enhanced cycle performance for Li ion batteries. J Phys Chem C 116:22149–22156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weidman J, Mulvenna R, Zhang Y, Boudouris B, Phillip W (2016) Unusually stable hystersis in the pH-response of poly (acrylic acid) brushes confined within nanoporous block polymer thin films. J Am Chem Soc 138:7030–7039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wu Z-S, Yang S, Sun Y, Parvez K, Feng X, Muellen K (2012) 3D nitrogen-doped graphene aerogel-supported Fe3O4 nanoparticles as efficient electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. J Am Chem Soc 134:9082–9085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wu Y, Gao G, Wu G (2015) Self-assembled three-dimensional hierarchical porous V2O5/graphene hybrid aerogels for supercapacitors with high energy density and long cycle life. J Mater Chem A 3:1828–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Xie Y, Meng Z, Cai T, Han W-Q (2015) Effect of boron-doping on the graphene aerogel used as cathode for the lithium sulfur battery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:25202–25210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yan H, Yang L, Yang Z, Yang H, Li A, Cheng R (2012) Preparation of chitosan/poly(acrylic acid) magnetic composite microspheres and applications in the removal of copper(II) ions from aqueous solutions. J Hazard Mater 229:371–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zeng G, Liu Y, Tang L, Yang G, Pang Y, Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Li Z, Li M, Lai M, He X, He Y (2015) Enhancement of Cd(II) adsorption by polyacrylic acid modified magnetic mesoporous carbon. Chem Eng J 259:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang N, Qiu H, Si Y, Wang W, Gao J (2011) Fabrication of highly porous biodegradable monoliths strengthened by graphene oxide and their adsorption of metal ions. Carbon 49:827–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang J, Azam MS, Shi C, Huang J, Yan B, Liu Q, Zeng H (2015) Poly(acrylic acid) functionalized magnetic graphene oxide nanocomposite for removal of methylene blue. RSC Adv 5:32272–32282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang LY, Zhang W, Zhou Z, Li CM (2016) Gamma-Fe2O3 nanocrystals-anchored macro/meso-porous graphene as a highly efficient adsorbent toward removal of methylene blue. J Colloid Interface Sci 476:200–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang Y, Jiao Z, Hu Y, Lv S, Fan H, Zeng Y, Hu J, Wang M (2017) Removal of tetracycline and oxytetracycline from water by magnetic Fe3O4@graphene. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:2987–2995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhao Y, Hu C, Hu Y, Cheng H, Shi G, Qu L (2012) A versatile, ultralight, nitrogen-doped graphene framework. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:11371–11375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhou F, Feng X, Yu J, Jiang X (2018) High performance of 3D porous graphene/lignin/sodium alginate composite for adsorption of Cd(II) and Pb(II). Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:15651–15661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhu T, Teng K, Shi J, Chen L, Xu Z (2016) A facile assembly of 3D robust double network graphene/polyacrylamide architectures via gamma-ray irradiation. Compos Sci Technol 123:276–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Advanced Braided Composites, Ministry of Education, School of TextilesTianjin Polytechnic UniversityTianjinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations