Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 34, pp 34139–34154 | Cite as

The content of the potentially toxic elements, iron and manganese, in the grapevine cv Tamjanika growing near the biggest copper mining/metallurgical complex on the Balkan peninsula: phytoremediation, biomonitoring, and some toxicological aspects

  • Slađana Č. Alagić
  • Snežana B. Tošić
  • Mile D. Dimitrijević
  • Maja M. Nujkić
  • Aleksandra D. Papludis
  • Viktorija Z. Fogl
Research Article
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

Plants growing in areas polluted by heavy metals represent excellent models for the investigations related to their potentials for hazardous metals accumulation which further may help in the estimation of plant practical biomonitoring and phytoremediation potentials. In this study, the potentials of the grapevine cultivar Tamjanika from a highly polluted region in Eastern Serbia, with intensive copper mining and metallurgical activities, were estimated in regard to the potentially toxic elements such as iron and manganese; the potential danger from these metals through fruit consummation is also considered. Used methods were the following: ICP-OES analysis, calculation of biological coefficients, the Pearson correlation study, one-way ANOVA, and hierarchical cluster analysis. The results revealed that a great majority of the recorded concentrations in different plant organs were in the range of normal concentrations, as well as that the calculated accumulation rates for both metals were very low. The data also pointed to generally minimal to moderate enrichment by these metals which represents totally dissimilar situation in comparison with other heavy metals detected in the very same plant samples. The results of this study suggested that the investigated plants of the grapevine cv Tamjanika assimilated iron and manganese predominately according to their individual needs, and confirmed that the utilization of this plant species can be very effective in different biomonitoring procedures and also in the phytoremediation procedure known as phytostabilization. At the same time, it was obvious that even in aggressive circumstances its fruit was protected from some serious contamination and kept pretty safe for consummation.

Keywords

Biomonitoring Fe Mn Phytostabilization Vitis vinifera 

Notes

Funding information

The authors received financial support from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Serbia (Project nos. III46010, OI172031, and OI172047).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alagić SČ, Šerbula SS, Tošić SB, Pavlović AN, Petrović JV (2013) Bioaccumulation of arsenic and cadmium in birch and lime from the Bor region. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 65(4):671–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alagić SČ, Tošić SB, Dimitrijević MD, Antonijević MM, Nujkić MM (2015a) Assessment of the quality of polluted areas based on the content of heavy metals in different organs of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera) cv Tamjanika. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(9):7155–7175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alagić SČ, Tošić SB, Dimitrijević MD, Nujkić MM (2015b) Iron content in the fruits of the grapevines and peach trees growing near mining and smelting complex Bor, East Serbia. FU Phys Chem Tech 13(2):99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alagić SČ, Tošić SB, Dimitrijević MD, Petrović JV, Medić DV (2016) The characterization of heavy metals in the grapevine (Vitis vinifera) cultivar Rkatsiteli and wild blackberry (Rubus fruticosus) from East Serbia by ICP-OES and BAFs. Commun Soil Sci Plan 47(17):2034–2045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alagić SČ, Tošić SB, Dimitrijević MD, Petrović JV, Medić DV (2017) Chemometric evaluation of trace metals in Prunus persica L. Batech and Malus domestica from Minićevo (Serbia). Food Chem 217:568–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alloway BJ (2013) Heavy metals in soils. Trace metals and metalloids in soils and their bioavailability. In: Environmental Pollution, vol 22, 3rd edn. Springer, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4470-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bakirdere S, Yaman M (2008) Determination of lead, cadmium and copper in roadside soil and plants in Elazig, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 136:401–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barbieri M (2016) The importance of enrichment factor (EF) and geoaccumulation index (Igeo) to evaluate the soil contamination. J Geol Geophys 5(1):237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhaduri AM, Fulekar MH (2012) Antioxidant enzyme responses of plants to heavy metal stress. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 11:55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chopin EIB, Marin B, Mkoungafoko R, Rigaux A, Hopgood MJ, Delannoy E, Cances B, Laurain M (2008) Factors affecting distribution and mobility of trace elements (Cu, Pb, Zn) in a perennial grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) in the Champagne region of France. Environ Pollut 156:1092–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dimitrijevic M, Nujkic M, Alagic S, Milic S, Tosic S (2016) Heavy metal contamination of topsoil and parts of peach-tree growing at different distances from a smelting complex. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:615–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dmuchowski W, Bytnerowicz A (2009) Long-term (1992–2004) record of lead, cadmium, and zinc air contamination in Warsaw, Poland: determination by chemical analysis of moss bags and leaves of Crimean lime. Environ Pollut 157:3413–3421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hofman J, Stokkaer I, Snauwaert L, Samson R (2013) Spatial distribution assessment of particulate matter in an urban street canyon using biomagnetic leaf monitoring of tree crown deposited particles. Environ Pollut 183:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IOM (2001) Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.  https://doi.org/10.17226/10026. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10026.html Accessed 19 January 2018
  15. Jones JB (2005) Hydroponics: a practical guide for the soilless grower, 2nd edn. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  16. Kabata-Pendias A (2011) Trace elements in soils and plants, 4th edn. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  17. Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H (2001) Trace elements in soils and plants, 3rd edn. CRC Press LLC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  18. Leita L, Mondini C, De Nobili M, Simoni A, Sequi P (1998) Heavy metal content in xylem sap (Vitis Vinifera) from mining and smelting areas. Environ Monit Assess 50:189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin Y-F, Aarts MGM (2012) The molecular mechanism of zinc and cadmium stress response in plants. Cell Mol Life Sci 69:3187–3206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marques APGC, Rangel AOSS, Castro PML (2009) Remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils: phytoremediation as a potentially promising clean-up technology. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 39:622–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marschner P (2012) Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants, 3rd edn. Academic Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller JN, Miller JC (2005) Statistics and Chemometrics for analytical chemistry. Pearson Education Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Mingorance MD, Valdés B, Oliva RS (2007) Strategies of heavy metal uptake by plants growing under industrial emissions. Environ Int 33:514–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nagajyoti PC, Lee KD, Sreekanth TVM (2010) Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: a review. Environ Chem Lett 8:199–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakalamić AJ, Marković NR (2009) Opšte vinogradarstvo, Univerzitet u Beogradu. Poljoprivredni fakultet Beograd-Zemun, BeogradGoogle Scholar
  26. Nujkić M, Dimitrijević M, Alagić S, Tošić S, Petrović J (2016) Impact of metallurgical activities on the content of trace elements in the spatial soil and plant parts of Rubus fruticosus L. Environ Sci-Proc Imp 18:350–360Google Scholar
  27. Oliva SR, Mingorance MD (2006) Assessment of airborne heavy metal pollution by aboveground plant parts. Chemosphere 65:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palmer CM, Guerinot ML (2009) Facing the challenges of Cu, Fe and Zn homeostasis in plants. Nat Chem Biol 5(5):333–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pavoni E, Petranich E, Adami G, Baracchini E, Crosera M, Emili A, Lenaz D, Higueras P, Covelli S (2017) Bioaccumulation of thallium and other trace metals in Biscutella laevigata nearby a decommissioned zinc-lead mine (Northeastern Italian Alps). J Environ Manag 186:214–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rascio N, Navari-Izzo F (2011) Heavy metal hyperaccumulating plants: how and why do they do it? And what makes them so interesting? Plant Sci 180:169–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rucandio MI, Petit-Domínguez MD, Fidalgo-Hijano C, García-Giménez R (2011) Biomonitoring of chemical elements in an urban environment using arboreal and bush plant species. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simon E, Braun M, Vidic A, Bogyó D, Fábián I, Tóthmérész B (2011) Air pollution assessment based on elemental concentration of leaves tissue and foliage dust along an urbanization gradient in Vienna. Environ Pollut 159:1229–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simon E, Baranyai E, Braun M, Cserháti C, Fábián I, Tóthmérész B (2014) Elemental concentrations in deposited dust on leaves along an urbanization gradient. Sci Total Environ 490:514–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sutherland RA (2000) Bed sediment-associated trace metals in an urban stream, Oahu, Hawaii. Environ Geol 39:611–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Szajdek A, Borowska EJ (2008) Bioactive compounds and health-promoting properties of berry fruits: a review. Plant Food Hum Nutr 63:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tošić S, Alagić S, Dimitrijević M, Pavlović A, Nujkić M (2016) Plant parts of the apple tree (Malus spp.) as possible indicators of heavy metal pollution. AMBIO 45(4):501–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. USDA (2016) United States Department of Agriculture, USDA Food composition table, database version SR28. Available at: https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/search Accessed 19 January 2018
  38. USEPA (1996) United States Environmental Protection Agency, USEPA method 3052: “microwave assisted acid digestion of siliceous and organically based matrices”. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC Available at: http://www.caslab.com/EPA-Methods/PDF/EPA-Method-3052.pdf Accessed 19 January 2018Google Scholar
  39. USEPA (2017) United States Environmental Protection Agency, USEPA risk-based screening table – generic tables; regional screening level, RSL summary table (TR = 1x10−6 and THQ = 1.0) November 2017. Available at: http://www2.epa.gov/risk/risk-based-screening-table-generic-tables accessed 19 January 2018
  40. Vamerali T, Bandiera M, Mosca G (2010) Field crops for phytoremediation of metal-contaminated land. A review. Environ Chem Lett 8:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vystavna Y, Rushenko L, Diadin D, Klymenko O, Klymenko M (2014) Trace metals in wine and vineyard environment in southern Ukraine. Food Chem 146:339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vystavna Y, Rätsep R, Klymenko N, Drozd O, Pidlisnyuk V, Klymenko M (2015) Comparison of soil-to-root transfer and translocation coefficients of trace elements in vines of Chardonnay and Muscat white grown in the same vineyard. Sci Hortic 192:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weber F, Kowarik I, Säumel I (2014) Herbaceous plants as filters: immobilization of particulates along urban street corridors. Environ Pollut 186:234–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Slađana Č. Alagić
    • 1
  • Snežana B. Tošić
    • 2
  • Mile D. Dimitrijević
    • 1
  • Maja M. Nujkić
    • 1
  • Aleksandra D. Papludis
    • 1
  • Viktorija Z. Fogl
    • 3
  1. 1.Technical faculty BorUniversity of BelgradeBorSerbia
  2. 2.Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Department of ChemistryUniversity of NisNišSerbia
  3. 3.RTB Bor, Copper Mine Majdanpek Group, DOOMajdanpekSerbia

Personalised recommendations