Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 33, pp 33309–33321 | Cite as

The application of molecularly imprinted polymers in passive sampling for selective sampling perfluorooctanesulfonic acid and perfluorooctanoic acid in water environment

  • Fengmei Cao
  • Lei Wang
  • Xinhao Ren
  • Fengchang Wu
  • Hongwen Sun
  • Shaoyong LuEmail author
Research Article
  • 344 Downloads

Abstract

Modeling and predicting of a novel polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS) for sampling of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) using molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) as receiving phase are presented in this study. Laboratory microcosm experiments were conducted to investigate the uptake kinetics, effects of flow velocity, pH, and dissolved organic matter (DOM), and also the selectivity of the POCIS. In this study, uptake study of PFOA and PFOS sampling on MIP-POCIS, over 14 days, was investigated. Laboratory calibrations of MIP-POCIS yielded sampling rate (Rs) values for PFOA and PFOS were 0.387 and 0.229 L/d, higher than POCIS using commercial sorbent WAX as receiving phase (0.133 and 0.141 L/d for PFOA and PFOS, respectively) in quiescent condition. The Rs values for PFOA and PFOS sampling on MIP-POCIS were increased to 0.591 and 0.281 L/d in stirred condition (0.01 m/s), and no significant increase occurred when the flow velocity was further increased. The Rs values were kept relatively high in the solution of which the pH was lower than the isoelectric point (IEP) of MIP-sorbent and decreased when the solution pH was extend the IEP value. Under the experimental conditions, DOM seemed to slightly facilitate the Rs values of PFOA and PFOS in MIP-POCIS. The results showed that the interaction between the target compounds and the receiving phase was fully integrated by the imprinting effects and also the electrostatic interaction. Finally, comparing the sampling rate of WAX-POCIS and the MIP-POCIS, the MIP-POCIS offers promising perspectives for selective sampling ability for PFOA and PFOS.

Keywords

POCIS Molecularly imprinted polymers Sampling rate Selective sampling Typical perfluoroalkyl substance 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41807393, 41573097, and 417223044) and Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No.2015FY110900). This work is also supported by the State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences.

References

  1. Ahrens L, Yeung LWY, Taniyasu S, Lam PKS, Yamashita N (2011) Partitioning of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctane sulfonamide (PFOSA) between water and sediment. Chemosphere 85:731–737.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.06.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez DA (2013) Development of semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) and polar organic chemical integrative samplers (POCIS) for environmental monitoring. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:2179–2181.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvarez DA, Petty JD, Huckins JN, Jones-Lepp TL, Getting DT, Goddard JP, Manahan SE (2004) Development of a passive, in situ, integrative sampler for hydrophilic organic contaminants in aquatic environments. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1640–1648.  https://doi.org/10.1897/03-603 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alvarez DA et al. (2007) Chapter 8 Tool for monitoring hydrophilic contaminants in water: polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS). In: R. Greenwood GM, Vrana B (eds) Comprehensive analytical chemistry, vol Volume 48. Elsevier, pp 171-197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-526X(06)48008-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alvarez DA, Rosen MR, Perkins SD, Cranor WL, Schroeder VL, Jones-Lepp TL (2012) Bottom sediment as a source of organic contaminants in Lake Mead, Nevada, USA. Chemosphere 88:605–611.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayen S, Segovia E, Loh LL, Burger DF, Eikaas HS, Kelly BC (2014) Application of polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS) to monitor emerging contaminants in tropical waters. Sci Total Environ 482:15–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Booij K, Vrana B, Huckins JN (2007a) Chapter 7 Theory, modelling and calibration of passive samplers used in water monitoring. Compr Anal Chem 48:141–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-526X(06)48007-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Booij K, Vrana B, Huckins JN (2007b) Chapter 7 Theory, modelling and calibration of passive samplers used in water monitoring. In: R. Greenwood GM, Vrana B (eds) Comprehensive analytical chemistry, vol 48. Elsevier, pp 141–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-526X(06)48007-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cao F, Wang L, Ren X, Sun H (2016) Synthesis of a perfluorooctanoic acid molecularly imprinted polymer for the selective removal of perfluorooctanoic acid in an aqueous environment. J Appl Polym Sci 133:43192 (43191-43110).  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.43192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cao F, Wang L, Tian Y, Wu F, Deng C, Guo Q, Sun H, Lu S (2017) Synthesis and evaluation of molecularly imprinted polymers with binary functional monomers for the selective removal of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid and perfluorooctanoic acid. J Chromatogr A 1516:42–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.08.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cao F, Wang L, Yao Y, Wu F, Sun H, Lu S (2018) Synthesis and application of a highly selective molecularly imprinted adsorbent based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes for selective removal of perfluorooctanoic acid. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 4:689–700.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EW00443E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Convention S (2010) Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs). Stockholm Convention, Chateleine, GevevaGoogle Scholar
  13. Dufková V, Čabala R, Ševčík V (2012) Determination of C5–C12 perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids in river water samples in the Czech Republic by GC–MS after SPE preconcentration. Chemosphere 87:463–469.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.12.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commission (2012) Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council. Amending directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy. Brussels. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-dangersub/pdf/com_2011_876.pdf
  15. Fedorova G, Golovko O, Randak T, Grabic R (2013) Passive sampling of perfluorinated acids and sulfonates using polar organic chemical integrative samplers. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:1344–1351.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1003-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fletcher T et al (2013) Associations between PFOA, PFOS and changes in the expression of genes involved in cholesterol metabolism in humans. Environ Int 57–58:2–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Galloway TS, Fletcher T, Thomas OJ, Lee BP, Pilling LC, Harries LW (2015) PFOA and PFOS are associated with reduced expression of the parathyroid hormone 2 receptor (PTH2R) gene in women. Chemosphere 120:555–562.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giesy JP, Kannan K (2001) Global distribution of perfluorooctane sulfonate in wildlife. Environ Sci Technol 35:1339–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen KJ, Johnson HO, Eldridge JS, Butenhoff JL, Dick LA (2002) Quantitative characterization of trace levels of PFOS and PFOA in the Tennessee River. Environ Sci Technol 36:1681–1685.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es010780r CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Houde M, De Silva AO, Muir DCG, Letcher RJ (2011) Monitoring of perfluorinated compounds in aquatic biota: an updated review. Environ Sci Technol 45:7962–7973.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es104326w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huckins JN, Petty JD, Orazio CE, Lebo JA, Clark RC, Gibson VL, Gala WR, Echols KR (1999) Determination of uptake kinetics (sampling rates) by lipid-containing semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water. Environ Sci Technol 33:3918–3923.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es990440u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaserzon SL, Vermeirssen ELM, Hawker DW, Kennedy K, Bentley C, Thompson J, Booij K, Mueller JF (2013) Passive sampling of perfluorinated chemicals in water: flow rate effects on chemical uptake. Environ Pollut 177:58–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kot-Wasik A, Zabiegała B, Urbanowicz M, Dominiak E, Wasik A, Namieśnik J (2007) Advances in passive sampling in environmental studies. Anal Chim Acta 602:141–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kwon H-O, Kim H-Y, Park Y-M, Seok K-S, Oh J-E, Choi S-D (2017) Updated national emission of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) from wastewater treatment plants in South Korea. Environ Pollut 220:298–306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.09.063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li H, Vermeirssen ELM, Helm PA, Metcalfe CD (2010) Controlled field evaluation of water flow rate effects on sampling polar organic compounds using polar organic chemical integrative samplers. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:2461–2469.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li F, Sun H, Hao Z, He N, Zhao L, Zhang T, Sun T (2011a) Perfluorinated compounds in Haihe River and Dagu Drainage Canal in Tianjin, China. Chemosphere 84:265–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.03.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li H, Helm PA, Paterson G, Metcalfe CD (2011b) The effects of dissolved organic matter and pH on sampling rates for polar organic chemical integrative samplers (POCIS). Chemosphere 83:271–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li Y, Yang C, Bao Y, Ma X, Lu G, Li Y (2016) Aquatic passive sampling of perfluorinated chemicals with polar organic chemical integrative sampler and environmental factors affecting sampling rate. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:16096–16103.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6791-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lindstrom AB, Strynar MJ, Libelo EL (2011) Polyfluorinated compounds: past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol 45:7954–7961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mazzella N, Dubernet J-F, Delmas F (2007) Determination of kinetic and equilibrium regimes in the operation of polar organic chemical integrative samplers: application to the passive sampling of the polar herbicides in aquatic environments. J Chromatogr A 1154:42–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mazzella N, Lissalde S, Moreira S, Delmas F, Mazellier P, Huckins JN (2010) Evaluation of the use of performance reference compounds in an oasis-HLB adsorbent based passive sampler for improving water concentration estimates of polar herbicides in freshwater. Environ Sci Technol 44:1713–1719.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es902256m CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morin N, Miège C, Coquery M, Randon J (2012) Chemical calibration, performance, validation and applications of the polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS) in aquatic environments. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 36:144–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2012.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Brien D, Bartkow M, Mueller JF (2011) Determination of deployment specific chemical uptake rates for SDB-RPD Empore disk using a passive flow monitor (PFM). Chemosphere 83:1290–1295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Okay OS, Karacık B, Güngördü A, Yılmaz A, Koyunbaba NC, Yakan SD, Henkelmann B, Schramm KW, Ozmen M (2017) Monitoring of organic pollutants in marine environment by semipermeable membrane devices and mussels: accumulation and biochemical responses. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:19114–19125.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9594-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ouyang G, Zhao W, Bragg L, Qin Z, Alaee M, Pawliszyn J (2007) Time-weighted average water sampling in Lake Ontario with solid-phase microextraction passive samplers. Environ Sci Technol 41:4026–4031.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es062647a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pignatello JJ, Katz BG, Li H (2010) Sources, interactions, and ecological impacts of organic contaminants in water, soil, and sediment: an introduction to the special series. All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. J Environ Qual 39:1133–1138.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2010.0099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pignotti E, Farré M, Barceló D, Dinelli E (2017) Occurrence and distribution of six selected endocrine disrupting compounds in surface- and groundwaters of the Romagna area (North Italy). Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:21153–21167.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9756-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saikat S, Kreis I, Davies B, Bridgman S, Kamanyire R (2013) The impact of PFOS on health in the general population: a review. Environ Sci Processes Impacts 15:329–335.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EM30698K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schaefer CE, Andaya C, Urtiaga A, McKenzie ER, Higgins CP (2015) Electrochemical treatment of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) in groundwater impacted by aqueous film forming foams (AFFFs). J Hazard Mater 295:170–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seethapathy S, Górecki T, Li X (2008) Passive sampling in environmental analysis. J Chromatogr A 1184:234–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.07.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stuer-Lauridsen F (2005) Review of passive accumulation devices for monitoring organic micropollutants in the aquatic environment. Environ Pollut 136:503–524.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sun H, Li F, Zhang T, Zhang X, He N, Song Q, Zhao L, Sun L, Sun T (2011) Perfluorinated compounds in surface waters and WWTPs in Shenyang, China: mass flows and source analysis. Water Res 45:4483–4490.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.05.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sun H, Zhang X, Wang L, Zhang T, Li F, He N, Alder AC (2012) Perfluoroalkyl compounds in municipal WWTPs in Tianjin, China—concentrations, distribution and mass flow. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:1405–1415.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0727-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vallejo A, Prieto A, Moeder M, Usobiaga A, Zuloaga O, Etxebarria N, Paschke A (2013) Calibration and field test of the polar organic chemical integrative samplers for the determination of 15 endocrine disrupting compounds in wastewater and river water with special focus on performance reference compounds (PRC). Water Res 47:2851–2862.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.02.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vecitis CD, Park H, Cheng J, Mader BT, Hoffmann MR (2009) Treatment technologies for aqueous perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA). Front Environ Sci Eng China 3:129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vrana B, Allan IJ, Greenwood R, Mills GA, Dominiak E, Svensson K, Knutsson J, Morrison G (2005) Passive sampling techniques for monitoring pollutants in water. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 24:845–868.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2005.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vrana B, Mills GA, Dominiak E, Greenwood R (2006) Calibration of the Chemcatcher passive sampler for the monitoring of priority organic pollutants in water. Environ Pollut 142:333–343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2005.10.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang L, Gong X, Wang R, Gan Z, Lu Y, Sun H (2017) Application of an immobilized ionic liquid for the passive sampling of perfluorinated substances in water. J Chromatogr A 1515:45–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Woodward DLC, R. Casson (2015) Lessons learned from characterizing several dozen sites impacted by perfluorinated compounds,Third International Bioremediation Symposium, B9 Emerging Contaminants: Perfluorinated Compounds Miami, FL 158Google Scholar
  50. Zareitalabad P, Siemens J, Hamer M, Amelung W (2013) Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) in surface waters, sediments, soils and wastewater – a review on concentrations and distribution coefficients. Chemosphere 91:725–732.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.02.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fengmei Cao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lei Wang
    • 2
  • Xinhao Ren
    • 3
  • Fengchang Wu
    • 1
  • Hongwen Sun
    • 2
    • 4
  • Shaoyong Lu
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory for Lake Pollution ControlChinese Research Academy of Environmental SciencesBejingChina
  2. 2.Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Environmental Remediation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Science and EngineeringNankai UniversityTianjinChina
  3. 3.School of Environmental Science and EngineeringShanxi University of Science and TechnologyXi’anChina
  4. 4.TianjinChina

Personalised recommendations