Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 4266–4276 | Cite as

Versatility of iron-rich steel waste for the removal of high arsenic and sulfate concentrations in water

  • Sandrine F. Araujo
  • Cláudia L. Caldeira
  • Virgínia S. T. Ciminelli
  • Ariadna Silva
  • Camila C. AmorimEmail author
Advanced Oxidation Technologies: State-of-the-Art in Ibero-American Countries
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this work is to evaluate the application of a steel waste, basic oxygen furnace sludge (BOFS), rich in iron, to treat water contaminated with elevated arsenic and sulfate concentrations. In the first step, three doses (10, 60, and 80 g L−1) of BOFS were tested to investigate the removal of As(III) and As(V) (67 mg L−1) and sulfate (3700 mg L−1) separately from an aqueous solution. In the second step, the efficacies of BOFS (10 g L−1) and commercial ZVI (5 g L−1) were compared to simultaneously remove arsenic and sulfate. The pH of the feed solution was adjusted to 2.5 and monitored during the experiment. The use of BOFS achieved arsenic removal up to 92% and sulfate removal of nearly 40% after 72 h of contact time. Use of BOFS also increased the solution pH to 12. Similar removal levels were achieved with both BOFS and ZVI. These results confirm the potential application of BOFS to remove high arsenic and sulfate concentrations from acidic solutions. The data obtained here should be used as a basis for further studies on the remediation of acid mine drainage with high concentrations of arsenic and sulfate using an abundant and low-cost steel waste.

Keywords

Basic oxygen furnace sludge (BOFS) Arsenic removal Sulfate removal Steel waste reuse 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Brazilian government agencies—FAPEMIG, CAPES, and CNPQ—for funding this research. The authors would like to thank Filipe A. T. Alves and Patricia Lopes at LAQ-DEMET/UFMG for performing the ICP-OES analyses. The authors would like to thank the Center of Microscopy at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (http://www.microscopia.ufmg.br) for providing the equipment and technical support for the experiments involving water analysis and electron microscopy.

Supplementary material

11356_2018_3168_MOESM1_ESM.docx (68 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 67.6 kb)
11356_2018_3168_MOESM2_ESM.pptx (6.8 mb)
ESM 2 (PPTX 6.76 mb)
11356_2018_3168_MOESM3_ESM.pptx (5.4 mb)
ESM 1 (PPTX 5.43 mb)

References

  1. Ahn JS, Chon C-M, Moon H-S, Kim K-W (2003) Arsenic removal using steel manufacturing byproducts as permeable reactive materials in mine tailing containment systems. Water Res 37:2478–2488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amorim CC, Dutra PR, Leão MMD, Pereira MC, Henriques AB, Fabris JD, Lago RM (2012) Controlled reduction of steel waste to produce active iron phases for environmental applications. Chem Eng J 209:645–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA (2005) Standard methods fo the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Bang S, Johnson MD, Korfiatis GP, Meng X (2005) Chemical reactions between arsenic and zero-valent iron in water. Water Res 39:763–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bard AJ, Parsons R, Jordan J (1985) Standard potentials in aqueous solutions. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Beak DG, Wilkin RT (2009) Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: part 2. Geochemical modeling and solid phase studies. J Contaminant Hydrol 106:15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bissen M, Frimmel FH (2003) Arsenic — a review. Part I: occurrence, toxicity, speciation, mobility. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 31:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biterna M, Antonoglou L, Lazou E, Voutsa D (2010) Arsenite removal from waters by zero valent iron: batch and column tests. Chemosphere 78:7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blowes DW, Ptacek CJ, Benner SG, McRae CWT, Bennett TA, Puls RW (2000) Treatment of inorganic contaminants using permeable reactive barriers. J Contam Hydrol 45:123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bothe JV, Brown PW (1999a) The stabilities of calcium arsenates at 23±1°C. J Hazard Mater 69:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bothe JV, Brown PW (1999b) Arsenic immobilization by calcium arsenate formation. Environ Sci Technol 33:3806–3811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burman J-O, Ponter C, Boströn K (1978) Metaborate digestion procedure for inductively coupled plasmaoptical emission spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 50:679–680Google Scholar
  13. Burman JO, Ponter C, Bostrom K (2012) Metaborate digestion procedure for inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry. Anal Chem 50(4):679–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caldeira CL, Ciminelli VST, Osseo-Asare K (2010) The role of carbonate ions in pyrite oxidation in aqueous systems. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74:1777–1789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cantrell KJ, Kaplan DI, Wietsma TW (1995) Zero-valent iron for the in situ remediation of selected metals in groundwater. J Hazard Mater 42:201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper MA, Hawthorne FC (1996) The crystal structure of rapidcreekite, Ca 2 (SO 4 )(CO 3 )(H 2 O) 4 , and its relation to the structure of gypsum. Can Mineral 34:99–106Google Scholar
  17. Das B, Prakash S, Reddy PSR, Misra VN (2007) An overview of utilization of slag and sludge from steel industries. Resour Conserv Recycl 50:40–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Devi P, Saroha AK (2017) Utilization of sludge based adsorbents for the removal of various pollutants: a review. Sci Total Environ 578:16–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dhoble YN, Ahmed S (2018) Review on the innovative uses of steel slag for waste minimization. J Mater Cycles Waste ManagGoogle Scholar
  20. Dimitrova SV (1996) Metal sorption on blast-furnace slag. Water Res 30:228–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dydo P, Turek M, Ciba J (2003) Scaling analysis of nanofiltration systems fed with saturated calcium sulfate solutions in the presence of carbonate ions. Desalination 159:245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fendorf S, Michael HA, van Geen A (2010): Spatial and temporal variations of groundwater arsenic in south and Southeast Asia. Science 328, 1123–1127Google Scholar
  23. Frade PR, Notini L, Santos SV, Moreira RFPM, Leão MMD, Amorim CC (2018) Feasibility study of the use of basic oxygen furnace sludge in a permeable reactive barrier. J Hazard Mater 351:188–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fu F, Dionysiou DD, Liu H (2014) The use of zero-valent iron for groundwater remediation and wastewater treatment: a review. J Hazard Mater 267:194–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guo X, Yang Z, Dong H, Guan X, Ren Q, Lv X, Jin X (2016) Simple combination of oxidants with zero-valent-iron (ZVI) achieved very rapid and highly efficient removal of heavy metals from water. Water Res 88:671–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Habuda-Stanić M, Nujić M (2015) Arsenic removal by nanoparticles: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:8094–8123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hug SJ, Leupin O (2003) Iron-catalyzed oxidation of arsenic(III) by oxygen and by hydrogen peroxide: pH-dependent formation of oxidants in the Fenton reaction. Environ Sci Technol 37:2734–2742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. IARC (2012) Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans., IARC Monographs. International Agency for Research on Cancer, LyonGoogle Scholar
  29. Kanel SR, Choi H, Kim J-Y, Vigneswaran S, Shim WG (2006) Removal of arsenic(III) from groundwater using low-cost industrial by-products—blast furnace slag. Water Qual Res J Can 41:130–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Katsoyiannis IA, Voegelin A, Zouboulis AI, Hug SJ (2015) Enhanced as(III) oxidation and removal by combined use of zero valent iron and hydrogen peroxide in aerated waters at neutral pH values. J Hazard Mater 297:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kefeni KK, Msagati TM, Maree JP, Mamba BB (2015) Metals and sulphate removal from acid mine drainage in two steps via ferrite sludge and barium sulphate formation. Miner Eng 81:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lackovic JA, Nikolaidis NP, Dobbs GM (2000) Inorganic arsenic removal by zero-valent Iron. Environ Eng Sci 17:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ladeira ACQ, Ciminelli VST (2004) Adsorption and desorption of arsenic on an oxisol and its constituents. Water Res 38:2087–2094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leupin OX, Hug SJ (2005) Oxidation and removal of arsenic (III) from aerated groundwater by filtration through sand and zero-valent iron. Water Res 39:1729–1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li Q, Xu X, Cui H, Pang J, Wei Z, Sun Z, Zhai J (2012) Comparison of two adsorbents for the removal of pentavalent arsenic from aqueous solutions. J Environ Manag 98:98–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Litter MI, Slodowicz M (2017): An overview on heterogeneous Fenton and photoFenton reactions using zerovalent iron materials. J Adv Oxidat TechnolGoogle Scholar
  37. López-Delgado A, Pérez C, López FA (1998) Sorption of heavy metals on blast furnace sludge. Water Res 32:989–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Manning BA, Hunt ML, Amrhein C, Yarmoff JA (2002) Arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) reactions with Zerovalent Iron corrosion products. Environ Sci Technol 36:5455–5461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Masindi V, Akinwekomi V, Maree JP, Muedi KL (2017) Comparison of mine water neutralisation efficiencies of different alkaline generating agents. J Environ Chem Eng 5:3903–3913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Masindi V, Osman MS, Mbhele RN, Rikhotso R (2018) Fate of pollutants post treatment of acid mine drainage with basic oxygen furnace slag: validation of experimental results with a geochemical model. J Clean Prod 172:2899–2909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miao Z, Brusseau ML, Carroll KC, Carreón-Diazconti C, Johnson B (2012) Sulfate reduction in groundwater: characterization and applications for remediation. Environ Geochem Health 34:539–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morgada ME, Levy IK, Salomone V, Farías SS, López G, Litter MI (2009) Arsenic (V) removal with nanoparticulate zerovalent iron: effect of UV light and humic acids. Catal Today 143:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Müller K, Ciminelli VST, Dantas MSS, Willscher S (2010) A comparative study of as(III) and as(V) in aqueous solutions and adsorbed on iron oxy-hydroxides by Raman spectroscopy. Water Res 44:5660–5672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Name T, Sheridan C (2014) Remediation of acid mine drainage using metallurgical slags. Miner Eng 64:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nikolaidis NP, Dobbs GM, Lackovic JA (2003) Arsenic removal by zero-valent iron: field, laboratory and modeling studies. Water Res 37:1417–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Noubactep C (2015) Metallic iron for environmental remediation: a review of reviews. Water Res 85:114–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Oh C, Rhee S, Oh M, Park J (2012) Removal characteristics of as(III) and as(V) from acidic aqueous solution by steel making slag. J Hazard Mater 213-214:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pantuzzo FL, Ciminelli VST (2010) Arsenic association and stability in long-term disposed arsenic residues. Water Res 44:5631–5640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Le Pape P, Battaglia-Brunet F, Parmentier M, Joulian C, Gassaud C, Fernandez-Rojo L, Guigner J-M, Ikogou M, Stetten L, Olivi L, Casiot C, Morin G (2017): Complete removal of arsenic and zinc from a heavily contaminated acid mine drainage via an indigenous SRB consortium. J Hazard Mater 321, 764–772Google Scholar
  50. Puls RW, Paul CJ, Powell RM (1999) The application of in situ permeable reactive (zero-valent iron) barrier technology for the remediation of chromate-contaminated groundwater: a field test. Appl Geochem 14:989–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rajagopal BS, LeGall J (1989) Utilization of cathodic hydrogen by hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 31:406–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rakotonimaro TV, Neculita CM, Bussière B, Benzaazoua M, Zagury GJ (2017) Recovery and reuse of sludge from active and passive treatment of mine drainage-impacted waters: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:73–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ramaswami A, Tawachsupa S, Isleyen M (2001) Batch-mixed Iron treatment of high arsenic waters. Water Res 35:4474–4479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Santos SV, Amorim CC, Andrade LN, Calixto NCZ, Henriques AB, Ardisson JD, Leão MMD (2015) Steel wastes as versatile materials for treatment of biorefractory wastewaters. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:882–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sarkar A, Paul B (2016) The global menace of arsenic and its conventional remediation - a critical review. Chemosphere 158:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sasaki K, Nukina S, Wilopo W, Hirajima T (2008) Removal of arsenate in acid mine drainage by a permeable reactive barrier bearing granulated blast furnace slag: column study. Mater Trans 49:835–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shabalala AN, Ekolu SO, Diop S, Solomon F (2017) Pervious concrete reactive barrier for removal of heavy metals from acid mine drainage − column study. J Hazard Mater 323:641–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sheridan C, Harding K, Koller E, De Pretto A (2013): A comparison of charcoal- and slag-based constructed wetlands for acid mine drainage remediation. Water SA 39, 369–374Google Scholar
  59. Shi C, Qian J (2000) High performance cementing materials from industrial slags — a review. Resour Conserv Recycl 29:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shokes TE, Möller G (1999) Removal of dissolved heavy metals from acid rock drainage using Iron metal. Environ Sci Technol 33:282–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smedley PL, Kinniburgh DG (2002) A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl Geochem 17:517–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Su C, Puls RW (2001) Arsenate and Arsenite removal by Zerovalent Iron: kinetics, redox transformation, and implications for in situ groundwater remediation. Environ Sci Technol 35:1487–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sun H, Wang L, Zhang R, Sui J, Xu G (2006) Treatment of groundwater polluted by arsenic compounds by zero valent iron. J Hazard Mater 129:297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sun F, Osseo-Asare KA, Chen Y, Dempsey BA (2011) Reduction of as(V) to as(III) by commercial ZVI or as(0) with acid-treated ZVI. J Hazard Mater 196:311–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sun Y, Guan X, Wang J, Meng X, Xu C, Zhou G (2014) Effect of weak magnetic field on arsenate and Arsenite removal from water by Zerovalent Iron: an XAFS investigation. Environ Sci Technol 48:6850–6858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Villa-Gomez DK, Pakshirajan K, Maestro R, Mushi S, Lens PNL (2015) Effect of process variables on the sulfate reduction process in bioreactors treating metal-containing wastewaters: factorial design and response surface analyses. Biodegradation 26:299–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilkens J, Shoemaker SH, Bazela WB, Egler AP, Sinha R, Bain JG (2003) Arsenic removal from groundwater using a BOF slag at the DuPont East Chicago (IN) site. RTDF PRB Action Teem Meeting, Niagara FallsGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilkin RT, Acree SD, Ross RR, Beak DG, Lee TR (2009) Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: part 1. Hydrogeochem studies. J Contamin Hydrol 106:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yang J-S, Kim Y-S, Park S-M, Baek K (2014) Removal of as(III) and as(V) using iron-rich sludge produced from coal mine drainage treatment plant. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:10878–10889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yang Z, Shan C, Zhang W, Jiang Z, Guan X, Pan B (2016) Temporospatial evolution and removal mechanisms of as(V) and se(VI) in ZVI column with H2O2 as corrosion accelerator. Water Res 106:461–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yang Z, Xu H, Shan C, Jiang Z, Pan B (2017) Effects of brining on the corrosion of ZVI and its subsequent as(III/V) and se(IV/VI) removal from water. Chemosphere 170:251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yi H, Xu G, Cheng H, Wang J, Wan Y, Chen H (2012) An overview of utilization of steel slag. Procedia Environ Sci 16:791–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhang F-S, Itoh H (2005) Iron oxide-loaded slag for arsenic removal from aqueous system. Chemosphere 60:319–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhu YN, Zhang XH, Xie QL, Wang DQ, Cheng GW (2006) Solubility and Stability of Calcium Arsenates at 25∘C 169:221–238Google Scholar
  75. Ziemkiewicz P, Skousen J (1999) Steel Slag Acid Mine Drainage Treat Control 1999:651–656Google Scholar
  76. Zvimba JN, Siyakatshana N, Mathye M (2016) Passive neutralization of acid mine drainage using basic oxygen furnace slag as neutralization material: experimental and modelling. Water Sci Technol 75:1014–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Research Group on Advanced Oxidation Processes-GruPOAUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, UFMGBelo HorizonteBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, UFMGBelo HorizonteBrazil
  3. 3.National Institute of Science and Technology: INCTe AcquaBelo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations