Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 34, pp 34262–34276 | Cite as

Removal of vanadium and palladium ions by adsorption onto magnetic chitosan nanoparticles

  • Maryam Omidinasab
  • Nadereh Rahbar
  • Mehdi Ahmadi
  • Babak Kakavandi
  • Farshid Ghanbari
  • George Z. Kyzas
  • Susana Silva Martinez
  • Neemat Jaafarzadeh
Research Article
  • 138 Downloads

Abstract

Chitosan (CS), synthesized from chitin chemically extracted from shrimp shells, was used for the synthesis of magnetic chitosan nanoparticles (Fe3O4-CSN), which makes the adsorbent easier to separate. Fe3O4-CSN was used for the removal of toxic metals such as vanadium (V(V)) and palladium (Pd(II)) ions from aqueous solutions. Influencing factors on the adsorption process such as pH, contact time, adsorbent dosage, and agitation speed were investigated. A competitive adsorption of V(V) and Pd(II) ions for the active sites was also studied. The monolayer maximum adsorption capacities (Qm) of 186.6 and 192.3 mg/g were obtained for V(V) and Pd(II) ions, respectively. The pseudo-second-order equation gave the best fit for the kinetic data, implying that chemisorption was the determining step. Freundlich model yielded a much better fit than the other adsorption models assessed (Langmuir, Temkin and Dubinin-Radushkevich). Thus, the adsorption of V(V) and Pd(II) ions onto Fe3O4-CSN is a combination of physical and chemical adsorption, as based on the kinetics and equilibrium study. Generally, physical adsorption is the mechanism that governs the system, while chemical adsorption is the slowest adsorption step that takes place. Thermodynamic studies displayed that the adsorption process was exothermic and spontaneous. Removal efficiencies of 99.9% for V(V) and 92.3% for Pd(II) ions were achieved, implying that Fe3O4-CSN adsorbent had an excellent ability for the removal of the metal ions from real industrial wastewaters without remarkable matrix effect.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Vanadium Palladium Chitin Chitosan coated magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles Shrimp shell 

Notes

Funding information

We are sincerely thankful to the Environmental Technologies Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (Project number: ETRC-9434) for the financial and academic supports of the present research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11356_2018_3137_MOESM1_ESM.docx (762 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 762 kb)

References

  1. Abbas M, Kaddour S, Trari M (2014) Kinetic and equilibrium studies of cobalt adsorption on apricot stone activated carbon. J Ind Eng Chem 20:745–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acosta R, Fierro V, Martinez de Yuso A et al (2016) Tetracycline adsorption onto activated carbons produced by KOH activation of tyre pyrolysis char. Chemosphere 149:168–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmadi M, Foladivanda M, Jafarzadeh N et al (2017a) Synthesis of chitosan zero-valent iron nanoparticles-supported for cadmium removal: characterization, optimization and modeling approach. J Water Supply Res Technol 66:116–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmadi M, Hazrati Niari M, Kakavandi B (2017b) Development of maghemite nanoparticles supported on cross-linked chitosan (γ-Fe2O3@CS) as a recoverable mesoporous magnetic composite for effective heavy metals removal. J Mol Liq 248:184–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Akkaya Sayʇili G, Sayʇili H, Koyuncu F, Güzel F (2015) Development and physicochemical characterization of a new magnetic nanocomposite as an economic antibiotic remover. Process Saf Environ Prot 94:441–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Johani H, Salam MA (2011) Kinetics and thermodynamic study of aniline adsorption by multi-walled carbon nanotubes from aqueous solution. J Colloid Interface Sci 360:760–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Angar Y, Djelali NE, Kebbouche-Gana S (2017) Investigation of ammonium adsorption on Algerian natural bentonite. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:11078–11089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Anirudhan TS, Radhakrishnan PG (2010) Adsorptive performance of an amine-functionalized poly(hydroxyethylmethacrylate)-grafted tamarind fruit shell for vanadium(V) removal from aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 165:142–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Azari A, Gharibi H, Kakavandi B et al (2017) Magnetic adsorption separation process: an alternative method of mercury extracting from aqueous solution using modified chitosan coated Fe3O4 nanocomposites. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 92:188–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Azzaz AA, Jellali S, Akrout H, Assadi AA, Bousselmi L (2017) Optimization of a cationic dye removal by a chemically modified agriculture by-product using response surface methodology: biomasses characterization and adsorption properties. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:9831–9846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Babaei AA, Baboli Z, Jaafarzadeh N et al (2015) Synthesis, performance, and nonlinear modeling of modified nano-sized magnetite for removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions. Desalin Water Treat 53:768–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Banerjee M, Basu RK, Das SK (2018) Cu(II) removal using green adsorbents: kinetic modeling and plant scale-up design. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–15Google Scholar
  13. Behnamfard A, Salarirad MM (2009) Equilibrium and kinetic studies on free cyanide adsorption from aqueous solution by activated carbon. J Hazard Mater 170:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Benavente M (2008) Adsorption of metallic ions onto chitosan: equilibrium and kinetic studies. Licentiate thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  15. Bingham E, Cohrssen B, Powell C (2001) Patty's toxicology. Wiley, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheera P, Karlapudi S, Sellola G, Ponneri V (2016) A facile green synthesis of spherical Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles and their effect on degradation of methylene blue in aqueous solution. J Mol Liq 221:993–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen Z, Liu T, Tang J, Zheng Z, Wang H, Shao Q, Chen G, Li Z, Chen Y, Zhu J, Feng T (2018) Characteristics and mechanisms of cadmium adsorption from aqueous solution using lotus seedpod-derived biochar at two pyrolytic temperatures. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:11854–11866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chorom M, Parnian A, Jaafarzadeh N (2012) Nickel removal by the aquatic plant (Ceratophyllum Demersum L.). Int J Environ Sci Dev 3:4–7Google Scholar
  19. Dada A, Olalekan A, Olatunya A, DADA O (2012) Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherms studies of equilibrium sorption of Zn2+ onto phosphoric acid modified rice husk. IOSR J Appl Chem 3:38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elhafez SEA, Hamad HA, Zaatout AA, Malash GF (2017) Management of agricultural waste for removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution: adsorption behaviors, adsorption mechanisms, environmental protection, and techno-economic analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:1397–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. El-Naas MH, Alhaija MA, Al-Zuhair S (2017) Evaluation of an activated carbon packed bed for the adsorption of phenols from petroleum refinery wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:7511–7520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Energy USD (2010) Analysis and geochemical modeling of vanadium contamination in groundwater new rifle processing site. In: ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  23. Essandoh M, Wolgemuth D, Pittman CU, Mohan D, Mlsna T (2017) Adsorption of metribuzin from aqueous solution using magnetic and nonmagnetic sustainable low-cost biochar adsorbents. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:4577–4590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fan L, Luo C, Lv Z et al (2011) Preparation of magnetic modified chitosan and adsorption of Zn2+ from aqueous solutions. Colloids Surfaces B 88:574–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fujiwara K, Ramesh A, Maki T et al (2007) Adsorption of platinum(IV), palladium(II) and gold(III) from aqueous solutions onto l-lysine modified crosslinked chitosan resin. J Hazard Mater 146:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gamage A, Shahidi F (2007) Use of chitosan for the removal of metal ion contaminants and proteins from water. Food Chem 104:989–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gao X, Wu L, Xu Q, Tian W, Li Z, Kobayashi N (2018) Adsorption kinetics and mechanisms of copper ions on activated carbons derived from pinewood sawdust by fast H3PO4 activation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:7907–7915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ghrab S, Eloussaief M, Lambert S, Bouaziz S, Benzina M (2018) Adsorption of terpenic compounds onto organo-palygorskite. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:18251–18262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gil A, Amiri MJ, Abedi-Koupai J, Eslamian S (2018) Adsorption/reduction of Hg(II) and Pb(II) from aqueous solutions by using bone ash/nZVI composite: effects of aging time, Fe loading quantity and co-existing ions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:2814–2829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hakim L, Sabarudin A, Oshita K et al (2008) Synthesis of cross-linked chitosan functionalized with threonine moiety and its application to on-line collection/concentration and determination of Mo, V and Cu. Talanta 74:977–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hu J, Chen C, Zhu X, Wang X (2009) Removal of chromium from aqueous solution by using oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J Hazard Mater 162:1542–1550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hu Q, Paudyal H, Zhao J et al (2014) Adsorptive recovery of vanadium(V) from chromium(VI)-containing effluent by Zr(IV)-loaded orange juice residue. Chem Eng J 248:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hydari S, Sharififard H, Nabavinia M, reza PM (2012) A comparative investigation on removal performances of commercial activated carbon, chitosan biosorbent and chitosan/activated carbon composite for cadmium. Chem Eng J 193–194:276–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jaafarzadeh N, Amiri H, Ahmadi M (2012) Factorial experimental design application in modification of volcanic ash as a natural adsorbent with Fenton process for arsenic removal. Environ Technol 33:159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jonidi Jafari A, Kakavandi B, Jaafarzadeh N et al (2017) Fenton-like catalytic oxidation of tetracycline by AC@Fe3O4 as a heterogeneous persulfate activator: adsorption and degradation studies. J Ind Eng Chem 45:323–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kakavandi B, Kalantary RR, Farzadkia M et al (2014) Enhanced chromium (VI) removal using activated carbon modified by zero valent iron and silver bimetallic nanoparticles. J Environ Heal Sci Eng 12:115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Khanafari A, Marandi R, Sanatei S (2008) Recovery of chitin and chitosan from shrimp waste by chemical and microbial methods. Iran J Environ Heal Sci Eng 5:19–24Google Scholar
  38. Kokkinos E, Soukakos K, Kostoglou M, Mitrakas M (2018) Cadmium, mercury, and nickel adsorption by tetravalent manganese feroxyhyte: selectivity, kinetic modeling, and thermodynamic study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:12263–12273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kumar ASK, Sharma S, Reddy RS et al (2015) Comprehending the interaction between chitosan and ionic liquid for the adsorption of palladium. Int J Biol Macromol 72:633–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kwok KCM, Koong LF, Al Ansari T, McKay G (2018) Adsorption/desorption of arsenite and arsenate on chitosan and nanochitosan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:14734–14742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kyzas GZ, Deliyanni EA (2013) Mercury(II) removal with modified magnetic chitosan adsorbents. Molecules 18:6193–6214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kyzas GZ, Lazaridis NK, Deliyanni EA (2013a) Oxidation time effect of activated carbons for drug adsorption. Chem Eng J 234:491–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kyzas GZ, Lazaridis NK, Kostoglou M (2013b) On the simultaneous adsorption of a reactive dye and hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions onto grafted chitosan. J Colloid Interface Sci 407:432–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kyzas GZ, Lazaridis NK, Kostoglou M (2014a) Adsorption/desorption of a dye by a chitosan derivative: experiments and phenomenological modeling. Chem Eng J 248:327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kyzas GZ, Siafaka PI, Lambropoulou DA, Lazaridis NK, Bikiaris DN (2014b) Poly(itaconic acid)-grafted chitosan adsorbents with different cross-linking for Pb(II) and Cd(II) uptake. Langmuir 30:120–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kyzas GZ, Travlou NA, Deliyanni EA (2014c) The role of chitosan as nanofiller of graphite oxide for the removal of toxic mercury ions. Colloids Surfaces B 113:467–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kyzas GZ, Siafaka PI, Pavlidou EG, Chrissafis KJ, Bikiaris DN (2015) Synthesis and adsorption application of succinyl-grafted chitosan for the simultaneous removal of zinc and cationic dye from binary hazardous mixtures. Chem Eng J 259:438–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Liu X, Zhang L (2015) Insight into the adsorption mechanisms of vanadium(V) on a high-efficiency biosorbent (Ti-doped chitosan bead). Int J Biol Macromol 79:110–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lu L, Li J, Ng DHL et al (2017) Synthesis of novel hierarchically porous Fe3O4@MgAl–LDH magnetic microspheres and its superb adsorption properties of dye from water. J Ind Eng Chem 46:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Melber C, Keller D, Mangelsdorf I (2002) Palladium: environmental health criteria. World Health Organization, Geneva, p 222Google Scholar
  51. Mthombeni NH, Mbakop S, Ochieng A, Onyango MS (2016) Vanadium (V) adsorption isotherms and kinetics using polypyrrole coated magnetized natural zeolite. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 66:172–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Naeem A, Westerhoff P, Mustafa S (2007) Vanadium removal by metal (hydr)oxide adsorbents. Water Res 41:1596–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Narayani H, Jose M, Sriram K, Shukla S (2018) Hydrothermal synthesized magnetically separable mesostructured H2Ti3O7/γ-Fe2O3 nanocomposite for organic dye removal via adsorption and its regeneration/reuse through synergistic non-radiation driven H2O2 activation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:20304–20319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nekouei F, Nekouei S, Keshtpour F, Noorizadeh H, Wang S (2017) Cr(OH)3-NPs-CNC hybrid nanocomposite: a sorbent for adsorptive removal of methylene blue and malachite green from solutions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:25291–25308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Parham H, Rahbar N (2009) Solid phase extraction-spectrophotometric determination of salicylic acid using magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as extractor. J Pharm Biomed Anal 50:58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pu S, Ma H, Zinchenko A, Chu W (2017) Novel highly porous magnetic hydrogel beads composed of chitosan and sodium citrate: an effective adsorbent for the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:16520–16530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pyrzyńska K, Wierzbicki T (2004) Determination of vanadium species in environmental samples. Talanta 64:823–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rahbar N, Behrouz E, Ramezani Z (2017) One-step synthesis of zirconia and magnetite nanocomposite immobilized chitosan for micro-solid-phase extraction of organophosphorous pesticides from juice and water samples prior to gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy. Food Anal Methods 10:2229–2240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sagheer FAA, Al-Sughayer MA, Muslim S, Elsabee MZ (2009) Extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan from marine sources in Arabian Gulf. Carbohydr Polym 77:410–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sari A, Tuzen M (2008) Biosorption of total chromium from aqueous solution by red algae (Ceramium virgatum): equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J Hazard Mater 160:349–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sari A, Mendil D, Tuzen M, Soylak M (2009) Biosorption of palladium(II) from aqueous solution by moss (Racomitrium lanuginosum) biomass: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J Hazard Mater 162:874–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sellaoui L, Dotto GL, Lamine AB, Erto A (2017) Interpretation of single and competitive adsorption of cadmium and zinc on activated carbon using monolayer and exclusive extended monolayer models. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:19902–19908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shaban M, Hassouna MEM, Nasief FM, AbuKhadra MR (2017) Adsorption properties of kaolinite-based nanocomposites for Fe and Mn pollutants from aqueous solutions and raw ground water: kinetics and equilibrium studies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:22954–22966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sharififard H, Ashtiani FZ, Soleimani M (2012) Adsorption of palladium and platinum from aqueous solutions by chitosan and activated carbon coated with chitosan. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 8:384–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sharma S, Rajesh N (2017) Expeditious preparation of β-cyclodextrin grafted chitosan using microwave radiation for the enhanced palladium adsorption from aqueous waste and an industrial catalyst. J Environ Chem Eng 5:1927–1935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shen Z, Zhang Y, McMillan O, Jin F, Al-Tabbaa A (2017) Characteristics and mechanisms of nickel adsorption on biochars produced from wheat straw pellets and rice husk. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:12809–12819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tran HV, Tran LD, Nguyen TN (2010) Preparation of chitosan/magnetite composite beads and their application for removal of Pb(II) and Ni(II) from aqueous solution. Mater Sci Eng C 30:304–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wanassi B, Hariz IB, Ghimbeu CM, Vaulot C, Hassen MB, Jeguirim M (2017) Carbonaceous adsorbents derived from textile cotton waste for the removal of Alizarin S dye from aqueous effluent: kinetic and equilibrium studies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:10041–10055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wang L, Zhao X, Zhang J, Xiong Z (2017) Selective adsorption of Pb (II) over the zinc-based MOFs in aqueous solution-kinetics, isotherms, and the ion exchange mechanism. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:14198–14206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wang M, Wu L, Hu Q, Yang Y (2018) Application of magnetic nanoparticles coated with sodium dodecyl sulfate and modified with 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-diethyl aminophenol as a novel adsorbent for dispersive-magnetic solid-phase extraction and determination of palladium in soil samples. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:8340–8349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wei W, Sha-hua Q, Mei X et al (2002) Preconcentration of vanadium(V) on crosslinked chitosan and determination by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci 7:222–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wei D, Li S, Fang L, Zhang Y (2018) Effect of environmental factors on enhanced adsorption and photocatalytic regeneration of molecular imprinted TiO2 polymers for fluoroquinolones. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:6729–6738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yamaura M, Costa CH, Gualbertoyamamura AP (2007) Adsorption studies for Cr(VI) onto magnetic particles covered with chitosan. International nuclear Atlantic conference - INAC 2007, Santos, SP, Brazil, September 30 to October 5 2007Google Scholar
  74. Yang J, Dong Y, Li J et al (2015) Removal of Co(II) from aqueous solutions by sulfonated magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Korean J Chem Eng 32:2247–2256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yuwei C, Jianlong W (2011) Preparation and characterization of magnetic chitosan nanoparticles and its application for Cu(II) removal. Chem Eng J 168:286–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhang L, Liu X, Xia W, Zhang W (2014) Preparation and characterization of chitosan-zirconium(IV) composite for adsorption of vanadium(V). Int J Biol Macromol 64:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhou L, Liu J, Liu Z (2009) Adsorption of platinum(IV) and palladium(II) from aqueous solution by thiourea-modified chitosan microspheres. J Hazard Mater 172:439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhou L, Xu J, Liang X, Liu Z (2010) Adsorption of platinum(IV) and palladium(II) from aqueous solution by magnetic cross-linking chitosan nanoparticles modified with ethylenediamine. J Hazard Mater 182:518–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maryam Omidinasab
    • 1
  • Nadereh Rahbar
    • 2
  • Mehdi Ahmadi
    • 1
    • 3
  • Babak Kakavandi
    • 4
    • 5
  • Farshid Ghanbari
    • 6
  • George Z. Kyzas
    • 7
  • Susana Silva Martinez
    • 8
  • Neemat Jaafarzadeh
    • 9
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public HealthAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical SciencesAhvazIran
  2. 2.Nanotechnology Research Center, Faculty of PharmacyAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical SciencesAhvazIran
  3. 3.Environmental Technologies Research CenterAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical SciencesAhvazIran
  4. 4.Research Center for Health, Safety and EnvironmentAlborz University of Medical SciencesKarajIran
  5. 5.Department of Environmental Health EngineeringAlborz University of Medical SciencesKarajIran
  6. 6.Department of Environmental Health EngineeringAbadan School of Medical SciencesAbadanIran
  7. 7.Hephaestus Advanced LaboratoryEastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of TechnologyKavalaGreece
  8. 8.Centro de Investigaciones en Ingeniería y Ciencias AplicadasUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de MorelosCuernavacaMexico
  9. 9.Environmental Technologies Research CenterAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical SciencesAhvazIran

Personalised recommendations