Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 31, pp 30979–30997 | Cite as

Tracing sediment sources in a mountainous forest catchment under road construction in northern Iran: comparison of Bayesian and frequentist approaches

  • Kazem Nosrati
  • Arman Haddadchi
  • Adrian L. Collins
  • Saeedeh Jalali
  • Mohammad Reza Zare
Research Article
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

Development and land use change lead to accelerated soil erosion as a serious environmental problem in river catchments in Iran. Reliable information about the sources of sediment in catchments is therefore necessary to design effective control strategies. This study used a composite sediment source tracing procedure to determine the importance of forest road cuttings as a sediment source in a mountainous catchment located in northern Iran. A fallout radionuclide (137Cs) and 12 geochemical tracers (Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, OC, Pb, Sr and TN) were used to determine the relative contributions of three sediment source types (hillslopes, road cuttings and channel banks) to both suspended and bed sediment samples. Two mixing models based on different mathematical concepts were used to apportion the sediment sources: the mixture sampling importance resampling Bayesian model which incorporates the mass-balance matrix and a distribution model using normal and summed probability of normal distributions. The results of both mixing models indicated that sub-soil erosion from road cuttings and channel banks dominated the sources of river bed and suspended sediment samples, respectively. These results therefore highlight that conservation that works in the study area to remedy the sediment problem should initially focus on stabilisation and rehabilitation of road cuttings and channel banks. This successful application of a composite (radionuclide and geochemical) tracing technique for discriminating source end members characterised by different erosion processes underscores the importance of sub-soil erosion in this case study.

Keywords

Sediment tracing Sub-surface erosion Geochemical tracers 137Cs MixSIR Bayesian model 

Notes

Funding

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) for financial support (grant numbers of 89002624). This project was also funded by a grant from the research council of Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran (grant number 600.3847). Rothamsted Research receives strategic funding from the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), and the input to this work by ALC was funded by grant BBS/E/C/000I0330.

References

  1. Abbaszadeh Afshar F, Ayoubi S, Jalalian A (2010) Soil redistribution rate and its relationship with soil organic carbon and total nitrogen using 137Cs technique in a cultivated complex hillslope in western Iran. J Environ Radioact 101:606–614.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnaez J, Larrea V, Ortigosa L (2004) Surface runoff and soil erosion on unpaved forest roads from rainfall simulation tests in northeastern Spain. Catena 57:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boardman J (2013) The hydrological role of ‘sunken lanes’ with respect to sediment mobilization and delivery to watercourses with particular reference to West Sussex, southern England. J Soils Sediments 13:1636–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caitcheon GG, Olley JM, Pantus F, Hancock G, Leslie C (2012) The dominant erosion processes supplying fine sediment to three major rivers in tropical Australia, the Daly (NT), Mitchell (Qld) and Flinders (Qld) Rivers. Geomorphology 151:188–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins AL, Walling DE (2004) Documenting catchment suspended sediment sources: problems, approaches and prospects. Prog Phys Geogr 28:159–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins A, Zhang Y, Walling D, Grenfell S, Smith P (2010a) Tracing sediment loss from eroding farm tracks using a geochemical fingerprinting procedure combining local and genetic algorithm optimisation. Sci Total Environ 408:5461–5471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins AL, Walling DE, Webb L, King P (2010b) Apportioning catchment scale sediment sources using a modified composite fingerprinting technique incorporating property weightings and prior information. Geoderma 155:249–261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins A et al (2014) Sources of sediment-bound organic matter infiltrating spawning gravels during the incubation and emergence life stages of salmonids. Agric Ecosyst Environ 196:76–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collins A, Pulley S, Foster ID, Gellis A, Porto P, Horowitz A (2017) Sediment source fingerprinting as an aid to catchment management: a review of the current state of knowledge and a methodological decision-tree for end-users. J Environ Manag 194:86–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connolly R, Costantini A, Loch R, Garthe R (1999) Sediment generation from forest roads: bed and eroded sediment size distributions, and runoff management strategies. Soil Res 37:947–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper RJ, Krueger T, Hiscock KM, Rawlins BG (2014) Sensitivity of fluvial sediment source apportionment to mixing model assumptions: a Bayesian model comparison. Water Resour Res 50:9031–9047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper RJ, Krueger T, Hiscock KM, Rawlins BG (2015) High-temporal resolution fluvial sediment source fingerprinting with uncertainty: a Bayesian approach. Earth Surf Process Landf 40:78–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Croke J, Hairsine P, Fogarty P (1999) Sediment transport, redistribution and storage on logged forest hillslopes in south-eastern Australia. Hydrol Process 13:2705–2720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. D’Haen K, Verstraeten G, Degryse P (2012) Fingerprinting historical fluvial sediment fluxes. Prog Phys Geogr 36:154–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Devereux OH, Prestegaard KL, Needelman BA, Gellis AC (2010) Suspended-sediment sources in an urban watershed, Northeast Branch Anacostia River, Maryland. Hydrol Process 24:1391–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Douglas G, Palmer M, Caitcheon G (2003) The provenance of sediments in Moreton Bay, Australia: a synthesis of major, trace element and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic geochemistry, modelling and landscape analysis. In: Kronvang B (ed) The interactions between sediments and water, vol 494. Hydrobiologia. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp 145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Everett SE, Tims SG, Hancock GJ, Bartley R, Fifield LK (2008) Comparison of Pu and 137Cs as tracers of soil and sediment transport in a terrestrial environment. J Environ Radioact 99:383–393.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.10.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forster JC (1995) Soil sampling, handling, storage and analysis. In: Alef K, Nannipieri P (eds) Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry, vol 631. 46 M592ma. Academic Press, pp 49–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012513840-6/50018-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foster ID, Lees JA (2000) Tracers in geomorphology: theory and applications in tracing fine particulate sediments. In: Foster IID (ed) Tracers in geomorphology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 3–20Google Scholar
  20. Foster ID et al (2017) The potential for gamma-emitting radionuclides to contribute to an understanding of erosion processes in South Africa. Proc Int Assoc Hydrol Sci 375:29–34Google Scholar
  21. Gellis AC, Hupp CR, Pavich MJ, Landwehr JM, Banks WS, Hubbard BE, Langland MJ, Ritchie JC, Reuter JM (2009) Sources, transport, and storage of sediment at selected sites in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5186. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, p 95Google Scholar
  22. Grygar TM, Popelka J (2016) Revisiting geochemical methods of distinguishing natural concentrations and pollution by risk elements in fluvial sediments. J Geochem Explor 170:39–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haddadchi A, Ryder DS, Evrard O, Olley J (2013) Sediment fingerprinting in fluvial systems: review of tracers, sediment sources and mixing models. Int J Sediment Res 28:560–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haddadchi A, Olley J, Laceby P (2014) Accuracy of mixing models in predicting sediment source contributions. Sci Total Environ 497–498:139–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haddadchi A, Olley J, Pietsch T (2015) Quantifying sources of suspended sediment in three size fractions. J Soils Sediments 15:2086–2100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hakimkhani S, Ahmadi H, Ghayoumian J (2009) Determining erosion types contributions to the sediment yield using sediment fingerprinting method (case study: Margan watershed, Makoo). Soil Water Sci J 19:83–96Google Scholar
  27. Hosseinalizadeh M, Ahmadi H, Feiznia S, Rivaz F, Naseri S (2017) Multivariate geostatistical analysis of fallout radionuclides activity measured by in-situ gamma-ray spectrometry: case study: loessial paired sub-catchments in northeast Iran. Quat Int 429(Part B):108–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hughes AO, Olley JM, Croke JC, McKergow LA (2009) Sediment source changes over the last 250 years in a dry-tropical catchment, central Queensland, Australia. Geomorphology 104:262–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jordán-López A, Martínez-Zavala L, Bellinfante N (2009) Impact of different parts of unpaved forest roads on runoff and sediment yield in a Mediterranean area. Sci Total Environ 407:937–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kalhor M (1998) Comparison of Cs-137 and USLE methods to estimate the soil loss of Rimeleh Watershed (Lorestan Province). MSc thesis in Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, IsfahanGoogle Scholar
  31. Koiter AJ, Owens PN, Petticrew EL, Lobb DA (2013) The behavioural characteristics of sediment properties and their implications for sediment fingerprinting as an approach for identifying sediment sources in river basins. Earth Sci Rev 125:24–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laceby JP, Olley J (2015) An examination of geochemical modelling approaches to tracing sediment sources incorporating distribution mixing and elemental correlations. Hydrol Process 29:1669–1685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Laceby JP, McMahon J, Evrard O, Olley J (2015) A comparison of geological and statistical approaches to element selection for sediment fingerprinting. J Soils Sediments 15:2117–2131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laceby JP, Evrard O, Smith HG, Blake WH, Olley JM, Minella JPG, Owens PN (2017) The challenges and opportunities of addressing particle size effects in sediment source fingerprinting: a review. Earth Sci Rev 169:85–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lane PN, Sheridan GJ (2002) Impact of an unsealed forest road stream crossing: water quality and sediment sources. Hydrol Process 16:2599–2612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu B, Storm DE, Zhang XJ, Cao W, Duan X (2016) A new method for fingerprinting sediment source contributions using distances from discriminant function analysis. CATENA 147:32–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mabit L, Bernard C, Makhlouf M, Laverdière MR (2008) Spatial variability of erosion and soil organic matter content estimated from 137Cs measurements and geostatistics. Geoderma 145:245–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.03.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marshak S (2015) Earth: portrait of a planet, 5th International Student edn. WW Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Martinez C, Hancock GR, Kalma JD (2010) Relationships between 137Cs and soil organic carbon (SOC) in cultivated and never-cultivated soils: an Australian example. Geoderma 158:137–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miller JR, Mackin G, Miller SMO (2015) Application of geochemical tracers to fluvial sediment. SpringerBriefs in Earth Sciences. Springer, London.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13221-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Minella JPG, Walling DE, Merten GH (2008) Combining sediment source tracing techniques with traditional monitoring to assess the impact of improved land management on catchment sediment yields. J Hydrol 348:546–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moore JW, Semmens BX (2008) Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models. Ecol Lett 11:470–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Motha J, Wallbrink P, Hairsine P, Grayson R (2004) Unsealed roads as suspended sediment sources in an agricultural catchment in south-eastern Australia. J Hydrol 286:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mukundan R, Radcliffe D, Ritchie J, Risse L, McKinley R (2010) Sediment fingerprinting to determine the source of suspended sediment in a southern Piedmont stream. J Environ Qual 39:1328–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Navratil O, Evrard O, Esteves M, Legout C, Ayrault S, Némery J, Mate-Marin A, Ahmadi M, Lefèvre I, Poirel A, Bonté P (2012) Temporal variability of suspended sediment sources in an alpine catchment combining river/rainfall monitoring and sediment fingerprinting. Earth Surf Process Landf 37:828–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nosrati K (2017) Ascribing soil erosion of hillslope components to river sediment yield. J Environ Manag 194:63–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nosrati K, Govers G, Semmens BX, Ward EJ (2014) A mixing model to incorporate uncertainty in sediment fingerprinting. Geoderma 217:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nosrati K, Haddadchi A, Zare MR, Shirzadi L (2015) An evaluation of the role of hillslope components and land use in soil erosion using 137 Cs inventory and soil organic carbon stock. Geoderma 243:29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Olley J, Brooks A, Spencer J, Pietsch T, Borombovits D (2013) Subsoil erosion dominates the supply of fine sediment to rivers draining into Princess Charlotte Bay, Australia. J Environ Radioact 124:121–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.04.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Owens P, Walling D, Leeks G (2000) Tracing fluvial suspended sediment sources in the catchment of the River Tweed, Scotland, using composite fingerprints and a numerical mixing model. In: Foster I (ed) Tracers in geomorphology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 291–308Google Scholar
  51. Owens P et al (2017) Fingerprinting and tracing the sources of soils and sediments: Earth and ocean science, geoarchaeological, forensic, and human health applications. Earth-Sci Rev 162:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Palazón L, Latorre B, Gaspar L, Blake WH, Smith HG, Navas A (2015) Comparing catchment sediment fingerprinting procedures using an auto-evaluation approach with virtual sample mixtures. Sci Total Environ 532:456–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Porto P, Walling DE, Callegari G (2013) Using 137Cs and 210Pbex measurements to investigate the sediment budget of a small forested catchment in southern Italy. Hydrol Process 27:795–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pulley S, Foster I (2017) Can channel banks be the dominant source of fine sediment in a UK river?: an example using 137Cs to interpret sediment yield and sediment source. Earth Surf Process Landf 42:624–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pulley S, Foster I, Antunes P (2015) The uncertainties associated with sediment fingerprinting suspended and recently deposited fluvial sediment in the Nene river basin. Geomorphology 228:303–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pulley S, Foster I, Collins AL (2017) The impact of catchment source group classification on the accuracy of sediment fingerprinting outputs. J Environ Manag 194:16–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ramos-Scharrón CE, MacDonald LH (2007) Measurement and prediction of natural and anthropogenic sediment sources, St. John, US Virgin Islands. Catena 71:250–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Russell MA, Walling DE, Hodgkinson RA (2001) Suspended sediment sources in two small lowland agricultural catchments in the UK. J Hydrol 252:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rutherford PM, McGill WB, Arocena JM, Figueiredo CT (2008) Total nitrogen. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 225–237Google Scholar
  60. Skjemstad JO, Baldock JA (2008) Total and organic carbon. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 225–237Google Scholar
  61. Smith H, Dragovich D (2008) Improving precision in sediment source and erosion process distinction in an upland catchment, south-eastern Australia. Catena 72:191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. StatSoft (2008) STATISTICA: [data analysis software system], version 8.0 for Windows update. StatSoft, Inc., 8.0 for Windows update ednGoogle Scholar
  63. Theocharopoulos SP, Florou H, Walling DE, Kalantzakos H, Christou M, Tountas P, Nikolaou T (2003) Soil erosion and deposition rates in a cultivated catchment area in central Greece, estimated using the 137Cs technique. Soil Tillage Res 69:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vale S, Fuller I, Procter J, Basher L, Smith I (2016) Characterization and quantification of suspended sediment sources to the Manawatu River, New Zealand. Sci Total Environ 543:171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wallbrink PJ, Murray AS, Olley JM, Olive LJ (1998) Determining sources and transit times of suspended sediment in the Murrumbidgee River, New South Wales, Australia, using fallout 137Cs and 210Pb. Water Resour Res 34:879–887.  https://doi.org/10.1029/97wr03471 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wallbrink PJ, Murray AS, Olley JM (1999) Relating suspended sediment to its original soil depth using fallout radionuclides. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wallbrink P, Roddy B, Olley J (2002) A tracer budget quantifying soil redistribution on hillslopes after forest harvesting. Catena 47:179–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Walling D (2005) Tracing suspended sediment sources in catchments and river systems. Sci Total Environ 344:159–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Walling D (2013) The evolution of sediment source fingerprinting investigations in fluvial systems. J Soils Sediments 13:1658–1675.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0767-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Walling D, Collins A (2008) The catchment sediment budget as a management tool. Environ Sci Pol 11:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Walling D, Woodward J (1992) Use of radiometric fingerprints to derive information on suspended sediment sources. In: Bogen J, Walling DE, Day TJ (eds) Erosion and sediment transport monitoring programmes in river basins (Proceedings of the Oslo Symposium, August 1992), vol 210. IAHS Press, Wallingford, pp 153–164Google Scholar
  72. Walling D, Woodward J, Nicholas A (1993) A multi-parameter approach to fingerprinting suspended-sediment sources. In: Peters NE, Hoehn E, Leibundgut C, Tase N, Walling DE (eds) Tracers in hydrology, vol 215. IAHS Press, Wallingford, pp 329–338Google Scholar
  73. Walling DE, Owens PN, Leeks GJ (1999) Fingerprinting suspended sediment sources in the catchment of the River Ouse, Yorkshire, UK. Hydrol Process 13:955–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Walling D, Collins A, Stroud R (2008) Tracing suspended sediment and particulate phosphorus sources in catchments. J Hydrol 350:274–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wilkinson SN, Hancock GJ, Bartley R, Hawdon AA, Keen RJ (2013) Using sediment tracing to assess processes and spatial patterns of erosion in grazed rangelands, Burdekin River basin, Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 180:90–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhao G, Mu X, Han M, An Z, Gao P, Sun W, Xu W (2017) Sediment yield and sources in dam-controlled watersheds on the northern Loess Plateau. Catena 149:110–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Earth SciencesShahid Beheshti UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.National Institute of Water and Atmospheric ResearchChristchurchNew Zealand
  3. 3.Sustainable Agriculture Sciences DepartmentRothamsted ResearchOkehamptonUK
  4. 4.Department of PhysicsMalek-Ashtar UniversityShahinshahrIran

Personalised recommendations