Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 31, pp 31190–31204 | Cite as

Water quality modeling of a prairie river-lake system

  • Nasim Hosseini
  • Eric Akomeah
  • John-Mark Davis
  • Helen Baulch
  • Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt
Research Article

Abstract

Eutrophication of an under-ice river-lake system in Canada has been modeled using the Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP7). The model was used to assess the potential effect on water quality of increasing inter-basin transfer of water from an upstream reservoir into the Qu’Appelle River system. Although water is currently transferred, the need for increased transfer is a possibility under future water management scenarios to meet water demands in the region. Output from the model indicated that flow augmentation could decrease total ammonia and orthophosphate concentrations especially at Buffalo Pound Lake throughout the year. This is because the water being transferred has lower concentrations of these nutrients than the Qu’Appelle River system, although there is complex interplay between the more dilute chemistry, and the potential to increase loads by increasing flows. A global sensitivity analysis indicated that the model output for the lake component was more sensitive to input parameters than was the model output of the river component. Sensitive parameters included dissolved organic nitrogen mineralization rate, phytoplankton nitrogen to carbon ratio, phosphorus-to-carbon ratio, maximum phytoplankton growth rate, and phytoplankton death rate. Parameter sensitivities on output variables for the lake component were similar for both summer (open water) and winter (ice-covered), whereas those for the river component were different. The complex interplay of water quality, ice behaviors, and hydrodynamics of the chained river-lake system was all coupled in WASP7. Mean absolute error varied from 0.03–0.08 NH4-N/L for ammonium to 0.5 to1.7 mg/L for oxygen, and 0.04–0.13 NO3-N/L for nitrate.

Keywords

Global sensitivity analysis Cold region River-lake systems Under-ice processes Water quality modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank those that shared data with us including the Saskatchewan Environment, the Saskatchewan Water Security Agency, and the Buffalo Pound Water Treatment Plant.

Funding information

We are also grateful for funding provided by the Canada Excellence Research Chair in Water Security at the University of Saskatchewan and through Environment and Climate Change Canada’s Environmental Damages Fund under the project, a water quality modeling system of the Qu’Appelle River catchment for long-term water management policy development.

References

  1. Akomeah E, Lindenschmidt KE (2017) Seasonal variation in sediment oxygen demand in a northern chained river-lake system. Water 9(4):254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akomeah E, Chun KP, Lindenschmidt KE (2015) Dynamic water quality modelling and uncertainty analysis of phytoplankton and nutrient cycles for the upper South Saskatchewan River. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(22):18239–18251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambrose RB, Wool TA, Connolly JP, Schanz RW (1988) WASP4, a hydrodynamic and water-quality model - model theory, user’s manual, and programmer’s guide. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA (USA). Environmental Research Lab. PB-88-185095/XAB; EPA-600/3–87/039Google Scholar
  4. Brooks BW, James ML, Meredith DAH, Mari-Vaghn V, Johnson Steve LM, Dawn AKP, Euan DR, Geoffrey IS, Stephanie AS, Jeffery A (2016) Are harmful algal blooms becoming the greatest inland water quality threat to public health and aquatic ecosystems? Environ Toxicol Chem 35(1):6–13.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown R (1984) Relationships between suspended solids, turbidity, light attenuation, and algal productivity. Lake Reserv Manag 1:198–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buffalo Pound Water Administration Board (2010) Buffalo Pound Water Administration Board 2010 Annual ReportGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapra SC (2008) Surface water-quality modeling. Waveland Press, Long GroveGoogle Scholar
  8. Covar AP (1976) Selecting the proper reaeration coefficient for use in water quality models. Washington, DC: In Proceedings of the Conference on Environmental Modeling and Simulation. Cincinnati, OH, EPA-600/9-76-016, Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Silva LP (2017) Biological and physicochemical mechanisms affecting phosphorus and arsenic efflux from prairie reservoir sediment, Buffalo Pound Lake, SK, Canada (Doctoral dissertation)Google Scholar
  10. Davies JM, Nowlin WH, Mazumder A (2004) Temporal changes in nitrogen and phosphorus codeficiency of plankton in lakes of coastal and interior British Columbia. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:1538–1551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies JM, Nowlin WH, Matthews B Mazumder A (2010) Temporal discontinuity of nutrient limitation in plankton communities. Aquat Sci 72:393–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis E, Sauer EK (1988) Water deterioration during interbasin transfer in Saskatchewan. CWRJ 13(3):50–59Google Scholar
  13. Dodds WK (2003) Misuse of inorganic N and soluble reactive P concentrations to indicate nutrient status of surface waters. J N Am Benthol Soc 22:171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geider RJ (1987) Light and temperature dependence of the carbon to chlorophyll a ratio in microalgae and cyanobacteria: implications for physiology and growth of phytoplankton. New Phytol 106(1):1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gurkan Z, Zhang J, Jørgensen SE (2006) Development of a structurally dynamic model for forecasting the effects of restoration of Lake Fure, Denmark. Ecol Model 197(1–2):89–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall RI, Peter RL, Aruna SD, Roberto Q, John PS (1999) Limnological succession in reservoirs : a paleolimnological comparison of two methods of reservoir formation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 1121:1109–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hammer UT (1971) Limnological studies of the lakes and streams of the upper QR system, Saskatchewan, Canada I. Chemical and physical aspects of the lakes and drainage system. Hydrobiologia 37(3–4):473–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hampton SE, Aaron WEG, Stephen MP, Batt D, Stephanie GL, Noah RL, Emily H (2017) Ecology under lake ice. Ecol Lett 20:98–111.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12699 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Healey FP (1985) Interacting effects of light and nutrient limitation on the growth rate of Synechococcus linearis (Cyanophyceae). J Phycol 21:134–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hornberger G, Robert S (1981) An approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems. J Environ Manag 12:7–18Google Scholar
  21. Hosseini N, Chun KP, Lindenschmidt KE (2016) Quantifying spatial changes in the structure of water quality constituents in a large prairie river within two frameworks of a water quality model. Water 8(4)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hosseini N, Chun KP, Wheater H, Lindenschmidt K-E (2017a) Parameter sensitivity of a surface water quality model of the lower South Saskatchewan River—Comparison between ice-on and ice-off periods. Environ Model Assess 22:291–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hosseini N, Johnston J, Lindenschmidt KE (2017b) Impacts of climate change on the water quality of a regulated prairie river. Water 9(3):199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hu L, Hu W, Zhai S, Wu H (2010) Effects on water quality following water transfer in Lake Taihu, China. Ecol Eng 36(4):471–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ji ZG (2008) Hydrodynamics and water quality: modeling rivers, lakes and estuaries, 1st edition, John Wiley, New Jersey, pp 676Google Scholar
  26. Kehoe MJ, Chun KP, Baulch HM (2015) Who Smells? Forecasting taste and odor in a drinking water Reservoir. Environ Sci Technol 49(18):10984–10992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Komatsu E, Fukushima T, Harasawa H (2007) A modeling approach to forecast the effect of long-term climate change on lake water quality. Ecol Model 209(2–4):351–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindenschmidt KE, Davies JM (2014) Winter flow testing of the upper Qu’Appelle River. LAP LAMBERT Academic PublishingGoogle Scholar
  29. Lindenschmidt K-E, Sereda J (2014) The impact of macrophytes on winter flows along the Upper Qu’Appelle River. Can Water Resour Journal/Revue Can Ressour Hydr 39:342–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu Y, Yilin W, Hu S, Feifei D, Rui Z, Lei Z, Huaicheng G, Xiang Z, Bin H (2014) Science of the total environment quantitative evaluation of lake eutrophication responses under alternative water diversion scenarios : a water quality modeling based statistical analysis approach. Sci Total Environ 468–469. Elsevier BV:219–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lung WS, Larson CE (1995) Water quality modeling of upper Mississippi River and Lake Pepin. J Environ Eng 121(10):691–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martins G, Ribeiro DC, Pacheco D, Cruz JV, Cunha R, Gonçalves V, Brito AG (2008) Prospective scenarios for water quality and ecological status in Lake Sete Cidades (Portugal): the integration of mathematical modelling in decision processes. Appl Geochem 23(8):2171–2181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mathias JA, Barica J (1980) Factors controlling oxygen depletion in ice-covered lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37(2):185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Matott LS (2008) OSTRICH : an optimization software tool ; documentation and user’s guide. University at Buffalo, BuffaloGoogle Scholar
  35. Nakamura Y, Heinz GS (1994) Effect of flow velocity on sediment oxygen demand: theory. J Environ Eng 120(5):996–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. North RL, Johansson J, Vandergucht DM, Doig LE, Liber K, Lindenschmidt KE, Hudson JJ (2015) Evidence for internal phosphorus loading in a large prairie reservoir (Lake Diefenbaker, Saskatchewan). J Great Lakes Res 41:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Norton DJ, Wickham JD, Wade TG, Kunert K, Thomas JV, Zeph P (2009) A method for comparative analysis of recovery potential in impaired waters restoration planning. Environ Manag 44(2):356–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Orihel DM, David WS, Nathaniel CB, Mark DG, David WOC, Lindsey RW, Rolf DV (2015) The ‘Nutrient Pump :’ iron-poor sediments fuel low nitrogen-to- phosphorus ratios and cyanobacterial blooms in polymictic lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 60:856–871.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pernica P, North R L, Baulch HM (2017) In the cold light of day : the potential importance of under-ice convective mixed layers to primary producers. Inland Waters 2041 (May). Taylor & Francis, pp 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2017.1296627 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prowse TD (2001) River-ice ecology. I: hydrological, geomorphic, and water-quality aspects. J Cold Reg Eng 15(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Razavi S, Gupta HV (2015) What do we mean by sensitivity analysis? The need for comprehensive characterization of ‘“Global”’ sensitivity in earth and environmental systems models. Water Resour Res 51(5):3070–3092.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016527.Received CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sadeghian A (2017) Water quality modeling of Lake Diefenbaker. (Doctoral dissertation) University of SaskatchewanGoogle Scholar
  43. Sadeghian A, Chapra S, Jeff H, Howard W, Lindenschmidt KE (2018) Improving in-lake water quality modeling using variable chlorophyll a/algal biomass ratios. Environ Model Softw 101:73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sagehashi M, Sakoda A, Suzuki M (2000) A predictive model of long-term stability after biomanipulation of shallow lakes. Water Res 34(16):4014–4028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schindler DW (2001) The cumulative effects of climate warming and other human stresses on Canadian freshwaters in the new millennium 1. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58: 18–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schindler DW (2012) The dilemma of controlling cultural eutrophication of lakes. Proc R Soc B 279:4322–4333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Terry JA, Sadeghian A, Lindenschmidt KE (2017) Modelling dissolved oxygen / sediment oxygen demand under ice in a shallow eutrophic prairie reservoir. Water 9(2):131.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w9020131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Terry JA, Sadeghian A, Baulch HM, Chapra SC, Lindenschmidt KE (2018) Challenges of modelling water quality in a shallow prairie lake with seasonal ice cover. Ecol Model 384:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Veenstra JN, Nolen SL (1991) In-situ sediment oxygen demand in five southwestern US lakes. Water Res 25:351–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wagener T, Kollat J (2007) Numerical and visual evaluation of hydrological and environmental models using the Monte Carlo analysis toolbox. Environ Model Softw 22:1021–1033.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang CBJ, Ambrose RB (2015) Development and application of mathematical models to support total maximum daily load for the Taihu Lake’s influent rivers, China. Ecol Eng 83:258–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wool TA, Ambrose RB, James LM, Edward AC (2006) Water quality analysis simulation program (WASP) version 6.0 manual. DRAFT: user’s manualGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhao L, Yuzhao L, Rui Z, Bin H, Xiang Z, Yong L, Junsong W (2013) A three-dimensional water quality modeling approach for exploring the eutrophication responses to load reduction scenarios in Lake. Environ Pollut 177. Elsevier Ltd:13–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.01.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Global Institute for Water SecurityUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada
  2. 2.Water Security AgencySaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations