Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 31, pp 30938–30948 | Cite as

Zn(II), Pb(II), and Cd(II) adsorption from aqueous solution by magnetic silica gel: preparation, characterization, and adsorption

  • Shuangzhen Guo
  • Zhigang Dan
  • Ning Duan
  • Guanyi Chen
  • Wubin Gao
  • Weijie Zhao
Research Article
  • 353 Downloads

Abstract

A novel magnetic silica gel adsorbent (Fe3O4-Si-COOH) was successfully prepared by introducing carboxyl group in situ to improve the performance for Pb(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II) adsorption. Infrared spectroscopy (IR), scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM), thermo-gravimetric analyzer (TGA), the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) characterizations suggested that Fe3O4-Si-COOH has been successfully prepared. The adsorption performance was evaluated by batch experiments with different initial concentrations, ionic strength, contact time, and pH. The adsorption kinetics data followed pseudo-second-order model and exhibited a three-stage intraparticle diffusion mode. Isothermal adsorption equilibrium data were best fitted by the Freundlich model and the adsorption capacity were 155, 110, and 93 mg/g (initial concentration 210 mg/L) for Pb(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II), respectively. The result of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey spectrum suggested that the main adsorption mechanism is that the H+ of carboxyl groups exchanged with heavy metal ions in the adsorption processes. In addition, the adsorbed Fe3O4-Si-COOH could be regenerated and the adsorption capacity of reused Fe3O4-Si-COOH could maintain 80.3% after five cycles. Hence, the Fe3O4-Si-COOH could be a kind of potential material for removing Pb(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II) from wastewater.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Carboxyl group Magnetic nano-materials Adsorption Pb(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II) In situ 

Notes

Funding information

We gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21506199).

Supplementary material

11356_2018_3050_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.2 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 2237 kb)

References

  1. Aguado J, Arsuaga JM, Arencibia A (2008) Influence of synthesis conditions on mercury adsorption capacity of propylthiol functionalized SBA-15 obtained by co-condensation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 109:513–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anbiaa M, Kargoshab K, Khoshbooei S (2015) Heavy metal ions removal from aqueous media by modified magnetic mesoporous silica MCM-48. Chem Eng Res Des 93:779–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badruddoza AZM, Shawon ZBZ, Tay WJD, Hidajat K, Uddin MS (2013) Fe3O4/cyclodextrin polymer nanocomposites for selective heavy metals removal from industrial wastewater. Carbohydr Polym 91:322–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolotin DS, Bokach NA, Kukushkin VY (2016) Coordination chemistry and metal-involving reactions of amidoximes: relevance to the chemistry of oximes and oxime ligands. Coord Chem Rev 313:62–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen K, He JY, Li YL (2017) Removal of cadmium and lead ions from water by sulfonated magnetic nanoparticle adsorbents. J Colloid Interf Sci 494:307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cui LM, Wang YG, Gao L (2015) EDTA functionalized magnetic graphene oxide for removal of Pb(II), Hg(II) and Cu(II) in water treatment: adsorption mechanism and separation property. Chem Eng J 281:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dorcheh AS, Abbasi MH (2008) Silica aerogel; synthesis, properties and characterization. J Mater Proce Tech 199:10–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fu F, Wang Q (2011) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manag 92:407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gao B, Gao Y, Li Y (2010) Preparation and chelation adsorption property of composite chelating material poly (amidoxime)/SiO2 towards heavy metal ions. Chem Eng J 158(3):542–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo SZ, Jiao PP, Dan ZG et al (2017) Preparation of L-arginine modified magnetic adsorbent by one-step method for removal of Zn(II) and Cd(II) from aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 317:999–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hakami O, Zhang Y, Banks CJ (2012) Thiol-functionalised mesoporous silica-coated magnetite nanoparticles for high efficiency removal and recovery of Hg from water. Water Res 46:3913–3922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Han Y, Xu Z, Gao C et al (2013) Ultrathin graphene nanofiltration membrane for water purification. Adv Funct Mater 23:3693–3700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. He J, Cai X, Chen K (2016) Performance of a novelly-defined zirconium metal-organic frameworks adsorption membrane in fluoride removal. J Colloid Interface Sci 484:162–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. He J, Chen K, Cai X (2017) A biocompatible and novelly-defined Al-HAP adsorption membrane for highly effective removal of fluoride from drinking water. J Colloid Interf Sci 490:97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang YD, Gao XD (2016) Amino-terminated SiO2 aerogel towards highly-effective lead(II) adsorbent via the ambient drying progress. J Non-Cryst Solids 443:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hüsing N, Schubert U (1998) Aerogels—airy materials: chemistry, structure, and properties. Angew Chem Int Edit 37(1998):22–45Google Scholar
  17. Jarup L, Akesson A (2009) Current status of cadmium as an environmental health problem. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 238(3):201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee SM, Laldawngliana C, Tiwari D (2012) Iron oxide nano-particles immobilized sand material in the treatment of Cu(II), Cd(II) and Pb(II) contaminated waste waters. Chem Eng J 195:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li W, Zhang S, Shan XQ (2007) Surface modification of goethite by phosphate for enhancement of Cu and Cd adsorption. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 1:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Linneen NN, Pfeffer R, Lin YS (2014) CO2 adsorption performance for amine grafted particulate silica aerogel. Chem Eng J 254:190–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ma ZY, Guan YP, Liu HZ (2005) Synthesis and characterization of micron-sized monodisperse superparamagnetic polymer particles with amino groups. J Polym Sci Polym Chem 43:3433–3439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maleki H, Durães L, Carlos A, García-González (2016) Synthesis and biomedical applications of aerogels: Possibilities and challenges. Adv Colloid Interface 236:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manna B, Ghosh UC (2007) Adsorption of arsenic from aqueous solution on synthetic hydrous stannic oxide. J Hazard Mater 1:522–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Masternak J, Machnik MZ, Kowalik M (2016) Recent advances in coordination chemistry of metal complexes based on nitrogen heteroaromatic alcohols. Synthesis, structures and potential applications. Coord Chem Rev 327-328:242–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller A, Wildeman T, Figueroa L (2013) Zinc and nickel removal in limestone based treatment of acid mine drainage: the relative role of adsorption and co-precipitation. Appl Geochem 37:57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pang Y, Zeng G, Tang L, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Lei X, Li Z, Zhang J, Liu Z, Xiong Y (2011a) Preparation and application of stability enhanced magnetic nanoparticles for rapid removal of Cr(VI). Chem Eng J 175:222–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pang Y, Zeng G, Tang L, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Lei X, Li Z, Zhang J, Xie G (2011b) PEI grafted magnetic porous powder for highly effective adsorption of heavy metal ions. Desalination 281(1):278–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Radi S, Tighadouini S, Massaoudi ME (2015) Thermodynamics and kinetics of heavy metals adsorption on silica particles chemically modified by conjugated β-Ketoenol Furan. J Chem Eng Data 60:2915–2925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ren Y, Abbood HA, He F (2013) Magnetic EDTA-modified chitosan/SiO2/Fe3O4 adsorbent: preparation, characterization, and application in heavy metal adsorption. Chem Eng J 226:300–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Repo E, Warchol JK, Kurniawan TA, Sillanpää MET (2010) Adsorption of Co(II) and Ni(II) by EDTA- and/or DTPA-modified chitosan: kinetic and equilibrium modeling. Chem Eng J 161:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reddy DHK, Lee S-M (2013) Application of magnetic chitosan composites for the removal of toxic metal and dyes from aqueous solutions. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 201–202(2013):68–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ryu J, Kim SM, Choi JW, Ha JM, Ahn DJ, Suh DJ, Suh YW (2012) Highly durable Pt supported niobia–silica aerogel catalysts in the aqueous-phase hydrodeoxygenation of 1-propanol. Cat Comm 29:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanady, L.S., 1995. Health damage due to pollution in Hungary, in: Proceedings of the Rome symposium, International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK, 1995Google Scholar
  34. Schroeder HA, Tipton IH (1968) The human body burden of lead. Arch Environ Health 17:965–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shen CC, Chen CL (2015) Superior adsorption capacity of g-C3N4 for heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions. J Colloid Interf Sci 456:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smirnova I, Suttiruengwong S, Arlt W (2004) Feasibility study of hydrophilic and hydrophobic silica aerogels as drug delivery systems. JNon-Cryst Solids 350:54–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sumiyoshi T, Adachi I, Enomoto R, Iijima T, Suda R, Leonidopoulos C, Marlow DR, Prebys E, Kawabata R, Kawai H, Ooba T, Nanao M, Suzuki K, Ogawa S, Murakami A, Khan MHR (1999) Silica aerogel Cherenkov counter for the KEK B-factory experiment. Nucl Intrum Meth A 433:385–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang JH, Zheng SR, Shao Y (2010) Amino-functionalized Fe3O4@SiO2 core–shell magnetic nanomaterial as a novel adsorbent for aqueous heavy metals removal. J Colloid Interf Sci 349:293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xiao W, Wang JJ, Wang H (2016) Hollow mesoporous silica sphere-embedded composite separator for high-performance lithium-ion battery. J Solid State Electr 20:2847–2855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xiang Y, Bai ZM, Zhang SF (2017) Lead adsorption, anticoagulation and in vivo toxicity studies on the new magnetic nanomaterial Fe3O4@SiO2@DMSA as a hemoperfusion adsorbent. Medicine 13:1341–1351Google Scholar
  41. Xie MJ, Zeng LX, Zhang QY (2015) Synthesis and adsorption behavior of magnetic microspheres based on chitosan/organic rectorite for low-concentration heavy metal removal. J Alloy Compd 647:892–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Xiong L, Chen C, Chen Q, Ni J (2011) Adsorption of Pb(II) and Cd(II) from aqueous solutions using titanate nanotubes prepared via hydrothermal method. J Hazard Mater 189(3):741–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yang GD, Tang L, Lei XX et al (2014) Cd(II) removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on aketoglutaric acid-modified magnetic chitosan. Appl Surf Sci 292:710–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yu J, H Y, Cheng B et al (2006) Effects of calcination temperature on the microstructures and photocatalytic activity of titanate nanotubes. J Mol Catal A Chem 249(1–2):135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yu JX, Wang LY, Chi RA, Zhang YF, Xu ZG, Guo J (2013) Competitive adsorption of Pb2+ and Cd2+ on magnetic modified sugarcane bagasse prepared by two simple steps. Appl Surf Sci 268:163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yu SM, Zhai L, Wang YJ (2015) Synthesis of magnetic chrysotile nanotubes for adsorption of Pb(II), Cd(II) and Cr(III) ions from aqueous solution. J Environ Chem Eng 3:752–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yun S, Luo H, Gao YF (2014) Superhydrophobic silica aerogel microspheres from methyltrimethoxysilane: rapid synthesis via ambient pressure drying and excellent absorption properties. RSC Adv 4(9):4535–4542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang Y, Bai LZ, Zhou WF et al (2016) Superior adsorption capacity of Fe3O4@nSiO2@mSiO2 core-shell microspheres for removal of Congo red from aqueous solution. J Mol Liq 219:88–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhao F, Repo E, Yin D, Sillanpää MET (2013) Adsorption of Cd(II) and Pb(II) by a novel EGTA-modified chitosan material: kinetics and isotherms. J Colloid Interf Sci 409:174–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhao FP, Tang WZ, Zhao DB (2014) Adsorption kinetics, isotherms and mechanisms of Cd(II), Pb(II), Co(II) and Ni(II) by a modified magnetic polyacrylamide microcomposite adsorbent. J Water Pro Eng 4:47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environmental Science and EngineeringTianjin UniversityTianjinChina
  2. 2.Chinese Research Academy of Environmental SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Beijing Metallurgical Equipment Research Design Institute Co. LtdBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations