Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 30, pp 30348–30365 | Cite as

Clean application of magnetic biomaterial for the removal of As (III) from water

  • Agnes Pholosi
  • Bobby E. Naidoo
  • Augustine E. Ofomaja
Research Article
  • 91 Downloads

Abstract

Magnetite-coated pine cone biomass was successfully synthesized, characterized, and its interaction with As (III) in water evaluated in order to apply it as an efficient adsorbent. Transmission electron microscope, scanning electron microscope, and imaging studies revealed that spherical magnetite particles were evenly distributed over the pine cone surface. Adsorption studies showed that the optimum pH of As (III) adsorption was 8 and that Fe (III) leaching was negligible at this pH. The optimum Fe3O4:pine cone ratio for As (III) removal was 2.0 g Fe3O4:1.5 g pine cone with adsorption capacity of 13.86 mg/g. The pseudo-second-order model best fitted the kinetic data with activation energy of adsorption was calculated to be 23.78 kJ/mol. The Langmuir isotherm described the equilibrium data best while the values of Dubinin–Radushkevich mean free energy suggests anion-exchange process. Increasing ionic strength slightly increased As (III) capacity of MNP-PCP from 13.86 to 17.82 mg/g at optimum solution pH of 8, but As (III) adsorption reduced by \( {\mathrm{PO}}_4^{3-} \)anions and humic acid due to competition. Adsorption mechanism was confirmed with evidence from FTIR, XPS, pHPZC, and \( {\mathrm{NO}}_3^{-} \) replacement by As (III) adsorption onto the \( {\mathrm{NO}}_3^{-} \)-loaded composite.

Keywords

Arsenic (III) Anion-adsorbate interaction Adsorption mechanism Mean free energy Magnetic adsorbent Anion-exchange coefficient 

Supplementary material

11356_2018_2990_MOESM1_ESM.docx (38 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 37.8 kb)

References

  1. Aaron DR, Macalady DL, Ahmann D (2002) Natural Organic Matter Affects Arsenic Speciation and Sorption onto Hematite. Environ Sci Technol 36:2889–2896Google Scholar
  2. Amin MN, Kaneco S, Kitagawa T, Begum A, Katsumata H, Suzuki T, Ohta K (2006) Removal of arsenic in aqueous solutions by adsorption onto waste rice husk. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:8105–8110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ansone L, Klavins M, Viksna A (2013) Arsenic removal using natural biomaterial-based sorbents. Environ Geochem Health 35:633–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aryal M, Ziagova M, Liakopoulou-Kyriakides M (2010) Study on arsenic biosorption using Fe (III)-treated biomass of Staphylococcus xylosus. Chem Eng J 162:178–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banerjee S, Chattopadhyaya M (2017) Adsorption characteristics for the removal of a toxic dye, tartrazine from aqueous solutions by a low cost agricultural by-product. Arab J Chem 10:S1629–S1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biswas BK, Inoue J-i, Inoue K, Ghimire KN, Harada H, Ohto K, Kawakita H (2008) Adsorptive removal of As (V) and As (III) from water by a Zr (IV)-loaded orange waste gel. J Hazard Mater 154:1066–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burton ED, Bush RT, Johnston SG, Watling KM, Hocking RK, Sullivan LA, Parker GK (2009) Sorption of arsenic (V) and arsenic (III) to schwertmannite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43:9202–9207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang F, Qu J, Liu H, Liu R, Zhao X (2009) Fe–Mn binary oxide incorporated into diatomite as an adsorbent for arsenite removal: preparation and evaluation. J Colloid Interface Sci 338:353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chung J-Y, Yu S-D, Hong Y-S (2014) Environmental source of arsenic exposure. J Prev Medi Public Health 47:253–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cumbal L, SenGupta AK (2005) Arsenic removal using polymer-supported hydrated iron (III) oxide nanoparticles: role of Donnan membrane effect. Environ Sci Technol 39:6508–6515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fang L, Ghimire KN, Kuriyama M, Inoue K, Makino K (2003) Removal of fluoride using some lanthanum (III)-loaded adsorbents with different functional groups and polymer matrices. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 78:1038–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giasuddin ABM, Kanel SR, Choi H (2007) Adsorption of Humic Acid onto Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron and Its Effect on Arsenic Removal. Environ Sci Technol 41:2022–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldberg S, Johnston CT (2001) Mechanisms of arsenic adsorption on amorphous oxides evaluated using macroscopic measurements, vibrational spectroscopy, and surface complexation modeling. J Colloid Interface Sci 234:204–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldberg S (2002) Competitive adsorption of arsenate and arsenite on oxides and clay minerals. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:413–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goswami A, Raul P, Purkait M (2012) Arsenic adsorption using copper (II) oxide nanoparticles. Chem Eng Res Des 90:1387–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gupta V, Nayak A (2012a) Cadmium removal and recovery from aqueous solutions by novel adsorbents prepared from orange peel and Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 180:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gupta V, Nayak A (2012b) Cadmium removal and recovery from aqueous solutions by novel adsorbents prepared from orange peel and Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 180:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hao L, Ouyang T, Lai L, Liu Y-X, Chen S, Hu H, Chang C-T, Wang J-J (2014) Temperature effects on arsenate adsorption onto goethite and its preliminary application to arsenate removal from simulative geothermal water. RSC Adv 4:51984–51990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hua M, Yang B, Shan C, Zhang W, He S, Lv L, Pan B (2017) Simultaneous removal of As (V) and Cr (VI) from water by macroporous anion exchanger supported nanoscale hydrous ferric oxide composite. Chemosphere 171:126–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kamala C, Chu K, Chary N, Pandey P, Ramesh S, Sastry A, Sekhar KC (2005) Removal of arsenic (III) from aqueous solutions using fresh and immobilized plant biomass. Water Res 39:2815–2826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kanel SR, Greneche JM, Choi H (2006) Removal of arsenic (III) from groudwater using nano scale zero-valent iron. Environ Sci Technol 39:1291–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karthick K, Namasivayam C, Pragasan LA (2017) Removal of direct red 12B from aqueous medium by ZnCl2 activated Jatropha husk carbon: adsorption dynamics and equilibrium studies. Indian J Chem Technol 24:73–81Google Scholar
  23. Kumar E, Bhatnagar A, Hogland W, Marques M, Sillanpää M (2014) Interaction of inorganic anions with iron-mineral adsorbents in aqueous media—a review. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 203:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lakshmipathiraj P, Narasimhan B, Prabhakar S, Raju GB (2006) Adsorption studies of arsenic on Mn-substituted iron oxyhydroxide. J Colloid Interface Sci 304:317–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lien H-L, Zhang W-X (2007) Nanoscale Pd/Fe bimetallic particles: catalytic effects of palladium on hydrodechlorination. Appl Catal B Environ 77:110–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu J-F, Zhao Z-S, Jiang G-B (2008) Coating Fe3 O4 Magnetic Nanoparticles with Humic Acid for High Efficient Removal of Heavy Metals in Water. Environ Sci Technol 42:6949–6954Google Scholar
  27. Lunge S, Singh S, Sinha A (2014) Magnetic iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles from tea waste for arsenic removal. J Magn Magn Mater 356:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mahanta N, Chen JP (2013) A novel route to the engineering of zirconium immobilized nano-scale carbon for arsenate removal from water. J Mater Chem A 1:8636–8644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meng F, Yang B, Wang B, Duan S, Chen Z, Ma W (2017) Novel Dendrimerlike magnetic biosorbent based on modified orange peel waste: adsorption–reduction behavior of arsenic. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:9692–9700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meng X, Korfiatis G, Jing C, Christodoulatos C (2001) Redox transformations of arsenic and Iron in water treatment, sludge during aging and TCLP extraction. Environ Sci Technol 35:3476–3481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mittal A, Kurup L, Mittal J (2007) Freundlich and Langmuir adsorption isotherms and kinetics for the removal of Tartrazine from aqueous solutions using hen feathers. J Hazard Mater 146:243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nashine A, Tembhurkar A (2016) Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies for adsorption of As (III) on coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) fiber. J Environ Chem Eng 4:3267–3273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ofomaja AE, Naidoo EB, Modise SJ (2009) Removal of copper (II) from aqueous solution by pine and base modified pine cone powder as biosorbent. J Hazard Mater 168:909–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pena M, Meng X, Korfiatis GP, Jing C (2006) Adsorption mechanism of arsenic on nanocrystalline titanium dioxide. Environ Sci Technol 40:1257–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peter KT, Johns AJ, Myung NV, Cwiertny DM (2017) Functionalized polymer-iron oxide hybrid nanofibers: electrospun filtration devices for metal oxyanion removal. Water Res 117:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ranjan D, Talat M, Hasan S (2009) Biosorption of arsenic from aqueous solution using agricultural residue ‘rice polish’. J Hazard Mater 166:1050–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Renkou X, Yong W, Tiwari D, Houyan W (2009) Effect of ionic strength on adsorption of As (III) and As (V) on variable charge soils. J Environ Sci 21:927–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reza RA, Ahmaruzzaman M (2015) A novel synthesis of Fe 2 O 3@ activated carbon composite and its exploitation for the elimination of carcinogenic textile dye from an aqueous phase. RSC Adv 5:10575–10586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sahu UK, Sahu S, Mahapatra SS, Patel RK (2017) Cigarette soot activated carbon modified with Fe3O4 nanoparticles as an effective adsorbent for As (III) and As (V): material preparation, characterization and adsorption mechanism study. J Mol Liq 243:395–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Santra D, Sarkar M (2016) Optimization of process variables and mechanism of arsenic (V) adsorption onto cellulose nanocomposite. J Mol. Liq 224:290–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Setyono D, Valiyaveettil S (2014) Chemically modified sawdust as renewable adsorbent for arsenic removal from water. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2:2722–2729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Subramanian K, Kumar PS, Jeyapal P, Venkatesh N (2005) Characterization of ligno-cellulosic seed fibre from Wrightia Tinctoria plant for textile applications—an exploratory investigation. Eur Polym J 41:853–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tian Y, Wu M, Lin X, Huang P, Huang Y (2011) Synthesis of magnetic wheat straw for arsenic adsorption. J Hazard Mater 193:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Vinh N, Zafar M, Behera S, Park H-S (2015) Arsenic (III) removal from aqueous solution by raw and zinc-loaded pine cone biochar: equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamics studies. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:1283–1294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Venkatesan G, Narayanan SL (2018) Synthesis of Fe2O3-coated and HCl-treated bauxite ore waste for the adsorption of arsenic (III) from aqueous solution: isotherm and kinetic models. Chem Eng Commun 205:34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weber WJ, Morris JC (1963) Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solution. J Sanit Eng Div 89:31–60Google Scholar
  47. Wilson D, Langell M (2014) XPS analysis of oleylamine/oleic acid capped Fe3O4 nanoparticles as a function of temperature. Appl Surf Sci 303:6–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wu K, Liu R, Li T, Liu H, Peng J, Qu J (2013) Removal of arsenic (III) from aqueous solution using a low-cost by-product in Fe-removal plants—Fe-based backwashing sludge. Chem Eng J 226:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yoon Y, Zheng M, Ahn Y-T, Park WK, Yang WS, Kang J-W (2017) Synthesis of magnetite/non-oxidative graphene composites and their application for arsenic removal. Sep Purif Technol 178:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yoshida I (1981) Adsorption of arsenic (III) ion on various ion exchange resins loaded with iron (III) and zirconium (IV). Bull Chem Soc Jpn 3:379–384Google Scholar
  51. Yu F, Sun S, Ma J, Han S (2015) Enhanced removal performance of arsenate and arsenite by magnetic graphene oxide with high iron oxide loading. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:4388–4397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yu X, Tong S, Ge M, Zuo J, Cao C, Song W (2013) One-step synthesis of magnetic composites of cellulose@ iron oxide nanoparticles for arsenic removal. J Mater Chem A 1:959–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang S, Li X-y, Chen JP (2010) An XPS study for mechanisms of arsenate adsorption onto a magnetite-doped activated carbon fiber. J Colloid Interface Sci 343:232–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang W, Zheng J, Zheng P, Tsang DC, Qiu R (2015) Sludge-derived biochar for arsenic (III) immobilization: effects of solution chemistry on sorption behavior. J Environ Qual 44:1119–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhao Z, Jia Y, Xu L, Zhao S (2011) Adsorption and heterogeneous oxidation of As (III) on ferrihydrite. Water Res 45:6496–6504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhou S, Wang D, Sun H, Chen J, Wu S, Na P (2014) Synthesis, characterization, and adsorptive properties of magnetic cellulose nanocomposites for arsenic removal. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:1945CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Agnes Pholosi
    • 1
  • Bobby E. Naidoo
    • 1
  • Augustine E. Ofomaja
    • 1
  1. 1.Biosorption and Wastewater Treatment Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Applied and Computer SciencesVaal University of TechnologyVanderbijlparkSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations