Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 4393–4403 | Cite as

Environmental photochemical fate and UVC degradation of sodium levothyroxine in aqueous medium

  • Marcela Prado Silva PariziEmail author
  • Arlen Mabel Lastre Acosta
  • Hamilton Mitsugu Ishiki
  • Renata Calciolari Rossi
  • Renata Cristina Mafra
  • Antonio Carlos Silva Costa Teixeira
Advanced Oxidation Technologies: State-of-the-Art in Ibero-American Countries
  • 76 Downloads

Abstract

The synthetic hormone sodium levothyroxine (LTX) is one of the most prescribed drugs in the world and the most effective in hypothyroidism treatment. The presence of LTX in the environment has become a matter of major concern due to the widespread use of this hormone and by the fact that it is only partially removed in conventional water and sewage treatment plants. However, information regarding the photochemical fate of this hormone in environmental or engineered systems is scarce in the literature. In this work, the sunlight-driven direct and indirect LTX degradation was investigated by determining the photolysis quantum yield, ΦLTX = 3.80 (± 0.02) × 10−5, as well as the second-order kinetic constants of the reactions with hydroxyl radicals, kLTX,•OH = 1.50 (± 0.01) × 1010 L mol−1 s−1 and singlet oxygen, kLTX,1O2 = 1.47 (± 0.66) × 108 L mol−1 s−1. Mathematical simulations indicate that LTX photodegradation is favored in shallow, nitrite-rich, and dissolved organic matter (DOM)-poor environments, with LTX half-life times varying from less than 10 days to about 80 days. LTX removals of 85 and 95% were achieved by UVC photolysis and UVC/H2O2 after 120 min, respectively. Three transformation products, triiodothyronine, diiodothyronine, and diiodotyrosine, were identified during LTX degradation by the UVC-based processes studied. The results herein regarding photo-induced kinetics coupled with environmental fate simulations may help evaluate LTX persistence and also the design of water and wastewater treatment processes.

Keywords

Sodium levothyroxine Environmental photochemical fate Advanced oxidation processes Endocrine disruptors Reactive oxygen species Mathematical simulations 

Notes

Funding information

The authors thank the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, grant #2013/50218-2) for the financial support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

11356_2018_2907_MOESM1_ESM.docx (424 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 423 kb)

References

  1. Abdallah S, Mohamed I (2016) Factor affecting photo and thermal stability of levothyroxine sodium. Br J Pharm Res 10:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.9734/BJPR/2016/23410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ANVISA (2017) Brazilian health regulatory agency. Statistical Book of Pharmaceutical Market, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  3. Bila DM, Dezotti M (2003) Fármacos no meio ambiente. Quim Nova 26:523–530.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422003000400015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bianco A, Fabbri D, Minella M, Brigante M, Mailhot G, Maurino V, Minero C, Vione D (2015) New insights into the environmental photochemistry of 5-chloro-2-(2,4- dichlorophenoxy)phenol (triclosan): reconsidering the importance of indirect photoreactions. Water Res 72:271–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.07.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bodrato M, Vione D (2014) APEX (Aqueous Photochemistry of Environmentally occurring Xenobiotics): a free software tool to predict the kinetics of photochemical processes in surface waters. Environ Sci Process Impacts 16:732–740.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3em00541k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolk N, Visser TJ, Nijman J, Jongste I, Tijssen JGP, Berghout A (2010) Effects of evening vs morning levothyroxine intake. Arch Intern Med 170:1996–2000.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boreen AL, Arnold WA, Mcneill K (2004) Photochemical fate of sulfa drugs in the aquatic environmental: sulfa drugs containing five-membered heterocyclic groups. Environ Sci Technol 38:3933–3940.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es0353053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for experimenters: an introduction to design, data analysis and model building. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Cappelli C, Pirola I, Gandossi E, Formenti A, Castellano M (2013) Oral liquid levothyroxine treatment at breakfast: a mistake? Eur J Endocrinol 170:95–99.  https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-13-0693 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dong Z, Senn DB, Moran RE, Shine JP (2013) Prioritizing environmental risk of prescription pharmaceuticals. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 65:60–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duan XD, He X, Wang D, Mezyk SP, Otto SC, Marfil-Vega R, Mills MA, Dionysiou DD (2017) Decomposition of iodinated pharmaceuticals by UV-254 nm-assisted advanced oxidation processes. J Hazard Mater 323:489–499.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.04.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elovitz MS, von Gunten U (1999) Hydroxyl radical ozone ratios during ozonation processes. I-the R-ct concept. Ozone Sci Eng 21:239–260.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01919519908547239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fabbri D, Minella M, Maurino V, Minero C, Vione D (2015) Photochemical transformation of phenylurea herbicides in surface waters: a model assessment of persistence, and implications for the possible generation of hazardous intermediates. Chemosphere 19:601–607.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graça CAL, Correia AV, Teixeira ACSC (2017) Role of Fe(III)-carboxylates in AMZ photodegradation: a response surface study based on a Doehlert experimental design. Chemosphere 184:981–991.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris DC (2003) Quantitative chemical analysis, 6th edn. W.H. Freeman and Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Ianiro G, Mangiola F, Di Rienzo TA, Bibbò S, Franceschi F, Greco AV, Gasbarrini A (2014) Levothyroxine absorption in health and disease, and new therapeutic perspectives. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 18:451–456Google Scholar
  17. Kazemifard AG, Moore DE, Aghazadeh A (2001) Identification and quantitation of sodium-thyroxine and its degradation products by LC using electrochemical and MS detection. J Pharm Biomed Anal 25:697–711.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(01)00370-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kostich MS, Lazorchak JM (2008) Risks to aquatic organisms posed by human pharmaceutical use. Sci Total Environ 389:329–339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lam MW, Mabury SA (2005) Photodegradation of the pharmaceuticals atorvastatin, carbamazepine, levofloxacin, and sulfamethoxazole in natural waters. Aquat Sci 67:177–188.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-004-0768-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laurentiis ED, Chiron S, Kouras-Hadef S, Richard C, Minella M, Maurino V, Minero C, Vione D (2012) Photochemical fate of carbamazepine in surface freshwaters: laboratory measures and modeling. Environ Sci Technol 46:8164–8173.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es3015887 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laurentiis E, Minella M, Brodato M, Maurino V, Minero C, Vione D (2013) Modeling the photochemical generation kinetics of 2-methyl-4-chlorophenol, an intermediate of the herbicide MCPA (2 methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid) in surface waters. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag 16:216–221.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14634988.2013.788433 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marchetti G, Minella M, Maurino V, Minero C, Vione D (2013) Photochemical transformation of atrazine and formation of photointermediates under conditions relevant to sunlit surface waters: laboratory measures and modelling. Water Res 47:6211–6222.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mostafa S, Rosario-Ortiz FL (2013) Singlet oxygen formation from wastewater organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 47:8179–8186.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es401814s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oppenlander T (2003) Photochemical purification of water and air: advanced oxidation processes (AOPs): principles, reaction mechanisms, reactor concepts, 1st edn. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  25. Passananti M, Temussi F, Iesce MR, Previtera L, Mailhot G, Vione D, Brigante M (2014) Photoenhanced transformation of nicotine in aquatic environments: involvement of naturally occurring radical sources. Water Res 55:106–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.02.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schwarzenbach RP (2003) Environmental organic chemistry, Second edn. Wiley & Sons, Inc., HobokenGoogle Scholar
  27. Shemer H, Sharpless CM, Elovitz MS, Linden KG (2006) Relative rate constants of contaminant with hydroxyl radicals. Environ Sci Technol 40:4460–4466.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es0602602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Silva MP, Mostafa S, Mckay G, Rosario-Ortiz FL, Teixeira ACSC (2015) Photochemical fate of amicarbazone in aqueous media: laboratory measurement and simulations. Environ Eng Sci 32:730–740.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2015.0127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Svanfelt J, Erikson J, Kronberg L (2010) Analysis of thyroid hormones in raw and treated waste water. J Chromatogr A 1217:6469–6474.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.08.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Svanfelt J, Erikson J, Kronberg L (2011) Photochemical transformation of the thyroid hormone levothyroxine in aqueous solution. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18:871–876.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0450-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van der Walt B, Cahnmann HJ (1982) Synthesis of thyroid hormone metabolites by photolysis of thyroxine and thyroxine analogs in the near UV. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 79:1492–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vione D, Das R, Rubertelli F, Maurino V, Minero C, Barbati S, Chiron S (2010) Modelling the occurrence and reactivity of hydroxyl radicals in surface waters: implications for the fate of selected pesticides. Int J Environ Anal Chem 90:260–275.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03067310902894218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vione D, Maddigapu PR, Laurentiis ED, Minella M, Pazzi M, Maurino V, Minero C, Kouras S, Richard C (2011) Modelling the photochemical fate of ibuprofen in surface waters. Water Res 45:6725–6736.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vione D (2014) A test of the potentialities of the APEX software (Aqueous Photochemistry of Environmentally occurring Xenobiotics). Modelling the photochemical persistence of the herbicide cycloxydim in surface waters, based on literature kinetic data. Chemosphere 99:272–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.078
  35. Zacarías VHR, Velázquez Machuca MA, Montañez Soto JL, Pimentel Equihua JL, Vallejo Cardona AA, López Calvillo MD, Venegas González J (2017) Hydrochemistry and emerging pollutants in urban industrial wastewater in Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico. Rev Int Contam Ambient 33:221–235.  https://doi.org/10.20937/RICA.2017.33.02.04 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcela Prado Silva Parizi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Arlen Mabel Lastre Acosta
    • 2
  • Hamilton Mitsugu Ishiki
    • 3
  • Renata Calciolari Rossi
    • 3
  • Renata Cristina Mafra
    • 3
  • Antonio Carlos Silva Costa Teixeira
    • 2
  1. 1.Energy Engineering DepartmentSão Paulo State University (UNESP)RosanaBrazil
  2. 2.Research Group in Advanced Oxidation Processes, Chemical Systems Engineering Center, Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Environment and Regional DevelopmentUniversity of Western São Paulo (Unoeste)Presidente PrudenteBrazil

Personalised recommendations