Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 4260–4265 | Cite as

ADMI color and toxicity reductions in raw textile mill effluent and dye mixtures by TiO2/UV is limited by presence of vat dyes

  • Ann H. MounteerEmail author
  • Gemima Santos Arcanjo
  • Eder Carlos Lopes Coimbra
  • Laís Miguelina Marçal da Silva
Advanced Oxidation Technologies: State-of-the-Art in Ibero-American Countries

Abstract

Full-scale application of heterogeneous photocatalysis for industrial wastewater treatment remains a challenge because of the complex nature of these matrices and the potential to form toxic by-products during treatment. A recent unsuccessful attempt to find adequate conditions for TiO2/UV treatment of a cotton dyeing textile mill led to this study on the treatability of mixtures of the dyes used in the greatest amounts at the mill and therefore most likely to be present in mill effluent. Four reactive and three vat dyes were mixed in different combinations and treated (10 mg/L of each dye, 0.5 mg/L TiO2, pH 4) to evaluate the influence of the different dyes on ADMI color, chemical oxygen demand (COD), and acute toxicity. While ADMI color removal was similar in all dye mixtures, COD removal was higher when vat dyes were absent. When treated individually, vat dyes exhibited greater recalcitrance, with no ADMI color removal and COD removals of less than 30%. Toxicity to Daphnia similis was decreased or eliminated from dye mixtures that exhibited the highest COD removals and corresponded to those in which reactive dyes were partially degraded. For raw textile mill effluent, photocatalysis reduced but did not eliminate treated effluent toxicity (EC50 = 26.8%).

Keywords

Daphnia similis Textile dye Heterogeneous photocatalysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Brazilian and Minas Gerais research agencies, CAPES, CNPq, and FAPEMIG, for scholarship support. The authors are grateful for the technical support provided by José Francisco Dias (in memoriam) from Universidade Federal de Viçosa’s (UFV’s) Soils Department. The authors would also like to acknowledge UFV’s Nucleus of Microscopy and Microanalysis (http://www.nmm.ufv.br/) for providing the equipment and technical support for experiments involving electron microscopy.

References

  1. ABNT (2016) NBR 12713: Ecotoxicologia aquática - Toxicidade aguda - Método de ensaio com Daphnia spp (Crustacea, Cladocera) (in Portuguese) Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed S, Rasul MG, Martens WN, Brown R, Hashib MA (2010) Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of phenols in wastewater: a review on current status and developments. Desalination 261:3–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed S, Rasul MG, Brown R, Hashib MA (2011a) Influence of parameters on the heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of pesticides and phenolic contaminants in wastewater: a short review. J Environ Manag 92:311–330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmed S, Rasul MG, Martens WN, Brown R, Hashib MA (2011b) Advances in heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of phenols and dyes in wastewater: a review. Water Air Soil Pollut 215:3–29.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-010-0456-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahmed MA, El-Katori EE, Gharni ZH (2013) Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye using Fe2O3/TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by sol–gel method. J Alloys Compd 553:19–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ajmal A, Majeed I, Malik RN, Idriss H, Nadeem MA (2014) Principles and mechanisms of photocatalytic dye degradation on TiO2 based photocatalysts: a comparative overview. RSC Adv 4:37003–37026.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA06658H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Akpan UG, Hameed BH (2009) Parameters affecting the photocatalytic degradation of dyes using TiO2-based photocatalysts: a review. J Hazard Mater 170:520–529.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Antić Ž, Krsmanović RM, Nikolić MG, Marinović-Cincović M, Mitrić M, Polizzi S, Dramićanin MD (2012) Multisite luminescence of rare earth doped TiO2 anatase nanoparticles. Mater Chem Phys 135:1064–1069.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.06.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. APHA (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22nd edn. APHA, AWWA, WPCF, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Arcanjo GS, Mounteer AH, Bellato CR, LMM S, Brant Dias SH, Silva PR (2018) Heterogeneous photocatalysis using TiO2 modified with hydrotalcite and iron oxide under UV–visible irradiation for color and toxicity reduction in secondary textile mill effluent. J Environ Manag 211:154–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ba-Abbad MM, Kadhum AAH, Mohamad AB et al (2012) Synthesis and catalytic activity of TiO2 nanoparticles for photochemical oxidation of concentrated chlorophenols under direct solar radiation. Int J Electrochem Sci 7:4871–4888Google Scholar
  12. Bila D, Montalvão AF, Azevedo D d A, Dezotti M (2007) Estrogenic activity removal of 17β-estradiol by ozonation and identification of by-products. Chemosphere 69:736–746.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.05.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Byberg R, Cobb J, Martin LD, Thompson RW, Camesano TA, Zahraa O, Pons MN (2013) Comparison of photocatalytic degradation of dyes in relation to their structure. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:3570–3581.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1551-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Candido JP, Andrade SJ, Fonseca AL, Silva FS, Silva MRA, Kondo MM (2016) Ibuprofen removal by heterogeneous photocatalysis and ecotoxicological evaluation of the treated solutions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:19911–19920.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6947-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chebli D, Fourcade F, Brosillon S, Nacef S, Amrane A (2010) Supported photocatalysis as a pre-treatment prior to biological degradation for the removal of some dyes from aqueous solutions; Acid Red 183, Biebrich Scarlet, Methyl Red Sodium Salt, Orange II. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 85:555–563.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2342 Google Scholar
  16. de Luna LAV, da Silva THG, Nogueira RFP, Kummrow F, Umbuzeiro GA (2014) Aquatic toxicity of dyes before and after photo-Fenton treatment. J Hazard Mater 276:332–338.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghaly A, Ananthashankar R, Alhattab M, Ramakrishna V (2014) Production, characterization and treatment of textile effluents: a critical review. J Chem Eng Process Technol 05:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7048.1000182 Google Scholar
  18. Hussein FH (2013a) Chemical properties of treated textile dyeing wastewater. Asian J Chem 25:9393–9400.  https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2013.15909A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hussein FH (2013b) Effect of photocatalytic treatments on physical and biological properties of textile dyeing wastewater. Asian J Chem 25:9387–9392.  https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2013.15909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. IPPC (2003) Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC). Reference document on best available techniques for the textiles industryGoogle Scholar
  21. Mantzavinos D, Psillakis E (2004) Enhancement of biodegradability of industrial wastewaters by chemical oxidation pre-treatment. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 79:431–454.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Neill C, Lopez A, Esteves S et al (2000) Azo-dye degradation in an anaerobic-aerobic treatment system operating on simulated textile effluent. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 53:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rauf MA, Meetani MA, Hisaindee S (2011) An overview on the photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes in the presence of TiO2 doped with selective transition metals. Desalination 276:13–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.03.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rizzo L (2011) Bioassays as a tool for evaluating advanced oxidation processes in water and wastewater treatment. Water Res 45:4311–4340.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.05.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Satuf ML, Pierrestegui MJ, Rossini L, Brandi RJ, Alfano OM (2011) Kinetic modeling of azo dyes photocatalytic degradation in aqueous TiO2 suspensions. Toxicity and biodegradability evaluation. Catal Today 161:121–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2010.11.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Souza RP, Ambrosio E, Souza MTF, Freitas TKFS, Ferrari-Lima AM, Garcia JC (2017) Solar photocatalytic degradation of textile effluent with TiO2, ZnO, and Nb2O5 catalysts: assessment of photocatalytic activity and mineralization. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:12691–12699.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8408-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. USEPA (2002) Short-term methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms, 4th edn. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Office of Water, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversidade Federal de ViçosaViçosaBrazil

Personalised recommendations