Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 28, pp 28391–28402 | Cite as

A factor analysis of landscape metrics of particles deposited on leaf surface

  • Lin Lin
  • Guojian Chen
  • Jingli Yan
  • Rongli Tang
  • Xiu Yuan
  • Zhe Yin
  • Rui Zhang
Research Article

Abstract

Particulate matter in the airborne environment is one of the top environmental concerns, as well as reasons of deaths and diverse diseases. Urban green infrastructure can improve the air quality by mitigating particulate matters from airborne environment and provide high spatial monitoring of particles by means of leaf particles as indicators. Three common species in Beijing (ailanthus, ash, and willow) were chosen to represent three different leaf characteristics. Then, we analyzed the correlation relationship of the particle metrics at landscape, class, and patch levels and implemented the principal components analysis and factor analysis. Firstly, at landscape level, metrics are mostly correlated with each other and the correlation relationship of metrics of ailanthus and willow were stronger than that of ash, which has coarse-texture leaves without hair. At class level, most of the metrics were correlated and the correlation relationship of metrics of ailanthus, whose leaves have microgrooves without hair, was weaker than that of ash and willow. At patch level, judging from proximity, the distance between particles from the same range was smaller for particles with complicated shape. Secondly, particles from four ranges were analyzed separately. The shape complexity of particles decreased and increased as the area increased respectively for PM1 (diameter ≤ 1 μm) and large particles (diameter ≥ 10 μm). Two principle components were identified for landscape and class levels respectively. These results will be useful for the in-depth understanding of the particles deposited on the leaf surface.

Keywords

Air pollution Landscape metric Particulate matter Urban greening Atmospheric biomonitor 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41430638), National Science Foundation of China (31500381), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0503003), and the Innovation Project of the State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology of China.

Supplementary material

11356_2018_2804_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

References

  1. Adachi K, Chung SH, Friedrich H, Buseck PR (2007) Fractal parameters of individual soot particles determined using electron tomography: implications for optical properties. J Geophys Res Atmos 112:1–10.Google Scholar
  2. Akram W, Madhuku M, Ahmad I, Li XL, Zhang GL, Yan L (2014) Morphology, microstructure and chemical composition of single inhalable particles in Shanghai, China. Environ Monit Assess 186:8587–8598.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4026-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai SY, Wang YJ, Zhao B, Wang SX, Chang X, Hao JM (2017) The impact of the “Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan” on PM2.5 concentrations in Jing-Jin-Ji region during 2012-2020. Sci Total Environ 580:197–209.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen L, Liu C, Zhang L, Zou R, Zhang Z (2017) Variation in tree species ability to capture and retain airborne fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Sci Rep 7:3206.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03360-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. China S, Salvadori N, Mazzoleni C (2014) Effect of traffic and driving characteristics on morphology of atmospheric soot particles at freeway on-ramps. Environ Sci Technol 48:3128–3135.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es405178n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Du P, Gui H, Zhang J, Liu J, Yu T, Wang J, Cheng Y, Shi Z (2018) Number size distribution of atmospheric particles in a suburban Beijing in the summer and winter of 2015. Atmos Environ 186:32–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dye AL, Rhead MM, Trier CJ (2000) The quantitative morphology of roadside and background urban aerosol in Plymouth, UK. Atmos Environ 34:3139–3148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00437-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guo S, Hu M, Zamora ML, Peng JF, Shang DJ, Zheng J, Du ZF, Wu Z, Shao M, Zeng LM, Molina MJ, Zhang RY (2014) Elucidating severe urban haze formation in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:17373–17378.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419604111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guo H, Wang YG, Zhang HL (2017) Characterization of criteria air pollutants in Beijing during 2014-2015. Environ Res 154:334–344.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.01.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hijmans RJ (2017) raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. R package version 2.3–33. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster
  11. Huang X, Liu Z, Zhang J, Wen T, Ji D, Wang Y (2016) Seasonal variation and secondary formation of size-segregated aerosol water-soluble inorganic ions during pollution episodes in Beijing. Atmos Res 168:70–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.08.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jin L, Luo X, Fu P, Li X (2017) Airborne particulate matter pollution in urban China: A chemical mixture perspective from sources to impacts. Natl Sci Rev. 4:593–610.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nww079
  13. Karthik KRG, Baikie T, Dass MET, Huang YZ, Guet C (2017) Understanding the Southeast Asian haze. Environ Res Lett 12:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa75d5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li XR, Wang LL, Wang YS, Wen TX, Yang YJ, Zhao YN, Wang YF (2012) Chemical composition and size distribution of airborne particulate matters in Beijing during the 2008 Olympics. Atmos Environ 50:278–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.12.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li W, Wang T, Zhou S, Lee S, Huang Y, Gao Y, Wang W (2013) Microscopic observation of metal-containing particles from Chinese continental outflow observed from a non-industrial site. Environ Sci Technol 47:9124–9131.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es400109q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li L, Li M, Huang Z, Gao W, Nian H, Fu Z, Gao J, Chai F, Zhou Z (2014) Ambient particle characterization by single particle aerosol mass spectrometry in an urban area of Beijing. Atmos Environ 94:323–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li GX, Xue M, Zeng Q, Cai Y, Pan XC, Meng Q (2017) Association between fine ambient particulate matter and daily total mortality: an analysis from 160 communities of China. Sci Total Environ 599:108–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin L, Yan J, Ma K, Zhou W, Chen G, Tang R, Zhang Y (2017) Characterization of particulate matter deposited on urban tree foliage: a landscape analysis approach. Atmos Environ 171:59–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu H, Tian Y, Xu Y, Huang Z, Huang C, Hu Y, Zhang J (2017) Association between ambient air pollution and hospitalization for ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in China: a multicity case-crossover study. Environ Pollut 230:234–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ma L, Li M, Zhang H, Li L, Huang Z, Gao W, Chen D, Fu Z, Nian H, Zou L, Gao J, Chai F, Zhou Z (2016) Comparative analysis of chemical composition and sources of aerosol particles in urban Beijing during clear, hazy, and dusty days using single particle aerosol mass spectrometry. J Clean Prod 112:1319–1329.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Margiotta S, Lettino A, Speranza A, Summa V (2015) PM1 geochemical and mineralogical characterization using SEM-EDX to identify particle origin - Agri Valley pilot area (Basilicata, southern Italy). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15:1551–1561.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1551-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGarigal K, SA Cushman, and E Ene. (2012): FRAGSTATS v4: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at the following web site: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
  23. Perini K, Ottelé M, Giulini S, Magliocco A, Roccotiello E (2017) Quantification of fine dust deposition on different plant species in a vertical greening system. Ecol Eng 100:268–276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.12.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Boone CG, Groffman PM, Irwin E, Kaushal SS, Marshall V, McGrath BP, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Szlavecz K, Troy A, Warren P (2011) Urban ecological systems: scientific foundations and a decade of progress. J Environ Manage 92:331–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pipal AS, Kulshrestha A, Taneja A (2011) Characterization and morphological analysis of airborne PM2.5 and PM10 in Agra located in north central India. Atmos Environ 45:3621–3630.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  27. Revelle W (2017) Psych: procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality researce, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
  28. Schmid O, Stoeger T (2016) Surface area is the biologically most effective dose metric for acute nanoparticle toxicity in the lung. J Aerosol Sci 99:133–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sgrigna G, Baldacchini C, Esposito R, Calandrelli R, Tiwary A, Calfapietra C (2016) Characterization of leaf-level particulate matter for an industrial city using electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis. Sci Total Environ 548:91–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shi Z, Shao L, Jones TP, Whittaker AG, Lu S, Bérubé KA, He T, Richards RJ (2003) Characterization of airborne individual particles collected in an urban area, a satellite city and a clean air area in Beijing, 2001. Atmos Environ 37:4097–4108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00531-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shi Y, Ji Y, Sun H, Hui F, Hu J, Wu Y, Fang J, Lin H, Wang J, Duan H (2015) Nanoscale characterization of PM2.5 airborne pollutants reveals high adhesiveness and aggregation capability of soot particles. Sci Rep-Uk 5:181–183.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11232
  32. Song F, Gao Y (2011) Size distributions of trace elements associated with ambient particular matter in the affinity of a major highway in the New Jersey-New York metropolitan area. Atmos Environ 45:6714–6723.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Song YS, Maher BA, Li F, Wang XK, Sun X, Zhang HX (2015) Particulate matter deposited on leaf of five evergreen species in Beijing, China: source identification and size distribution. Atmos Environ 105:53–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. StoffynEgli P, Potter TM, Leonard JD, Pocklington R (1997) The identification of black carbon particles with the analytical scanning electron microscope: methods and initial results. Sci Total Environ 198:211–223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-9697(97)05464-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tian SL, Pan YP, Wang YS (2016) Size-resolved source apportionment of particulate matter in urban Beijing during haze and non-haze episodes. Atmos Chem Phys 16:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1-2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tian Y, Xiang X, Juan J, Sun K, Song J, Cao Y, Hu Y (2017) Fine particulate air pollution and hospital visits for asthma in Beijing, China. Environ Pollut 230:227–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang QQ, Ma YL, Tan JH, Zheng NJ, Duan JC, Sun YL, He KB, Zhang YX (2015) Characteristics of size-fractionated atmospheric metals and water-soluble metals in two typical episodes in Beijing. Atmos Environ 119:294–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang Y, Liu F, He C, Bi L, Cheng T, Wang Z, Zhang H, Zhang X, Shi Z, Li W (2017) Fractal dimensions and mixing structures of soot particles during atmospheric processing. Environ Sci Tech Let 4:487–493.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00418 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weber F, Kowarik I, Saumel I (2014) Herbaceous plants as filters: immobilization of particulates along urban street corridors. Environ Pollut 186:234–240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weerakkody U, Dover JW, Mitchell P, Reiling K (2018) Evaluating the impact of individual leaf traits on atmospheric particulate matter accumulation using natural and synthetic leaves. Urban For Urban Green 30:98–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Willis KJ, Petrokofsky G (2017) The natural capital of city trees. Science 356:374–376.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9724 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wu J, Xie W, Li W, Li J (2015) Effects of urban landscape pattern on PM2.5 pollution-a Beijing case study. Plos One 10:e0142449.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142449 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Xu P, Xu JX, He M, Song LX, Chen DL, Guo GS, Dai HX (2016) Morphology and chemical characteristics of micro- and Nano-particles in the haze in Beijing studied by XPS and TEM/EDX. Sci Total Environ 565:827–832.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yan J, Lin L, Zhou W, Ma K, Pickett STA (2016a) A novel approach for quantifying particulate matter distribution on leaf surface by combining SEM and object-based image analysis. Remote Sens Environ 173:156–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.11.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yan S, Cao H, Chen Y, Wu C, Hong T, Fan H (2016b) Spatial and temporal characteristics of air quality and air pollutants in 2013 in Beijing. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23:13996–14007.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6518-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yan G, Liu J, Zhu L, Zhai J, Cong L, Ma W, Wang Y, Wu Y, Zhang Z (2018) Effectiveness of wetland plants as biofilters for inhalable particles in an urban park. J Clean Prod 194:435–443.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zampieri MCT, Sarkis JES, Pestana RCB, Tavares AR, Melo-de-Pinna GFA (2013) Characterization of Tibouchina granulosa (Desr.) Cong. (Melastomataceae) as a biomonitor of air pollution and quantification of particulate matter adsorbed by leaves. Ecol Eng 61:316–327.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.09.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang XY, Wang YQ, Niu T, Zhang XC, Gong SL, Zhang YM, Sun JY (2012) Atmospheric aerosol compositions in China: spatial/temporal variability, chemical signature, regional haze distribution and comparisons with global aerosols. Atmos Chem Phys 12:779–799.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-779-2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang R, Jing J, Tao J, Hsu SC, Wang G, Cao J, Lee CSL, Zhu L, Chen Z, Zhao Y, Shen Z (2013) Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM2.5 in Beijing: seasonal perspective. Atmos Chem Phys 13:7053–7074.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7053-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhao JJ, Chen SB, Wang H, Ren Y, Du K, Xu WH, Zheng H, Jiang B (2012) Quantifying the impacts of socio-economic factors on air quality in Chinese cities from 2000 to 2009. Environ Pollut 167:148–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2012.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhao PS, Dong F, He D, Zhao XJ, Zhang XL, Zhang WZ, Yao Q, Liu HY (2013) Characteristics of concentrations and chemical compositions for PM2.5 in the region of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei, China. Atmos Chem Phys 13:4631–4644.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4631-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Department of Botany and Plant SciencesUniversity of California-RiversideRiversideUSA
  4. 4.Chongqing Academy of Agricultural SciencesChongqingChina
  5. 5.Institutes of Science and DevelopmentChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations