New comprehensive approach for airborne asbestos characterisation and monitoring
- 55 Downloads
High concentrations of airborne asbestos in the ambient air are still a serious problem of air quality in numerous localities around the world. Since 2002, elevated concentrations of asbestos minerals of unknown origin have been detected in the ambient air of Pilsen, Czech Republic. To determine the asbestos fibre sources in this urban air, a systematic study was conducted. First, 14 bulk dust samples were collected in Pilsen at nine localities, and 6 bulk samples of construction aggregates for gravel production were collected in a quarry in the Pilsen-Litice district. The quarry is the largest quarry in the Pilsen region and the closest quarry to the built-up urban area. X-ray diffraction of the asbestos minerals revealed that monoclinic amphibole (MA, namely actinolite based on subsequent SEM-EDX analysis) in the bulk samples accounted for < 1–33% of the mass and that the highest values were found in the bulk dust samples from the railway platform of the Pilsen main railway station. Simultaneously, 24-h samples of airborne particulate matter (PM) at three localities in Pilsen were collected. Actinolite was identified in 40% of the PM samples. The relationship between the meteorology and presence of actinolite in the 24 PM10 samples was not proven, probably due to the long sampling integration time. Therefore, highly time-and-size-resolved PM sampling was performed. Second, sampling of size-segregated aerosols and measurements of the wind speed (WS), wind direction (WD), precipitation (P) and hourly PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 were conducted in a suburban locality near the quarry in two monthly highly time-resolved periods (30, 60, 120 min). Three/eight PM size fractions were sampled by a Davis Rotating-drum Uniform-size-cut Monitor (3/8DRUM) and analysed for the presences of asbestos fibres by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX). Asbestos fibre detection in highly time-resolved PM samples and current WD and WS determination allows the apportionment directionality of asbestos fibre sources. The number of critical actinolite asbestos fibres (length ≥ 5 μm and width < 3 μm, 3:1) increased with the PM1–10/PM10 and PM2.5–10/PM10 ratios, WS > 2 m s−1 and precipitation < 1 mm. Additionally, the number of critical actinolite asbestos fibres was not related to a specific WD. Therefore, we conclude that the sources of airborne critical actinolite asbestos fibres in Pilsen’s urban area are omnipresent. Frequent use of construction aggregates and gravel from the metamorphic spilite quarries in the Pilsen region and in many localities around the urban area is a plausible explanation for the omnipresence of the critical actinolite asbestos fibres concentration in Pilsen’s ambient air. Mitigation strategies to reduce the concentrations of critical actinolite asbestos fibres must be developed. Continuous monitoring and performing SEM-EDX analysis of highly time-and-size-resolved PM samples, correlated with fast changing WS and WD, seems to be a strong tool for efficiently controlling the mitigation strategies of critical actinolite asbestos fibres.
KeywordsActinolite asbestos Naturally occurring asbestos DRUM sampler SEM-EDX X-ray powder diffraction
The authors acknowledge the Czech Hydrometeorological Institute Branch, Pilsen, for their cooperation during the measurements and data provision.
This work was supported by grant no P503/12/G147 of the Czech Science Foundation and by the Environmental Fund of Pilsen.
- Cahill C.F., 2003. Asian aerosol transport to Alaska during ACE-Asia. Journal of Geophysical Research 108 (D23):32, 1–8Google Scholar
- Cahill TA, Goodart C, Nelson JW, Eldred RA, Nastrom JS, Feeney PJ (1985) Design and evaluation of the drum impactor. In: Ariman T, Veziroglu TN (eds) Proceedings of international symposium on particulate and multi-phase process, vol 2. Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, pp 19–25Google Scholar
- Case BW, Abraham JL (2008) Heterogeneity of exposure and attribution of mesotheliom: trend and strategies in two American countries. J Phys Conf Ser 151:1–15Google Scholar
- Červenka, V., 2005. Zpráva o kontaminaci venkovního ovzduší amfibolovým azbestem z neznámého zdroje (Report of ambient air contamination via amphibole asbestos of unknown source), Foster Bohemia spol. s r.o., final report, PrahaGoogle Scholar
- Chlupáč I, Brzobohatý R, Kovanda J, Stráník Z (2002) Geologická minulost České republiky. Academia Praha, Czech, p 436Google Scholar
- Davis, B.L., 1988. Reference intensity method of quantitative X-ray diffraction analysis, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid CityGoogle Scholar
- Fiala F (1977) Proterozoický vulkanismus Barrandienu a problematika spilitů. Sborník Geologických věd, Geologie 30:7–247 in CzechGoogle Scholar
- Harris, K.E., Bunker, K.L., Strohmeier, B.R., Hoch, R., Lee, R.J., 2007. Discovering the true morphology of amphibole minerals: complementary TEM and FESEM characterization of particles in mixed mineral dust. In: Méndez-Vilas, a., Diaz, J., editors. Modern research and educational topics in microscopy, vol. 2. Formatex research center, Badajoz, Spain. ISBN-13: 978-84-611-9420-9Google Scholar
- IARC, 2012. A review of human carcinogens: arsenic, metals, fibres, and dusts. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinogen Risks Hum 100C http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol100C/index.php
- IARC, 1977. Asbestos. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 14Google Scholar
- ICDD, 2011. International Centre for diffraction data, powder diffraction file - release 2011, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
- Ondruš, P., 1994: ZDS Software pro analýzu RTG práškových difrakčních záznamů, verze 5.14, PrahaGoogle Scholar
- Pokorná P., Hovorka J., Brejcha J., 2016b. Impact of mining activities on the air quality in the village nearby a coal strip mine, IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ Sci, 44, 032021Google Scholar
- Scherbakov, S. V., Kashansky, S., Domnin, S.G., Kogan, F.M., Kozlov, V. Kochelayev, V.A., Nolan, R. P. in: The Health Effects of Chrysotile Asbestos: Contribution of Science to Risk Management Decisions, eds. Nolan, R. P., Langer, A. M., Ross, M., Wicks, F. J., Martin, R. F., 2001. Mineralogical Association of Canada, Canadian Special Publication 5, 187–198Google Scholar
- Swayze GA, Kokaly RF, Higgins CT, Clinkenbreard JP, Clark RN, Lowers HA, Sutley SJ (2009) Mapping potentially asbestos-bearing rocks using imaging spectroscopy. Geological Soc Am 37:763–766Google Scholar
- World Health Organisation (WHO), 2000. Air quality guidelines for Europe. Second edition. WHO Regional publications, European Series, No. 91Google Scholar
- World Health Organisation (WHO), 2010. Asbestos: elimination of asbestos-related diseases. Fact sheet N 343, July. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs343/en/index.html
- Zachariáš, J., 2009. Mineralogická charakteristika vzorků kameniva (mineralogical characteristic of the bulk samples), study, Institute of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Mineral Resources, Faculty of Science, Charles UniversityGoogle Scholar