Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 14–23 | Cite as

Varying concentrations of soil chromium (VI) for the exploration of tolerance thresholds and phytoremediation potential of the oregano (Origanum vulgare)

  • Efi LevizouEmail author
  • Anna A. Zanni
  • Vasileios Antoniadis
New Toxic Emerging Contaminants: Beyond the Toxicological effects
  • 845 Downloads

Abstract

Varying concentrations of soil Cr(VI) were used in order to explore the tolerance thresholds and phytoremediation potential of Greek oregano (Origanum vulgare), in a pot experiment conducted outdoors. Oregano exhibited a rather exceptional capacity to bioaccumulate Cr in both the aerial part (up to 1200 mg of total Cr kg−1 DM) and the root—reaching 4300 mg kg−1 DM when grown in soil [Cr(VI)] of 150–200 mg kg−1. Plant responses indicated that there was a threshold set at 100 mg Cr(VI) kg−1 in the soil, above which the following results were recorded: (i) a restriction of Cr translocation from below- to above-ground plant part, (ii) a raise of the soil-to-root Cr transfer, and (iii) the Cr(III) evolution from the reduction of Cr(VI) was significantly decelerated in the root and accelerated in the aerial part. Soil [Cr] that surpassed this threshold challenged plant tolerance, resulting in a dose-dependent reduction of growth and antioxidant phenolics pool. Nonetheless, the significant Cr uptake capacity at plant level accounted for the considerably short remediation time (i.e., 29 years at soil [Cr(VI)] of 150 mg kg−1) calculated according to these results. The overall performance of oregano indicated that phytoremediation would be feasible at sites with Cr contamination levels ranging within the above-defined thresholds.

Keywords

Oregano Contamination Heavy metals Bioaccumulation Translocation Phenolics 

References

  1. Ali H, Khan E, Sajad MA (2013) Phytoremediation of heavy metals—concepts and applications. Chemosphere 91:869–881.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anjum SA, Ashraf U, Khan I et al (2017) Phyto-toxicity of chromium in maize: oxidative damage, osmolyte accumulation , anti-oxidative defense and chromium uptake. Pedosph An Int J 27:262–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60315-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antoniadis V, Levizou E, Shaheen SM, Ok YS, Sebastian A, Baum C, Prasad MNV, Wenzel WW, Rinklebe J (2017a) Trace elements in the soil-plant interface: phytoavailability, translocation, and phytoremediation—a review. Earth-Science Rev 171:621–645.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antoniadis V, Polyzois T, Golia EE, Petropoulos SA (2017b) Chemosphere hexavalent chromium availability and phytoremediation potential of Cichorium spinosum as affect by manure , zeolite and soil ageing Chemosphere 171:729–734. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.146
  5. Antoniadis V, Zanni AA, Levizou E, Shaheen SM, Dimirkou A, Bolan N, Rinklebe J (2018) Modulation of hexavalent chromium toxicity on οriganum vulgare in an acidic soil amended with peat, lime, and zeolite. Chemosphere 195:291–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bahadur A, Ahmad R, Afzal A, Feng H, Suthar V, Batool A, Khan A, Mahmood-ul-Hassan M (2017) The influences of Cr-tolerant rhizobacteria in phytoremediation and attenuation of Cr (VI) stress in agronomic sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Chemosphere 179:112–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bini C, Wahsha M, Fontana S, Maleci L (2012) Effects of heavy metals on morphological characteristics of Taraxacum officinale web growing on mine soils in NE Italy. J Geochemical Explor 123:101–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buendía-González L, Orozco-Villafuerte J, Cruz-Sosa F, Barrera-Díaz CE, Vernon-Carter EJ (2010) Prosopis laevigata a potential chromium (VI) and cadmium (II) hyperaccumulator desert plant. Bioresour Technol 101:5862–5867.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen H, Dou J, Xu H (2017) Removal of Cr(VI) ions by sewage sludge compost biomass from aqueous solutions: reduction to Cr(III) and biosorption. Appl Surf Sci 425:728–735.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dube BK, Tewari K, Chatterjee J, Chatterjee C (2003) Excess chromium alters uptake and translocation of certain nutrients in citrullus. Chemosphere 53:1147–1153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00570-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gill RA, Zang L, Ali B, Farooq MA, Cui P, Yang S, Ali S, Zhou W (2015) Chromium-induced physio-chemical and ultrastructural changes in four cultivars of Brassica napus L. Chemosphere 120:154–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.06.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horváth E, Szalai G, Tibor J (2007) Induction of Abiotic Stress Tolerance by Salicylic Acid Signaling. J Plant Growth Regul (2007) 26:290–300.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-007-9017-4
  13. Islam F, Yasmeen T, Saleem M et al (2016) Plant physiology and biochemistry combined ability of chromium ( Cr ) tolerant plant growth promoting bacteria ( PGPB ) and salicylic acid ( SA ) in attenuation of chromium stress in maize plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 108:456–467.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Karabourniotis G, Liakopoulos G, Nikolopoulos D, Bresta P, Stavroulaki V, Sumbele S (2014) Plant science “carbon gain vs. water saving, growth vs. Defence”: two dilemmas with soluble phenolics as a joker. Plant Sci 227:21–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kováčik J, Babula P, Hedbavny J, Klejdus B (2014) Hexavalent chromium damages chamomile plants by alteration of antioxidants and its uptake is prevented by calcium. J Hazard Mater 273:110–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kurniawan TA, Chan GYS, Lo WH, Babel S (2006) Physico-chemical treatment techniques for wastewater laden with heavy metals. Chem Eng J 118:83–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2006.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kushwaha A, Rani R, Kumar S, Gautam A (2016) Heavy metal detoxification and tolerance mechanisms in plants: implications for phytoremediation. Environ Rev 24:39–51.  https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2015-0010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lattanzio V, Cardinali A, Ruta C, et al (2009) Relationship of secondary metabolism to growth in oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) shoot cultures under nutritional stress. 65:54–62. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.09.002
  19. Levizou E, Antoniadis V, Papatheodorou S (2016) Without exceeding the limits: industrial soil rich in Zn and Cd has no effect on purslane and lettuce but promotes geranium growth. Environ Earth Sci 75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6070-y
  20. Lindsay WL, Norvel WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am 42:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu J, Duan C, Zhang X, Zhu Y, Lu X (2011) Potential of Leersia hexandra Swartz for phytoextraction of Cr from soil. J Hazard Mater 188:85–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Molla K, Dimirkou A, Antoniadis V (2012) Hexavalent chromium dynamics and uptake in manure-added soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:6059–6067.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1340-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oliveira H (2012) Chromium as an environmental pollutant: insights on induced plant toxicity. J Bot 2012:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/375843 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Patra DK, Pradhan C, Patra HK (2018) An in situ study of growth of lemongrass Cymbopogon flexuosus (Nees ex Steud.) W. Watson on varying concentration of chromium (Cr+6) on soil and its bioaccumulation: perspectives on phytoremediation potential and phytostabilisation of chromium toxicity. Chemosphere 193:793–799.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Prado C, Rosa M, Pagano E, Prado F (2013) Metabolic interconnectivity among alternative respiration, residual respiration, carbohydrates and phenolics in leaves of Salvinia minima exposed to Cr(VI). Environ Exp Bot 87:32–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prado FE, Hilal M, Chocobar-Ponce S, et al (2015) Chromium and the plant: a dangerous affair?Google Scholar
  27. Redondo-Gómez S, Mateos-Naranjo E, Vecino-Bueno I, Feldman SR (2011) Accumulation and tolerance characteristics of chromium in a cordgrass Cr-hyperaccumulator, Spartina argentinensis. J Hazard Mater 185:862–869.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodriguez E, Santos C, Azevedo R, Moutinho-Pereira J, Correia C, Dias MC (2012) Chromium (VI) induces toxicity at different photosynthetic levels in pea. Plant Physiol Biochem 53:94–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sampanpanish P, Pongsapich W, Khaodhiar S, Khan E (2006) Chromium removal from soil by phytoremediation with weed plant species in Thailand. Water, Air, Soil Pollut Focus 6:191–206.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11267-005-9006-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shahid M, Shamshad S, Rafiq M, Khalid S, Bibi I, Niazi NK, Dumat C, Rashid MI (2017) Chromium speciation, bioavailability, uptake, toxicity and detoxification in soil-plant system: a review. Chemosphere 178:513–533.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sinha V, Pakshirajan K, Chaturvedi R (2018) Chromium tolerance, bioaccumulation and localization in plants: an overview. J Environ Manag 206:715–730.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tiwari KK, Singh NK, Rai UN (2013) Chromium phytotoxicity in radish (Raphanus sativus): effects on metabolism and nutrient uptake. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 91:339–344.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-013-1047-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. UdDin I, Bano A, Masood S (2015) Chromium toxicity tolerance of Solanum nigrum L. and Parthenium hysterophorus L. plants with reference to ion pattern, antioxidation activity and root exudation. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 113:271–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.12.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vokou D, Kokkinit S, Bessiere J (1993) Geographic variation of Greek oregano (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum) essential oils. 21:287–295Google Scholar
  35. Waterman PG, Mole S (1994) Analysis of phenolic plant metabolites. Blackwell Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
  36. Yadav SK, Dhote M, Kumar P, Sharma J, Chakrabarti T, Juwarkar AA (2010) Differential antioxidative enzyme responses of Jatropha curcas L. to chromium stress. J Hazard Mater 180:609–615.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang XH, Liu J, Huang HT, Chen J, Zhu YN, Wang DQ (2007) Chromium accumulation by the hyperaccumulator plant Leersia hexandra Swartz. Chemosphere 67:1138–1143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.11.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agriculture Crop Production and Rural EnvironmentUniversity of ThessalyVolosGreece

Personalised recommendations