Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 23, pp 22810–22817 | Cite as

A modeling understanding on the phosphorous removal performances of A2O and reversed A2O processes in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant

  • Wen-Ming Xie
  • Raymond J. Zeng
  • Wen-Wei Li
  • Guo-Xiang Wang
  • Li-Min Zhang
Research Article

Abstract

Reversed A2O process (anoxic-anaerobic-aerobic) and conventional A2O process (anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic) are widely used in many wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Asia. However, at present, there are still no consistent results to figure out which process has better total phosphorous (TP) removal performance and the mechanism for this difference was not clear yet. In this study, the treatment performances of both processes were compared in the same full-scale WWTP and the TP removal dynamics was analyzed by a modeling method. The treatment performance of full-scale WWTP showed the TP removal efficiency of the reversed A2O process was more efficient than in the conventional A2O process. The modeling results further reveal that the TP removal depends highly on the concentration and composition of influent COD. It had more efficient TP removal than the conventional A2O process only under conditions of sufficient influent COD and high fermentation products content. This study may lay a foundation for appropriate selection and optimization of treatment processes to suit practical wastewater properties.

Keywords

Reversed A2Total phosphorous (TP) Modeling Wastewater Phosphorus accumulating organisms 

Notes

Funding information

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51408587; 51522812; 51778301).

References

  1. APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Bi XJ, Zhang B (2006) The principle and full-scale application of reversed A2O process for removing nitrogen and phosphorus. Environ Eng (in Chinese) 24:29–31Google Scholar
  3. Fang F, Ni BJ, Li WW, Sheng GP, Yu HQ (2011) A simulation-based integrated approach to optimize the biological nutrient removal process in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant. Chem Eng J 174:635–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fang F, Qiao LL, Cao JS, Li Y, Xie WM, Sheng GP, Yu HQ (2016) Quantitative evaluation of A2O and reversed A2O processes for biological municipal wastewater treatment using a projection pursuit method. Sep Purif Technol 166:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Filipe CDM, Daigger GT, Grady CPL Jr (2001) pH as a key factor in the competition between glycogen-accumulating organisms and phosphorous-accumulating organisms. Water Environ Res 73:223–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gernaey KV, van Loosdrecht MCM, Henze M, Lind M, JØrgensen SB (2004) Activated sludge wastewater treatment plant modeling and simulation: state of the art. Environ Model Softw 19:763–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grady Jr CPL, Daigger GT, Lim H (1999) Biological wastewater treatment. Revised and Expanded, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, Matsuo T, Wentzel MC, Marais GVR, van Loosdrecht MCM (1999) Activated sludge model no. 2d, ASM2d. Water Sci Technol 39:165–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hu X, Wisniewski K, Czerwionka K, Zhou Q, Xie L (2016) Modeling the effect of external carbon source addition under different electron acceptor conditions in biological nutrient removal activated sludge systems. Environ Sci Technol 50:1887–1896Google Scholar
  10. Kang XS, Liu CQ, Zhang B, Bi XJ, Zhang F, Cheng LH (2011) Application of reversed A2/O process on removing nitrogen and phosphorus from municipal wastewater in China. Water Sci Technol 63:2138–2142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lahav O, Loewenthal RE (2000) Measurement of VFA in anaerobic digestion: the five-point titration method revised. Water SA 26:389–392Google Scholar
  12. Li P, Bi XJ, Wang J, Ru SG (2017) Microbial diversity in activated sludges of conventional and reversed A2/O processes. China Environ Sci (in Chinese) 37:1137–1145Google Scholar
  13. Liu CQ, Zhang F, Bi XJ, Zhang B (2008) Contrast between reversed A2O process and improved A2O process in full-scale test. Technol Wat Treat 34:53–56Google Scholar
  14. Makinia J, Rosenwinkel KH, Spering V (2005) Long-term simulation of the activated sludge process at the Hanover-Gümmerwald pilot WWTP. Water Res 39:1489–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Massara TM, Solis B, Guisasola A, Katsou E, Baeza JA (2018) Development of an ASM2d-N2O model to describe nitrous oxide emission in municipal WWTPs under dynamic conditions. Chem Eng J 335:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mino T, van Loosdrecht MCM, Heijnen JJ (1998) Microbiology and biochemistry of the enhanced biological phosphate removal process. Water Res 32:3193–3207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ni BJ, Yu HQ (2012) Microbial products of activated sludge in biological wastewater treatment systems: a critical review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 42:187–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ni BJ, Xie WM, Liu SG, Yu HQ, Wang YZ, Wang G, Dai XL (2009) Modeling and simulation of the sequencing batch reactor at a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant. AICHE J 55:2186–2196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oehmen A, Lopez-Vazquez CM, Carvalho G, Reis MAM, van Loosdrecht MCM (2010) Modeling the population dynamics and metabolic diversity of organisms relevant in anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic enhanced biological phosphorous removal processes. Water Res 44:4473–4486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pratt S, Yuan Z, Keller J (2004) Modeling aerobic carbon oxidation and storage by integrating respirometric, titrimetric, and off-gas CO2 measurements. Biotechnol Bioeng 88:135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reichert P (1998) Aquasim 2.0-User Manual, Computer Program for the Identification and Simulation of Aquatic Systems. EAWAG, Dübendorf, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  22. Xie WM, Zhang R, Li WW, Ni BJ, Fang F, Sheng GP, Yu HQ, Song J, Le DZ, Bi XJ, Liu CQ, Yang M (2011) Simulation and optimization of a full-scale Carrousel oxidation ditch plant for municipal wastewater treatment. Biochem Eng J 56:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Xie WM, Ni BJ, Sheng GP, Seviour T, Yu HQ (2016) Quantification and kinetic characterization of soluble microbial products from municipal wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 88:703–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang B, Gao TY (2000) An anoxic/anaerobic/aerobic process for the removal of nitrogen and phosphorous from wastewater. J Environ Sci Health A 35:1797–1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang M, Peng YZ, Wang C, Wang CX, Zhao WH, Zeng W (2016) Optimization denitrifying phosphorous removal at different hydraulic retention times in a novel anaerobic anoxic oxic-biological contact oxidation process. Biochem Eng J 106:26–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhou Z, Wu ZC, Wang ZW, Tang SJ, Gu GW, Wang LC, Wang YJ, Xin ZL (2011) Simulation and performance evaluation of the anoxic/anaerobic/aerobic process for biological nutrient removal. Korean J Chem Eng 28:1233–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhou Z, Shen XL, Jiang LM, Wu ZC, Wang ZW, Ren WC, Hu DL (2015) Modeling of multimode anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic wastewater treatment process at low temperature for process optimization. Chem Eng J 281:644–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wen-Ming Xie
    • 1
    • 2
  • Raymond J. Zeng
    • 3
  • Wen-Wei Li
    • 2
    • 3
  • Guo-Xiang Wang
    • 1
  • Li-Min Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EnvironmentNanjing Normal UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.CAS Key Laboratory of Urban Pollutants Conversion, Department of ChemistryUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiChina
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations