Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 18, pp 17965–17973 | Cite as

Green certification, e-commerce, and low-carbon economy for international tourist hotels

  • Long-Fei ChenEmail author
Environmental Pollution and Energy Management

Abstract

Increasing population and over-consumption are placing unprecedented demands on agriculture and natural resources. The Earth is suffering from global warning and environmental destruction while our agricultural systems are concurrently degrading land, water, biodiversity, and climate on a global scale. For a sustainable future, green certification, e-commerce, and environment education can boost low-carbon economy with decreasing carbon emissions, but very few researches address them for the hotel industry. This research studies the performance impact of e-commerce, international hotel chain, local hotel chain, and green certification for carbon emission reductions of international tourist hotels of Taiwan. It reveals that, after a sufficiently long time, there is an improvement in the environmental and economic performance of the green-certified hotel group. In addition, it reveals that, as recommended by the operation policy, the international hotel chain group together with e-commerce has better performance than local hotel chain. It is also discussed how to sustain the continuing improvement in low-carbon performance of the hotel industry.

Keywords

Green certification Cross-border e-commerce Environment education Low-carbon economy International tourist hotel (ITH) Data envelopment analysis (DEA) Public health 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author wants to thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Funding information

The fund was sponsored by “The key subject of the provincial characteristics of the Nanfang College of Sun Yat-sen University - the funding for the construction of electronic commerce project” and the R&D project “Green IOT data, information security, application of smart buildings” from Nanfang College of Sun Yat-sen University. The author also wants to thank ANU professor Robert Costanza and Ida Kubiszewski for their valuable explanation about why are ecosystem services are importantly related to environmental performance and CSR and well-being beyond current GDP calculation.

References

  1. Bohdanowicz P, Martinac I (2007) Determinants and benchmarking of resource consumption in hotels—case study of Hilton international and Scandic in Europe. Energy Build 39:82–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Butchart SH, Walpole M, Collen B, Van SA, Scharlemann JP, Almond RE et al (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328(5982):1164–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chan W (2009) Environmental measures for hotels’ environmental management systems ISO 14001. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 21(5):542–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen LF (2013a) The little green handbook—seven trends shaping the future of our planet, Ron Nielsen, St. Martin’s press, new York, USA, ISBN 0-312-42581-3. Ecol Econ 89(5):202–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen L (2013b) A sustainable hypothesis for tourist hotels: evidence from international hotel chains. Tour Econ 19(6):1449–1460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chung Y, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 51:229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Galloway JN, Leach AM (2016) Sustainability: your feet’s too big. Nat Geosci 9(2)Google Scholar
  8. Gössling S (2002) Global environmental consequences of tourism. Glob Environ Chang 12(4):283–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grigg PJ, Hibberd PPL, Kurmi OP, Lam KH et al (2014) Respiratory risks from household air pollution in low and middle income countries. Lancet Respir Med 2(10):823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Griggs D, Staffordsmith M, Gaffney O, Rockström J, Ohman MC, Shyamsundar P et al (2013) Policy: sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature 495(7441):305–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gunasekaran A, Ngai EW (2004) Information systems in supply chain integration and management. Eur J Oper Res 159(2):269–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. He G, Boas I, Mol AP, Lu Y (2016) E-participation for environmental sustainability in transitional urban China. Sustain Sci 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0403-3
  13. Hsieh LF, Lin LH (2010) A performance evaluation model for international tourist hotels in Taiwan: an application of the relational network DEA. Int J Hosp Manag 29:14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang CW, Ho FN, Chiu YH (2014) Measurement of tourist hotels’ productive efficiency, occupancy, and catering service effectiveness using a modified two-stage dea model in Taiwan. Omega 48:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lyson TA (2002) Advanced agricultural biotechnologies and sustainable agriculture. Trends Biotechnol 20(5):193–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ma X, Liu Y, Wei X, Li Y, Zheng M, Li Y et al (2017) Measurement and decomposition of energy efficiency of northeast China-based on super efficiency DEA model and Malmquist index. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(24):19859–19873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Manganari EE, Dimara E, Theotokis A (2015) Greening the lodging industry: current status, trends and perspectives for green value. Curr Issue Tour 19(3):1–20Google Scholar
  18. Ming C, Fan J (2013) Carbon reduction in a high-density city: a case study of Langham Place Hotel, Mongkok Hong Kong. Renew Energy 50(3):433–440Google Scholar
  19. Moutinho V, Madaleno M, Robaina (2017) Advanced scoring method of eco-efficiency in European cities. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0540-y
  20. Seele P, Lock I (2017) The game-changing potential of digitalization for sustainability: possibilities, perils, and pathways. Sustain Sci 12(2):1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shu G, Ren TZ, Wang MH (2007) Technology and infrastructure considerations for e-commerce in Chinese agriculture. Agric Sci China 6(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Travel and Tourism Market (n.d.) https://www.statista.com/statistics
  23. UN (2016). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2016Google Scholar
  24. UN (n.d.) The Trade and Development Report (TDR) 2016: structural transformation for inclusive and sustained growth, http://www.unctad.org, access time: 2017–2-1
  25. US Energy Information Administration (1998) https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/previous.php
  26. Zeng Y, Wan L, Guo H (2016) Agricultural e-commerce research: a review of the current status and prospects, China Rural Survey, No 3, 82–93Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NanFang College of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations