Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 4242–4252 | Cite as

A comparison between the four Geldart groups on the performance of a gas-phase annular fluidized bed photoreactor for volatile organic compound oxidation

  • Leonardo Almeida DinizEmail author
  • Thiago Lewis Reis Hewer
  • Danielle Matsumoto
  • Antonio Carlos Silva Costa Teixeira
Advanced Oxidation Technologies: State-of-the-Art in Ibero-American Countries
  • 114 Downloads

Abstract

Heterogeneous photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) is a widely studied alternative for the elimination of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in air. In this context, research on novel photoreactor arrangements to enhance PCO rates is desired. Annular fluidized bed photoreactors (AFBPR) have yielded prominent results when compared to conventional thin film reactors. However, very few works aimed at optimizing AFBPR operation. In this study, TiO2 photocalytic agglomerates were synthesized and segregated in specific size distributions to behave as Geldart groups A, B, C, and D fluidization. The TiO2 agglomerates were characterized by XRD, FTIR spectra, and N2 adsorption. Photocatalyst performances were compared in a 10-mm gapped AFBPR for degrading the model pollutant methyl-ethyl-ketone (MEK), using a 254-nm radiation source. Geldart group C showed to be inadequate for AFBPR operation due to the short operation range between fluidization and elutriation. In all the cases, photocatalytic reaction rates were superior to sole UV photolysis. Group A and group B demonstrated the highest reaction rates. Considerations based on mass transfer suggested that the reasons were enhanced UV distribution within the bed at lower flow rates and superior catalyst surface area at higher flow rates. Results also revealed that groups A, B, and D perform equally per catalyst area within an AFBPR if the fluidization numbers (FN) are high enough.

Keywords

Air treatment Photocatalysis VOC Fluidized bed Geldart group Methyl-ethyl-ketone 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level Personnel (CAPES, Brazil), the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Brazil), and the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, grant PIPE no 2016/00953-6) for the financial support. We are also grateful to Prof. Sergio Brochsztain from the Federal University of ABC for his help with the BET analysis.

Supplementary material

11356_2018_2145_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (237 kb)
Figure S1 (PDF 236 kb)

References

  1. Atkinson R (2000) Atmospheric chemistry of VOC and NOx. Atmos Environ 34:2063–2101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00460-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ausloos P, Steacie EWR (1955) The photolysis of methyl ethyl ketone. Can J Chem 33(6):1062–1068.  https://doi.org/10.1139/v55-122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyjoo Y, Sun H, Liu J, Pareek VK, Wang S (2017) A review on photocatalysis for air treatment: from catalyst development to reactor design. Chem Eng J 310:537–559.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun AM, Maurette MT, Oliveros E (1991) Photochemical technology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen J, Li G, He Z, Na T (2011) Adsorption and degradation of model volatile organic compounds by a combined titania–montmorillonite–silica photocatalyst. J Hazard Mater 190:416–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen J, Qin Y, Chen Z, Yanh Z, Yang W, Wang Y (2016) Gas circulating fluidized beds photocatalytic regeneration of I-TiO2 modified activated carbons saturated with toluene. Chem Eng J 293:281–290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costa-Filho BM, Araujo ALP, Silva GV, Boaventura RAR, Dias MMD, Lops JCB, Vilar VJP (2017) Intensification of heterogeneous TiO2 photocatalysis using an innovative micro-meso-structured-photoreactor for n-decane oxidation at gas phase. Chem Eng J 310:331–341.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dashliborun AM, Sotudeh-Gharebagh R, Hajaghazadeh M, Kakooei H, Afshar S (2013) Modeling of the photocatalytic degradation of methyl ethyl ketone in a fluidized bed reactor of nano-TiO2/γ-Al2O3 particles. Chem Eng J 226:59–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.04.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dibble LA, Raupp GB (1992) Fluidized-bed photocatalytic oxidation of trichloroethylene in contaminated airstreams. Environ Sci Technol 26:492–495.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es00027a006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Faghri A, Zhang Y, Howell JR (2010) Advanced heat and mass transfer. Global Digital Press, ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  11. Flakker CL, Muggli DS (2008) Factors affecting methanol photocatalytic oxidation and catalyst attrition in a fluidized-bed reactor. Appl Catal B Environ 84:706–714.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fogler HS (2004) Elements of chemical reaction engineering. Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  13. Geng Q, Guo Q, Yue X (2010) Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation kinetics of gaseous cyclohexane in an annular fluidized bed photocatalytic reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:4644–4652.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie100114e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kamal MS, Razzak AS, Hossain MM (2016) Catalytic oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs): a review. Atmos Environ 140:117–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim MJ, Nam W, Han GY (2004) Photocatalytic oxidation of ethyl alcohol in an annulus fluidized bed reactor. Korean J Chem Eng 21(3):721–725.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02705511 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Korologos CA, Nikolaki MD, Zerva CN, Philippopoulos CJ, Poulopoulos SG (2012) Photocatalytic oxidation of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and m-xylene in the gas-phase over TiO2-based catalysts. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 244:24–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2012.06.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krichveskaya M, Preis S, Moiseev A, Pronina N, Deubern J (2017) Gas-phase photocatalytic oxidation of refractory VOCs mixtures: through the net of process limitations. Catal Today 280:93–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.03.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kunii D, Levenspiel O (1991) Fluidization engineering. Butterworth-Heinemann, BostonGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuo HP, Wu CT, Hsu RC (2011) Continuous toluene vapour photocatalytic deduction in a multi-stage fluidised bed. Powder Technol 210:225–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2011.03.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lim TH, Kim SD (2004a) Trichloroethylene degradation by photocatalysis in annular flow and annulus fluidized bed photoreactors. Chemosphere 54:305–312.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00753-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lim TH, Kim SD (2004b) Photo-degradation characteristics of TCE (trichloroethylene) in an annulus fluidized bed photoreactor. Korean J Chem Eng 21(4):905–909.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02705538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martra G (2000) Lewis acid and base sites at the surface of microcrystalline TiO2 anatase: relationships between surface morphology and chemical behaviour. Appl Catal A: Gen 200:275–285.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00641-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martra G, Coluccia S, Marchese L, Augugliaro V, Loddo V, Palmisano L, Schiavello M (1999) The role of H2O in the photocatalytic oxidation of toluene in vapour phase on anatase TiO2 catalyst a FTIR study. Catal Today 53:695–702.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00156-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mo J, Zhang Y, Xu Q, Lamson JJ, Zhao R (2009) Photocatalytic purification of volatile organic compounds in indoor air: a literature review. Atmos Environ 43:2229–2246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelson RJ, Flakker CL, Muggli DS (2007) Photocatalytic oxidation of methanol using titania-based fluidized beds. Appl Catal B Environ 69:189–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.06.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Park JH, Seo YS, Kim HS, Kim K (2011) Photodegradation of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene by fluidized bed gaseous reactor with TiO2/SiO2. Korean J Chem Eng 28(8):1693–1697.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-011-0021-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Prieto O, Fermoso J, Irusta R (2007) Photocatalytic degradation of toluene in air using a fluidized bed photoreactor. Int J Photoenergy 2007:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/32859 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rajakamur B, Gierczak T, Flad JE, Ravishankara AR, Burkholder JB (2008) The CH3CO quantum yield in the 248 nm photolysis of acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, and biacetyl. J Photochem Photobiol 199:336–344.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2008.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sing KSW, Everett DH, Haul RAW, Moscou L, Pierotti RA, Rouquérol J, Siemieniewska T (1984) Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure & Appl Chem 57 (4): 603–619. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198557040603
  30. Spurr RA, Myers H (1957) Quantitative analysis of anatase-rutile mixtures with an X-ray diffractometer. Anal Chem 29:760–762.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60125a006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. USEPA (2016) National enforcement initiative: cutting hazardous air pollutants. EPA Web https://wwwepagov/enforcement/national-enforcement-initiative-cutting-hazardous-air-pollutants Acessed 18 December 2017
  32. Wolkenstein T (1973) The electronic theory of photocatalytic reactions on semiconductors. Adv Catal 23:157–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-0564(08)60301-6 Google Scholar
  33. Yao SW, Kuo WP (2015) Photocatalytic degradation of toluene on SiO2/TiO2 photocatalyst in a fluidized bed reactor. Procedia Eng 102:1254–1260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.254 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonardo Almeida Diniz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Thiago Lewis Reis Hewer
    • 2
  • Danielle Matsumoto
    • 1
  • Antonio Carlos Silva Costa Teixeira
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Group in Advanced Oxidation Processes (AdOx), Chemical Systems Engineering Center, Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Chemical Systems Engineering Center (CESQ), Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations