Effect of mono and divalent salts on the conformation and composition of a humic acid and on atrazine adsorption

  • Luis C. González-Márquez
  • Anne M. Hansen
  • Fernando A. González-Farias
Research Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

We investigated the effects of sodium and calcium chlorides on the conformation and composition of a purified Aldrich humic acid (PAHA), as well as on the adsorption of atrazine. The PAHA was treated with 1, 10, and 100 mM NaCl, CaCl2, or a mixture of NaCl and CaCl2 (molar ratio 5:1) at pH 7.5 and 8.5. The conformation of treated PAHA was characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and spectral changes of functional groups of PAHA by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). AFM and TEM images showed an increase in the aggregation of the PAHA as salinity increased. FTIR spectra revealed that changes in the aggregation of the PAHA were principally due to the formation of bridged interactions between calcium and carboxylate groups in the PAHA. The adsorption of atrazine on > 0.45 μm PAHA decreased as salt concentrations and pH increased. This reduction of atrazine adsorption was explained by the decrease in available adsorption sites due to agglomeration of PAHA.

Keywords

Herbicide Organic matter Salinity Sodium Calcium TEM AFM FTIR 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by CNA-CONACYT (contract no. CNA-2000-01-032) and The Mexican Institute of Water Technology (project no. TH0803.1). A doctoral scholarship was provided by the Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT) for Luis Carlos González-Márquez (scholarship number 7430). We would like to thank Prof. James O. Leckie for his very important comments and suggestions as well as for the opportunity to carry out part of this research at the Environmental Engineering Research Laboratory at Stanford University, and Federico Pacheco for his technical support with the TEM and AFM imaging.

Supplementary material

11356_2018_1939_Fig7_ESM.gif (680 kb)
Fig S1

(GIF 680 kb)

11356_2018_1939_MOESM1_ESM.tif (7.5 mb)
High resolution image (TIFF 7724 kb)
11356_2018_1939_Fig8_ESM.gif (5.8 mb)
Fig S2

(GIF 5889 kb)

11356_2018_1939_MOESM2_ESM.tif (947 kb)
High resolution image (TIFF 946 kb)

References

  1. Abate G, Penteado JC, Cuzzi JD, Vitti GC, Lichtig J, Masini JC (2004) Influence of humic acid on adsorption and desorption of atrazine, hydroxyatrazine, deethylatrazine, and deisopropylatrazine onto a clay-rich soil sample. J Agric Food Chem 52:6747–6754.  https://doi.org/10.1021/JF049229E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APHA, AWWA, WEF (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21th edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  3. Baalousha M, Motelica-Heino M, Galaup S, Le Coustumer P (2005) Supramolecular structure of humic acids by TEM with improved sample preparation and staining. Microsc Res Tech 66:299–306.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.20173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baalousha M, Motelica-Heino M, Le CP (2006) Conformation and size of humic substances: effects of major cation concentration and type, pH, salinity, and residence time. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 272:48–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balnois E, Wilkinson KJ (2002) Sample preparation techniques for the observation of environmental biopolymers by atomic force microscopy. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 207:229–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00136-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barriuso E, Feller C, Calvet R, Cerri C (1992) Sorption of atrazine, terbutryn and 2,4-D herbicides in two Brazilian Oxisols. Geoderma 53:155–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(92)90028-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Celano G, Šmejkalová D, Spaccini R, Piccolo A (2008) Interactions of three s-triazines with humic acids of different structure. J Agric Food Chem 56:7360–7366.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf8008074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen C, Wang X, Jiang H, Hu W (2007) Direct observation of macromolecular structures of humic acid by AFM and SEM. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 302:121–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.02.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dubois LH, Zegarski BR, Nuzzo RG (1986) Spontaneous organization of carboxylic acid monolayer films in ultrahigh vacuum. Kinetic constraints to assembly via gas-phase adsorption. Langmuir 2:412–417.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la00070a006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Union (2004) COMMISSION DECISION of 10 March 2004 concerning the non-inclusion of atrazine in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing this active substance. THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIESGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferreira JA, Martin-Neto L, Vaz CMP, Regitano JB (2002) Sorption interactions between imazaquin and a humic acid extracted from a typical Brazilian Oxisol. J Environ Qual 31:1665–1670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilliom RJ, Barbash JE, Crawford CG, et al (2006) The quality of our nation’s waters—pesticides in the nation’s streams and ground water, 1992–2001Google Scholar
  13. González-Márquez LC, Hansen AM (2009) Adsorción y mineralización de atrazina y relación con parámetros de suelos del DR 063 Guasave, Sinaloa. Rev Mex Ciencias Geológicas 26:587–599Google Scholar
  14. Guan X-H, Shang C, Chen G-H (2006) Competitive adsorption of organic matter with phosphate on aluminum hydroxide. J Colloid Interface Sci 296:51–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2005.08.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. He Z, Ohno T, Cade-Menun BJ, Erich MS, Honeycutt CW (2006) Spectral and chemical characterization of phosphates associated with humic substances. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:741–1751.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0030 Google Scholar
  16. Hernández-Antonio A, Hansen AM (2011) Uso de plaguicidas en dos zonas agrícolas de México y evaluación de la contaminación de agua y sedimentos. Rev Int Contam Ambie 27:115–127Google Scholar
  17. Iglesias A, López R, Gondar D, Antelo J, Fiol S, Arce F (2009) Effect of pH and ionic strength on the binding of paraquat and MCPA by soil fulvic and humic acids. Chemosphere 76:107–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kovaios ID, Paraskeva CA, Koutsoukos PG (2011) Adsorption of atrazine from aqueous electrolyte solutions on humic acid and silica. J Colloid Interface Sci 356:277–285.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kulikova NA, Perminova IV (2002) Binding of atrazine to humic substances from soil, peat, and coal related to their structure. Environ Sci Technol 36:3720–3724.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ES015778E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laird DA, Barriuso E, Dowdy RH, Koskinen WC (1992) Adsorption of atrazine on smectites. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:62.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600010010x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li H, Teppen BJ, Laird DA, Johnston CT, Boyd SA (2006) Effects of increasing potassium chloride and calcium chloride ionic strength on pesticide sorption by potassium- and calcium-smectite. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1889.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0392 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin-Neto L, Vieira EM, Sposito G (1994) Mechanism of atrazine sorption by humic acid: a spectroscopic study. Environ Sci Technol 28:1867–1873.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es00060a017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin-Neto L, Traghetta DG, Vaz CM et al (2001) On the interaction mechanisms of atrazine and hydroxyatrazine with humic substances. J Environ Qual 30:520–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Myneni S, Brown J, Martinez G, Meyer-Ilse W (1999) Imaging of humic substance macromolecular structures in water and soils. Science 286:1335–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakamoto K (1997) Infrared and Raman spectra of inorganic and coordination compounds: part A: theory and applications in inorganic chemistry, 5th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Namjesnik-Dejanovic K, Maurice PA (1997) Atomic force microscopy of soil and stream fulvic acids. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 120:77–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(96)03678-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Namjesnik-Dejanovic K, Maurice PA (2001) Conformations and aggregate structures of sorbed natural organic matter on muscovite and hematite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 65:1047–1057.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00542-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oste LA, Temminghoff EJ, Van Riemsdijk WH (2002) Solid-solution partitioning of organic matter in soils as influenced by an increase in pH or Ca concentration. Environ Sci Technol 36:208–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Piccolo A, Celano G, De Simone C (1992) Interactions of atrazine with humic substances of different origins and their hydrolysed products. Sci Total Environ 117–118:403–412.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(92)90106-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Plaschke M, Römer J, Klenze R, Kim J (1999) In situ AFM study of sorbed humic acid colloids at different pH. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 160:269–279.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(99)00191-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Prosen H, Zupančič-Kralj L (2000) The interaction of triazine herbicides with humic acids. Chromatographia 51:S155–S164.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02492799 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Senesi N, D’Orazio V, Miano TM (1995) Adsorption mechanisms of s-triazine and bipyridylium herbicides on humic acids from hop field soils. Geoderma 66:273–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(94)00083-M CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Spark K, Swift R (2002) Effect of soil composition and dissolved organic matter on pesticide sorption. Sci Total Environ 298:147–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00213-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Swift RS (1996) Organic matter characterization. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH (eds) Methods of soil analysis part 3 chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 1011–1069Google Scholar
  35. Tang CY, Kwon Y-N, Leckie JO (2007) Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by humic acid—effects of solution composition and hydrodynamic conditions. J Membr Sci 290:86–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.12.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tappe W, Groeneweg J, Jantsch B (2002) Diffuse atrazine pollution in German aquifers. Biodegradation 13:3–10.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016325527709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Temminghoff EJM, Van der Zee SEATM, de Haan FAM (1998) Effects of dissolved organic matter on the mobility of copper in a contaminated sandy soil. Eur J Soil Sci 49:617–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tramonti V, Zienius RH, Gamble DS (1986) Solution phase interaction of lindane with fulvic acid: effect of solution pH and ionic strength. Int J Environ Anal Chem 24:203–212.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03067318608076471 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ureña-Amate MD, Socías-Viciana M, González-Pradas E, Saifi M (2005) Effects of ionic strength and temperature on adsorption of atrazine by a heat treated kerolite. Chemosphere 59:69–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.09.098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wall NA, Choppin GR (2003) Humic acids coagulation: influence of divalent cations. Appl Geochem 18(10):1573–1582Google Scholar
  41. Wang Z, Gamble D, Langford C (1991) Interaction of atrazine with Laurentian humic acid. Anal Chim Acta 244:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang LF, Wang LL, Ye XD, Li WW, Ren XM, Sheng GP, Yu HQ, Wang XK (2013) Coagulation kinetics of humic aggregates in mono- and di-valent electrolyte solutions. Environ Sci Technol 47:5042–5049.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es304993j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weng L, Temminghoff EJM, Van Riemsdijk WH (2002) Interpretation of humic acid coagulation and soluble soil organic matter using a calculated electrostatic potential. Eur J Soil Sci 53:575–587.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2002.00455.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wu Q, Yang Q, Zhou W, Zhu L (2015) Sorption characteristics and contribution of organic matter fractions for atrazine in soil. J Soils Sediments 15:2210–2219.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1162-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yeo AR, Flowers TJ (1985) The absence of an effect of the Na/Ca ratio on sodium chloride uptake by rice (Oryza sativa L.). New Phytol 99:81–90.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1985.tb03638.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Autónoma de OccidenteGuasaveMéxico
  2. 2.Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del AguaJiutepecMexico
  3. 3.Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations