Analysis of asymmetries in air pollution with water resources, and energy consumption in Iran

Research Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Iran should pay special attention to its excessive consumption of energy and air pollution due to the limited availability of water resources. This study explores the effects of the consumption of energy and water resources on air pollution in Iran from 1971 to 2014. It utilizes the non-linear autoregressive distributed lag approach to establish a robust relationship between the variables which show that both long- and short-run coefficients are asymmetrical. The positive and negative aspects of the long-run coefficients of energy consumption and water resources were found to be 0.19, − 1.63, 0.18, and 2.36, respectively, while only the negative ones were significant for energy consumption. Based on the cumulative effects, it can be established that there are important and significant differences in the responses of air pollution to positive and negative changes in water productivity and energy consumption. In particular, CO2 gas emissions are affected by negative changes in H2O productivity both in terms of the total and the GDP per unit of energy use in Iran. In regard to short-run results, considerable asymmetric effects occur on all the variables for CO2 emissions. Based on the results obtained, some recommendations are presented, which policymakers can adopt in efforts to address the issues of pollution and consumption.

Keywords

Air pollution Energy consumption Water resources NARDL model 

Abbreviations

NARDL

Non-linear autoregressive distributed lag

AECM

Asymmetric error correction model

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to place on record their sincerest thanks to the Editor-in-Chief. We would also like to express our gratitude to the three anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions which tremendously improved the quality of the paper.

References

  1. Ahmad N, Du L (2017) Effects of energy production and CO2 emissions on economic growth in Iran: ARDL approach. Energy 123:521–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akhmat G, Zaman K, Shukui T, Sajjad F, Khan MA, Khan MZ (2014) The challenges of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution through energy sources: evidence from a panel of developed countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(12):7425–7435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balke NS, Fomby TB (1997) Threshold cointegration. Int Econ Rev 38:627–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharya M, Churchill SA, Paramati SR (2017) The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions. Renew Energy 111:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanco J, Malato S, Fernández-Ibañez P, Alarcón D, Gernjak W, Maldonado M (2009) Review of feasible solar energy applications to water processes. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13(6):1437–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bozkurt C, Akan Y (2014) Economic growth, CO2 emissions and energy consumption: the Turkish case. Int J Energy Econ Policy 4(3):484Google Scholar
  7. Cole MA, Neumayer E (2004) Examining the impact of demographic factors on air pollution. Popul Environ 26(1):5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Compain P (2012) Solar energy for water desalination. Proc Eng 46:220–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366a):427–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. EA (2008) Greenhouse gas emissions of water supply and demand management options. Retrieved from www.environment-agency.gov.uk
  11. Economics V (2013) Energy efficiency and economic growth: report prepared for the climate institute. Vivid Economics, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. EIA (n.d.) U.S. Energy information administration retrieved from https://www.eia.gov
  13. EPA (2013) Global greenhouse gas emissions data. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/global.html
  14. Fogden J, Wood G (2009) Access to safe drinking water and its impact on global economic growth. HaloSource Inc., BothellGoogle Scholar
  15. Granger, C., & Yoon, G. (2002). Hidden cointegration. University of California San Diego. Economics Working Paper Series, 2Google Scholar
  16. Hardin E, AghaKouchak A, Qomi M, Madani K, Tarroja B, Zhou Y, Samuelsen S (2017) California drought increases CO2 footprint of energy. Sustain Cities Soc 28:450–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heidari H, Katircioğlu ST, Saeidpour L (2015) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and energy consumption in the five ASEAN countries. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 64:785–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hodrick RJ, Prescott EC (1997) Postwar US business cycles: an empirical investigation. J Money, Credit, Bank (1):16Google Scholar
  19. IWMI (2016). International Water Management Institute. Retrieved from www.iwmi.cgiar.org
  20. Kalogirou S (1997) Survey of solar desalination systems and system selection. Energy 22(1):69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kapetanios G, Shin Y, Snell A (2006) Testing for cointegration in nonlinear smooth transition error correction models. Econometric Theory 22(2):279–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karagiannis IC, Soldatos PG (2008) Water desalination cost literature: review and assessment. Desalination 223(1–3):448–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khan MM, Zaman K, Irfan D, Awan U, Ali G, Kyophilavong P, Naseem I (2016) Triangular relationship among energy consumption, air pollution and water resources in Pakistan. J Clean Prod 112:1375–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koroneos C, Dompros A, Roumbas G (2007) Renewable energy driven desalination systems modelling. J Clean Prod 15(5):449–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lotfalipour MR, Falahi MA, Ashena M (2010) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and fossil fuels consumption in Iran. Energy 35(12):5115–5120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Massarrat, M. (2012) Energy scenario for Iran. BBCGoogle Scholar
  27. MEI (2017). Ministry of Energy of Iran Retrieved from www.moe.gov.ir
  28. Mirzaei M, Bekri M (2017) Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Iran, 2025. Environ Res 154:345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Motevallian S, Tabesh M (2011) Sustainable development of urban water supply and distribution systems in Iran: challenges and opportunities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the international conference on water & wastewaterGoogle Scholar
  30. Omay T, Hasanov M, Ucar N (2014) Energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from nonlinear panel cointegration and causality tests. Прикладная эконометрика (2 (34))Google Scholar
  31. Omri A (2013) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth nexus in MENA countries: evidence from simultaneous equations models. Energy Econ 40:657–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pesaran MH, Shin Y (1998) An autoregressive distributed-lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. Econometric Soc Monographs 31:371–413Google Scholar
  33. Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Phillips PC, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(2):335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Psaradakis Z, Sola M, Spagnolo F (2004) On Markov error-correction models, with an application to stock prices and dividends. J Appl Econ 19(1):69–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rafindadi AA (2015a) Could the expanding economic growth and trade openness of the United Kingdom pose a threat to its existing energy predicaments? Int J Energy Econ Policy 5(1):121Google Scholar
  37. Rafindadi AA (2015b) Econometric prediction on the effects of financial development and trade openness on the German energy consumption: a startling revelation from the data set. Int J Energy Econ Policy 5(1):182Google Scholar
  38. Rafindadi AA (2016a) Does the need for economic growth influence energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Nigeria? Evidence from the innovation accounting test. Renew Sust Energ Rev 62:1209–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rafindadi AA (2016b) Revisiting the concept of environmental Kuznets curve in period of energy disaster and deteriorating income: empirical evidence from Japan. Energy Policy 94:274–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rafindadi AA, Ilhan O (2017) Dynamic effects of financial development, trade openness and economic growth on energy consumption: evidence from South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  41. Rafindadi AA, Muye IM, Kaita RA (2018) The effects of FDI and energy consumption on environmental pollution in predominantly resource-based economies of the GCC. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 25:126–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rafindadi AA, Ozturk I (2015) Natural gas consumption and economic growth nexus: is the 10th Malaysian plan attainable within the limits of its resource? Renew Sust Energ Rev 49:1221–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rafindadi AA, Ozturk I (2016) Effects of financial development, economic growth and trade on electricity consumption: evidence from post-Fukushima Japan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:1073–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rafindadi AA, Ozturk I (2017) Impacts of renewable energy consumption on the German economic growth: evidence from combined cointegration test. Renew Sust Energ Rev 75:1130–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rafindadi AA, Yusof Z (2015) Do the dynamics of financial development spur economic growth in Nigeria’s contemporal growth struggle? A fact beyond the figures. Qual Quant 49(1):365–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rafindadi AA, Yusof Z, Zaman K, Kyophilavong P, Akhmat G (2014) The relationship between air pollution, fossil fuel energy consumption, and water resources in the panel of selected Asia-Pacific countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(19):11395–11400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roostaei N (2004) River basin challenges and management in Iran: Ministry of Environment. Deputy of Human Environment TehranGoogle Scholar
  48. Saidi K, Hammami S (2015) The impact of energy consumption and CO2 emissions on economic growth: fresh evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equations models. Sustainable Cities Soc 14:178–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Salahuddin M, Gow J (2014) Economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in gulf cooperation council countries. Energy 73:44–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sari R, Soytas U (2004) Disaggregate energy consumption, employment and income in Turkey. Energy Econ 26(3):335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schorderet Y (2003) Asymmetric cointegration: Université de Genève/Faculté des sciences économiques et socialesGoogle Scholar
  52. Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6(2):461–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. SCI (2017) Statistical Center of Iran. Retrieved from https://www.amar.org.ir
  54. Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Sbia R, Bibi S (2015) Does energy intensity contribute to CO2 emissions? A trivariate analysis in selected African countries. Ecol Indic 50:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shang Y, Hei P, Lu S, Shang L, Li X, Wei Y, Gong J (2018) China’s energy-water nexus: assessing water conservation synergies of the total coal consumption cap strategy until 2050. Appl Energy 210:643–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sharzehei G, Haghanie M (2010) Study of the relationship between carbon emission and national income with an emphasis on the role of energy consumption. J Econ Res (Persian) 44:16Google Scholar
  57. Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo M (2014) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt (pp. 281–314): SpringerGoogle Scholar
  58. Singh VP, Khedun CP, Mishra AK (2014) Water, environment, energy, and population growth: implications for water sustainability under climate change. J Hydrol Eng 19(4):667–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. UN (2016) United Nations. Retrieved from www.un.org/en/
  60. WorldBank (2017) International development, poverty, & sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/
  61. WRI (2016) World Resources Institute. Retrieved from www.wri.org
  62. Život E, Andrews D (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 10(3):251–270Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsKharazmi UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations