Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methane biofiltration in the presence of ethanol vapor under steady and transient state conditions: an experimental study

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Methane (CH4) removal in the presence of ethanol vapors was performed by a stone-based bed and a hybrid packing biofilter in parallel. In the absence of ethanol, a methane removal efficiency of 55 ± 1% was obtained for both biofilters under similar CH4 inlet load (IL) of 13 ± 0.5 gCH4 m−3 h−1 and an empty bed residence time (EBRT) of 6 min. The results proved the key role of the bottom section in both biofilters for simultaneous removal of CH4 and ethanol. Ethanol vapor was completely eliminated in the bottom sections for an ethanol IL variation between 1 and 11 gethanol m−3 h−1. Ethanol absorption and accumulation in the biofilm phase as well as ethanol conversion to CO2 contributed to ethanol removal efficiency of 100%. In the presence of ethanol vapor, CO2 productions in the bottom section increased almost fourfold in both biofilters. The ethanol concentration in the leachate of the biofilter exceeding 2200 gethanol m−3 leachate in both biofilters demonstrated the excess accumulation of ethanol in the biofilm phase. The biofilters responded quickly to an ethanol shock load followed by a starvation with 20% decrease of their performance. The return to normal operations in both biofilters after the transient conditions took less than 5 days. Unlike the hybrid packing biofilter, excess pressure drop (up to 1.9 cmH2O m−1) was an important concern for the stone bed biofilter. The biomass accumulation in the bottom section of the stone bed biofilter contributed to 80% of the total pressure drop. However, the 14-day starvation reduced the pressure drop to 0.25 cmH2O m−1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avalos Ramirez A, Bénard S, Giroir-Fendler A, Jones JP, Heitz M (2008) Kinetics of microbial growth and biodegradation of methanol and toluene in biofilters and an analysis of the energetic indicators. J Biotechnol 138:88–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian P, Philip L, Murty Bhallamudi S (2012) Biotrickling filtration of VOC emissions from pharmaceutical industries. Chem Eng J 209:102–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt EMF, Duarte FV, Vieira JPR, Melo VM, Souza CL, Araújo JC, Chernicharo CAL (2016) The use of novel packing material for improving methane oxidation in biofilters. J Environ Manag 182:412–420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cáceres M, Dorado AD, Gentina JC, Aroca G (2016) Oxidation of methane in biotrickling filters inoculated with methanotrophic bacteria . Environ Sci Pollut res, 1-11 (in press)

  • Caniani D, Esposito G, Gori R, Mannina G (2015) Towards a new decision support system for design, management and operation of wastewater treatment plants for the reduction of greenhouse gases emission. Water (Switzerland) 7:5599–5616

    Google Scholar 

  • Daelman MRJ, van Voorthuizen EM, van Dongen UGJM, Volcke EIP, van Loosdrecht MCM (2012) Methane emission during municipal wastewater treatment. Water Res 46:3657–3670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Detchanamurthy S, Gostomski PA (2012) Biofiltration for treating VOCs: an overview. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 11:231–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devinny JS, Hodge DS (1995) Formation of acidic and toxic intermediates in overloaded ethanol biofilters. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 45:125–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dorado AD, Baeza JA, Lafuente J, Gabriel D, Gamisans X (2012) Biomass accumulation in a biofilter treating toluene at high loads—part 1: experimental performance from inoculation to clogging. Chem Eng J 209:661–669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada JM, Hernández S, Muñoz R, Revah S (2013) A comparative study of fungal and bacterial biofiltration treating a VOC mixture. J Hazard Mater 250-251:190–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferdowsi M, Veillette M, Avalos Ramirez A, Jones JP, Heitz M (2016) Performance evaluation of a methane biofilter under steady state, transient state and starvation conditions. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferdowsi M, Avalos Ramirez A, Jones JP, Heitz M (2017) Steady state and dynamic behaviors of a methane biofilter under periodic addition of ethanol vapors. J Environ Manag 197:106–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fulazzaky MA, Talaiekhozani A, Ponraj M, Abd Majid MZ, Hadibarata T, Goli A (2014) Biofiltration process as an ideal approach to remove pollutants from polluted air. Desalin Water Treat 52:3600–3615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallastegui G, Avalos Ramirez A, Elías A, Jones JP, Heitz M (2011) Performance and macrokinetic analysis of biofiltration of toluene and p-xylene mixtures in a conventional biofilter packed with inert material. Bioresour Technol 102:7657–7665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ganendra G, Mercado-Garcia D, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Boeckx P, Ho A, Boon N (2015) Methane biofiltration using autoclaved aerated concrete as the carrier material. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:7307–7320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Girard M, Viens P, Avalos Ramirez A, Brzezinski R, Buelna G, Heitz M (2012) Simultaneous treatment of methane and swine slurry by biofiltration. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 87:697–704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Cuervo S, Hernández J, Omil F (2016) Identifying the limitations of conventional biofiltration of diffuse methane emissions at long-term operation. Environ Technol 37:1947–1958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández J, Gómez-Cuervo S, Omil F (2015) EPS and SMP as stability indicators during the biofiltration of diffuse methane emissions. Water Air Soil Pollut 226

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Working Group III contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY

  • Kim D, Sorial GA (2007) Role of biological activity and biomass distribution in air biofilter performance. Chemosphere 66:1758–1764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TG, Lee EH, Cho KS (2013) Effects of nonmethane volatile organic compounds on microbial community of methanotrophic biofilter. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:6549–6559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TG, Jeong SY, Cho KS (2014) Characterization of tobermolite as a bed material for selective growth of methanotrophs in biofiltration. J Biotechnol 173:90–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Limbri H, Gunawan C, Rosche B, Scott J (2013) Challenges to developing methane biofiltration for coal mine ventilation air: a review. Water Air Soil Pollut 224

  • Limbri H, Gunawan C, Thomas T, Smith A, Scott J, Rosche B (2014) Coal-packed methane biofilter for mitigation of green house gas emissions from coal mine ventilation air. PLoS One 9(4):e94641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López JC, Quijano G, Souza TSO, Estrada JM, Lebrero R, Muñoz R (2013) Biotechnologies for greenhouse gases (CH4, N2O, and CO2) abatement: state of the art and challenges. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:2277–2303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López ME, Boger Z, Rene ER, Veiga MC, Kennes C (2014) Transient-state studies and neural modeling of the removal of a gas-phase pollutant mixture in a biotrickling filter. J Hazard Mater 269:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay D, Shiu WY, Ma KC, Lee SC (2006) Handbook of physical-chemical properties and environmental fate for organic chemicals. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Ménard C, Avalos Ramirez A, Nikiema J, Heitz M (2012) Effect of trace gases, toluene and chlorobenzene, on methane biofiltration: an experimental study. Chem Eng J 204-205:8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan-Sagastume F, Sleep BE, Allen DG (2001) Effects of biomass growth on grass pressure drop in biofilters. J Environ Eng 127:388–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morotti K, Avalos Ramirez A, Jones JP, Heitz M (2011) Analysis and comparison of biotreatment of air polluted with ethanol using biofiltration and biotrickling filtration. Environ Technol 32:1967–1973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikiema J, Heitz M (2010) The use of inorganic packing materials during methane biofiltration Int J Chem Eng 573149:1–8

  • Ryu HW, Cho KS, Chung DJ (2010) Relationships between biomass, pressure drop, and performance in a polyurethane biofilter. Bioresour Technol 101:1745–1751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staudinger J, Roberts PV (1996) A critical review of Henry's law constants for environmental applications. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 26:205–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (2016) Inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2014, EPA 430-R-16-002. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-04/documents/us-ghg-inventory-2016-main-text.pdf. Accessed 04 July 2017

  • Veillette M, Girard M, Viens P, Brzezinski R, Heitz M (2012) Function and limits of biofilters for the removal of methane in exhaust gases from the pig industry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 94:601–611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek AS, Drake HL, Kolb S (2011) Organic acids and ethanol inhibit the oxidation of methane by mire methanotrophs. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 77:28–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Chen H, Zeng G, Yu G, Luo S (2010) Biomass accumulation and control strategies in gas biofiltration. Biotechnol Adv 28:531–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

M. Heitz and J.P. Jones would like to acknowledge the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) which financially supported this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, J1K 2R1, Canada

    Milad Ferdowsi, Antonio Avalos Ramirez, Joseph Peter Jones & Michèle Heitz

  2. Centre National en Électrochimie et en Technologies Environnementales, 2263, Avenue du Collège, Shawinigan, QC, G9N 6V8, Canada

    Antonio Avalos Ramirez

Authors
  1. Milad Ferdowsi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio Avalos Ramirez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joseph Peter Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michèle Heitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michèle Heitz.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Angeles Blanco

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferdowsi, M., Ramirez, A.A., Jones, J.P. et al. Methane biofiltration in the presence of ethanol vapor under steady and transient state conditions: an experimental study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 20883–20896 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9634-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9634-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation