Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 30, pp 29936–29942 | Cite as

Biorational substitution of piperonyl butoxide in organic production: effectiveness of vegetable oils as synergists for pyrethrums

  • Patrice A. Marchand
  • Claire Dimier-Vallet
  • Rodolphe Vidal
Chemistry, Activity and Impact of Plant Biocontrol products
  • 96 Downloads

Abstract

Piperonyl butoxide is a semi-synthetic synergist for natural pyrethrum and synthetic pyrethroid insecticides in phytochemicals and biocides. As such it is used in large quantities for crop treatments, stored grain protection, disinfestation of grain storage facilities and indoor uses. Piperonyl butoxide is consequently a regular contaminant in stored grains, and subsequently in corresponding cereal food products and meat via feed uses. Therefore it is regularly monitored and its MRL is ongoing a reassessment. It is also considered as a possible human carcinogen and a suspected endocrine disruptor. For all these reasons and considerations most of the countries have already banned its use in Organic Farming as France in 2017. Thus, ecological substitution of with biorational and sustainable solutions is required. Vegetable oils have been described as exhibiting similar potency and synergistic effects. We have reviewed the literature and have proceeded to ecotoxicological efficacy tests in order to determine the best and most durable substitution candidates. Sesame and rape seed oil were determined to be the most efficient.

Keywords

Insecticide Vegetable oils Piperonyl butoxide Synergist Endocrine disruptor Biorationals 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thanks Taupier-Letage B. for his implication in the CASDAR program. Thanks also to Dr. Trevor M. Fenning for providing helpful advice on the editing and writing of the manuscript.

Financial support

This work about PBO substitution in organic production was initially supported by French Ministry of Agriculture -DGER (CASDAR Securbio (2011–2014) and later by French Ministry of Ecology - DGPR (Urgence PBO 2014–2015).

References

  1. Adams NH, Levi PE, Hodgson E (1993) Differences in induction of three P450 isozymes by piperonyl butoxide, sesamex, safrole, and isosafrole. Pestic Biochem Physiol 46(1):15–26.  https://doi.org/10.1006/pest.1993.1032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ANSES (2013) AVIS de l’Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l’alimentation, de l’environnement et du travail relatif à une demande d'avis pour la fixation de limites maximales de résidus (LMR) concernant le butoxyde de pipéronyle sur les végétaux. Saisine no. 2012-SA-0049. 1–34Google Scholar
  3. Barata C, Campos B, Rivetti C, LeBlanc GA, Eytcheson S, McKnight S, Tobor-Kaplon M, de Vries Buitenweg S, Choi S, Choi J, Sarapultseva IH, Coutelle MA, Coke M, Pandard P, Chaumot A, Quéau H, Delorme N, Geffard O, Martínez-Jerónimo F, Watanabe H, Tatarazako N, Lopes L, Pestanal JLT, Soares AMVM, Pereira CM, De Schamphelaere K (2017) Validation of a two-generational reproduction test in Daphnia magna: an interlaboratory exercise. Sci Total Environ 579:1073–1083.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beroza M (1954) Pyrethrum synergists in sesame oil. sesamolin, a potent synergist. J Am Oil Chem Soc 31(7):302–305.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02639163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bioland (2016) Bioland Richtlinien Fassung vom 22. November 2016. Bioland e.V. Verband für organisch-biologischen Landbau, pp 1–56. www.bioland.de/fileadmin/dateien/HP_Dokumente/Richtlinien/Bioland_Richtlinien_22_Nov_2016.pdf. Accessed 21 December 2017
  6. Campos B, Jordão R, Rivetti C, Lemos MFL, Soares AMVM, Tauler R, Barata C (2016) Two-generational effects of contaminants in Daphnia magna: effects of offspring quality. Environ Toxicol Chem 35(6):1470–1477.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canyon DV, Heukelbach J, Shaalan ES, Speare R (2010) Piperonyl butoxide. In: Grayson ML (ed) Kucer: the use of antibiotics, 6th edn. Hodder Arnold, London, pp 2306–2309.  https://doi.org/10.1201/b13787-235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charpentier G, Louat F, Bonmatin J-M, Marchand PA, Locker D, Decoville M (2014) Lethal and sublethal effects of Imidacloprid, after chronic exposure, on insect model Drosophila melanogaster. Environ Sci Technol 48(7):4096–4102.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es405331c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DiMatteo K (2004) Perspectives. Correspondence. Pesticides and organic agriculture. Environ Health Perspect 112(15):A865.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.112-a865b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eagleson C, Fruitdale T (1940) Oil synergist for insecticides dedicated to the free use of the people in the territory of the United States no. 2,202,145 patented may 28,·1940 United States Patent OfficeGoogle Scholar
  11. EC (European Commission) (2005) Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin. OJ L 70, 16.3.2005, 1–16Google Scholar
  12. EC (European Commission) (2009) Commission Regulation No 1107/2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, OJ L 309 of 24.11.2009, p. 1–50Google Scholar
  13. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2013) Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance plant oils/rapeseed oil. EFSA J 11(1):3058. [45 pp.].  https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2016) Technical report on the outcome of the consultation with Member States and EFSA on the basic substance application for sunflower oil for use in plant protection as insecticide on fruit trees, grapevine, potato, vegetables and post-harvest treatment on stored grains and as fungicide on vegetables and grapevine. EFSA supporting publication 2016: EN-1023. 51ppGoogle Scholar
  15. EU (2012) Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products, L 167 of 27.6.2012, p 1–123Google Scholar
  16. EU (2016a) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2016/2288 approving piperonyl butoxide as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-type 18, L 344 of 17.12.2016, p 65–67Google Scholar
  17. EU (2016b) Commission implementing regulation (EU) no. 2016/1978 approving the basic substance sunflower oil, L 305 of 12.11.2016, p 23–25Google Scholar
  18. Haller HL, McGovran ER, Goodhue LD, Sullivan WN (1942) The synergistic action of sesamin with pyrethrum insecticides. J Org Chem 7(2):183–184.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jo01196a011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hecker M, Hollert H, Cooper R, Vinggaard AM, Akahori Y Murphy M, Nellemann C, Higley E Newsted J Laskey J Buckalew A, Grund S, Maletz S, Giesy J, Timm G (2017) Erratum to: The OECD validation program of the H295R steroidogenesis assay: phase 3. Final inter-laboratory validation study. Environ Sci Pollut res. 1-3.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0321-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horton MK, Rundle A, Camann DE, Barr DB, Rauh VA, Whyatt RM (2011) Impact of prenatal exposure to piperonyl butoxide and permethrin on 36-month neurodevelopment. Pediatrics 127(3):e699–e706.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-0133 pp. e699-706 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hsinhung JH and Chun-Hua C (2001) Natural oils having a synergistic affect as a pesticide. United States Patent application publication US 2001/0055628A1 Dec. 27, 2001Google Scholar
  22. INAO (2015) Comite National de L’Agriculture biologique, Résumé des décisions prises 2015–300, du 8 décembre 2015Google Scholar
  23. Lachance S, Grange G (2014) Repellent effectiveness of seven plant essential oils, sunflower oil and natural insecticides against horn flies on pastured dairy cows and heifers. Med Vet Entomol 28(2):193–200.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mve.12044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lima LM (2015) Safrole and the versatility of a natural biophore. Rev Virtual Quim 7(2):495–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu B, Jung KH, Horton MK, Camann DE, Liu X, Reardon AM, Perzanowski MS, Zhang H, Perera FP, Whyatt RM, Miller RL (2012) Prenatal exposure to pesticide ingredient piperonyl butoxide and childhood cough in an urban cohort. Environ Int 48:156–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marchand PA (2015) Basic substances: an approval opportunity for low concern natural products under EU pesticide regulation. Pest. Manag Sci 71(9):1197–1200.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3997 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marchand PA (2016a) Basic substances under EC 1107/2009 phytochemical regulation: experience with non-biocide and food products as biorationals. J Plant Prot Res 56(3):312–318.  https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2016-0041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marchand PA (2016b) L’Huile de tournesol, un insecticide bio! Altern Agric 136:31Google Scholar
  29. Marchand PA (2017a) Basic substances under EU pesticide regulation: an opportunity for organic production? Org Farm 3(1):16–19.  https://doi.org/10.12924/of2017.03010016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marchand PA (2017b) Basic substances as renewable and affordable crop protection products. Chronicle Bioresour Manage 1(2):065–066Google Scholar
  31. Martín-López B, Varela I, Marnotes S, Cabaleiro C (2006) Use of oils combined with low doses of insecticide for the control of Myzus persicae and PVY epidemics. Pest Manag Sci 62(4):372–378.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Muguruma M, Kawai M, Dewa Y, Nishimura J, Saegusa Y, Yasuno H, Jin M, Matsumoto S, Takabatake M, Arai K, Mitsumori K (2009) Threshold dose of piperonyl butoxide that induces reactive oxygen species-mediated hepatocarcinogenesis in rats. Arch Toxicol 83(2):183–193.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-008-0340-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nougadère A, Sirota V, Kadara A, Fastier A, Truchot E, Vergnet C, Hommet F, Baylé J, Gros P, Leblanc J-C (2012) Total diet study on pesticide residues in France: levels in food as consumed and chronic dietary risk to consumers. Environ Int 45:135–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. NTP (National Toxicology Program) (2014) Department of Health and Human Services, 13th report on carcinogens (RoC), Safrole 1-2Google Scholar
  35. Peyser RD, Lanno SM, Shimshak SJ, Coolon JD (2017) Analysis of cytochrome P450 contribution to evolved plant toxin resistance in Drosophila sechellia. Insect Mol Biol 26(6):715–720.  https://doi.org/10.1111/imb.12329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Serrano B and Heilig U (2007) CEB method no. 135 (insecticides and miticide,) method practical effectiveness test of insecticides or miticides specialties for treatment of local storage of animal or vegetable products (treatments by applying products on surfaces), AFPPGoogle Scholar
  37. Shah AN, Iqbal J, Ullah A, Yang G, Yousaf M, Fahad S, Tanveer M, Hassan W, Tung SA, Wang L, Khan A, Wu Y (2016) Allelopathic potential of oil seed crops in production of crops: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(15):14854.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6969-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tayama S (1996) Cytogenetic effects of piperonyl butoxide and safrole in CHO-K1 cells. Mutation research/genetic toxicology. Genet Toxicol 368(3-4):249–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1218(96)90066-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tozzi A (1998) A brief history of the development of Piperonyl Butoxide as an insecticide synergist. In: Jones DG (ed) Piperonyl Butoxide: the insecticide synergist. Academic, San Diego, pp 1–5Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrice A. Marchand
    • 1
  • Claire Dimier-Vallet
    • 2
  • Rodolphe Vidal
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut Technique de l’Agriculture Biologique (ITAB)Paris Cedex 12France
  2. 2.Syndicat National des Transformateurs de Produits Naturels et de Culture Biologique (Synabio)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations