Performance and biofilm characteristics of biotrickling filters for ethylbenzene removal in the presence of saponins
- 241 Downloads
Saponins were applied to enhance ethylbenzene removal in biotrickling filters (BTFs), and comparison experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of saponins on ethylbenzene removal and biofilm characteristics at various saponin concentrations. Results showed that the optimum concentration of saponins was 40 mg/L and a maximum removal efficiency (RE) of ethylbenzene reached 84.3%. When the inlet ethylbenzene concentration increased, ranging from 750 to 2300 mg/m3, the RE decreased from 92.1 to 60.8% and from 69.4 to 44.2% for BTF1 and BTF2 in which saponin was and was not added, respectively. The corresponding RE declined from 91.1 to 40.8% and from 71.5 to 35.8% with a decreased empty bed residence time ranging from 45 to 7.5 s. Additionally, significant differences existed between both BTFs not only in the contents of polysaccharide and proteins but also in the surface charge of biofilms, and the ratio of protein to polysaccharide increased with the increase of saponin concentration, which indicated the presumable effect of saponins on liquid-biofilm transfer rates of ethylbenzene. Mechanisms for the enhanced removal of hydrophobic volatile organic compounds at the presence of surfactants were also discussed.
KeywordsBiofiltration Saponin Ethylbenzene VOC Biofilm
This study received financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 51478172, 51278464, and 51521006), the International S&T Cooperation Program of China (Contract No.: 2015DFG92750), the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China (Grant No.: LY17E080002), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China (Grant No.: 2017JJ2029), and the Department of Science and Technology of Changsha City of China (Contract No.: kh1601187).
- Cai ZL, Kim D, Sorial GA (2007) Biological oxidation of gaseous VOC mixtures in a trickle-bed air biofilter. J Adv Oxid Technol 10:144–150Google Scholar
- Chan WC, You HZ (2009) Nonionic surfactant Brij35 effects on toluene biodegradation in a composite bead biofilter. Afr J Biotechnol 820:5406–5414Google Scholar
- Comte S, Guibaud G, Baudu M (2006) Relations between extraction protocols for activated sludge extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and complexation properties of Pb and Cd with EPS: part II. Consequences of EPS extraction methods on Pb2+ and Cd2+ complexation. Enzyme. Microb. Tech. 38(1-2):237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.06.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- López ME, Rene ER, Malhautier L, Rocher J, Bayle S, Veiga MC, Kennes C (2013) One-stage biotrickling filter for the removal of a mixture of volatile pollutants from air: performance and microbial community analysis. Bioresour Technol 138:245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang BB, Peng DC, Hou YP, Li HJ, Pei LY, Yu LF (2014a) The important implications of particulate substrate in determining the physicochemical characteristics of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in activated sludge. Water Res 58:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yang CP, Suidan MT, Zhu XQ, Kim BJ (2004) Removal of a volatile organic compound in a hybrid rotating drum biofilter. J Environ Eng 130(3):282–291. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:3(282) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zita A, Hermansson M (1997) Effects of bacterial cell surface structures and hydrophobicity on attachment to activated sludge flocs. Appl Environ Microbiol 63(3):1168–1170Google Scholar
- Zita A, Hermansson M (1994) Effects of ionic strength on bacterial adhesion and stability of flocs in a wastewater activated sludge system. Appl Environ Microbiol 60(9):3041–3048Google Scholar