Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 18, pp 17901–17910 | Cite as

Pollution source localization in an urban water supply network based on dynamic water demand

  • Xuesong Yan
  • Zhixin Zhu
  • Tian LiEmail author
Environmental Pollution and Energy Management

Abstract

Urban water supply networks are susceptible to intentional, accidental chemical, and biological pollution, which pose a threat to the health of consumers. In recent years, drinking-water pollution incidents have occurred frequently, seriously endangering social stability and security. The real-time monitoring for water quality can be effectively implemented by placing sensors in the water supply network. However, locating the source of pollution through the data detection obtained by water quality sensors is a challenging problem. The difficulty lies in the limited number of sensors, large number of water supply network nodes, and dynamic user demand for water, which leads the pollution source localization problem to an uncertainty, large-scale, and dynamic optimization problem. In this paper, we mainly study the dynamics of the pollution source localization problem. Previous studies of pollution source localization assume that hydraulic inputs (e.g., water demand of consumers) are known. However, because of the inherent variability of urban water demand, the problem is essentially a fluctuating dynamic problem of consumer’s water demand. In this paper, the water demand is considered to be stochastic in nature and can be described using Gaussian model or autoregressive model. On this basis, an optimization algorithm is proposed based on these two dynamic water demand change models to locate the pollution source. The objective of the proposed algorithm is to find the locations and concentrations of pollution sources that meet the minimum between the analogue and detection values of the sensor. Simulation experiments were conducted using two different sizes of urban water supply network data, and the experimental results were compared with those of the standard genetic algorithm.

Keywords

Pollution source localization Dynamic water demand Genetic algorithm Gaussian model Autoregressive model Simulation optimization 

Notes

Funding information

This paper is supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61673354, 61672474) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan).

References

  1. Costa DM, Melo LF, Martins FG (2013) Localization of contamination sources in drinking water distribution systems: a method based on successive positive readings of sensors. Water Resour Manag 27(13):4623–4635Google Scholar
  2. Cowpertwait PSP, Metcalfe AV (2009) Introductory time series with R. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  3. De Sanctis AE, Shang F, Uber JG (2009) Real-time identification of possible contamination sources using network backtracking methods. J Water Resour Plan Manag 136(4):444–453Google Scholar
  4. Guan J, Aral MM, Maslia ML et al (2006) Identification of contaminant sources in water distribution systems using simulation–optimization method: case study. J Water Resour Plan Manag 132(4):252–262Google Scholar
  5. Hu C, Zhao J, Yan X et al (2015) A MapReduce-based parallel niche genetic algorithm for contaminant source identification in water distribution network. Ad Hoc Netw 35:116–126Google Scholar
  6. Huang JJ, McBean EA (2009) Data mining to identify contaminant event locations in water distribution systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 135(6):466–474Google Scholar
  7. Laird CD, Biegler LT et al (2005) Contamination source determination for water networks. J Water Resour Plan Manag 131(2):125–134Google Scholar
  8. Liu L, Ranjithan SR, Mahinthakumar G (2010) Contamination source identification in water distribution systems using an adaptive dynamic optimization procedure. J Water Resour Plan Manag 137(2):183–192Google Scholar
  9. Perelman L, Ostfeld A (2012) Bayesian networks for source intrusion detection. J Water Resour Plan Manag 39(4):426–432Google Scholar
  10. Shang F, Uber JG, Polycarpou MM (2002) Particle backtracking algorithm for water distribution system analysis. J Environ Eng 128(5):441–450Google Scholar
  11. Rossman L. A (2000) Epanet 2: users manual, Laboratory Office of Research & Devt.u.s.env.protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  12. Shumway RH, Stoffer DS (2000) Time series analysis and its applications. Stud Inform Control 9(4):375–376Google Scholar
  13. Vankayala P, Sankarasubramanian A, Ranjithan SR et al (2009) Contaminant source identification in water distribution networks under conditions of demand uncertainty. Environ Forensic 10(3):253–263Google Scholar
  14. Wang H, Harrison KW (2014) Improving efficiency of the Bayesian approach to water distribution contaminant source characterization with support vector regression. J Water Resour Plan Manag 140(1):3–11Google Scholar
  15. Wang H, Jin X (2013) Characterization of groundwater contaminant source using Bayesian method. Stoch Env Res Risk A 27(4):867–876Google Scholar
  16. Yan X, Zhao J, Hu C et al (2016) Contaminant source identification in water distribution network based on hybrid encoding. J Comput Methods Sci Eng 16(2):379–390Google Scholar
  17. Yan X, Sun J, Hu C (2017a) Research on contaminant sources identification of uncertainty water demand using genetic algorithm. Clust Comput 20(2):1007–1016Google Scholar
  18. Yan X, Gong W, Wu Q (2017b) Contaminant source identification of water distribution networks using cultural algorithm. Concurren Comput: Pract Exp 2017:e4230  https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4230 Google Scholar
  19. Yan X, Zhao J, Hu C, Zeng D (2017c) Multimodal optimization problem in contamination source determination of water supply networks. Swarm Evol Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2017.05.010

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer ScienceChina University of GeosciencesWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations