Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 3157–3173 | Cite as

Effect of pH on hexavalent and total chromium removal from aqueous solutions by avocado shell using batch and continuous systems

  • Erick Aranda-García
  • Eliseo Cristiani-UrbinaEmail author
Contaminated sites, waste management and green chemistry: New challenges from monitoring to remediation

Abstract

Solution pH appears to be the most important regulator of the biosorptive removal of chromium ions from aqueous solutions. This work presents a kinetic study of the effects of solution pH on Cr(VI) and total chromium removal from aqueous solution by Hass avocado shell (HAS) in batch and continuous packed bed column systems. Different Cr(VI) and total chromium removal performances of HAS were obtained in pH-shift batch, pH-controlled batch, and continuous systems. These results emphasize the great importance of determining the most appropriate pH for Cr(VI) and total chromium removal, considering the operational mode of the proposed large-scale treatment system. Total chromium biosorption batch kinetics was well described by the Elovich model, whereas in the continuous system, the fitness of the kinetic models to the experimental data was pH dependent. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and kinetic studies clearly indicated that the reaction mechanism of Cr(VI) with HAS was the reductive biotransformation of Cr(VI) to Cr(III), which was partially released to the aqueous solution and partially biosorbed onto HAS.

Keywords

Avocado shell Biosorption Hexavalent chromium pH Total chromium Wastewater treatment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The CONACyT awarded a graduate scholarship to one of the authors (E.A.-G.). E.C.-U. holds grants from COFAA-IPN, EDI-IPN, and SNI-CONACyT.

Funding information

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the scientific team of the Centro de Nanociencias y Micro y Nanotecnologías, IPN, as well as the financial support provided by the Secretaría de Investigación y Posgrado, IPN.

Supplementary material

11356_2017_248_MOESM1_ESM.docx (34 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 33.6 kb).
11356_2017_248_MOESM2_ESM.docx (32 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 32.3 kb).
11356_2017_248_MOESM3_ESM.docx (18 kb)
ESM 3 (DOCX 17.9 kb).
11356_2017_248_MOESM4_ESM.docx (31 kb)
ESM 4 (DOCX 30.9 kb).

References

  1. Aksu Z, Gönen F, Demircan Z (2002) Biosorption of chromium (VI) ions by Mowital®B30H resin immobilized activated sludge in a packed bed: comparison with granular activated carbon. Process Biochem 38:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aranda-García E, Morales-Barrera L, Pineda-Camacho G, Cristiani-Urbina E (2014) Effect of pH, ionic strength, and background electrolytes on Cr(VI) and total chromium removal by acorn shell of Quercus crassipes Humb. & Bonpl. Environ Monit Assess 186:6207–6221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arslan G, Pehlivan E (2007) Batch removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solution by Turkish brown coals. Bioresour Technol 98:2836–2845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basha S, Murthy ZVP (2007) Kinetic and equilibrium models for biosorption of Cr(VI) on chemically modified seaweed, Cystoseira indica. Process Biochem 42:1521–1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanes PS, Bordoni M, González JC, García SI, Atria AM, Sala LF, Bellú SE (2016) Application of soy hull biomass in removal of Cr(VI) from contaminated waters. Kinetic, thermodynamic and continuous sorption studies. J Environ Chem Eng 4:516–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blázquez G, Hernáinz F, Calero M, Martin-Lara MA, Tenorio G (2009) The effect of pH on the biosorption of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) with olive stone. Chem Eng J 148:473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabatingan LK, Agapay RC, Rakels JLL, Otens M, van der Wielen LAM (2001) Potential of biosorption for the recovery of chromate in industrial wastewater. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:2302–2309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calderón-Oliver M, Escalona-Buendía HB, Medina-Campos ON, Pedraza-Chaverri J, Pedroza-Islas R, Ponce-Alquicira E (2016) Optimization of the antioxidant and antimicrobial response of the combined effect of nisin and avocado byproducts. LWT-Food Sci Technol 65:46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calero M, Hernáinz F, Blázquez G, Tenorio G, Martín-Lara MA (2009) Study of Cr (III) biosorption in a fixed-bed column. J Hazard Mater 171:886–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chatterjee A, Schiewer S (2011) Biosorption of cadmium(II) ions by citrus peels in a packed bed column: effect of process parameters and comparison of different breakthrough curve models. Clean-Soil Air Water 39:874–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chauhan D, Sankararamakrishnan N (2011) Modeling and evaluation on removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous systems using fixed bed column. J Hazard Mater 185:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen S, Yue Q, Gao B, Li Q, Xu X, Fu K (2012) Adsorption of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution by modified corn stalk: a fixed-bed column study. Bioresour Technol 113:114–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheung CW, Porter JF, McKay G (2000) Sorption kinetics for the removal of copper and zinc from effluents using bone char. Sep Purif Technol 19:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheung CW, Porter JF, McKay G (2001) Sorption kinetic analysis for the removal of cadmium ions from effluents using bone char. Water Res 35:605–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cimino G, Passerini A, Toscano G (2000) Removal of toxic cations and Cr(VI) from aqueous solution by hazelnut shell. Water Res 34:2955–2962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Costa M (2003) Potential hazards of hexavalent chromium in our drinking water. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 188:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cristiani-Urbina E, Netzahuatl-Muñoz AR, Cristiani-Urbina MDC (2011) Removal of hexavalent and total chromium from aqueous solution by avocado shell. Chem Eng Trans 24:1339–1344Google Scholar
  18. Daneshvar N, Salari D, Aber S (2002) Chromium adsorption and Cr(VI) reduction to trivalent chromium in aqueous solutions by soya cake. J Hazard Mater 94:49–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Das N, Vimala R, Karthika P (2008) Biosorption of heavy metals—an overview. Indian J Biotechnol 7:159–169Google Scholar
  20. Dupont L, Guillon E (2003) Removal of hexavalent chromium with a lignocellulosic substrate extracted from wheat bran. Environ Sci Technol 37:4235–4241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. El Nemr A, El-Sikaily A, Khaled A, Abdelwahab O (2015) Removal of toxic chromium from aqueous solution, wastewater and saline water by marine red alga Pterocladia capillacea and its activated carbon. Arab J Chem 8:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farooq U, Athar M, Khan MA, Kozinski JA (2013) Biosorption of Pb(II) and Cr(III) from aqueous solutions: breakthrough curves and modeling studies. Environ Monit Assess 185:845–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Febrianto J, Kosasih AN, Sunarso J, Ju YH, Indraswati N, Ismadji S (2009) Equilibrium and kinetic studies in adsorption of heavy metals using biosorbent: a summary of recent studies. J Hazard Mater 162:616–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fellenz N, Perez-Alonso FJ, Martin PP, García-Fierro JL, Bengoa JF, Marchetti SG, Rojas S (2017) Chromium (VI) removal from water by means of adsorption-reduction at the surface of amino-functionalized MCM-41 sorbents. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 239:138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fiol N, Escudero C, Poch J, Villaescusa I (2006) Preliminary studies on Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solution using grape stalk wastes encapsulated in calcium alginate beads in a packed bed up-flow column. React Funct Polym 66:795–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fiol N, Escudero C, Villaescusa I (2008) Chromium sorption and Cr(VI) reduction to Cr(III) by grape stalks and yohimbe bark. Bioresour Technol 99:5030–5036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ghasemi M, Keshtkar AR, Dabbagh R, Jaber Safdari S (2011) Biosorption of uranium(VI) from aqueous solutions by Ca-pretreated Cystoseira indica alga: Breakthrough curves studies and modeling. J Hazard Mater 189:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gokhale SV, Jyoti KK, Lele SS (2009) Modeling of chromium (VI) biosorption by immobilized Spirulina platensis in packed column. J Hazard Mater 170:735–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hach Company (2008) Hach Water Analysis Handbook. Hach, LovelandGoogle Scholar
  30. Hasan HS, Ranjan D, Talat M (2010) Water hyacinth biomass (WHB) for the biosorption of hexavalent chromium: optimization of process parameters. Bioresources 5:563–575Google Scholar
  31. Ho YS, McKay G (1999) Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem 34:451–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ho YS, McKay G (2002) Application of kinetic models to the sorption of copper(II) on to peat. Adsorpt Sci Technol 20:797–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Horwitz W, Latimer GW Jr (2005) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 18th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, AOAC International, GaithersburgGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuppusamy S, Thavamani P, Megharaj M, Venkateswarlu K, Lee YB, Naidu R (2016a) Potential of Melaleuca diosmifolia leaf as a low-cost adsorbent for hexavalent chromium removal from contaminated water bodies. Process Saf Environ Prot 100:173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kuppusamy S, Thavamani P, Megharaj M, Venkateswarlu K, Lee YB, Naidu R (2016b) Oak (Quercus robur) acorn peel as a low-cost adsorbent for hexavalent chromium removal from aquatic ecosystems and industrial effluents. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li Y, Wang W, Zhou L, Liu Y, Mirza ZA, Lin X (2017) Remediation of hexavalent chromium spiked soil by using synthesized iron sulfide particles. Chemosphere 169:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lopez-Nuñez PV, Aranda-García E, Cristiani-Urbina MDC, Morales-Barrera L, Cristiani-Urbina E (2014) Removal of hexavalent and total chromium from aqueous solutions by plum (P. domestica L.) tree bark. Environ Eng Manag J 13:1927–1938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malkoc E, Nuhoglu Y, Abali Y (2006) Cr(VI) adsorption by waste acorn of Quercus ithaburensis in fixed beds: prediction of breakthrough curves. Chem Eng J 119:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marahel F, Khan MA, Marahel E, Bayesti I, Hosseini S (2015) Kinetics, thermodynamics, and isotherm studies for the adsorption of BR2 dye onto avocado integument. Desalin Water Treat 53:826–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mishra A, Dubey A, Shingal S (2015) Biosorption of chromium (VI) from aqueous solutions using plant biomass. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:1415–1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morales-Barrera L, Guillén-Jiménez FDM, Ortiz-Moreno A, Villegas-Garrido TL, Sandoval-Cabrera A, Hernández-Rodríguez CH, Cristiani-Urbina E (2008) Isolation, identification and characterization of a Hypocrea tawa strain with high Cr(VI) reduction potential. Biochem Eng J 40:284–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moussavi G, Barikbin B (2010) Biosorption of chromium(VI) from industrial wastewater onto pistachio hull waste biomass. Chem Eng J 162:893–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Murphy V, Hughes H, McLoughlin P (2008) Comparative study of chromium biosorption by red, green and brown seaweed biomass. Chemosphere 70:1128–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Netzahuatl-Muñoz AR, Aranda-García E, Cristiani-Urbina MDC, Barragán-Huerta BE, Villegas-Garrido TL, Cristiani-Urbina E (2010) Removal of hexavalent and total chromium from aqueous solutions by Schinus molle bark. Fresenius Environ Bull 19:2911–2918Google Scholar
  45. Netzahuatl-Muñoz AR, Morales-Barrera L, Cristiani-Urbina MDC, Cristiani-Urbina E (2012a) Hexavalent chromium reduction and chromium biosorption by Prunus serotina bark. Fresenius Environ Bull 21:1793–1801Google Scholar
  46. Netzahuatl-Muñoz AR, Guillén-Jiménez FDM, Chávez-Gómez B, Villegas-Garrido TL, Cristiani-Urbina E (2012b) Kinetic study of the effect of pH on hexavalent and trivalent chromium removal from aqueous solution by Cupressus lusitanica bark. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:625–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Netzahuatl-Muñoz AR, Cristiani-Urbina MDC, Cristiani-Urbina E (2015) Chromium biosorption from Cr(VI) aqueous solutions by Cupressus lusitanica bark. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0137086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ozdes D, Gundogdu A, Kemer B, Duran C, Kucuk M, Soylak M (2014) Assessment of kinetics, thermodynamics and equilibrium parameters of Cr(VI) biosorption onto Pinus brutis Ten. Can J Chem Eng 92:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Park D, Yun Y-S, Park JM (2004) Reduction of hexavalent chromium with the brown seaweed Ecklonia biomass. Environ Sci Technol 38:4860–4864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Park D, Yun Y-S, Jo JH, Park JM (2005) Mechanism of hexavalent chromium removal by dead fungal biomass of Aspergillus niger. Water Res 39:533–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Park D, Lim SR, Yun YS, Park JM (2007) Reliable evidences that the removal mechanism of hexavalent chromium by natural biomaterials is adsorption-coupled reduction. Chemosphere 70:298–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Park D, Yun Y-S, Kim JY, Park JM (2008a) How to study Cr(VI) biosorption: use of fermentation waste for detoxifying Cr(VI) in aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 136:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Park D, Yun Y-S, Park JM (2008b) XAS and XPS studies on chromium-binding groups of biomaterial during Cr(VI) biosorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 317:54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Park D, Yun Y-S, Park JM (2010) The past, present, and future trends of biosorption. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 15:86–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Plazinski W, Rudzinski W, Plazinska A (2009) Theoretical models of sorption kinetics including a surface reaction mechanism: a review. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 152(1–2):2–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ponce SC, Prado C, Pagano E, Prado FE, Rosa M (2015) Effect of solution pH on the dynamic of biosorption of Cr(VI) by living plants of Salvinia minima. Ecol Eng 74:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rangabhashiyam S, Nakkeeran E, Anu N, Selvaraju N (2015) Biosorption potential of a novel powder, prepared from Ficus auriculata leaves, for sequestration of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions. Res Chem Intermed 41:8405–8424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rodríguez-Carpena JG, Morcuende D, Estévez M (2011) Avocado by-products as inhibitors of color deterioration and lipid and protein oxidation in raw porcine patties subjected to chilled storage. Meat Sci 89:166–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Romero-González J, Walton JC, Peralta-Videa JR, Rodríguez E, Romero J, Gardea-Torresdey JR (2009) Modeling the adsorption of Cr(III) from aqueous solution onto Agave lechuguilla biomass: study of the advective and dispersive transport. J Hazard Mater 161:360–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sari A, Tuzen M (2008) Biosorption of total chromium from aqueous solution by red algae (Ceramium virgatum): equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J Hazard Mater 160:349–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Senthilkumar R, Vijayaraghavan K, Jegan J, Velan M (2010) Batch and column removal of total chromium from aqueous solution using Sargassum polycystum. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 29:334–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shen Y-S, Wang S-L, Huang S-T, Tzou Y-M, Huang J-H (2010) Biosorption of Cr(VI) by coconut coir: spectroscopy investigation on the reaction mechanism of Cr(VI) with lignocellulosic material. J Hazard Mater 179:160–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Silva B, Figueiredo H, Quintelas C, Neves IC, Tavares T (2012) Improved biosorption for Cr(VI) reduction and removal by Arthrobacter viscosus using zeolite. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 74:116–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spasojevic PM, Panic VV, Jovic MD, Markovic J, van Roost C, Popovic IG, Velickovic SJ (2016) Biomimic hybrid polymer networks based on casein and poly(methacrylic acid). Case study: Ni2+ removal. J Mater Chem A 4:1680–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tunali S, Kiran I, Akar T (2005) Chromium(VI) biosorption characteristics of Neurospora crassa fungal biomass. Miner Eng 18:681–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vázquez-Palma DE, Netzahuatl-Muñoz AR, Pineda-Camacho G, Cristiani-Urbina E (2017) Biosorptive removal of Ni(II) ions from aqueous solution by Hass avocado (Persea americana Mill. var. Hass) shell as an effective and low-cost biosorbent. Fresenius Environ Bull 26(5):3501–3513Google Scholar
  67. Vieira MGA, Oisiovici RM, Gimenes ML, Silva MGC (2008) Biosorption of chromium(VI) using a Sargassum sp. packed-bed column. Bioresour Technol 99:3094–3099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vinod VTP, Wactawek S, Senan C, Kupcik J, Pesková K, Cernik M, Somashekarappa HM (2017) Gum karaya (Sterculia urens) stabilized zero-valent iron nanoparticles: characterization and applications for the removal of chromium and volatile organic pollutants from water. RSC Adv 7:13997–14009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yang L, Chen JP (2008) Biosorption of hexavalent chromium onto raw and chemically modified Sargassum sp. Bioresour Technol 99:297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zheng S, Huang H, Zhang R, Cao L (2014) Removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions by fruiting bodies of the jelly fungus (Auricularia polytricha). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:8729–8736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhong QQ, Yue QY, Li Q, Gao BY, Xu X (2014) Removal of Cu(II) and Cr(VI) from wastewater by an amphoteric sorbent based on cellulose-rich biomass. Carbohydr Polym 111:788–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Departamento de Ingeniería BioquímicaInstituto Politécnico NacionalMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations