Advertisement

Numerical and Experimental Study of the Spatial Stress Distribution on the Cornea Surface During a Non-Contact Tonometry Examination

  • S. MuenchEmail author
  • M. Roellig
  • E. Spoerl
  • D. Balzani
Article
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

The determination of biomechanical properties of the cornea by a non-contact tonometry (NCT) examination requires a precise knowledge of the air puff generated in the device, which is applied to the cornea surface. In this study, a method is proposed to identify the resulting stress profile on the surface, which may be used to numerically solve an inverse problem to obtain the material properties. This method is based on an experimental characterization of the air puff created by the Corvis ST in combination with computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations, which are adjusted to the experimental data. The identified nozzle inlet pressure of approximately \(25 \text {kPa}\) (188.5mmHg) is then used for a numerical influence study of the interaction between the air puff and the cornea deformation. Therefore, eleven cornea deformation states based on measurements are implemented in the CFD model. A more realistic model is also analyzed by the geometrical reproduction of the human face, which is used for a further influence study. The outcomes showed a dependence between the cornea deformation and the pressure as well as the shear stress distribution. However, quantitatively, the shear stress component can be considered of minor importance being approximately one hundred times smaller than the pressure. The examination with consideration of the human face demonstrates that the pressure and shear stress distributions are not rotationally symmetric in measurements on real humans, which indicates the requirement to include more complex stress distributions on the eye. We present the detailed stress distribution on the cornea during a non-contact tonometry examination, which is made accessible for further investigations in the future by analytical nonlinear functions.

Keywords

Corneal biomechanics Non-contact tonometry Computational fluid dynamics Pressure distribution Shear force distribution Air puff characterization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate financial funding from the European Research Fund (ESF) through the training research group “Cosima” (ESF Project 100231947). Furthermore, the author Daniel Balzani thanks the Institutional Strategy “The Synergetic University” at Technische Universität Dresden funded by the DFG and the author Eberhard Spörl appreciates funding from the Ministry of Education and Research for a German-India project. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

11340_2018_449_MOESM1_ESM.zip (23 kb)
(ZIP 23.0 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Vaughan JM, Randall JT (1980) Brillouin scattering, density and elastic properties of the lens and cornea of the eye. Nature 5755:489–491.  https://doi.org/10.1038/284489a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hollman KW, Emelianov SY, Neiss JH, Jotyan G, Spooner GJR et al (2002) Strain imaging of corneal tissue with an ultrasound elasticity microscope. Cornea 1:68–73.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200201000-00015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Luce DA (2005) Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 1:156–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jaycock PD, Lobo L, Ibrahim J, Tyrer J, Marshall J (2005) Interferometric technique to measure biomechanical changes in the cornea induced by refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1:175–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ford M, Dupps WJ Jr, Huprikar N, Lin R, Rollins AM (2006) OCT corneal elastography by pressure-induced optical feature flow. Proc SPIE 6138:61380P-61380P-7.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.648685 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Litwiller DV, Pulido JS, Kruse SA, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL (2007) MR elastography of the eye: initial feasibility. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 15:1262Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tanter M, Touboul D, Gennisson JL, Bercoff J, Fink M (2009) High-resolution quantitative imaging of cornea elasticity using supersonic shear imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 12:1881–1893.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2009.2021471 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li C, Guan G, Huang Z, Johnstone M, Wang RK (2012) Noncontact all-optical measurement of corneal elasticity. Opt Lett, OSA 10:1625–1627.  https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.37.001625 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elsheikh A, Alhasso D, Kotecha A, Garway-Heath D (2009) Assessment of the ocular response analyzer as a tool for intraocular pressure measurement. J Biomed Eng, ASME 8:081010–1–081010-9.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3148462 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Whitford C, Studer H, Boote C, Meek KM, Elsheikh A (2015) Biomechanical model of the human cornea: Considering shear stiffness and regional variation of collagen anisotropy and density. J Mech Behav Biomed 42:76–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Metzler K, Roberts C, Whitaker S, Lawrence M, Malik J, Bons J (2013) Modeling corneal response to an air puff using deformation data to derive Young’s modulus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 15:1629Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ariza-Gracia MÁ, Zurita JF, Piñero DP, Rodriguez-Matas JF, Calvo B (2015) Coupled biomechanical response of the cornea assessed by non-contact tonometry. A simulation study. PLoS ONE 3:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121486 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roy AS, Kurian M, Matalia H, Shetty R (2015) Air-puff associated quantification of non-linear biomechanical properties of the human cornea in vivo. J Mech Behav Biomed 48:173–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.04.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bahr N, Ali N, Patel D, McGhee C, Hunter P et al (2015) Modelling the deformation of the human cornea produced by a focussed air pulse. In: Doyle B, Miller K, Wittek A, Nielsen PM (eds) Computational biomechanics for medicine: New approaches and new applications. Springer International Publishing, pp 93–100.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15503-6_9
  15. 15.
    Kling S, Bekesi N, Dorronsoro C, Pascual D, Marcos S (2014) Corneal viscoelastic properties from finite-element analysis of in vivo air-puff deformation. PLoS ONE 8:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104904 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Muench S, Balzani D, Roellig M, Spoerl E (2017) Method for the development of realistic boundary conditions for the simulation of non-contact tonometry. PAMM 17:207–208.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.201710073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Micro-Epsilon Messtechnik GmbH & Co. KG (2011) Instruction Manual optoNCDT 2300Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Menter FR (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA-J 8:1598–1605.  https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    (2015) ANSYS Release16.1, ANSYS Documentation CFX, Theory Guide, 11.1.1 Discretization of the Governing Equations, ANSYS, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    VDI/VDE (1993) 2640 Netzmessungen in Stroemungsquerschnitten (Blatt1): Allgemeine Richtlinien und mathematische Grundlagen. VDI-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas CJ, Coleman H et al (2008) Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J Fluid Eng-T ASME 7:078001–1–078001-4.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2960953 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Werkmeister RM, Alex A, Kaya S, Unterhuber A, Hofer B et al (2013) Measurement of tear film thickness using ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 8:5578–5583.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-11920 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    XAMR. Human Head. Grabcad. [Online] Available at: https://grabcad.com/library/human-head-1 [Accessed 21 April 2016]
  24. 24.
    U.S. (1962) Committee on Extension to the Standard Atmosphere U.S. Standard Atmosphere 1962. U.S Government Printing Office, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Freescale Semiconductor (2012) Data Sheet: Technical Data MPX2300DT1. Rev 9Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oculus Optikgeraete GmbH (2011) Corvis ST instruction manualGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Mechanics and Shell Structures (IMF)DresdenGermany
  2. 2.Fraunhofer Institute for Ceramic Technologies and Systems (IKTS)DresdenGermany
  3. 3.Dresden Center for Computational Materials Science (DCMS)Technische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
  4. 4.Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav CarusTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
  5. 5.Chair of Computational MechanicsRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations