Advertisement

Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 125–148 | Cite as

Experimental Techniques for Finite Shear Strain Measurement within Two Advanced High Strength Steels

  • N. PathakEmail author
  • C. Butcher
  • M. J. Worswick
Article
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract

There is a growing need to experimentally characterize local shear deformation in advanced high strength steels (AHSS) for the calibration of stress-state dependent fracture criteria and to better understand sheared edge cracking during secondary forming operations. Planar shear test specimens with digital image correlation (DIC) strain measurement are now commonly performed tests but may not be able to resolve the local strains during the final stage of fracture when the macroscopic shear band collapses to a micro-shear band with intense local strains. Studies of sheared edge stretching of AHSS have shown that the microstructure at the sheared edge experiences extreme local shear deformation with the shear-affected zone (SAZ) that can be much larger than the macroscopic strains reported using DIC on planar shear tests. In this work, two independent experimental techniques are proposed to characterize the residual strain distribution within the shear-affected zone for two AHSS grades with a similar strength level: a complex-phase (CP) steel, CP800, and a dual-phase (DP) steel, DP780. The first method uses finite strain theory to calculate the work-conjugate equivalent strain from grain rotations within the shear bands of interrupted in-plane shear tests. A comparison between the local DIC strain measurements and the grain rotation measurements were found to be in excellent agreement until just prior to failure. The second technique used micro-hardness measurements taken from the interrupted shear tests to develop correlations with the measured equivalent strain from the DIC system. The hardness and grain rotation techniques were then used to characterize the local strain distribution within the SAZ of hole expansion test specimens for punch clearances of 12% and 28%. Both methods provided similar strain distributions with the grain rotation method having the highest strain resolution. The residual strain field within the SAZ of both AHSS was found to be strongly dependent upon the punch clearance. Finally, a homogenization procedure was applied to the SAZ strain distributions to facilitate the length scale transition from the grain-level to length scales appropriate for finite-element modelling of sheet metal forming operations with sheared edges.

Keywords

Shear strain Sheared edge stretching AHSS 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support for this work was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the AUTO21 Network of Centres of Excellence and the Canada Research Chairs Secretariat. The authors would like to acknowledge the support of their industrial partner, ArcelorMittal Dofasco, with special thanks to Jeff Gao, Erika Bellhouse, Rex Holden, Pao Som and Bernie Jeffrey.

References

  1. 1.
    Bao Y, Wierzbicki T (2004) On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space. Int J Mech Sci 46(1):81–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bai Y, Wierzbicki T (2008) A new model of metal plasticity and fracture with pressure and Lode dependence. Int J Plast 24(6):1071–1096CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bai Y, Wierzbicki T (2010) Application of extended Mohr-Coulomb criterion to ductile fracture. Int J Fract 161:1–20CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dunand M, Mohr D (2010) Hybrid experimental-numerical analysis of basic fracture experiments for sheet metals. Int J Solids Struct 47:1130–1143CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roth CC, Mohr D (2016) Ductile fracture experiments with locally proportional loading histories. Int J Plast 79:328–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pathak N, Butcher C, Worswick M (2016) Assessment of the Critical Parameters Influencing the Edge Stretchability of Advanced High Strength Steel. J Mater Eng Perform 25(11):4919–4932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pathak N et al (2017) Damage Evolution in Complex-Phase and Dual-Phase Steels during Edge Stretching. Materials 10(4):346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheong K, Omer K, Butcher C, George R, Dykeman J (2017) Evaluation of the VDA 238-100 Tight Radius Bending Test using Digital Image Correlation Strain Measurement, Proceedings of 36th International Conference of the International Deep Drawing Research Group (IDDRG 2017). J Phys Conf Ser 896(012075):1–9Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luo M, Wierzbicki T (2010) Numerical failure analysis of a stretch-bending test on dual phase steel sheet using a phenomenological fracture model. Int J Solids Struct 47:3084–3102CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anderson D, Butcher C, Pathak N, Worswick M (2017) Failure parameter identification and validation for a dual-phase 780 steel sheet. Int J Solids Struct 124:89–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rice JR, Tracey DM (1969) On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 17:201–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21:21–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brosius A, Yin Q, Guner A, Tekkaya AE (2011) A new shear test for sheet metal characterization. Steel Research International 82:323–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pohlandt K, Tekkaya AE (1985) Torsion testing – plastic deformation to high strains and strain rates. Mater Sci Technol 1:972–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dunand M, Mohr D (2011) Optimized butterfly specimen for the fracture testing of sheet materials under combined normal and shear loading. Eng Fract Mech 78(17):2919–2934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mohr D, Henn S (2007) Calibration of stress-triaxiality dependent crack formation criteria: a new hybrid experimental-numerical method. Exp Mech 47:805–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peirs J, Verleysen P, Degrieck J (2012) Novel technique for static and dynamic shear testing of Ti6Al4V sheet. Exp Mech 52:729–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yin Q, Zillmann B, Suttner S, Gerstein G, Biasutti M, Tekkaya A, Wagner M, Merklein M, Schaper M, Halle T, Brosius A (2014) An experimental and numerical investigation of different shear test configurations for sheet metal characterization. Int J Solids Struct 51:1066–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abedini A, Butcher C, Worswick M (2016) Fracture characterization of rolled sheet alloys in shear loading: studies of specimen geometry, anisotropy, and rate sensitivity. Journal of Experimental Mechanics 57(1):75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Papasidero J, Doquet V, Mohr D (2015) Ductile fracture of aluminum 2024-T351 under proportional and non-proportional multi-axial loading: Bao-Wierzbicki results revisited. Int J Solids Struct 69-70:459–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scales M, Tardif N, Kyriakides S (2016) Ductile failure of aluminum alloy tubes under combined torsion and tension. Int J Solids Struct 97-98:116–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beese AM, Luo M, Li Y, Bai Y, Wierzbicki T (2010) Partially coupled anisotropic fracture model for aluminum sheets. Eng Fract Mech 77:1128–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ghahremaninezhad A, Ravi-Chandar K (2013) Ductile failure behavior of polycrystalline AlGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rahmaan T, et al (2017) Investigation into the ShearStress, Localization and Fracture Behavior of DP600 and AA5182-O Sheet Metal Alloys under Elevated Strain Rates. International Journal of Impact EngineeingGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Levy B, Van Tyne C (2012) Review of the Shearing Process for Sheet Steels and Its Effect on Sheared-Edge Stretching. J Mater Eng Perform 21(7):1205–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    ASTM E8/E8M-11 (2011) Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Abedini A, Butcher C, Rahmaan T, Worswick M (2017) Evaluation and calibration of anisotropic yield criteria in shear Loading: Constraints to eliminate numerical artefacts. International Journal of Solids and Structures. Volume In pressGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zener C, Hollomon J (1944) Effect of strain rate upon plastic flow of steel. J Appl Phys 15:22–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhou X, Tamma X (2003) On the applicability and stress update formulations for corotational stress rate hypoelasticity constitutive models. Finite Elem Anal Des 39:783–816MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Butcher C, Abedini A (2017) Shear confusion: identification of the appropriate equivalent strain in simple shear using the logarithmic strain measure. Volume submittedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Onaka S (2012) Comment on “A comparison of the von Mises and Hencky equivalent strains in simple shear experiments”. Philos Mag 92:2264–2271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Swift H (1952) Plastic instability under plane stress. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 1(1):1–8Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pavlina E, Van Tyne C (2008) Correlation of Yield Strength and Tensile Strength with Hardness for Steels. J Mater Eng Perform 17(6):888–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang K, Greve L, Wierzbicki T (2015) FE simulation of edge fracture considering pre-damage from blanking process. Int J Solids Struct 71:206–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Barlat F et al (2005) Linear transfomation-based anisotropic yield functions. Int J Plast 21(5):1009–1039CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Barlat F, Lege D, Brem J (1991) A six-component yield function for anisotropic materials. Int J Plast 7(7):693–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    ISO/TS (2009) Metallic materials – method of hole expanding test, s.l.: s.nGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Japan Iron & Steel Federation Standard (1996) Method of hole expanding test, s.l.: s.nGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Herrmann K (2011) Hardness testing: principles and applications. s.l.: ASM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sutton MA, Orteu JJ, Schreier H (2009) Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements. s.l.: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wu X, Bahmanpour H, Schmid K (2012) Characterization of mechanically sheared edges of dual phase steels. J Mater Process Technol 212(6):1209–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics EngineeringUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations