Advertisement

Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 95–109 | Cite as

Hybrid Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar to Identify Impulse-dependent Wave Characteristics of Viscoelastic Phononic Crystals

  • A. Haque
  • R. F. Ghachi
  • W. I. Alnahhal
  • A. Aref
  • J. ShimEmail author
Article
  • 426 Downloads

Abstract

There has recently been a rising interest in the nonlinear wave transmission behavior of phononic crystals. However, experimental studies focusing on the nonlinear wave transmission behavior of phononic crystals have been predominantly performed on 1-D granular crystals using customized impact apparatus. In this study, we explore split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) apparatus as a tool to study the nonlinear wave characteristics of a 1-D continuum viscoelastic phononic crystal. In order to resolve experimental challenges relating to signal-to-noise ratios and input impulse magnitudes, we propose a hybrid SHPB system composed of an aluminum input bar and a nylon output bar. For a considered viscoelastic phononic crystal, the application of the hybrid SHPB apparatus enabled us to observe some low transmission frequency zones, which were not identified from the linearly perturbed settings such as the analytical solution and the electrodynamic shaker tests. We further conducted a series of additional FE simulations to ensure the appearance of impulse-dependent low transmission frequency zones of the considered viscoelastic phononic crystal specimen. The additional sets of simulations evidently illustrate the impulse-dependent evolution of wave transmission coefficients, and demonstrate that the impulse-dependent wave transmission behavior can be experimentally investigated by adopting the hybrid SHPB apparatus. Thus, this study shows that the conventional SHPB apparatus can be employed effectively to study the emerging research field of nonlinear wave characteristics of phononic crystals.

Keywords

Hybrid SHPB Impulse-dependent transmission coefficient Impact excitation Electrodynamic shaker Phononic crystals Finite-strain viscoelastic model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Qatar University Center for Advanced Materials facilitating the DMA tests of the considered silicon rubber. Thanks are also due to the support of the Center for Computational Research at the University at Buffalo (UB). The authors acknowledge the partial financial support through Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF) Grant No. NPRP8-1568-2-666.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interests

All the authors declare that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Kushwaha MS, Halevi P, Dobrzynski L, Djafari-Rouhani B (1993) Acoustic band structure of periodic elastic composites. Phys Rev Lett 71(13):2022–2025Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sigalas M, Economou E (1993) Band structure of elastic waves in two dimensional systems. Solid State Commun 86(3):141–143Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boechler N, Yang J, Theocharis G, Kevrekidis PG, Daraio C (2011) Tunable vibrational band gaps in one-dimensional diatomic granular crystals with three-particle unit cells. J Appl Phys 109(7):074906Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bousfia A, El Boudouti EH, Djafari-Rouhani B, Bria D, Nougaoui A, Velasco VR (2001) Omnidirectional phononic reflection and selective transmission in one-dimensional acoustic layered structures. Surf Sci 482-485(2):1175–1180Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cao WW, Qi WK (1995) Plane wave propagation in finite composites. J Appl Phys 78(7):4627–4632Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manzanares-Martinez B, Sanchez-Dehesa J, Hakansson A, Cervera F, Ramos-Mendieta F (2004) Experimental evidence of omnidirectional elastic bandgap in finite one-dimensional phononic systems. Appl Phys Lett 85(1):154–156Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liang B, Yuan B, Cheng JC (2009) Acoustic diode: Rectification of acoustic energy flux in one-dimensional systems. Phys Rev Lett 103(10)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liang B, Guo XS, Tu J, Zhang D, Cheng JC (2010) An acoustic rectifier. Nat Mater 9(12):989–992Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ma C, Parker RG, Yellen BB (2013) Optimization of an acoustic rectifier for unidirectional wave propagation in periodic mass-spring lattices. J Sound Vib 332(20):4876–4894Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saini G, Pezeril T, Torchinsky DH, Yoon J, Kooi SE, Thomas EL, Nelson KA (2011) Pulsed laser characterization of multicomponent polymer acoustic and mechanical properties in the sub-ghz regime. J Mater Res 22(3):719–723Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Casadei F, Bertoldi K (2014) Harnessing fluid-structure interactions to design self-regulating acoustic metamaterials. J Appl Phys 115(3):034907Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Policarpo H, Neves MM, Ribeiro AMR (2010) Dynamical response of a multi-laminated periodic bar: Analytical, numerical and experimental study. Shock Vib 17(4–5):521–535Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yan-Lin W, Ming-Wen C, Zi-Dong W (2011) Study on band gap structure of one dimensional phononic crystals. In: Jiang Z, Han J, Liu X (eds) New Materials and Advanced Materials, vol 152-153. Trans Tech Publications, Zurich, Switzerland, pp 1696–1699Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hayashi T, Morimoto Y, Serikawa M, Tokuda K, Tanaka T (1983) Experimental study on cut-off phenomenon for layered composite. Bulletin of JSME 26(211):23–29Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Robinson CW, Leppelmeier GW (1974) Experimental verification of dispersion relations for layered composites. J Appl Mech 41(1):89–91Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Manktelow K, Narisetti RK, Leamy MJ, Ruzzene M (2013) Finite-element based perturbation analysis of wave propagation in nonlinear periodic structures. Mech Syst Signal Process 39(1–2):32–46Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Narisetti RK, Ruzzene M, Leamy MJ (2011) A perturbation approach for analyzing dispersion and group velocities in two-dimensional nonlinear periodic lattices. J Vib Acoust 133(6):061020Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Narisetti RK, Ruzzene M, Leamy MJ (2012) Study of wave propagation in strongly nonlinear periodic lattices using a harmonic balance approach. Wave Motion 49(2):394–410MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ahsan Z, Jayaprakash KR (2016) Evolution of a primary pulse in the granular dimers mounted on a linear elastic foundation: an analytical and numerical study. Phys Rev E 94(4):043001Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ganesh R, Gonella S (2014) Invariants of nonlinearity in the phononic characteristics of granular chains. Phys Rev E 90(2):023205Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Daraio C, Nesterenko V, Herbold E, Jin S (2005) Strongly nonlinear waves in a chain of teflon beads. Phys Rev E 72(1):016603Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Daraio C, Nesterenko V, Herbold E, Jin S (2006) Tunability of solitary wave properties in one-dimensional strongly nonlinear phononic crystals. Phys Rev E 73(2, 2):026610Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Herbold EB, Kim J, Nesterenko VF, Wang SY, Daraio C (2009) Pulse propagation in a linear and nonlinear diatomic periodic chain: effects of acoustic frequency band-gap. Acta Mech 205(1–4):85–103zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yang J, Daraio C (2013) Frequency- and amplitude-dependent transmission of stress waves in curved one-dimensional granular crystals composed of diatomic particles. Exp Mech 53(3):469–483Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marechal P, Lenoir O, Khaled A, MEC EK, Chenouni D (2014) Viscoelasticity effect on a periodic plane medium immersed in water. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 100(6):1036–1043Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mukherjee S, Lee E (1978) Dispersion relations and mode shapes for waves in laminated viscoelastic composites by variational methods. Int J Solids Struct 14(1):1–13zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Babaee S, Wang P, Bertoldi K (2015) Three-dimensional adaptive soft phononic crystals. J Appl Phys 117(24):244903Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mousanezhad D, Babaee S, Ghosh R, Mahdi E, Bertoldi K, Vaziri A (2015) Honeycomb phononic crystals with self-similar hierarchy. Phys Rev B 92(10):104304Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bergstrom J, Boyce M (1998) Constitutive modeling of the large strain time-dependent behavior of elastomers. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 46:931–954zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shim JS, Mohr D (2011) Rate dependent finite strain constitutive model of polyurea. Int J Plast 27:868–886zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yeoh O (1993) Some forms of the strain energy function for rubber. Rubber Chem Technol 66:754–771Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brinson HF, Brinson LC (2008) Polymer Engineering Science and Viscoelasticity: An Introduction. Springer Science+Business Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Winter HH, Mours M (2006) The cyber infrastructure initiative for rheology. Rheol Acta 45(4):331–338Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Charalambides MN, Wanigasooriya L, Williams JG, Goh SM, Chakrabarti S (2006) Large deformation extensional rheology of bread dough. Rheol Acta 46(2):239–248Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Miller K (1999) Constitutive model of brain tissue suitable for finite element analysis of surgical procedures. J Biomech 32(5):531–537Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    ABAQUS (2012) ABAQUS Standard Analysis User's Manual Version 6.12. PawtuchetGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Collet M, Ouisse M, Ruzzene M, Ichchou MN (2011) Floquet-bloch decomposition for the computation of dispersion of two-dimensional periodic, damped mechanical systems. Int J Solids Struct 48(20):2837–2848Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Farzbod F, Leamy MJ (2011) Analysis of bloch's method in structures with energy dissipation. J Vib Acoust 133(5):051010Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sprik R, Wegdam GH (1998) Acoustic band gaps in composites of solids and viscous liquids. Solid State Commun 106(2):77–81Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhao YP, Wei PJ (2009) The band gap of 1d viscoelastic phononic crystal. Comput Mater Sci 46(3):603–606MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Andreassen E, Jensen JS (2013) Analysis of phononic bandgap structures with dissipation. J Vib Acoust 135(4):041015Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Haque ABMT, Ghachi RF, Alnahhal WI, Aref A, Shim J (2018) Sagittal plane waves in infinitely periodic multilayered composites composed of alternating viscoelastic and elastic solids. J Appl Mech.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039039
  43. 43.
    Naciri T, Navi P, Granacher O (1990) On harmonic wave propagation in multilayered viscoelastic media. Int J Mech Sci 32(3):225–231zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tanaka K, Kon-No A (1980) Harmonic viscoelastic waves propagating normal to the layers of laminated media. Bulletin of JSME 23(181):1092–1099MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ashcroft NW, Mermin ND (1976) Solid State Physics. Saunders College, PhiladelphiazbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bo Y, Yingren Z, Xiud L (2015) Discussion on dynamic numerical simulation for earthquake of immersed tunnel at seabed. The Open Civil Engineering Journal 9(1):773–782Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mendes N, Lourenco PB (2010) Seismic assessment of masonry “gaioleiro” buildings in lisbon, portugal. J Earthq Eng 14(1):80–101Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Shim J, Mohr D (2009) Using split hopkinson pressure bars to perform large strain compression tests on polyurea at low, intermediate and high strain rates. International Journal of Impact Engineering 36(9):1116–1127Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Feng RX, Liu KX (2012) Tuning of band-gap of phononic crystals with initial confining pressure. Chinese Physics B 21(12):126301Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Feng RX, Liu KX (2012) Tuning the band-gap of phononic crystals with an initial stress. Phys B Condens Matter 407(12):2032–2036Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    O'Brien D, Mather P, White S (2001) Viscoelastic properties of an epoxy resin during cure. J Compos Mater 35:883–904Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gary G, Klepaczko J, Zhao H (1995) Generalization of split hopkinson bar technique to use viscoelastic bars. International Journal of Impact Engineering 16:529–530Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wang LL, Labibes K, Azari Z, Pluvinage G (1994) Generalization of split hopkinson bar technique to use viscoelastic bars. International Journal of Impact Engineering 15(5):669–686Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chen W, Zhang B, Forrestal MJ (1999) A split hopkinson bar technique for low-impedance materials. Exp Mech 39(2):81–85Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pervin F, Chen WW (2009) Dynamic mechanical response of bovine gray matter and white matter brain tissues under compression. J Biomech 42(6):731–735Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ahonsi B, Harrigan JJ, Aleyaasin M (2012) On the propagation coefficient of longitudinal stress waves in viscoelastic bars. International Journal of Impact Engineering 45:39–51Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Othman R (2014) On the use of complex young's modulus while processing polymeric kolsky hopkinson bars' experiments. International Journal of Impact Engineering 73:123–134Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bacon C (1998) An experimental method for considering dispersion and attenuation in a viscoelastic hopkinson bar. Exp Mech 38(4):242–249Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lundberg B, Blanc R (1988) Determination of mechanical material properties from the two-points response of an impacted linearly viscoelastic rod specimen. J Sound Vib 126:97–108Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Graff KF (1991) Wave Motion in Elastic Solids. Dover Publications, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Halvorsen WG, Brown DL (1977) lmpulse technique for structural frequency response testing. Sound and Vibration 11(11):8–18Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wickramarachi P (2003) Effects of windowing on the spectral content of a signal. Sound and Vibration 37(1):10–11Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Fujikawa M, Takashi M (2003) Prony series approximation with generalized maxwell model based on collocation method. Japanese Society of Experimental Mechanics 3(4):278–284Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Nuruzzaman DM, Chowdhury MA (2012) Effect of normal load and sliding velocity on friction coefficient of aluminum sliding against different pin materials. American Journal of Materials Science 2(1):26–31Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kagan VA, Weitzel SP (2002) Smart structure and integrated system: reinforced nylon and aluminum self-tapping screws. International Body Engineering Conference & Exhibition and Automotive & Transportation Technology Congress, ParisGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Avallone EA, Baumeister T III (2006) Marks' Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers, 11th edn. McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing, New York CityGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Bartlett BW (1944) Coefficients of friction greater than unity. Am J Phys 12(1):48MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Booser ER (1983) CRC Handbook of Lubrication: Application and Maintenance. CRC Publications, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Moran J, Sucharitakul T (2015) Variations in dry sliding friction coefficients with velocityGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Cook CE (1960) Pulse compression-key to more efficient radar transmission. Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers 48(3):310–316Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Klauder JR, Price AC, Darlington S, Albersheim WJ (1960) The theory and design of chirp radars. Bell Syst Tech J 39(4):745–808Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Gerlach R, Kettenbeil C, Petrinic N (2012) A new split hopkinson tensile bar design. International Journal of Impact Engineering 50(1):63–67Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Mohr D, Gary G (2007) M-shaped specimen for the high-strain rate tensile testing using a split hopkinson pressure bar apparatus. Exp Mech 47(5):681–692Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Duffy J, Campbell JD, Hawley RH (1971) On the use of a torsional split hopkinson bar to study rate effects in 1100-0 aluminum. J Appl Mech 38(1):83–91Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Xue Q, Shen LT, Bai YL (1995) A modified split hopkinson torsional bar in studying shear localization. Meas Sci Technol 6(11):1557–1565Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Trexler MM, Lennon AM, Wickwire AC, Harrigan TP, Luong QT, Graham JL, Maisano AJ, Roberts JC, Merkle AC (2011) Verification and implementation of a modified split hopkinson pressure bar technique for characterizing biological tissue and soft biosimulant materials under dynamic shear loading. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 4(8):1920–1928Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental EngineeringUniversity at BuffaloBuffaloUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Architectural EngineeringQatar UniversityDohaQatar

Personalised recommendations