Advertisement

Effects of cluster training sets on muscle power and force–velocity relationship in postmenopausal women

  • Marcelo A. S. Carneiro
  • Gersiel N. de Oliveira Júnior
  • Jairo F. R. de Sousa
  • Samarita B. Santagnello
  • Markus V. C. Souza
  • Fábio Lera OrsattiEmail author
Original Article
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the higher load resistance training with a cluster training sets (CS) design maximizes muscle power and strength gains when compared to higher load resistance training with a traditional sets (TS) design in postmenopausal women (PW).

Methods

Each leg of 16 PW was randomly allocated into two groups: TS (n = 16 legs) and CS (n = 16 legs). Both groups performed three sets of four repetitions at 90% one repetition maximum (1RM), 3 s per muscle action, with a 1.5-min rest interval between sets, twice-weekly, for 8 weeks. Only CS group performed 30 s interrepetition rest periods.

Results

Both groups similarly increased (P < 0.05) thigh muscle mass, muscle strength (1RM), and maximal muscle power. However, whereas the CS increased (P < 0.05) peak power at 40% and theoretical maximal velocity (V0), the TS increase theoretical maximal force (F0). The TS reduced slope of the force–velocity relationship when compared to the CS.

Conclusions

Although both CS and TS design are similarly effective at improving muscle mass and strength and Pmax, TS and CS induce different changes in the force–velocity profile (Sfv) in PW. Thus, our findings suggest that TS may be a preferential RT design if the focus of training is a force–velocity profile more “force-oriented”, whereas CS may be a preferential RT design if the focus of training is a force–velocity profile more “velocity-oriented”.

Keywords

Interrepetition rest Hypertrophy Muscle strength Older women 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-Brasil (CAPES, Code 001) and Fundação de Amparo e Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

The study was given by the University Review Board for the Use of Human Subjects (no. 2.654.326, approved by the local Ethics Committee) and was written in accordance with the standards set by the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual women included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Raj IS, Bird SR, Shield AJ (2010) Aging and the force–velocity relationship of muscles. Exp Gerontol 45(2):81–90PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reid KF, Fielding RA (2012) Skeletal muscle power: a critical determinant of physical functioning in older adults. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 40(1):4–12PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chodzko-Zajko WJ et al (2009) American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(7):1510–1530PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guadalupe-Grau A et al (2015) Association of regional muscle strength with mortality and hospitalisation in older people. Age Ageing 44(5):790–795PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Metter EJ et al (2004) Arm-cranking muscle power and arm isometric muscle strength are independent predictors of all-cause mortality in men. J Appl Physiol (1985) 96(2):814–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Straight CR, Brady AO, Evans E (2015) Sex-specific relationships of physical activity, body composition, and muscle quality with lower-extremity physical function in older men and women. Menopause 22(3):297–303PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sirola J, Rikkonen T (2005) Muscle performance after the menopause. Br Menopause Soc J 11(2):45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Phillips S et al (1993) Muscle weakness in women occurs at an earlier age than in men, but strength is preserved by hormone replacement therapy. Clin Sci 84(1):95–98PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cooper R et al (2008) Menopausal status and physical performance in midlife: findings from a British birth cohort study. Menopause (New York, NY) 15(6):1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steffl M et al (2017) The increase in health care costs associated with muscle weakness in older people without long-term illnesses in the Czech Republic: results from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Clin Interv Aging 12:2003PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Byrne C et al (2016) Ageing, muscle power and physical function: a systematic review and implications for pragmatic training interventions. Sports Med 46(9):1311–1332PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seals DR, Justice JN, LaRocca TJ (2016) Physiological geroscience: targeting function to increase healthspan and achieve optimal longevity. J Physiol 594(8):2001–2024PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ACSM (2009) American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(3):687–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tufano JJ, Brown LE, Haff GG (2017) Theoretical and practical aspects of different cluster set structures: a systematic review. J Strength Cond Res 31(3):848–867PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Steib S, Schoene D, Pfeifer K (2010) Dose-response relationship of resistance training in older adults: a meta-analysis. Medi Science Sports Exerc 42(5):902–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hardee JP et al (2012) Effect of interrepetition rest on power output in the power clean. J Strength Cond Res 26(4):883–889PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gorostiaga EM et al (2010) Anaerobic energy expenditure and mechanical efficiency during exhaustive leg press exercise. PLoS One 5(10):e13486PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gorostiaga EM et al (2012) Energy metabolism during repeated sets of leg press exercise leading to failure or not. PLoS One 7(7):e40621PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carneiro M et al (2018) High-intensity interval body weight training promotes different adaptations to combined training in body composition and muscle strength in young women. Sci Sports 33(3):e105–e113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pareja-Blanco F et al (2017) Effects of velocity loss during resistance training on athletic performance, strength gains and muscle adaptations. Scand J Med Sci Sports 27(7):724–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Andersen JL, Aagaard P (2000) Myosin heavy chain IIX overshoot in human skeletal muscle. Muscle Nerve Off J Am Assoc Electrodiagn Med 23(7):1095–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Andersen LL et al (2010) Early and late rate of force development: differential adaptive responses to resistance training? Scand J Med Sci Sports 20(1):e162–e169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Straight CR et al (2016) Effects of resistance training on lower-extremity muscle power in middle-aged and older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sports Med 46(3):353–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Haff GG et al (2008) Cluster training: a novel method for introducing training program variation. Strength Cond J 30(1):67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Piché M-È et al (2005) Relation of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and fibrinogen to abdominal adipose tissue, blood pressure, and cholesterol and triglyceride levels in healthy postmenopausal women. Am J Cardiol 96(1):92–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oliver JM et al (2013) Greater gains in strength and power with intraset rest intervals in hypertrophic training. J Strength Cond Res 27(11):3116–3131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carneiro MAS, Barcelos LC, Nunes PRP, de Souza LRMF, Oliveira EP, Orsatti FL (2019) Anthropometric equations to estimate the thigh muscle cross-sectional area by magnetic resonance in young men. Sci Sports.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scispo.2019.03.008
  28. 28.
    Nunes PR et al (2017) Effect of resistance training volume on walking speed performance in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. Exp Gerontol 97:80–88PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jaric S (2015) Force–velocity relationship of muscles performing multi-joint maximum performance tasks. Int J Sports Med 36(09):699–704PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Iglesias-Soler E, Fariñas J, Mayo X, Santos L, Jaric S (2019) Comparison of different regression models to fit the force–velocity relationship of a knee extension exercise. Sports Biomech 18(2):174–189PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jaric S (2016) Two-load method for distinguishing between muscle force, velocity, and power-producing capacities. Sports Med 46(11):1585–1589PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Alcazar J et al (2017) The force–velocity relationship in older people: reliability and validity of a systematic procedure. Int J Sports Med 38(14):1097–1104PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bouchard DR et al (2007) Fat mass but not fat-free mass is related to physical capacity in well-functioning older individuals: nutrition as a determinant of successful aging (NuAge)—the Quebec Longitudinal Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 62(12):1382–1388PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cruz-Jentoft AJ et al (2010) Sarcopenia: european consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 39(4):412–423PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guizelini PC, de Aguiar RA, Denadai BS, Caputo F, Greco CC (2018) Effect of resistance training on muscle strength and rate of force development in healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp Gerontol 102:51–58PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tomeleri CM et al (2016) Resistance training improves inflammatory level, lipid and glycemic profiles in obese older women: a randomized controlled trial. Exp Gerontol 84:80–87PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nicholson G, Ispoglou T, Bissas A (2016) The impact of repetition mechanics on the adaptations resulting from strength-, hypertrophy-and cluster-type resistance training. Eur J Appl Physiol 116(10):1875–1888PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Iglesias-Soler E et al (2012) Acute effects of distribution of rest between repetitions. Int J Sports Med 33(05):351–358PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Willardson JM (2008) A brief review: how much rest between sets? Strength Cond J 30(3):44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Reid KF et al (2014) Longitudinal decline of lower extremity muscle power in healthy and mobility-limited older adults: influence of muscle mass, strength, composition, neuromuscular activation and single fiber contractile properties. Eur J Appl Physiol 114(1):29–39PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bean JF et al (2002) The relationship between leg power and physical performance in mobility-limited older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 50(3):461–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Foldvari M et al (2000) Association of muscle power with functional status in community-dwelling elderly women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55(4):M192–M199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cuoco A et al (2004) Impact of muscle power and force on gait speed in disabled older men and women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59(11):1200–1206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ramirez-Campillo R et al (2018) High-speed resistance training in elderly women: effects of cluster training sets on functional performance and quality of life. Exp Gerontol 110:216–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Morin J-B, Samozino P (2016) Interpreting power–force–velocity profiles for individualized and specific training. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 11(2):267–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Latella C, Teo WP, Drinkwater EJ, Kendall K, Haff GG (2019) The acute neuromuscular responses to cluster set resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 1–17Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Alcazar J et al (2018) Force–velocity profiling in older adults: an adequate tool for the management of functional trajectories with aging. Exp Gerontol 108:1–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Alcazar J et al (2018) Skeletal muscle power measurement in older people: a systematic review of testing protocols and adverse events. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 73(7):914–924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tøien T et al (2017) Neural plasticity with age: unilateral maximal strength training augments efferent neural drive to the contralateral limb in older adults. J Gerontol Ser A 73(5):596–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mitchell CJ et al (2012) Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men. J Appl Physiol (1985) 113(1):71–77PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Exercise Biology Research Group (BioEx)Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM)UberabaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Sport Sciences, Health Science InstituteFederal University of Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM)UberabaBrazil
  3. 3.Post Graduate Program in Physical Education, Exercise Biology Research Laboratory (BioEx)Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM)UberabaBrazil

Personalised recommendations