Foam rolling is an effective recovery tool in trained distance runners
Many endurance athletes use foam rolling (FR) to decrease muscle soreness, but it is unclear whether FR effectively treats soreness in this population. Moreover, the effects of FR in highly trained runners are unknown. The aim of this study was to use downhill running (DHR) to induce muscle soreness in runners and to determine the influence of FR on soreness and running performance when compared to sham compression tights.
Participants performed a running economy (RE) test at 75% of 5-km race speed and a 3-km time trial (TT). In a crossover design, subjects then completed DHR followed by either a FR protocol or wearing sham compression tights. Two days post-DHR, subjects repeated the RE and TT tests. Crossover visits occurred 2–4 weeks later. During RE tests, VO2 and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded. Passive and active soreness were measured on a scale of 0 (no soreness) to 10 (extreme soreness).
Eight runners (aged 31 ± 7 years; four females; VO2peak 57 ± 7 ml kg−1 min−1) completed the study. Both treatment conditions experienced passive (p = 0.026) and active soreness (p = 0.012) induced by DHR. Active soreness 2 days post-DHR was significantly lower after FR than after sham compression tights (p = 0.025). With tights, there was a trend for an increased RPE compared to pre-DHR (p = 0.056).
Foam rolling decreases leg soreness in well-trained runners and attenuates soreness-related increases in perceived exertion during sub-maximal running.
KeywordsRecovery Time trial Running economy Muscle soreness Foam rolling
This study was funded by NIH grant R01 HL108962-03.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The University of Minnesota’s Institutional Review Board approved the protocols for this study.
All participants provided written informed consent prior to enrollment.
- 4.Connolly DAJ, Sayers SE, McHugh MP (2003) Treatment and prevention of delayed onset muscle soreness. J Strength Cond Res 17(1):197–208Google Scholar
- 18.Scott KE, Rozenek R, Russo AC, Crussemeyer JA, Lacourse MG (2003) Effects of delayed onset muscle soreness on selected physiological responses to submaximal running. J Strength Cond Res 17(4):652–658Google Scholar
- 33.Burgess TL, Lambert MI (2010) The efficacy of cryotherapy on recovery following exercise-induced muscle damage. Int Sport Med J 11(2):258–277Google Scholar
- 37.Kraemer WJ, Bush JA, Wickham RB, Denegar CR, Gomez AL, Gotshalk LA, Duncan ND, Volek JS, Newton RU, Putukian M, Sebastianelli WJ (2001) Continuous compression as an effective therapeutic intervention in treating eccentric exercise-induced muscle soreness. J Sport Rehabil 10:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Moraska A (2005) Sports massage: a comprehensive review. J Sports Med Phys Fit 45(3):370–380Google Scholar
- 41.Sullivan KM, Silvey DBJ, Button DC, Behm DG (2013) Roller-massager application to the hamstrings increases sit-and-reach range of motion within five to ten seconds without performance impairments. Int J Sports Phys Ther 8(3):228–236Google Scholar
- 42.Smith LL, Keating MN, Holbert D, Spratt DJ, McCammon MR, Smith SS, Israel RG (1994) The effects of athletic massage on delayed onset muscle soreness, creatine kinase, and neutrophil count: a preliminary report. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 19(2):93–99. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.19220.127.116.11;12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar