Differences in electromechanical delay components induced by sex, age and physical activity level: new insights from a combined electromyographic, mechanomyographic and force approach
- 70 Downloads
Electromyographic (EMG), mechanomyographic (MMG) and force (F) signals combined analysis represents an interesting approach to partition the electrochemical and mechanical events contributing to total electromechanical delay, i.e., the time lag existing between the muscle activation and the onset of force generation.
The study sought to assess the differences in electromechanical delay due to sex, age, and physical activity level.
Electromechanical components were assessed on vastus lateralis muscle during a maximum voluntary contraction and electrically evoked contractions in 180 participants. During each contraction, the EMG, MMG and F signals were recorded. Electromechanical delays and its two components (Δt EMG-MMG, mainly electrochemical component; and Δt MMG-F, mainly mechanical component) were computed. Measurements’ reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) and sensitivity (minimum detectable changes at 95% confidence as a percentage, MDC95%) were also calculated.
ICC spanned from 0.89 to 0.97 with a percentage change of the standard error of the measurement (SEM%) ranging from 1.6 to 4.9%. MDC95% values ranged between 3.1 and 9.8%. Longer electromechanical delay values were observed in: (1) women compared to men; (2) 40–45 years old compared to 30–35 years and 20–25 years; and (3) sedentary than active participants. Differences were accompanied by increments in Δt MMG-F but not in Δt EMG-MMG values.
The alterations in the whole electromechanical delay induced by sex, age, and physical activity level could be ascribed to the difference in the duration of the mechanical events included in the electromechanical delay, possibly due to modifications in the muscle–tendon unit characteristics.
KeywordsMaximum voluntary contraction Electrically evoked contraction Electromyography Mechanomyography
Maximum voluntary contraction
Electromechanical delay during voluntary contraction
Electromechanical delay during electrically evoked contraction
The authors thank all the participants involved in the study, for their patience and committed involvement. The study was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) as post-doctoral fellow to Hasan Sözen.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the latest Helsinki Declaration upon receiving necessary approval from Milan University Ethics Committee (CE 27/17 11-07-2017).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 5.Grosset J, Mora I, Lambertz D et al (2005) Age-related changes in twitch properties of plantar flexor muscles in prepubertal children. Pediatr Res 58:966–970. https://doi.org/10.1203/01.PDR.0000181375.61935.7D CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Esposito F, Limonta E, Cè E (2011) Passive stretching effects on electromechanical delay and time course of recovery in human skeletal muscle: new insights from an electromyographic and mechanomyographic combined approach. Eur J Appl Physiol 111:485–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1659-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Cè E, Longo S, Rampichini S et al (2015) Stretch-induced changes in tension generation process and stiffness are not accompanied by alterations in muscle architecture of the middle and distal portions of the two gastrocnemii. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 25:469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.03.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M et al (2003) International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-Country Reliability and Validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:1381–1395. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Stegeman DF, Hermens HJ (2007) Standards for surface electromyography: the European project “Surface EMG for non-invasive assessment of muscles (SENIAM)”. http://www.med.uni-jena.de/motorik/pdf/stegeman.pdf Google Scholar
- 22.Munro BH (2004) Statistical methods for health care research, 5th edn. Lippincott William and Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 33.Seynnes OR, Erskine RM, Maganaris CN et al (2009) Training-induced changes in structural and mechanical properties of the patellar tendon are related to muscle hypertrophy but not to strength gains. J Appl Physiol 107:523–530. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00213.2009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Ferreira Andrade S, Hunzicker Skiba G, Krueger E, Rodacki A (2016) Electromechanical delay from mechanomyography in long-term strength trained men. J Exerc Phisiology online 19:110–119Google Scholar