Only unbalanced games are affected by technical and tactical aspects able to discriminate winning and losing performance in women’s water polo Olympic Games
- 5 Downloads
This study aimed to analyze technical and tactical parameters characterizing the women's water polo Olympic Games (Rio, Brazil, 2016) to discriminate winning and losing performance profile in general and according to close and unbalanced games with different margin of victory (i.e., ≤ or > of 3, 4, and 5 goals of difference between teams).
Twenty-four games were analysed through the frequency of occurrence of the following technical and tactical indicators: goals scored (GS), goals scored and shots without goals inside (AsG, AsWG) and outside (5-mG, 5-mWG) the 5-m area, goals scored (5-mFG) and shots without goals (5-FWG) after a 5-m fouls, penalties scored (PS) and failed (PWG), turnovers (TO), assists (AS), blocked shots (BS), and counterattack goals (CG). Mann–Whitney U test was applied to compare the values of winning and losing teams for each indicator.
Regardless of GS, no difference between teams emerged in close games. Conversely, for unbalanced games, differences between teams emerged for AS (p ≤ 0.001; effect size, ES ≥ 0.5) in each margin of victory, and for AsWG and 5-mWG (p ≤ 0.05; ES ≥ 0.3) in > 5 goals of margin of victory.
The outcomes of women’s water polo Olympic close and unbalanced games are determined by not specific playing events, and few technical and tactical factors (such as AS), respectively. Therefore, top-level women’s water polo coaches and physical trainers can plan a sound training session according to specific game data reported for the Olympic Games contest.
KeywordsElite women’s water polo Notational analysis Successful performance Margin of victory Team sports
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Torino (Turin, Italy; prot. 26,831) and performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.
No informed consent due to the nature of the study.
- 1.Federation Internationale de Natation (International Swimming Federation) (2018) Water polo rules. https://www.fina.org/sites/default/files/rules-print-pdf/8476.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2018
- 2.Argudo Iturriaga FM, Roque JIA, Marın PG, Lara ER (2007) Influence of the efficacy values in counterattack and defensive adjustment on the condition of winner and loser in male and female water polo. Int J Perform Anal Sport 7:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2007.11868398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Escalante Y, Saavedra JM, Tella V, Mansilla M, García-Hermoso A, Domínguez AM (2013) Differences and discriminatory power of water polo game-related statistics in men in international championships and their relationship with the phase of the competition. J Strength Cond Res 27(4):893–901. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318260ed85 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Lozovina V, Pavicic L, Lozovina M (2004) Analysis of indicators of load during the game in the activity of the center in water polo. Nase More 51:135–141Google Scholar
- 8.Lupo C, Capranica L, Cugliari G, Gómez MA, Tessitore A (2016) Tactical, swimming activity, and heart rate aspects of youth water polo game. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 56(9):997–1006Google Scholar
- 10.Lupo C, Condello G, Tessitore A (2012) Notational analysis of elite men’s water polo related to specific margins of victory. J Sports Sci Med 11:516–525Google Scholar
- 11.Lupo C, Tessitore A (2010) How important is the final outcome to interpret match analysis data: the influence of scoring a goal, and difference between close and balance games in elite soccer: comment on Lago-Penas and Gomez-Lopez (2014). Percept Mot Skills 122(1):280–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512515626629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Saavedra JM, Escalante Y, Madera J, Mansilla M, García-Hermoso A (2014) Comparison of game-related statistics in men’s international championships between winning and losing teams according to margin of victory. Coll Antropol 38(3):901–907Google Scholar
- 14.Takagi H, Nishijima T, Enomoto I, Stewart AM (2005) Determining factors of game performance in the 2001 world Water Polo Championships. J Hum Mov Stud 49:333–352Google Scholar
- 15.Abraldes JA, Ferragut C, Rodríguez N, Vila MH (2012) Tactical and shooting variables that determine the difference between win or loss in top-level female water polo: analysis by phases of the game. Int J Perform Anal Sport 12:373–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2011.11868567 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Escalante Y, Saavedra JM, Tella V, Mansilla M, Garcia-Hermoso A, Dominguez AM (2012) Water polo game-related statistics in Women’s International Championships: differences and discriminatory power. J Sports Sci Med 11:475–482Google Scholar
- 17.Enomoto I, Suga M, Takahashi M, Komori T, Minami T, Fujimoto H et al (2003) A notational match analysis of the 2001 women’s water polo world championships. In: Chatard JC (ed) Biomechanics and medicine in swimming IX. University of Saint Etienne, Saint-Etienne, pp 487–492Google Scholar
- 18.Mirvić E, Kazazović B, Aleksandrović M (2011) Differences between winning and losing teams from world water polo championship for women. Homo Sporticus 13:41–43Google Scholar
- 21.Huck SW (2000) Reading statistics and research, 3rd edn. Addison, Wesley Longman, New York, pp 628–629Google Scholar
- 25.Platanou T (2006) Simple “in-water” vertical jump testing in water polo. Kinesiology 38:57–62Google Scholar