Advertisement

Sport Sciences for Health

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 535–541 | Cite as

The physiological and mechanical demands of aerobics, indoor cycling, and netball in recreationally active females

  • Victoria McIver
  • Matt Greig
  • Kelly MarrinEmail author
Open Access
Original Article
  • 641 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Group-based exercise is a popular method of improving fitness. However, limited research exists on the multidisciplinary responses to group-based exercise.

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare the physiological and mechanical demands of aerobics, indoor group cycling, and netball.

Methods

Fourteen recreationally active females (age 20 ± 2 years, body height 1.65 ± 0.09 m, body mass 65.9 ± 11.8 kg, body fat 26.3 ± 7.2%) participated in three experimental trials (aerobics, indoor cycling, netball) in a randomised order with 1 week intervening. Heart rate, blood lactate, RPE and PlayerLoad™ were measured.

Results

A repeated-measures ANOVA revealed mean and peak heart rate (beats·min−1) were lower (P < 0.05) for aerobics (130 ± 114; 176 ± 18) than indoor cycling (150 ± 9; 191 ± 9) and netball (144 ± 11; 195 ± 6), respectively. Blood lactate (mmol·L−1) was higher (P < 0.001) after indoor cycling (5.6 ± 2.6) compared to aerobics (2.2 ± 1.4) and netball (2.5 ± 1.1). RPE was not different between trials. PlayerLoad™ (a.u) during indoor cycling (213.9 ± 46.9) was lower (P < 0.05) than netball (358.5 ± 94.5) and aerobics (296.9 ± 99.0).

Conclusions

These results suggest indoor cycling stimulates greater physiological demands, whilst netball and aerobics elicit a higher PlayerLoad™ corresponding to higher mechanical demands. These findings may have implications for exercise prescription in recreationally active females.

Keywords

Aerobics Indoor cycling Netball Physiological demands PlayerLoad™ 

Introduction

The association between physical activity and health is well established, yet only approximately half of the UK adult population engage in regular moderate or higher intensity physical activity [1] and physical inactivity is a global pandemic [2]. Aerobics and other group exercise classes have become an increasingly popular mode of exercise due to the fact that individuals can exercise whilst socialising and having fun [3].

It has been reported that aerobics exercise classes are a form of high-impact, but lower intensity, exercise with typical heart rates equating to 68–79% of maximum [4, 5]. Aerobics classes combine rhythmic aerobic exercise and strength training with the objective of improving cardiovascular fitness including reduced resting heart rate and blood pressure [6], improved maximal oxygen uptake and muscle strength, and reduced body fat [7]. Furthermore, the maintenance and/or increase of skeletal health from the mechanical demands associated with aerobic exercise classes are viewed as a key benefit, particularly in female populations [8].

Indoor cycling is one of the most popular forms of group-based exercise comprising cardiovascular exercise with phases of high-intensity intervals utilising large muscle groups [9, 10]. Participants typically attain heart rates equating to ~ 80% of maximum and, consequently, the energy expenditure during a class is high [10, 11, 12]. Thus, indoor cycling may provide a training threshold at which several physiological benefits can occur, including cardiovascular (improved heart function, increased maximal oxygen uptake) and skeletal muscle (increased muscle mass) adaptations together with reductions in body fat [9, 10]. However, due to the non-weight bearing nature of the class, it is postulated that these health benefits occur with low impact loading.

One alternative to class based exercise is traditional sporting activity. Netball is predominantly a female sport played by more than 20 million people in over 80 countries [13]. In recent years, netball participation at a recreational level has become increasingly popular, due to the group and social exposure provided via the team environment. As such, females may choose to participate in this sporting activity as part of a health and fitness programme. Intermittent activities such as netball comprise frequent changes in activity with these occurring, on average, every 4–6 s [14]. These intermittent and multi-directional movements often elicit a higher physiological response, e.g., elevated heart rate and blood lactate, than continuous style activities [14]. Furthermore, the changes in direction are likely to stimulate a greater PlayerLoad™ and in particular an increased medial–lateral loading compared to linear activities [13].

Despite the reported benefits of physical activity [1], and the use of group-based exercise to increase exercise adherence [3], there is a need for research on the physical demands of different modes of group-based exercise in recreationally active females. This information may facilitate the prescription of future exercise interventions.

Thus, the aim of the current study was to assess the physiological demands, quantified by heart rate, blood lactate and RPE and also assess the mechanical demands, quantified by PlayerLoad™, of aerobics, group indoor cycling and netball sessions in recreationally active females. It was hypothesised that indoor cycling would elicit higher physiological responses and a lower PlayerLoad™ than aerobics and netball.

Materials and methods

Participants

Fourteen recreationally active females (age 20 ± 2 years, body height 1.65 ± 0.09 m, body mass 65.9 ± 11.8 kg, body fat 26.3 ± 7.3%) volunteered to participate in the current study. All participants were injury-free for a minimum of 6 months prior to testing, were non-smokers and had a minimum of 3 years’ experience of completing group-based exercise classes and netball. Participants were normotensive (systolic blood pressure ≤ 140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg). The study was approved by the Departmental Research Ethics Committee and conformed to the declaration of Helsinki. Participants received written and oral instructions before the study. Written informed consent was provided by all participants.

Research design

A repeated-measures design was utilised in which all participants completed a body composition assessment, a familiarisation and then three experimental trials, in a randomised order, with 1 week intervening each. The three experimental trials were aerobics, indoor cycling and netball sessions lasting the duration of 1 h to reflect a standard class design.

Each trial was conducted at the same time of day to avoid any variations due to circadian rhythms [15]. All participants refrained from caffeine or food consumption in the hour preceding trials. Furthermore, both alcohol consumption and exhaustive exercise were avoided in the 48 h prior to the trials.

Preliminary measurements

All participants underwent comprehensive health screening prior to participation. This involved the completion of a medical questionnaire and screening form. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured using an automated blood pressure and heart rate monitor (Omron, Mx3 Plus, The Netherlands). Body height was measured using a stadiometer (Holtain, UK) and body mass measured using calibrated top-pan scales (Seca, Germany). Body composition was assessed using air displacement plethysmography (BodPod Body Composition system, V4.2, Life measurement Instruments, USA). This allowed the measurement of the relative proportions of fat and lean mass in the body. Participants wore minimal tight-fitting clothing and a swim cap, and were required to sit quietly and still in the enclosed pod during measurements. The BodPod is deemed a reliable and valid method for body composition assessment [16].

Experimental trials

Aerobics exercise class

The aerobics trial was completed in a dance studio and led by a qualified fitness instructor. The aerobic session comprised a warm up, main phase, and cool down with dance and body-conditioning moves set to music. During the main phase, the basic aerobic moves were taught and progressed in intensity, to raise heart rate. The session involved a mix of classic aerobics fast and upbeat exercises, including jogging forward and back, grapevines, leg curls, knee lifts, box steps, travelling kicks, lunges, side, and back lunges.

Indoor cycling class

Indoor cycling was completed in the dance studio, performed on a stationary cycle ergometer (Keiser M3 indoor bike, Keiser UK Ltd, UK) and was led by a qualified fitness instructor. The session comprised a warm up, main phase, and cool down. The class comprised combinations of seated sprints and climbs, standing runs and climbs, and jumps. The combinations were randomised with varying durations ranging from 30 s sprints to 4 min climbs, with active recovery between.

Netball session

The netball trial was completed in a sports hall and was delivered by a qualified coach. The netball game replicated a real netball match and involved two matched teams of seven players. The standard rules of a netball game were applied, with participants on each team attempting to score as many goals as possible whilst, at the same time, preventing the opposition from scoring. The game was split into 15 min quarters with a 3-min break between the first and second and the third and fourth quarters, respectively. Half-time between the second and third quarters lasted 5 min.

Physical measurements

Heart rate

Heart rate was continuously measured using short-range radio telemetry (Polar T31, Polar Electro Oy, Finland) throughout the trials and mean and peak heart rate recorded for each trial.

Blood lactate

Capillary blood samples were extracted from participant’s fingertips prior to experimental trials and immediately after all trials. The capillary blood sample was immediately analysed for lactate concentration using a portable lactate analyser (Lactate Pro, LT-1710, Japan).

Rating of perceived exertion (RPE)

Rating of perceived exertion was assessed immediately post each experimental trial using the Borg 6–20 RPE Scale [17].

PlayerLoad™

Participants wore a Global Positioning System (GPS) (MinimaxX S4, Catapult Innovations, Scoresby, Australia) mounted tri-axial accelerometer (Kionix KX94, Kionix, Ithaca, New York, USA), which recorded at 100 Hz to determine tri-axial PlayerLoad™ throughout the experimental trials. The GPS device was positioned at the cervical region of the spine and held in a neoprene vest (Catapult Innovations, Scoresby, Australia). Accelerometry data were recorded for the duration of each experimental trial, and was analysed post-testing using the Catapult Sprint software (Version 5.0.9.2; Firmware 6.75). Planar PlayerLoad™ in the anterior–posterior (PLAP), medial–lateral (PLML), and vertical (PLV) movement planes were quantified. Total accumulated uniaxial load was calculated using the rate of change in acceleration: √ [(aAP1aAP−1)2/100]. This was done for each of the three discrete uniaxial vectors. The cumulative (triaxial) Total PlayerLoad™ was also calculated, defined as the sum of the three uniaxial vectors.

Data analysis

All variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviations (SD). Significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05 using IBM SPSS Statistics v 22.0. Data were initially assessed for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. A repeated-measures ANOVA was conducted on each physiological variable (blood lactate, heart rate, RPE) and in PlayerLoad™ to determine whether there were any significant differences between the three exercise modes. When a significant main effect was found, a post-hoc pairwise comparison with Bonferonni correction factor was applied.

Results

Mean and SD values for each variable during aerobics, indoor cycling and netball are illustrated in Table 1.

Table 1

Mean ± SD values for all measured variables

Variable

Aerobics

Indoor cycling

Netball

Mean heart rate (beats·min−1)

130 ± 14

150 ± 9

144 ± 11

Peak heart rate (beats·min−1)

176 ± 18

191 ± 9

195 ± 6

Peak lactate (mmol·L−1)

2.2 ± 1.4

5.6 ± 2.6

2.5 ± 1.1

RPE (a.u)

15 ± 2

16 ± 2

15 ± 2

Accumulated PlayerLoad™ (a.u)

296.9 ± 99.0

213.9 ± 46.9

358.5 ± 94.5

Anterior–posterior (PLAP) PlayerLoad™ (a.u)

85.5 ± 38.0

61.5 ± 17.4

102.3 ± 37.5

Medial–lateral (PLML) PlayerLoad™ (a.u)

86.4 ± 27.0

58.4 ± 16.7

98.4 ± 27.1

Vertical (PLV) PlayerLoad™ (a.u)

125.0 ± 37.0

93.9 ± 16.3

152.9 ± 35.4

Physiological responses

Mean and peak heart rate responses during indoor cycling and netball were significantly higher in comparison to aerobics (P < 0.05), but were not different from each other. These results are illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Mean and peak heart rate (beats·min−1) for the three exercise modes. *Significantly lower mean and peak heart rate during aerobics compared to indoor cycling and netball

Blood lactate was significantly higher (P < 0.001) after indoor cycling compared to aerobics and netball, which were not different to each other. These results are illustrated in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Blood lactate (mmol·L−1) values obtained pre and post exercise for the three exercise modes. *Significantly higher post-exercise blood lactate in indoor cycling than aerobics and netball

No significant differences (P > 0.05) in RPE across the three trials were observed.

Mechanical responses

PlayerLoad™ during indoor cycling was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than aerobics and netball, which were not different to each other (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

PlayerLoad™ (a.u) for the three exercise modes. *Significantly lower PlayerLoad™ during indoor cycling compared to aerobics and netball

Netball generated greater PLAP in comparison to indoor cycling (P = 0.014). Netball and aerobics generated greater PLML in comparison to indoor cycling (P < 0.05). Again, both netball and aerobics elicited a greater PLV movement in comparison to indoor cycling (P < 0.05). However, no differences between netball and aerobics were observed for PLAP, PLML, and PLV (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Planar PlayerLoad™ (a.u) for the three exercise modes. *Significantly higher PLAP during netball compared to indoor cycling. ^Significantly lower PLML and PLV during indoor cycling compared to aerobics and netball

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to compare the physiological and mechanical demands of group-based exercise classes and netball in recreationally active females. The physiological responses, reflected by blood lactate, were highest in indoor cycling. Heart rate responses were greater in both indoor cycling and netball in comparison to aerobics. However, the aerobics and netball session elicited a greater PlayerLoad™. These findings suggest that indoor cycling elicits higher physiological responses with a lower mechanical load in comparison to aerobics and netball.

Mean heart rate (HR) values observed from the aerobics class were 130 ± 14 beats·min−1 and peak values attained were 176 ± 18 beats·min−1. The peak heart rates observed in previous research [18, 19] were slightly higher, but within a similar range, with values of 178 ± 7 and 181 ± 7 beats·min−1 reported, respectively. However, Luettgen et al. [5] reported mean HR values of 154 ± 14 beats·min−1 and peak values of 196 ± 7 beats·min−1. The lower values in the current study may be due to the aerobics class involving lower intensity conditioning movements compared to the higher intensity dance activities utilised in the previous research [4, 5]. The phases of body conditioning (strengthening and isometric exercises) that occurred within the class could potentially lower HR values. In contrast, the netball session and indoor cycling class elicited significantly higher HR responses, corresponding to high-intensity exercise based upon the HR values following the ACSM guidelines [20]. The mean HR of 144 ± 11 beats·min−1 and peak HR of 195 ± 6 beats·min−1 reported during the netball session in the current study support those observed by Chandler et al. [21] during university match play. Similarities in values may be due to the similar fitness levels and experience of the participants; however, many of the previous studies [13, 14, 22] have utilised competitive netball players. Similarly, some studies [11, 23] pertaining to indoor cycling have reported HR as a % of maximum which makes comparisons difficult as maximum heart rate was not established in the current study. In future studies, preliminary testing utilising an incremental maximal test should be utilised to assess maximal heart rate. Peak values in the current study were 191 ± 9 beats·min−1 and the mean HR was 150 ± 9 beats·min−1. Some studies [9, 23] observed considerably lower HR values, reporting mean HR values of 143 ± 25 beats·min−1 and 130 ± 2 beats·min−1, respectively. However, Muyor [11] reported similar values of 152 ± 14 beats·min−1. The variance of HR responses may be due to self-selected effort [11] although effort levels were set by the instructor. The instructor may, also, influence HR via the choreography adopted. Although all instructors follow particular phases, the phase order and set intensity can be dependent on the instructor, with research suggesting the variety of intensities and positional movements included within an indoor cycling class influence the physiological demands of the exercise [9].

The indoor cycling class elicited a higher post-exercise blood-lactate value in comparison to the aerobics and netball sessions. Intermittent activities, such as indoor cycling, comprise periods of high-intensity work alternated with low-intensity activity that allows accumulated lactate to be dissipated. Previous studies reported blood-lactate values of 5.3 ± 0.69 mmol·L−1 and 7.2 ± 0.8 mmol·L−1 after an indoor cycling class [23, 24]. Piacentini et al. [23] reported these values in adult males whilst Kang et al. [24] investigated a group of young adults comprising both males and females. If the work:rest ratio is altered during a class, it is possible that lactate production may exceed the rate of removal. Previously, it has been reported [11, 23] that females could sustain high-intensity efforts during indoor cycling which would elicit high concentrations of lactate. However, the lower blood-lactate values observed in aerobics and netball are similar to those found in previous intermittent activities such as rugby union (2.8 mmol·L−1) [25, 26]. Conversely, slightly higher values of 3.7 mmol·L−1 and 4.8 mmol·L−1 have been recorded during aerobics classes [27, 28] using recreationally active females. The variance in blood-lactate concentrations may be due to the timing of the samples. Blood lactate is sensitive to both the time of sampling and the activity profile immediately preceding measurement, and thus it is often difficult to make direct comparisons between studies. Blood-lactate levels typically continue to increase for several minutes after cessation of exercise, due to the continuous efflux from previously active muscle and then the blood-lactate concentration declines back to baseline values [29]. Blood lactate was measured immediately post exercise, but values could have differed if they were taken earlier in the session or after a longer recovery period post exercise. Future studies should consider the measurement of blood lactate at more frequent time points during and post exercise.

RPE did not significantly differ across the three exercise modes and values are similar to those previously reported in the literature [18, 21, 23]. Many exercise classes utilise RPE as a method for participants to monitor their own exercise intensity. However, it has been suggested [21] that RPE is an insensitive measure of activity demands when compared with accelerometer data, or that all training activities elicited similar perceptions of effort, despite the differences in physical load. Kang et al. [24] proposed that as long as the average intensity remains similar, the overall perception of exertion would stay unchanged. The fact that the average RPE for spinning and netball did not differ may provide additional support for the use of such high-intensity exercise, as the increase in energy expenditure was not necessarily associated with an increased perception of exertion [24].

Indoor cycling generated significantly lower PlayerLoad™ values in comparison to aerobics and netball. Indoor cycling is a non-weight bearing exercise, it therefore lacks osteroarticular impact compared with aerobics exercise classes [10] which contributes to lower accumulation of PlayerLoad™. Consequently, it can be postulated that indoor cycling classes may improve cardiovascular outcomes (as indicated by the physiological responses) whilst reducing mechanical loading. Even though the cycling class represents a static challenge in comparison to aerobics and netball, the contributions of core strength [30] to maintain upper body balance [31] during the varied intensities and technical elements highlights why the relative contributions to loading were similar between tasks. Aerobics and netball are both multi-directional activities, with movement in the anterior–posterior and medial–lateral plane in addition to the obvious vertical loading [13]. Therefore, it is not surprising that there were no significant differences in PlayerLoad™ and associated planar loads generated between these two modes of exercise. The greater vertical, medial–lateral and anterior–posterior movement loads generated by aerobics and netball in comparison to indoor cycling, do not only come from the impact of vertical loading, but the accelerations and decelerations and the rapid changes in movement [22, 32]. The effects of physical activity on bone mineral density (BMD) are primarily linked to the mechanisms of mechanical loading for maintenance and increase of bone health that are particularly important in females [33, 34]. Therefore, as netball and aerobics elicit greater impact, multi-directional, acceleration and deceleration phases, it could be argued these movement patterns may offer a positive outcome for females for bone health. Further research is required to establish the impact of this type of exercise on bone mineral density. Conversely, for exercisers requiring minimal impact loading, exercise such as indoor cycling may be preferable over the modes of aerobics and netball based on PlayerLoad™ values.

Conclusions

To conclude, the results of the current study support the original experimental hypothesis that indoor cycling would elicit higher physiological responses and a lower PlayerLoad™ than aerobics and netball. Indoor cycling is deemed a high-intensity activity with greater physiological demands in comparison to aerobics and netball. The elevated heart rate and blood-lactate values are indicative of a greater cardiovascular challenge suggesting that, whilst beneficial, the elevated anaerobic contribution may not be suitable for beginners and individuals with health conditions. It is consequently proposed that heart rate be monitored during classes to adjust intensity accordingly. The findings also suggest aerobics exercise and netball elicit a greater mechanical stimulus, which is essential for bone health but may also increase the risk of injury. These findings have practical applications in terms of facilitating appropriate exercise prescription for recreationally active females.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed written consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Eime RM, Young JA, Harvey JT, Charity MJ, Payne WR (2013) A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for adults: informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity 10:98.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-98 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Althoff T, Sosic R, Hicks JL, King AC, Delp SL, Lescovec J (2017) Large-scale physical activity data reveal worldwide activity inequality. Nature 547:336–339.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23018 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choi PYL, Van Horn JD, Picker DE, Roberts HI (1993) Mood changes in women after an aerobics class: a preliminary study. Health Care Women Int 14(2):167–177.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339309516038 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hiznayova K (2013) Exercise intensity during Zumba fitness and Tae-bo aerobics. J Hum Sport Ex 8(2):228–241.  https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2012.8.Proc2.26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luettgen M, Foster C, Doberstein S, Mikat R, Porcari J (2012) Zumba: Is the “fitness party” a good workout? J Sports Sci Med 11(2):357–358PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leelarungrayub D, Saidee K, Pothongsunun P, Pratanaphon P, Yankai A, Bloomer RJ (2011) Six weeks of aerobic dance improves blood oxidative stress status and increases interleukin-2 in previously sedentary women. J Bodwork Movement Therap 15(3):355–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williford HN, Scharff-Olson M, Blessing DL (1989) The physiological effects of aerobic dance: a review. Sports Med 8(6):335–345.  https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-198908060-00003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gregov C, Salaj S (2014) The effects of different training modalities on bone mass: a review. Kinesiology 46(1):10–29Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rendos NK, Musto AA, Signorile JF (2015) Interactive effects of body position and perceived exertion during spinning exercises. J Strength Cond Res 29(3):692–699.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000699 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Caria MA, Tangianu F, Concu A, Crisafulli A, Mameli O (2007) Quantification of spinning bike performance during a standard 50-minute class. J Sports Sci 25(4):421–429.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410600718533 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muyor JM (2013) Exercise intensity and validity of the ratings of perceived exertion (Borg and OMNI Scales) in an indoor cycling session. J Hum Kinet 18(39):93–101.  https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2013-0072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Verrusio W, Andreozzi P, Renzi A, Martinez A, Longo G, Musumeci M, Cacciafesta M (2016) Efficacy and safety of spinning exercise in middle-aged and older adults with metabolic syndrome: randomized control trial. Ann Ist Super Sanità 52(2):295–300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cormack SJ, Smith RL, Mooney MM, Young WB, O’Brien BJ (2014) Accelerometer load as a measure of activity profile in different standards of netball match. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 9(2):283–291.  https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2012-0216 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davidson A, Trewartha G (2008) Understanding the physiological demands of netball: a time-motion investigation. Int J Perform Anal Sport 8(3):1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2008.11868443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reilly T, Waterhouse J (2009) Sports performance: is there evidence that the body clock plays a role? Eur J Appl Physiol 106:321–332.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1066-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chin MK, Kiew OF, Girandola RN (2006) A comparison of body fat measurement by bodpod, skinfolds, and three bioelectrical impedance analysis techniques in Chinese college student. Int J Physical Ed 43:77–85Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Borg GAV (1982) Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 15(5):377–381Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Laukkanen RM, Kalaja MK, Kalaja SP, Holmalia EB, Paavolainen LM, Tummavuori M, Virtanen P, Rusko HK (2001) Heart rate during aerobics classes in women with different previous experience of aerobics. Eur J Appl Physiol 84(1):64–68.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210000338 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tschakert G, Kroepfl J, Mueller A, Moser O, Groeschl W, Hofmann P (2015) How to regulate the acute physiological response to ‘aerobic’ high intensity interval exercise. J Sports Sci Med 14:29–36PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pescatello LS, Arena R, Riebe D, Thompson PD (2013) ACSM’s Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 9th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chandler PT, Pinder SJ, Curran JD, Gabbett TJ (2014) Physical demands of training and competition in collegiate netball players. J Strength Cond Res 28(10):2732–2737.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000486 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fish K, Greig M (2014) The influence of playing position on the biomechanical demands of netball match-play. J Athl Enhanc Int 3(5):1–15.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2324-9080.1000173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Piacentini MF, Gianfelici A, Faina M, Figura F, Capranica L (2009) Evaluation of intensity during an interval spinning® session: a field study. Sport Sci Health 5(1):29–36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-009-0073-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kang J, Chaloupka EC, Mastrangelo MA, Hoffman JR, Ratamess NA, O’Conor E (2005) Metabolic and perceptual responses during spinning cycle exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37(5):853–859.  https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000161826.28186.76 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kruger PE, Smit RF (2012) Physiological demands during Rugby Union match and Practice sessions. Afr J Phys Health Educ Recreat Danc 17(1):1–13Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Coutts A, Reaburn P, Abt G (2003) Heart rate, blood lactate concentration and estimated energy expenditure in a semi-professional rugby league team during a match: a case study. J Sports Sci 2(2):97–103.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0264041031000070831 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Clapp JF, Little KD (1994) The physiological response of instructors and participants to three aerobics regimens. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26(8):1041–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    De Angelis M, Vinciguerra G, Gasbarri A, Pacitti C (1998) Oxygen uptake, heart rate and blood lactate concentration during a normal training session of an aerobics dance class. Eur J Appl Physiol 78(2):121–127.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050396 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Menzies P, Menzies C, Mcintyre L, Paterson P, Wilson J, Kemi OJ (2010) Blood lactate clearance during active recovery after an intense running bout depends on the intensity of the active recovery. J Sports Sci 28(9):975–982.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.481721 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Willardson JM (2007) Core stability training: applications to sports conditioning programs. J Strength Cond Res 21(3):979–985.  https://doi.org/10.1519/R-20255.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wassinger CA, Mckinney H, Roane S, Davenport MJ, Owens B, Breese U, Sokell GA (2014) The influence of upper body fatigue on dynamic standing balance. Inter J Sports Phys Ther 9(1):40–46Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mcmanus A, Stevenson M, Finch C (2006) Incidence and risk factors for injury in non-elite netball. J Sci Med Sport 9(1):119–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2006.03.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Egan E, Reilly T, Giacomoni M, Redmond L, Turner C (2006) Bone mineral density among female sports participants. Bone 38(2):227–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.08.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liang MTC, Braun W, Bassin SL, Dutto D, Pontello A, Wong ND, Spalding TW, Amaud SB (2011) Effect of high-impact aerobics and strength training on BMD in young women aged 20–35 years. Int J Sports Med 32(2):100–108.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sport and Physical ActivityEdge Hill UniversityLancashireUK
  2. 2.Manchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations