The benefits and risks of the high-intensity CrossFit training
The main aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the recent research output produced on CrossFit and to examine the benefits and risks of the high-intensity CrossFit training.
Systematic search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Web of Science was conducted. Thematic analysis of the research output on CrossFit was performed and each of the included articles was assessed using the Delphi Scale for quality assessment of individual studies.
A total of 25 articles were included in this study. Based on our results, high-intensity CrossFit training incorporates both aerobic and anaerobic elements, which in turn improve cardiovascular fitness, anaerobic capacity, and body composition of individuals of all levels of fitness and of both genders. CrossFit has also positive psychological effects on athletes, such as exercise enjoyment, challenge, satisfaction, and goals achievement, which lead to high levels of retention and adherence of participants to CrossFit programs. On the other hand, high-intensity CrossFit training includes risks. These are musculoskeletal injuries occurring at different body parts, with most common being shoulder, lower back and knee injuries, and other more severe but less common injuries, such as exertional rhabdomyolysis.
The findings of this study indicate that intense CrossFit training improves the six out of ten general physical skills of athletes, as proposed by CrossFit Inc., such as cardiovascular/respiratory endurance, stamina, strength, flexibility, power and balance. The other four physical skills, such as speed, coordination, agility, and accuracy, are yet to be verified.
KeywordsSystematic review CrossFit training Benefits Risks Injuries
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
This review article does not contain any participation of human subjects or animals.
For this type of study, informed consent is not required.
- 3.Etchecolatz F, Mitchell M (2013) CrossFit goes global. In: CrossFit games. https://games.crossfit.com/article/crossfit-goes-global. Accessed 14 Mar 2018
- 4.Paine M, Uptgraft J, Wylie R (2010) CrossFit study. Command Gen Staff Coll 1–34Google Scholar
- 6.Waryasz GR, Suric V, Daniels AH et al (2016) CrossFit instructor demographics and practice trends. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 8:106–110Google Scholar
- 9.Murawska-Cialowicz E, Wojna J, Zuwala-Jagiello J (2015) Crossfit training changes brain-derived neurotrophic factor and irisin levels at rest, after wingate and progressive tests, and improves aerobic capacity and body composition of young physically active men and women. J Physiol Pharmacol 66:811–821PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Braun V, Clarke V, Weate P (2016) Using thematic analysis in sport and exercise research. In: Smith B, Sparkes A (eds) Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
- 19.Butcher SJ, Judd TB, Benko CR et al (2015) Relative intensity of two types of Crossfit exercise: acute circuit and high-intensity interval exercise. J Fit Res 4:3–15Google Scholar
- 22.Fernandez-Fernandez J, Sabido-Solana R, Moya D et al (2015) Acute physiological responses during Crossfit (R) workouts. Eur J Hum Mov 35:114–124Google Scholar
- 26.Montalvo A, Shaefer H, Rodrigez B et al (2017) Retrospective injury epidemiology and risk factors for injury in CrossFit. J Sport Sci Med 16:53–59Google Scholar
- 33.Grier T, Canham-Chervak M, McNulty V, Jones BH (2013) Extreme conditioning programs and injury risk in a US Army Brigade Combat Team. US Army Med Dep J 2013:36–47Google Scholar
- 38.Larsen C, Jensen MP (2014) Rhabdomyolysis in a well-trained woman after unusually intense exercise. Ugeskr Laeger 176:1–2Google Scholar