Sport Sciences for Health

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 215–222 | Cite as

Effects of prophylactic knee bracing on knee joint kinetics and kinematics during single- and double-limb post-catch deceleration strategies in university netballers

  • Jonathan SinclairEmail author
  • Paul John Taylor
  • Hannah Foxcroft
Original Article



The aim of the current investigation was to investigate the effects of a prophylactic knee brace on knee joint kinetics and kinematics during single- and double-limb deceleration tasks.


Twenty female university first team-level netballers performed single- and double-limb deceleration tasks under two conditions (prophylactic knee brace/no-brace). Biomechanical data were captured using an eight-camera 3D motion capture system and a force platform. Participants also subjectively rated the comfort/stability properties of the brace, and their knee joint proprioception was examined with and without the knee brace using a weight-bearing joint position sense test.


The results showed that during both single- and double-limb deceleration tasks, neither peak anterior cruciate ligament [brace: single = 1.30/double = 1.30 bodyweight (BW) and no-brace: single = 1.19/double = 1.29 BW] P = 0.51, patellofemoral (brace: single = 4.21/double = 4.93 BW and no-brace: single = 3.99/double = 4.63 BW) P = 0.20, nor patellar tendon (brace: single = 6.17/double = 6.49 BW and no-brace: single = 6.07/double = 6.14 BW) P = 0.49 kinetics were significantly affected as a function of wearing the knee brace. The findings also showed that the knee brace helped to increase participants’ perceived knee stability (P < 0.001), but there were no statistical improvements in weight-bearing knee proprioception (brace = 3.59 and no-brace = 2.94°) P = 0.44.


The current investigation indicates that the utilization of prophylactic knee-bracing akin to the device used in the current study does not appear to reduce the biomechanical parameters linked to the aetiology of knee injuries during netball-specific deceleration movements.


Netball Knee Biomechanics Knee brace 



We acknowledge the assistance of Gareth Shadwell and Philip Stainton.


The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by University of Central Lancashire.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Hetherington S, King S, Visentin D, Bird ML (2009) A kinematic and kinetic case study of a netball shoulder pass. Int J Exerc Sci 2:243–253Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gamble P (2011) Physical preparation for netball–part 1: needs analysis and injury epidemiology. UKSCA J 22:10–16Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hume PA, Steele JR (2000) A preliminary investigation of injury prevention strategies in netball: are players heeding the advice? J Sci Med Sport 3:406–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saunders N, Otago L (2009) Elite netball injury surveillance: implications for injury prevention. J Sci Med Sport 12:63–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hopper DM (1997) Somatotype in high performance female netball players may influence players position and the incidence of lower limb and back injuries. Br J Sports Med 31:197–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thacker SB, Stroup DF, Branche CM, Gilchrist J (2003) Prevention of knee injuries in sports: a systemic review of the literature. J Sports Med Phys Fit 43:165–179Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coventry E, O’Connor KM, Hart BA, Earl JE, Ebersole KT (2006) The effect of lower extremity fatigue on shock attenuation during single-leg landing. Clin Biomech 21:1090–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Voskanian N (2013) ACL injury prevention in female athletes: review of the literature and practical considerations in implementing an ACL prevention program. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 6:158–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Janssen I, Steele JR, Munro BJ, Brown NA (2013) Predicting the patellar tendon force generated when landing from a jump. Med Sci Sports Exerc 45:927–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petersen W, Rembitzki I, Liebau C (2017) Patellofemoral pain in athletes. Open Access J Sports Med 8:143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith HC, Vacek P, Johnson RJ, Slauterbeck JR, Hashemi J, Shultz S, Beynnon BD (2012) Risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury: a review of the literature—part 1: neuromuscular and anatomic risk. Sport Health 4:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gottlob CA, Baker CL Jr, Pellissier JM, Colvin L (1999) Cost effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:272–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koga H, Bahr R, Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Grund T, Krosshaug T (2011) Estimating anterior tibial translation from model-based image-matching of a noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury in professional football: a case report. Clin J Sport Med 21:271–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin CF, Liu H, Gros MT, Weinhold P, Garrett WE, Yu B (2012) Biomechanical risk factors of non-contact ACL injuries: a stochastic biomechanical modeling study. J Sport Health Sci 1:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thomas MJ, Wood L, Selfe J, Peat G (2010) Anterior knee pain in younger adults as a precursor to subsequent patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a systematic review. BMC Musc Disord 11:201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Farrokhi S, Keyak JH, Powers CM (2011) Individuals with patellofemoral pain exhibit greater patellofemoral joint stress: a finite element analysis study. Osteoarthr Cartil 19:287-294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cook JL, Khan KM, Purdam CR (2001) Conservative treatment of patellar tendinopathy. Phys Ther Sport 35:291–294Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosen AB, Ko J, Simpson KJ, Kim SH, Brown CN (2015) Lower extremity kinematics during a drop jump in individuals with patellar tendinopathy. Orthop J Sport Med. Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sinclair J, Vincent H, Richards J (2017) Effects of prophylactic knee bracing on knee joint kinetics and kinematics during netball specific movements. Phys Ther Sport 23:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paluska SA, McKeag DB (2000) Knee braces: current evidence and clinical recommendations for their use. Am Fam Physician 61:411–418Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martin TJ (2001) Technical report: knee brace use in the young athlete. Pediatrics 108:503–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Warden SJ, Hinman RS, Watson MA, Avin KG, Bialocerkowski AE, Crossley KM (2008) Patellar taping and bracing for the treatment of chronic knee pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res 59:73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sinclair J, Stainton P (2017) Effects of specific and non-specific court footwear on anterior cruciate ligament loading during a maximal change of direction manoeuvre. Footwear Sci 9:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Drouin JM, Houglum PA, Perrin DH, Gansneder BM (2003) Weight bearing and non-weight-bearing knee joint reposition sense are not related to functional performance. J Sport Rehab 12:54–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    van Eijden TM, Kouwenhoven E, Verburg J, Weijs WA (1998) A mathematical model of the patellofemoral joint. J Biomech 19:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Willson JD, Ratcliff OM, Meardon SA, Willy RW (2015) Influence of step length and landing pattern on patellofemoral joint kinetics during running. Scand J Med Sci Sports 25:736–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    DeVita P, Hortobagyi T (2001) Functional knee brace alters predicted knee muscle and joint forces in people with ACL reconstruction during walking. J Appl Biomech 17:297–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ward SR, Eng CM, Smallwood LH, Lieber RL (2009) Are current measurements of lower extremity muscle architecture accurate? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1074–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nemeth G, Ohlsen H (1985) In vivo moment arm lengths for hip extensor muscles at different angles of hip flexion. J Biomech 18:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Self BP, Paine D (2001) Ankle biomechanics during four landing techniques. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33:1338–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Spoor CW, van Leeuwen JL (1992) Knee muscle moment arms from MRI and from tendon travel. J Biomech 25:201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Besier TF, Draper CE, Gold GE, Beaupre GS, Delp SL (2005) Patellofemoral joint contact area increases with knee flexion and weight-bearing. J Orthop Res 23:345–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Herzog W, Read LJ (1993) Lines of action and moment arms of the major force-carrying structures crossing the human knee joint. J Anat 182:213–230Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Herrington L, Simmonds C, Hatcher J (2005) The effect of a neoprene sleeve on knee joint position sense. Res Sport Med 13:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Riemann BL, Lephart SM (2002) The sensorimotor system, part I: the physiologic basis of functional joint stability. J Athl Train 37:71–79Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Baker V, Bennell K, Stillman B, Cowan S, Crossley K (2002) Abnormal knee joint position sense in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Res 20:208–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bottoni G, Herten A, Kofler P, Hasler M, Nachbauer W (2013) The effect of knee brace and knee sleeve on the proprioception of the knee in young non-professional healthy sportsmen. Knee 20:490–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Birmingham T, Kramer J, Inglis J, Mooney C, Murray L, Fowler P, Kirkley S (1998) Effect of a neoprene sleeve on knee joint position sense during sitting open kinetic chain and supine closed kinetic chain tests. Am J Sports Med 26:562–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Van Tiggelen D, Coorevits P, Witvrouw E (2008) The effects of a neoprene knee sleeve on subjects with a poor versus good joint position sense subjected to an isokinetic fatigue protocol. Clin J Sport Med 18:259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hanafy AF (2017) Weight-bearing and non-weight bearing proprioception assessment of dominant and non-dominant lower limbs in adult females. J Med Sci Clin Res 5:17484–17492CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Applied Sport and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and WellbeingUniversity of Central LancashirePrestonUK
  2. 2.School of Psychology, Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversity of Central LancashireLancashireUK

Personalised recommendations