Ankle taping and bracing does not change static and dynamic balance in volleyball players
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of nonelastic adhesive tape, dynamic bracing, and no-tape/brace on static and dynamic balance during single-leg stance in women’s college volleyball. Seventeen young uninjured players (18.94 ± 2.49 years; 1.71 ± 0.05 m; 65.45 ± 9.49 kg; 9.2 ± 4.1 years played; 4 ± 1 weekly training frequency) were submitted to three conditions presented in randomized order: dynamic bracing; nonelastic adhesive tape and no-tape/brace. In all conditions, the center of gravity displacement (total displacement, TD; anteroposterior displacement, APD and mediolateral displacement, MLD) of the dominant and non-dominant lower limb (DLL and NDLL) was assessed using the static and dynamic platform of the Biodex Balance System. The ANOVA (three-way) test with repeated measures was applied, considering a 5% significance level. The results showed no interaction between any of the independent factors in all displacements (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant main level effect for TD (p = 0.001, mean difference = 1.1°) and MLD (p = 0.013, mean difference = 0.30°), with greater displacement in the dynamic level compared to its static counterpart. There was also a significant main limb effect for APD (p = 0.003, mean difference = 0.73°) and MLD (p ≤ 0.001, mean difference = 0.60°), with a higher degree of instability in MND when compared to MD. In conclusion, the data indicated that the use of nonelastic tape and bracing was not superior to the no-tape/brace condition in controlling center of gravity displacement during single-leg stance.
KeywordsStability Unilateral balance Ankle support Postural control
All authors contributed to the conception and design of this study. G. M. Barbosa wrote the article drafts. W. H. Brito Vieira and H. H. Santos critically revised the writing and data interpretations. All the authors approved the final version.
This work was financially supported by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq—2010 grant call).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Fédération Internationale de Volleyball (FIVB) n.d. http://www.fivb.org/en/volleyball/index.asp. Accessed 13 Aug 2017
- 8.Quackenbush KE, Barker PRJ, Stone Fury SM, Behm DG (2008) The effects of two adhesive ankle-taping methods on strength, power, and range of motion in female athletes. N Am J Sports Phys Ther 3:25–32Google Scholar
- 17.Barbanera M, De Andrade E, Souza Mazuchi F, Batista JPB, De Moura Ultremare J, Da Silva Iwashita J, Ervilha UF (2014) Semi-rigid brace and taping decrease variability of the ankle joint position sense. Motriz Rev Educ Fis 20:448–453. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-65742014000400012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Rodrigues RC, Masiero D, Mizusaki JM, Imoto AM, Peccin MS, Cohen M et al (2008) Tradução, adaptação cultural e validação do “American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society(AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale”. Acta Ortopédica Bras 16:107–111. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-78522008000200009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. L. Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
- 24.Beynnon BD, Murphy DF, Alosa DM (2002) Predictive factors for lateral ankle sprains: a literature review. J Athl Train 37:376–380Google Scholar
- 33.McCurdy K, Langford G (2006) The relationship between maximum unilateral squat strength and balance in young adult men and women. J Sports Sci Med 5:282–288Google Scholar
- 34.Barfield WR, Kirkendall DT, Yu B (2002) Kinematic instep kicking differences between elite female and male soccer players. J Sports Sci Med 1:72–79Google Scholar