Advertisement

Purinergic Signalling

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 343–355 | Cite as

Onset kinetics of noise-induced purinergic adaptation of the ‘cochlear amplifier’

  • Jennie M. E. Cederholm
  • Allen F. Ryan
  • Gary D. HousleyEmail author
Original Article
  • 81 Downloads

Abstract

A major component of slowly reversible hearing loss which develops with sustained exposure to noise has been attributed to release of ATP in the cochlea activating P2X2 receptor (P2X2R) type ATP-gated ion channels. This purinergic humoral adaptation is thought to enable the highly sensitive hearing organ to maintain function with loud sound, protecting the ear from acoustic overstimulation. In the study that established this hearing adaptation mechanism as reported by Housley et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:7494–7499, 2013), the activation kinetics were determined in mice from auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold shifts with sustained noise presentation at time points beyond 10 min. The present study was designed to achieve finer resolution of the onset kinetics of purinergic hearing adaptation, and included the use of cubic (2f1–f2) distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) to probe whether the active mechanical outer hair cell ‘cochlear amplifier’ contributed to this process. We show that the ABR and DPOAE threshold shifts were largely complete within the first 7.5 min of moderate broadband noise (85 dB SPL) in wildtype C57Bl/6J mice. The ABR and DPOAE adaptation rates were both best fitted by a single exponential function with ~ 3 min time constants. ABR and DPOAE threshold shifts with this noise were minimal in mice null for the P2rx2 gene encoding the P2X2R. The findings demonstrate a considerably faster purinergic hearing adaptation to noise than previously appreciated. Moreover, they strongly implicate the outer hair cell as the site of action, as the DPOAEs stem from active cochlear electromotility.

Keywords

Distortion product otoacoustic emission P2X2 receptor Auditory brainstem response Noise-induced hearing loss Temporary threshold shift Mouse 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NH&MRC), Australia grants APP630618 and APP1089838, and the Research Service of the US Veterans Administration grants BX001205 and RX000977.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

Jennie M. E. Cederholm declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Allen F. Ryan declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Gary D. Housley declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All experimental procedures for the mice were reviewed and approved by the UNSW Sydney Animal Care and Ethics Committee.

Declaration of interest statement

The authors declare that the findings of this study form part of a patent filing by New South Innovations Pty Ltd., the commercialization arm of UNSW Sydney (the assignee), for a method for predicting vulnerability to hearing loss.

Supplementary material

11302_2019_9648_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (130 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 130 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Gates GA, Schmid P, Kujawa SG, Nam B, D’Agostino R (2000) Longitudinal threshold changes in older men with audiometric notches. Hear Res 141(1–2):220–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sadhra S, Jackson CA, Ryder T, Brown MJ (2002) Noise exposure and hearing loss among student employees working in university entertainment venues. Ann Occup Hyg 46(5):455–463Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liberman MC, Epstein MJ, Cleveland SS, Wang H, Maison SF (2016) Toward a differential diagnosis of hidden hearing loss in humans. PLoS One 11(9):e0162726.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162726 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yankaskas K, Hammill T, Packer M, Zuo J (2017) Editorial: auditory injury - a military perspective. Hear Res 349:1–3.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2017.04.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kellerhals B (1972) Acoustic trauma and cochlear microcirculation. An experimental and clinical study on pathogenesis and treatment of inner ear lesions after acute noise exposure. Adv Oto-rhino-laryngology 18:91–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kujawa SG, Liberman MC (2009) Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci 29(45):14077–14085.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miller JD, Watson CS, Covell WP (1963) Deafening effects of noise on the cat. Acta Otolaryngol 1276:1–91Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Froud KE, Wong AC, Cederholm JM, Klugmann M, Sandow SL, Julien JP, Ryan AF, Housley GD (2015) Type II spiral ganglion afferent neurons drive medial olivocochlear reflex suppression of the cochlear amplifier. Nat Commun 6:7115.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Housley GD, Morton-Jones R, Vlajkovic SM, Telang RS, Paramananthasivam V, Tadros SF, Wong AC, Froud KE, Cederholm JM, Sivakumaran Y, Snguanwongchai P, Khakh BS, Cockayne DA, Thorne PR, Ryan AF (2013) ATP-gated ion channels mediate adaptation to elevated sound levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(18):7494–7499.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222295110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morton-Jones RT, Vlajkovic SM, Thorne PR, Cockayne DA, Ryan AF, Housley GD (2015) Properties of ATP-gated ion channels assembled from P2X2 subunits in mouse cochlear Reissner’s membrane epithelial cells. Purinergic Signal 11(4):551–560.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11302-015-9473-4
  11. 11.
    Housley GD, Bringmann A, Reichenbach A (2009) Purinergic signaling in special senses. Trends Neurosci 32(3):128–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2009.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang JC, Raybould NP, Luo L, Ryan AF, Cannell MB, Thorne PR, Housley GD (2003) Noise induces up-regulation of P2X2 receptor subunit of ATP-gated ion channels in the rat cochlea. Neuroreport 14(6):817–823.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000067784.69995.47
  13. 13.
    Housley GD, Luo L, Ryan AF (1998) Localization of mRNA encoding the P2X2 receptor subunit of the adenosine 5′-triphosphate-gated ion channel in the adult and developing rat inner ear by in situ hybridization. J Comp Neurol 393(4):403–414Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Greenwood D, Jagger DJ, Huang LC, Hoya N, Thorne PR, Wildman SS, King BF, Pak K, Ryan AF, Housley GD (2007) P2X receptor signaling inhibits BDNF-mediated spiral ganglion neuron development in the neonatal rat cochlea. Development 134(7):1407–1417.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.002279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yan D, Zhu Y, Walsh T, Xie D, Yuan H, Sirmaci A, Fujikawa T, Wong AC, Loh TL, Du L, Grati M, Vlajkovic SM, Blanton S, Ryan AF, Chen ZY, Thorne PR, Kachar B, Tekin M, Zhao HB, Housley GD, King MC, Liu XZ (2013) Mutation of the ATP-gated P2X2 receptor leads to progressive hearing loss and increased susceptibility to noise. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(6):2228–2233.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222285110
  16. 16.
    Moteki H, Azaiez H, Booth KT, Hattori M, Sato A, Sato Y, Motobayashi M, Sloan CM, Kolbe DL, Shearer AE, Smith RJ, Usami S (2015) Hearing loss caused by a P2RX2 mutation identified in a MELAS family with a coexisting mitochondrial 3243AG mutation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 124(Suppl 1):177S–183S.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489415575045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Faletra F, Girotto G, D’Adamo AP, Vozzi D, Morgan A, Gasparini P (2014) A novel P2RX2 mutation in an Italian family affected by autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss. Gene 534(2):236–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2013.10.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liberman MC, Gao J, He DZ, Wu X, Jia S, Zuo J (2002) Prestin is required for electromotility of the outer hair cell and for the cochlear amplifier. Nature 419(6904):300–304.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ren T, He W, Gillespie PG (2011) Measurement of cochlear power gain in the sensitive gerbil ear. Nat Commun 2:216.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Elliott SJ, Shera CA (2012) The cochlea as a smart structure. Smart Mater Struct 21(6):64001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/21/6/064001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liberman MC, Zuo J, Guinan JJ Jr (2004) Otoacoustic emissions without somatic motility: can stereocilia mechanics drive the mammalian cochlea? J Acoust Soc Am 116(3):1649–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shaffer LA, Withnell RH, Dhar S, Lilly DJ, Goodman SS, Harmon KM (2003) Sources and mechanisms of DPOAE generation: implications for the prediction of auditory sensitivity. Ear Hear 24(5):367–379.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AUD.0000090439.16438.9F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Althen H, Wittekindt A, Gaese B, Kossl M, Abel C (2012) Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control. J Neurophysiol 107(7):1962–1969.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00418.2011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schlenther D, Voss C, Kossl M (2014) Influence of ketamine-xylazine anaesthesia on cubic and quadratic high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 15(5):695–705.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-014-0470-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cederholm JM, Froud KE, Wong AC, Ko M, Ryan AF, Housley GD (2012) Differential actions of isoflurane and ketamine-based anaesthetics on cochlear function in the mouse. Hear Res 292(1–2):71–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2012.08.010 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jarlebark LE, Housley GD, Raybould NP, Vlajkovic S, Thorne PR (2002) ATP-gated ion channels assembled from P2X2 receptor subunits in the mouse cochlea. Neuroreport 13(15):1979–1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thorne PR, Munoz DJ, Housley GD (2004) Purinergic modulation of cochlear partition resistance and its effect on the endocochlear potential in the guinea pig. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 5:58–65.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-003-4003-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Raybould NP, Housley GD (1997) Variation in expression of the outer hair cell P2X receptor conductance along the guinea-pig cochlea. J Physiol 498(Pt 3):717–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Housley GD, Greenwood D, Ashmore JF (1992) Localization of cholinergic and purinergic receptors on outer hair cells isolated from the guinea-pig cochlea. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 249(1326):265–273.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1992.0113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Robles L, Ruggero MA (2001) Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev 81(3):1305–1352.  https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.2001.81.3.1305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vlajkovic SM, Thorne PR, Housley GD, Munoz DJ, Kendrick IS (1998) Ecto-nucleotidases terminate purinergic signalling in the cochlear endolymphatic compartment. Neuroreport 9(7):1559–1565Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vlajkovic SM, Thorne PR, Munoz DJ, Housley GD (1996) Ectonucleotidase activity in the perilymphatic compartment of the guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res 99(1–2):31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dulon D, Moataz R, Mollard P (1993) Characterization of Ca2+ signals generated by extracellular nucleotides in supporting cells of the organ of Corti. Cell Calcium 14(3):245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chen C, Bobbin RP (1998) P2X receptors in cochlear Deiters’ cells. Br J Pharmacol 124(2):337–344.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0701848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lagostena L, Mammano F (2001) Intracellular calcium dynamics and membrane conductance changes evoked by Deiters’ cell purinoceptor activation in the organ of Corti. Cell Calcium 29(3):191–198.  https://doi.org/10.1054/ceca.2000.0183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hubbard AE, Mountain DC (1990) Haircell forward and reverse transduction: differential suppression and enhancement. Hear Res 43(2–3):269–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mountain DC (1980) Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. Science 210(4465):71–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ohlemiller KK, Gagnon PM (2007) Genetic dependence of cochlear cells and structures injured by noise. Hear Res 224(1–2):34–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2006.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ohlemiller KK, Kaur T, Warchol ME, Withnell RH (2018) The endocochlear potential as an indicator of reticular lamina integrity after noise exposure in mice. Hear Res 361:138–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2018.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ohlemiller KK, Rosen AD, Rellinger EA, Montgomery SC, Gagnon PM (2011) Different cellular and genetic basis of noise-related endocochlear potential reduction in CBA/J and BALB/cJ mice. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12(1):45–58.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-010-0238-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Vassout P (1984) Effects of pure tone on endocochlear potential and potassium ion concentration in the guinea pig cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol 98(3–4):199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Syka J, Melichar I, Ulehlova L (1981) Longitudinal distribution of cochlear potentials and the K+ concentration in the endolymph after acoustic trauma. Hear Res 4(3–4):287–298Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Melichar I, Syka J, Ulehlova L (1980) Recovery of the endocochlear potential and the K+ concentrations in the cochlear fluids after acoustic trauma. Hear Res 2(1):55–63Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ikeda K, Kusakari J, Takasaka T (1988) Ionic changes in cochlear endolymph of the guinea pig induced by acoustic injury. Hear Res 32(2–3):103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hirose K, Liberman MC (2003) Lateral wall histopathology and endocochlear potential in the noise-damaged mouse cochlea. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 4(3):339–352.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-002-3036-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Liberman MC, Brown MC (1986) Physiology and anatomy of single olivocochlear neurons in the cat. Hear Res 24(1):17–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Guinan JJ Jr, Stankovic KM (1996) Medial efferent inhibition produces the largest equivalent attenuations at moderate to high sound levels in cat auditory-nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 100(3):1680–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Maison SF, Usubuchi H, Liberman MC (2013) Efferent feedback minimizes cochlear neuropathy from moderate noise exposure. J Neurosci 33(13):5542–5552.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5027-12.2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Anselmi F, Hernandez VH, Crispino G, Seydel A, Ortolano S, Roper SD, Kessaris N, Richardson W, Rickheit G, Filippov MA, Monyer H, Mammano F (2008) ATP release through connexin hemichannels and gap junction transfer of second messengers propagate Ca2+ signals across the inner ear. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(48):18770–18775.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800793105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Muñoz DJ, Kendrick IS, Rassam M, Thorne PR (2001) Vesicular storage of adenosine triphosphate in the guinea-pig cochlear lateral wall and concentrations of ATP in the endolymph during sound exposure and hypoxia. Acta Otolaryngol 121(1):10–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    White PN, Thorne PR, Housley GD, Mockett B, Billett TE, Burnstock G (1995) Quinacrine staining of marginal cells in the stria vascularis of the guinea-pig cochlea: a possible source of extracellular ATP? Hear Res 90(1–2):97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zhao HB (2016) Expression and function of pannexins in the inner ear and hearing. BMC Cell Biol 17(Suppl 1):16.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12860-016-0095-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gale JE, Piazza V, Ciubotaru CD, Mammano F (2004) A mechanism for sensing noise damage in the inner ear. Curr Biol 14(6):526–529.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Translational Neuroscience Facility and Department of Physiology, School of Medical SciencesUNSW SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Departments of Surgery and NeurosciencesUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  3. 3.Veterans Administration Medical CenterLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations