Phylogenetic and evolutionary applications of analyzing endocarp morphological characters by classification binary tree and leaves by SSR markers for the characterization of olive germplasm
- 4 Downloads
Seed (endocarp) morphology is useful for genotype discrimination and cultivar classification. Over a 20-year period, 504 olive trees (Olea europaea subsp. europaea) previously assigned to different cultivars originating from Greece (n = 37), Spain (n = 2), and Italy (n = 2) as well as one accession of Olea europaea subsp. cuspidata were evaluated employing 11 endocarp morphological markers and 9 SSR markers. A matrix of 42 morphotypes in total was subjected to classification binary tree (CBT) analysis. In addition, cultivars were fingerprinted employing 9 microsatellite (SSR) markers and placed on a similarity dendrogram. All 41 olive cultivars and one accession of Olea europaea subsp. cuspidata employed in the present study yielded different morphological profiles produced by the 11 endocarp traits. In the resulting CBT, the total reduction in error, that is, the total information in the set of all 42 morphotypes, was 100%. This meant that the set of 11 morphological characters—having 28 different states in all—was sufficient to remove all data noise and to correctly classify all examined olive cultivars. In addition, all olive cultivars were successfully discriminated by the 9 SSR markers employed. It is suggested that cultivars with large seeds—and concomitantly large fruits—are more distant from the wild forms and probably more evolved compared to cultivars with small seeds. In corroboration to the above, based on seed shape, some of the olive cultivars showed high resemblance to wild olives leading thus to the hypothesis that they were produced or selected during the early ages of olive domestication.
KeywordsCluster Cultivar Germplasm management Olea europaea subsp. europaea Olea europaea subsp. cuspidata
The authors express their gratitude to Ms Angelina Zapolska and Dr. Vasilios Ziogas for their assistance in image capture and processing. Continuous support by Georgios Kostelenos Nurseries is also acknowledged. Last but not least thanks to the numerous colleagues who contributed to endocarp measurements during the past two decades and more.
Financial support from H.A.O. DEMETER and several projects is appreciated, first among all, the Resgen project CT—1996–1997 and the International Olive Council. This work was also partially funded—for the SSR part—by the Greek Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT), project Regional Innovation Pole of Crete, “i4Crete, A8—Integrated system of olive oil fingerprinting control and promotion—11RIPC06” to AGD and to ITM which was coordinated by the Heraklion Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Data archiving statement
All relevant raw data will be freely available to any scientist wishing to use them for non-commercial purposes. No nucleic acid sequences, protein sequences, genetic maps, SNPs, expression data, etc. were produced in this study. All morphological data used for morphometric analysis and CBT construction, along with all names of analyzed cultivars, are presented in Table 1 of this paper.
- Baldoni L, Cultrera NG, Mariotti R, Ricciolini C, Arcioni S, Vendramin GG, Buonamici A, Porceddu A, Sarri V, Ojeda MA, Trujillo I, Rallo L, Belaj A, Perri E, Salimonti A, Muzzalupo I, Casagrande A, Lain O, Messina R, Testolin R (2009) A consensus list of microsatellite markers for olive genotyping. Mol Breed 24:213–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bandelj D, Jakše J, Javornik B (2002) DNA fingerprinting of olive varieties by microsatellite markers. Food Technol Biotechnol 40:185–190Google Scholar
- Barranco D, Cimato A, Fiorino P, Rallo L, Touzani A, Castaneda C, Serafıni F, Trujillo I (2000) World catalogue of olive varieties. International Olive Oil Council, Madrid. http://www.internationaloliveoil.org/store/view/79-world-catalogue-of-olive-varieties-english. Accessed August 2018Google Scholar
- Bartolini G (2008) Olea databases. http://www.oleadb.it/. Accessed August 2018
- Blazakis NK, Kosma M, Kostelenos G, Baldoni L, Bufacchi M, Kalaitzis P (2017) Description of olive morphological parameters by using open access software. Plant Methods 13:111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0261-8
- Bourgeon O, Pagnoux C, Mauné S, Vargas EG, Ivorra S, Bonhomme V, Ater M, Moukhli A, Terral JF (2018) Olive tree varieties cultivated for the great Baetican oil trade between the 1st and the 4th centuries ad: morphometric analysis of olive stones from Las Delicias (Ecija, Province of Seville, Spain). Veg Hist Archaeobotany 27:463–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-017-0648-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C (1984) Classification and decision trees. Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
- Cervantes E, Martín JJ, Saadaoui E (2016) Updated methods for seed shape analysis. Scientifica https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5691825
- FAOSTAT (2018) Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Statistics division. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed 09.02.18
- Gros-Balthazard M, Newton C, Ivorra S, Pierre M-H, Pintaud J-C, Terral J-F (2016) The domestication syndrome in Phoenix dactylifera seeds: toward the identification of wild date palm populations. PLoS One 11(3):e0152394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152394 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Moisen G (2008) Classification and regression trees. In: Jørgensen SE, Fath BD (editor-in-chief) Encyclopedia of ecology, vol 1. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 582–588Google Scholar
- Petrakis PV, Agiomyrgianaki A, Christophoridou S, Spyros A, Dais P (2008) Geographical characterization of Greek virgin olive oils (cv. Koroneiki) using 1H and 31P NMR fingerprinting with canonical discriminant analysis and classification binary trees. J Agric Food Chem 56:3200–3207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reboredo-Rodríguez P, González-Barreiro C, Cancho-Grande B, Simal-Gándara J, Trujillo I (2018) Genotypic and phenotypic identification of olive cultivars from north-western Spain and characterization of their extra virgin olive oils in terms of fatty acid composition and minor compounds. Sci Hortic 232:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ripley B (2017) Package ‘tree’. R language routine. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tree/tree.pdf. Accessed August 2018
- Rohlf F (2000) NTSYSpc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate system. Version 2.21s Exeter Software Applied Biostatics Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification. W.H. Freeman and Company, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Therneau TM, Atkinson B, Ripley B (2018) Package ‘rpart’: R language routine. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rpart/rpart.pdf. Accessed August 2018
- Timofeev R (2004) Classification and regression trees (CART) theory and applications, a master thesis presented by Roman Timofeev (188778) to Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Hardle. CASE - Center of Applied Statistics and Economics, Humboldt University, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- UPOV - International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (2011) Technical guideline for the conduct of tests for distinctness, homogeneity, and stability Olive, UPOV Code: OLEAA_EUR, Olea europaea TG/099/4 Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Wilkinson L (1995) Mobiles. Department of Statistics, Northwestern University, EvanstonGoogle Scholar