Advertisement

Tree Genetics & Genomes

, 14:65 | Cite as

Molecular discrimination and ploidy level determination for elite willow cultivars

  • Qiuyan Wu
  • Xiaogang Liang
  • Xiaogang Dai
  • Yingnan Chen
  • Tongming Yin
Original Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Evolution

Abstract

Willow (Salix spp.), a woody plant in forms of tree, sub-tree, or shrub, has long been cultivated as an important fiber resource and for environmental protection. To manage commercial willow plantations, there is an increasing demand for the genetic discrimination of willow cultivars based on molecular markers. In this study, based on the genomic sequences of Salix suchowensis, a core set of 16 highly polymorphic simple sequence repeat (SSR) primer pairs were selected for the molecular discrimination of different willow cultivars. Using these primer pairs, DNA fingerprints of a collection of 25 elite willow cultivars were generated and their genetic identities were analyzed based on the SSR genotyping profiles and the UPGMA clustering. Subsequently, we examined the ploidy levels of these cultivars by combining SSR marker genotyping with flow cytometry measurements. It was found that, in this collection, the shrub cultivars were mainly presented as diploids, while cultivars in tree form mainly existed as polyploids. This study established a reference DNA fingerprinting database for managing the commercial willow cultivars, and the determination of their ploidy levels provided critical information for aiding the polyploid breeding programs in willows.

Keywords

Willow Simple sequence repeat (SSR) Cultivar discrimination Ploidy level Flow cytometry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was also supported by the Priority Academic Program Development Program of Jiangsu Province. We sincerely thank for the valuable comments from the editor and the anonymous reviewers for formulating the final revision.

Funding information

This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Plant of China (2016YFD0600101), the Youth Elite Science Sponsorship Program by CAST (YESS), and the Qing Lan talent support program at Jiangsu Province.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Data archiving statement

The datasets generated during the current study was deposited at the website: http://115.29.234.170/Database/Salix_integra/. The data will be available to public after the publication of this manuscript.

Supplementary material

11295_2018_1281_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (32 kb)
ESM 1 (XLSX 31 kb)

References

  1. Argus GW (2010) Salix L. In: Flora of North America editorial committee (ed), Flora of North America north of Mexico, volume 7. Magnoliophyta: Salicaceae to Brassicaceae. Oxford university press, Oxford, pp. 23–162Google Scholar
  2. Bisognin C, Seemüller E, Citterio S, Velasco R, Grando MS, Jarausch W (2009) Use of SSR markers to assess sexual vs. apomictic origin and ploidy level of breeding progeny derived from crosses of apple proliferation-resistant Malus sieboldii and its hybrids with Malus× domestica cultivars. Plant Breed 128:507–513.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2008.01614.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boccacci P, Akkak A, Botta R (2006) DNA typing and genetic relations among European hazelnut (Corylusavellana L.) cultivars using microsatellite markers. Genome 49:598–611.  https://doi.org/10.1139/g06-017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brereton NJB, Pitre FE, Hanley SJ, Ray MJ, Karp A, Murphy RJ (2010) QTL mapping of enzymatic saccharification in short rotation coppice willow and its independence from biomass yield. Bioenerg Res 3:251–261.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-010-9077-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Y, Dai X, Hou J, Guan H, Wang Y, Li Y, Yin T (2016) DNA fingerprinting of oil camellia cultivars with SSR markers. Tree Genet Genomes 12:7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-015-0966-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dai X, Hu Q, Cai Q, Feng K, Ye N, Tuskan GA, Milne R, Chen Y, Wan Z, Wang Z, Luo W, Wang K, Wan D, Wang M, Wang J, Liu J, Yin T (2014) The willow genome and divergent evolution from poplar after the common genome duplication. Cell Res 24:1274–1277.  https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2014.83 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. De Silva HN, Hall AJ, Rikkerink E, Mcneilage MA, Fraser LG (2005) Estimation of allele frequencies in polyploids under certain patterns of inheritance. Heredity 95:327–334.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800728 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J (2007) Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat Protoc 2:2233–2244.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.310 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Doveri S, Gil FS, Díaz A et al (2008) Standardization of a set of microsatellite markers for use in cultivar identification studies in olive (Olea europaea L.). Sci Hortic 116:367–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo W, Hou J, Yin T, Chen Y (2016) An analytical toolkit for polyploid willow discrimination. Sci Rep 6:37702.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37702 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanley S, Barker A, Van Ooijen J, Aldam C, Harris S, Åhman I, Larsson S, Karp A (2002) A genetic linkage map of willow (Salix viminalis) based on AFLP and microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet 105:1087–1096.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-0979-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Julkunen-Tiitto R (1986) A chemotaxonomic survey of phenolics in leaves of northern Salicaceae species. Phytochemistry 25:663–667.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(86)88020-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaur S, Panesar PS, Bera MB, Kaur V (2015) Simple sequence repeat markers in genetic divergence and marker-assisted selection of rice cultivars: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci 55:41–49.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.646363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keim P, Beavis W, Schupp J, Freestone R (1992) Evaluation of soybean RFLP marker diversity in adapted germplasm. Theor Appl Genet 85:205–212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222861 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kloosterman AD, Budowle B, Daselaar P (1993) PCR-amplification and detection of the human D1S80 VNTR locus. Int J Legal Med 105:257–264.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01370382 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kong F, Liu J, Chen Y, Wan Z, Yin T (2013) Marker-aided selection of polyploid poplars. Bioenerg Res 6:984–990.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9331-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kopp R, Smart L, Maynard C, Tuskan G, Abrahamson L (2002) Predicting within-family variability in juvenile height growth of Salix based upon similarity among parental AFLP fingerprints. Theor Appl Genet 105:106–112.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-001-0855-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuzovkina YA (2015) Compilation of the checklist for cultivars of Salix L. (Willow). HortScience 50:1608–1609 http://hortsci.ashspublications.org/content/50/11/16 08.full Google Scholar
  19. Kuzovkina YA, Weih M, Romero MA et al (2008) Salix: botany and global horticulture. Hortic Revs 34:447–489.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470380147.ch8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Langeveld H, Quist-Wessel F, Dimitriou I, Aronsson P, Baum C, Schulz U, Bolte A, Baum S, Köhn J, Weih M, Gruss H, Leinweber P, Lamersdorf N, Schmidt-Walter P, Berndes G (2012) Assessing environmental impacts of short rotation coppice (SRC) expansion: model definition and preliminary results. Bioenerg Res 5:621–635.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9235-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewandowski I (2016) The role of perennial biomass crops in a growing bioeconomy. In: Barth S, Murphy-Bokern D, Kalinina O, Taylor G, Jones M (eds) Perennial biomass crops for a resource-constrained world. Springer, Cham, pp 3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu H, Yang W, Hou J, Hu N, Yin T, Li S (2016) Genetic identification of 43 elite clonal accessions of Populus deltoides by SSR fingerprinting. Can J Plant Sci 96:494–502.  https://doi.org/10.1139/CJPS-2015-0272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loureiro J, Pinto G, Lopes T, Doležel J, Santos C (2005) Assessment of ploidy stability of the somatic embryogenesis process in Quercus suber L. using flow cytometry. Planta 221:815–822.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-005-1492-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Loureiro J, Rodriguez E, Doležel J, Santos C (2007) Two new nuclear isolation buffers for plant DNA flow cytometry: a test with 37 species. Ann Bot 100:875–888.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm152 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. MacAlpine WJ, Shield IF, Trybush SO, Hayes CM, Karp A (2008) Overcoming barriers to crossing in willow (Salix spp.) breeding. Aspects of Applied Biology 90, Biomass and Energy Crops III, pp. 173-180Google Scholar
  26. Molla MR, Islam MN, Rohman MM, Choudhury RU, Rahman L (2010) The use of SSR DNA markers to reveal the polymorphism at ploidy level in cultivated rapeseed varieties in Bangladesh. Global J Biotechnol & Biochem 5:141–144 http://www.idosi.org/gjbb/gjbb5(2)10/11.pdf Google Scholar
  27. Ochatt S, Patat-Ochatt E, Moessner A (2011) Ploidy level determination within the context of in vitro breeding. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 104:329–341.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-011-9918-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Porebski S, Bailey LG, Baum BR (1997) Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Mol Biol Rep 15:8–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02772108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reif JC, Xia XC, Melchinger AE, Warburton ML, Hoisington DA, Beck D, Bohn M, Frisch M (2004) Genetic diversity determined within and among CIMMYT maize populations of tropical, subtropical, and temperate germplasm by SSR markers. Crop Sci 44:326–334.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.3260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sattler MC, Carvalho CR, Clarindo WR (2016) The polyploidy and its key role in plant breeding. Planta 243:281–296.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-015-2450-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Scarano D, Rao R, Masi P, Corrado G (2015) SSR fingerprint reveals mislabeling in commercial processed tomato products. Food Control 51:397–401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Serapiglia MJ, Gouker FE, Hart JF, Unda F, Mansfield SD, Stipanovic AJ, Smart LB (2015) Ploidy level affects important biomass traits of novel shrub willow (Salix) hybrids. Bioenerg Res 8:259–269.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9521-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Serapiglia MJ, Gouker FE, Smart LB (2014) Early selection of novel triploid hybrids of shrub willow with improved biomass yield relative to diploids. BMC Plant Biol 14:74.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-14-74 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Singh NB, Joshi S, Choudhary P, Sharma JP (2013) SSR DNA marker aided genetic diversity assessment of selected willow clones. Genetika 45:527–536.  https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1302527S CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smart LB, Cameron KD (2008) Genetic improvement of willow (Salix spp.) as a dedicated bioenergy crop. In: Vermerris W (ed) Genetic improvement of bioenergy crops. Springer, New York, pp 377–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stamati K, Blackie S, Brown JWS, Russell J (2003) A set of polymorphic SSR loci for subarctic willow (Salix lanata, S. lapponum and S. herbacea). Mol Ecol Resour 3:280–282.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00426.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stanton BJ, Serapiglia MJ, Smart LB (2014) The domestication and conservation of Populus and Salix genetic resources (Ch 4). In: Isebrands JG, Richarson J (eds) Poplars and willows: trees for society and the environment. FAO and CABI, Rome, Italy, pp 124–199, 634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Suda Y (1963) The chromosome numbers of Salicaceous plants in relation to their taxonomy. Sci Rep Tohoku Univ Fourth Series Biol 29:413–430Google Scholar
  39. Suda Y, Argus GW (1968) Chromosome numbers of some north American Salix. Brittonia 20:191–197.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2805440 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thibault J (1998) Nuclear DNA amount in pure species and hybrid willows (Salix): a flow cytometric investigation. Can J Bot 76:157–165.  https://doi.org/10.1139/b97-153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tommasini L, Batley J, Arnold G, Cooke R, Donini P, Lee D, Law J, Lowe C, Moule C, Trick M, Edwards K (2003) The development of multiplex simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers to complement distinctness, uniformity and stability testing of rape (Brassica napus L.) varieties. Theor Appl Genet 106:1091–1101.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-1125-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Triest L (2001) Hybridization in staminate and pistillate Salix alba and S. fragilis (Salicaceae): morphology versus RAPDs. Plant Syst Evol 226:143–154.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s006060170062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Varshney RK, Graner A, Sorrells ME (2005) Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. Trends Biotechnol 23:48–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Vélez MD, Ibáñez J (2012) Assessment of the uniformity and stability of grapevine cultivars using a set of microsatellite markers. Euphytica 186:419–432.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-012-0633-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang Y, Xu L, Huang M (2008a) Research progress on Salix genetics. Chin Bull Bot 25:240–247 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  46. Wang Y, Xu L, Huang M (2008b) Analysis of fingerprinting of Salix intagra Thunb. and Salix suchowensis Cheng using microsatellite (SSR) markers. J Nanjing Fore Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 32:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2008.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weising K, Nybom H, Pfenninger M, Wolff K, Kahl G (2005) DNA fingerprinting in plants: principles, methods, and applications. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yagi M, Kimura T, Yamamoto T, Onozaki T (2009) Estimation of ploidy levels and breeding backgrounds in pot carnation cultivars using flow cytometry and SSR markers. J Japan Soc Hort Sci 78:335–343.  https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs1.78.335 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yap I, Nelson RJ (1996) WinBoot: a program for performing bootstrap analysis of binary data to determine the confidence limits of UPGMA-based dendrograms. Manila, Philippines: international Rice Research Institute (IRRI)Google Scholar
  50. Zoghlami N, Riahi L, Laucou V, Lacombe T, Mliki A, Ghorbel A, This P (2009) Origin and genetic diversity of Tunisian grapes as revealed by microsatellite markers. Sci Hortic 120:479–486.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qiuyan Wu
    • 1
  • Xiaogang Liang
    • 1
  • Xiaogang Dai
    • 1
  • Yingnan Chen
    • 1
  • Tongming Yin
    • 1
  1. 1.The Key Lab of Cultivar Innovation and Germplasm Improvement of Salicaceae Species, College of ForestryNanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations