Capital Structure and Value of Advertising Expenditures: Evidence from an Emerging Market

  • Zakir Pashayev
  • Omar FarooqEmail author


This paper documents a non-linear impact of capital structure on the value of advertising expenditures in India during the period between 2004 and 2016. India, one of the largest emerging markets, was chosen for study because it has become an important destination for international portfolio investment. These results show that advertising expenditures incurred by firms with moderate levels of debt are more valuable than advertising expenditures incurred by firms with low or high levels of debt. Our results are robust across various proxies of capital structure and across various sub-samples. This paper argues that moderate levels of debt are associated with low agency problems, while low and high levels of debt are synonymous with high agency problems. Differences in agency problems lead to advertising expenditures that have very different levels of value-relevance.


Capital structure Agency problems Value Advertising expenditures Emerging markets 





  1. Bick, G. N. C. (2009). Increasing shareholder value through building customer and brand equity. Journal of Marketing Management, 25(1–2), 117–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deshmukh, S. (2005). The effect of asymmetric information on dividend policy. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 44(1–2), 108–127.Google Scholar
  3. Fang, V. W., Noe, T. H., & Tice, S. (2009). Stock market liquidity and firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1), 150–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Farooq, O., & Satt, H. (2014). Does analyst following improve firm performance? Evidence from the MENA region. Corporate Ownership and Control, 11(2), 145–154.Google Scholar
  5. Farooq, O., Asgarov, Z., Guliyev, A., Islam, T., Kalinina, Y., & Pashayev, Z. (2017). Capital structure and value of reported earnings: Evidence from an emerging market. Applied Economics Letters, 24(10), 690–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fosu, S., Danso, A., Ahmad, W., & Coffie, W. (2016). Information asymmetry, leverage and firm value: Do crisis and growth matter? International Review of Financial Analysis, 46, 1540–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gao, W., & Zhu, F. (2015). Information asymmetry and capital structure around the world. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 32, 131–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaud, P., Jani, E., Hoesli, M., & Sarig, O. (2005). The capital structure of Swiss companies: An empirical analysis using dynamic panel data. European Financial Management, 11, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Graham, R., & Frankenberge, K. (2000). The contribution of changes in advertising expenditures to earnings and market values. Journal of Business Research, 50(2), 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Helsen, K., Jedidi, K., & DeSarbo, W. S. (1993). A new approach to country segmentation utilizing multinational diffusion patterns. Journal of Marketing, 57, 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jegadeesh, N., & Livnat, J. (2006). Revenue surprises and stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41(1–2), 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, American Economic Association, 76(2), 323–329.Google Scholar
  13. Jerzemowska, M. (2006). The main agency problems and their consequences. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 2006(3), 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, S. S., & Aulakh, P. S. (2002). Multinationality and firm performance: The moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. Journal of Finance, 55(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, K., & Zhao, X. (2008). Asymmetric information and dividend policy. Financial Management, 37(4), 673–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lou, D. (2014). Attracting investor attention through advertising. Review of Financial Studies, 27(6), 1797–1829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mello, A., & Parsons, J. (1992). Measuring the agency cost of debt. Journal of Finance, 47(5), 1887–1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Singh, M., & Davidson, W. N. (2003). Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance mechanisms. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27(2003), 793–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Singh, M., Faircloth, S., & Nejadmalayeri, A. (2005). Capital market impact of product marketing strategy: Evidence from the relationship between advertising expenses and cost of capital. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 432–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thomson Reuters. (2017). Worldscope. Accessed Sept 2017.

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ADA UniversityBakuAzerbaijan

Personalised recommendations