Advertisement

The Value of Residential Community Associations: Evidence from South Carolina

  • Kathleen Grace
  • Joshua C. HallEmail author
Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

This empirical study uses a hedonic pricing model and a dataset of Spartanburg, South Carolina homes from 2002 to 2005 to evaluate the effect of Residential Community Associations (RCAs). Spartanburg is focused on due to data availability. The number of RCAs have exploded in the United States in recent decades. Given that RCAs both supplement and complement local government provision of goods and services, it is an important policy question to ascertain whether they create value for their residents. While the literature on RCAs has generally shown that they increase property values, the lack of comprehensive data has led scholars to primarily focus on Virginia and Florida. Given the heterogeneity of state laws governing RCAs and the diversity of local government amenities, the external validity of these results is in question. This study used data on a mid-sized city in South Carolina to provide further evidence on RCAs. The findings suggest that RCAs increase property values by 2.2%. These results are much smaller than estimates from other locations, suggesting that for many people in Spartanburg, local governments are a good substitute. The findings also highlight how failure to properly control for structure age can lead to incorrect inferences about the impact of RCAs on home prices.

Keywords

Residential community associations Homeowners associations Hedonic 

JEL Classification

R30 R52 R58 

Notes

References

  1. Agan, A., & Tabarrok, A. (2005). What are private governments worth? Regulation, 28(3), 14–17.Google Scholar
  2. Angjellari-Dajci, F., Cebula, R. J., Boylan, R., Izard, C. D., & Gresham, G. (2015). The impact of taxes and HOA fees on single-family home prices. International Advances in Economic Research, 21(2), 201–211.Google Scholar
  3. Cheung, R., Cunningham, C., & Meltzer, R. (2014). Do homeowners associations mitigate or aggravate negative spillovers from neighboring homeowner distress? Journal of Housing Economics, 24(1), 75–88.Google Scholar
  4. Clarke, W. (2017). Mapping homeowners’ associations: Who lives in them and how do they affect housing values? UC Irvine, mimeo. http://sites.uci.edu/wyattclarke/files/2017/10/HOA_hedonic-57.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2019.
  5. Clarke, W. (2018). Essays on market-based provision of local public services. PhD dissertation, University of California, Irvine. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/78v5m48r. Accessed 10 Jan 2019.
  6. Community Associations Institute. (2016). National and state statistical review for 2016. Falls Church: Community Associations Institute. https://www.caionline.org/AboutCommunityAssociations/Statistical%20Information/2016StatsReviewFBWeb.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2019.
  7. Dilger, R. (1991). Residential community associations: issues, impacts, and relevance for local government. State and Local Government Review, 23(1), 17–23.Google Scholar
  8. Dilger, R. (1992). Neighborhood politics: Residential community associations in American governance. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Feng, X., & Humphreys, B. (2018). Assessing the economic impact of sports facilities on residential property values: a spatial hedonic approach. Journal of Sports Economics, 19(2), 188–210.Google Scholar
  10. Foldvary, F. (1994). Public goods and private communities. Brookfield: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  11. Hall, J. (2017). Does school district and municipality border congruence matter? Urban Studies, 54(7), 1601–1618.Google Scholar
  12. Helsley, R., & Strange, W. (1998). Private government. Journal of Public Economics, 69(2), 281–304.Google Scholar
  13. Hopkins, E. (2016). The impact of community associations on residential property values. Housing and Society, 43(3), 157–167.Google Scholar
  14. Humphreys, B. R., & Nowak, A. (2017). Professional sports facilities, teams and property values: evidence from NBA team departures. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 66(1), 39–51.Google Scholar
  15. Ignacio, L. B., & Fuego, J. H. (2017). Rights and fights: the role of homeowners association (HOA) as compared to local government of gated community. International Journal of Real Estate Studies, 11(1), 11–27.Google Scholar
  16. LaCour-Little, M., & Malpezzi, S. (2009). Gated streets and house prices. Journal of Housing Research, 18(1), 19–43.Google Scholar
  17. Langbein, L., & Spotswood-Bright, K. (2004). Efficiency, accountability, and private government: the impact of residential community associations on residential property values. Social Science Quarterly, 85(3), 640–659.Google Scholar
  18. Makovi, M. (2018). Cookie cutter covenants: Regulation-induced homogeneity of homeowners associations. Texas Tech University, mimeo. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3194419. Accessed 10 Jan 2019.
  19. Meltzer, R., & Cheung, R. (2014). How are homeowners associations capitalized into property values? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 46(1), 93–102.Google Scholar
  20. Nelson, R. (2009). The puzzle of local double taxation: why do private community associations exist? The Independent Review, 13(3), 345–365.Google Scholar
  21. Nelson, R. (2011). Homeowners associations in historical perspective. Public Administration Review, 71(4), 546–549.Google Scholar
  22. Nowak, A., & Sayago-Gomez, J. (2018). Homeowner preferences after September 11th, a microdata approach. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 70(2), 330–351.Google Scholar
  23. Pompe, J. (2008). The effect of a gated community on property and beach amenity valuation. Land Economics, 84(3), 423–433.Google Scholar
  24. Scheller, D. (2015). Neighborhood governments and their role in property values. Urban Affairs Review, 51(2), 290–309.Google Scholar
  25. Scheller, D. S. (2017). Neighborhood racial composition, public goods provision, and homeowners associations: bridging the literatures and future directions for research. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 25(2), 283–309.Google Scholar
  26. Shultz, C., Hall, J., & Strager, M. (2015). Production of wind energy and agricultural land values: evidence from Pennsylvania. Oil, Gas, & Energy Quarterly, 64(2), 267–274.Google Scholar
  27. Spartanburg Association of Realtors. (2005). Spartanburg County South Carolina Multiple Listing Service dataset [electronic file]. Spartanburg Association of Realtors, Spartanburg SC.Google Scholar
  28. Sterk, S. (1997). Minority protection in residential private governments. Boston University Law Review, 77, 273–341.Google Scholar
  29. Stumpf, E. (2018). What roll should government play in regulating the growth in the number of homeowners associations in Sacramento County? Master’s thesis, California State University, Sacramento. https://www.csus.edu/ppa/thesis-project/bank/2018/Stumpf.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2019.
  30. Tullock, G. (1970). Private wants, public means: An economic analysis of the desirable scope of government. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Accounting, Business, and FinanceWofford CollegeSpartanburgUSA
  2. 2.College of Business and EconomicsWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations