Advertisement

Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 293–309 | Cite as

Alternative Work Arrangements and Job Satisfaction

  • Cheryl CarletonEmail author
  • Mary Kelly
Article
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

The pressures of traditional jobs on working families, along with an aging population facing financial need, have contributed to heightened interest in the percentage of workers participating in alternative work arrangements. These include working as an independent contractor or self-employed, and those employed by others on-call, through temp agency, or as contractors. Examining job satisfaction across work arrangements by occupation and gender is one way to investigate a potential increase in the supply of such workers. Higher job satisfaction may indicate that more workers will select into these work arrangements and away from traditional jobs in the future. If this is particularly true for women, it has important implications for firms that would like to retain more women. Moreover, changes in how individuals earn a living may impact the social safety nets of such workers and their families given the nature of how such benefits are provided in the U.S. economy. This study utilizes recent waves of the General Social Survey to explore job satisfaction for workers in disaggregated alternative work arrangements, while controlling for both occupation and gender. The study finds that female workers who are independent contractors and self-employed are more satisfied with their jobs than those in regular salaried jobs, even those in nonprofessional occupations. Job satisfaction for those who work in temp agencies, do on-call work or work for contractors is no different than for those in regular jobs, regardless of occupation and gender.

Keywords

Job satisfaction Alternative work arrangements Well-being Quality of work life 

JEL

J28 J16 J48 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Kathryn Asher for her assistance in organizing the data and participants at the International Atlantic Economic Conference in Boston, 8-11 October 2015, and Eastern Economic Association conference for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

  1. Alvarez, G., & Sinde-Cantorna, A. I. (2014). Self-employment and job satisfaction: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Manpower, 35(5), 688–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartel, A. P. (1981). Race differences in job satisfaction: a reappraisal. Journal of Human Resources, 16(2), 294–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bender, K. A., Donohue, S. M., & Heywood, J. S. (2005). Job satisfaction and gender segregation. Oxford Economic Papers, 57(3), 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booth, A. L., Francesconi, M., & Frank, J. (2002). Temporary jobs: stepping stones or dead ends? Economic Journal, 112(480), F189–F213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borjas, G. J. (1979). Job satisfaction, wages and unions. Journal of Human Resources, 14(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley, D. E., & Roberts, J. A. (2004). Self-employment and job satisfaction: Investigating the role of self-efficacy, depression, and seniority. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(1), 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buddelmeyer, H., McVicar, D., & Wooden, M. (2015). Non-standard ‘contingent’ employment and job satisfaction: a panel data analysis. Industrial Relations, 54(2), 256–275.Google Scholar
  8. Budig, M. J. (2006). Intersections on the road to self-employment: gender, family, and occupational class. Social Forces, 84(4), 2223–2239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2017). Contingent and alternative employment arrangements summary. Resource document. Economic News Release, June 7, 2018. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/conemp.nr0.htm. Accessed 23 Nov 2018.
  10. Carleton, C., & Clain, S. H. (2012). Women, men, and job satisfaction. Eastern Economic Journal, 38(3), 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chadi, A, & Hetschko, C. (2013). Flexibilisation without Hesitation? Temporary Contracts and Job Satisfaction. IAAEU Discussion Paper Series, no. 04/2013. Available at: https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-social-sciences/business/events/beyondwages/stansiebert/16ChadiHetschko-tempsatisfaction.pdf
  12. Clark, A. E. (1997). Job satisfaction and gender: Why are women so happy at work? Labour Economics, 4(4), 341–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Graaf-Zijl, M. (2012). Job satisfaction and contingent employment. De Economist, 160(2), 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donohue, S. M., & Heywood, J. S. (2004). Job satisfaction and gender: an expanded specification from the NLSY. International Journal of Manpower, 25(2), 211–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friedman, G. (2014). Workers without employers: shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2(2), 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Green, C. P., & Heywood, J. S. (2011). Flexible contracts and subjective well-being. Economic Inquiry, 49(3), 716–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Green, C., Kler, P., & Leeves, G. (2010). Flexible contract workers in inferior jobs: reappraising the evidence. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(3), 605–629.Google Scholar
  18. Hamermesh, D. S. (2001). The changing distribution of job satisfaction. Journal of Human Resources, 36(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
  19. Hardy, D. J., & Walker, R. J. (2003). Temporary but seeking permanence: a study of New Zealand temps. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 24(3), 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Houseman, S. N. (2001). Why employers use flexible staffing arrangements: evidence from an establishment survey. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 55(1), 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2019). The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States, 1995-2015. ILR Review, 72(2), 382–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lange, T. (2012). Job satisfaction and self-employment: autonomy or personality. Small Business Economics, 38(2), 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manyika, J., Lund, S., Bughin, J., Robinson, K., Mischke, J., & Mahajan, D. (2016). Independent work: choice, necessity and the gig economy. Resource Document. McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Featured%20Insights/Employment%20and%20Growth/Independent%20work%20Choice%20necessity%20and%20the%20gig%20economy/Independent-Work-Choice-necessity-and-the-gig-economy-Full-report.ashx. Accessed 12 Nov 2018.
  24. Marler, J. H., & Moen, P. (2005). Alternative employment arrangements: a gender perspective. Sex Roles, 52(5/6), 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morris, M. D. S., & Vekker, A. (2001). An alternative look at temporary workers, their choices, and the growth in temporary employment. Journal of Labor Research, 22(2), 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Origo, F., & Pagani, L. (2009). Flexicurity and job satisfaction in Europe: the importance of perceived and actual job stability for well-being at work. Labour Economics, 16(5), 547–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pinsof, J. (2016). A new take on an old problem: employee misclassification in the modern gig-economy. Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, 22(2), 341–373.Google Scholar
  28. Polivka, A. E. (1996). Into contingent and alternative employment: by choice? Monthly Labor Review, 119(10), 55–74.Google Scholar
  29. Rollero, C., Fedi, A., & De Piccoli, N. (2016). Gender or occupational status: what counts more for well-being at work? Social Indicators Research, 128(2), 467–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sloane, P. J., & Williams, H. (2000). Job satisfaction, comparison earnings, and gender. Labour, 14(3), 473–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, T. W., Marsden, P. V., & Hout, M. (2015). General Social Surveys, 1972–2014, [machine-readable data file] /Principal Investigator, Smith, Tom W.; Co-Principal Investigators, Peter V. Marsden and Michael Hout; Sponsored by National Science Foundation. --NORC ed.--Chicago: National Opinion Research Center. 1 data file (59,599logical records) + 1 codebook (3,505pp.). --(National Data Program for the Social Sciences, no. 23). Available at: http://www.gss.norc.org/).
  32. Solon, G., Haider, S. J., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). What are we weighting for? The Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sousa-Poza, A., & Sousa-Poza, A. A. (2000). Taking another look at the gender/job-satisfaction paradox. KYKLOS, 53(2), 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tan, H., & Tan, C. (2002). Temporary employees in Singapore: what drives them? The Journal of Psychology, 136(1), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van der Meer, P. H., & Wielers, R. (2013). What makes workers happy? Applied Economics, 45(3), 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilkin, C. L. (2013). I can’t get no job satisfaction: meta-analysis comparing permanent and contingent workers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 46–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams, R. (2011). Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. The Stata Journal, 12(2), 308–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsVillanova UniversityVillanovaUSA

Personalised recommendations