Jobless Recovery: A Time Series Look at the United States
- 39 Downloads
We use vector auto regression models controlling for log differences in gross domestic product (GDP), the unemployment rate, and changes in the unemployment rate to show that following a recession, the rate of decrease in the unemployment rate significantly slowed over time. Controlling for GDP growth rates, we find two structural breaks indicating weaker recoveries in the unemployment rate over time, i.e. recoveries that are increasingly jobless. The first break is in 1959, and the second is in 1984 coinciding with the usual timing of the Great Moderation. Using the 7.85% unemployment rate at the end of 2012 and assuming average annual recovery growth of 2%, the structural breaks imply an additional two full years are necessary to return to a historical long-run average of 5.5%. We empirically explore possible causes proposed in the literature including industry composition, participation rates and social benefits. Demographic shifts in the labor force and changing industry composition appear to be the strongest contributors to jobless recovery.
KeywordsUnemployment rates Business cycles Multivariate analysis and structural breaks
JELE24 E32 C32
- Aaronson, D., Rissman, E.R., Sullivan, D.G. (2004). Assessing the jobless recovery. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Q2, 2–21.Google Scholar
- Davis, S., Haltiwanger, J., Schuh, S. (2006). Job creation and destruction. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. (2014). http://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/indicators-data/total-factor-productivity-tfp/. Total factor productivity. Accessed: February.
- Fernald, J. (2014). A quarterly, utilization-adjusted series on total factor profuctivity. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper. http://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/files/wp12-19bk.pdf.
- Groshen, E.L., & Potter, S. (2003). Has structural change contributed to a jobless recovery? Federal Reserve Bank of New York Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 9(8), 1–7.Google Scholar
- Hall, R.E. (2005). Job loss, job finding, and unemployment in the U.S. Economy over the past fifty years. NBER working paper, #11678. http://www.nber.org/papers/w11678.pdf.
- Jaimovich, N., & Siu, H. (2012). The trend is the cycle: job polarization and jobless recoveries. NBER working paper, #18334. http://www.nber.org/papers/w18334.pdf.
- MacLeod, W., & Malcomson, J.M. (1998). Motivation and markets. American Economic Association, 88(3), 388–411.Google Scholar
- Merz, M. (1999). Time series evidence of unemployment flows: the sample period matters. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 17(3), 324–334.Google Scholar
- Peretto, P. (2006). The employment (and output) of nations: theory and policy implications. Duke University Working Paper, #16. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1270645.
- Shapiro, C., & Stiglitz, J. (1984). Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. American Economic Review, 74(3), 433–444.Google Scholar
- Stock, J., & Watson, M. (2003). Has the business cycle changed? evidence and explanations. Monetary policy and uncertainty: adapting to a changing economy. In Proceedings of symposium sponsored by federal reserve bank of Kansas City, Jackson Hole, Wyo. (pp. 9–56). https://hec.unil.ch/docs/files/80/599/stock-watson03.pdf.
- U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2014). https://www.bea.gov 1948–2012, U.S. Economic accounts and income and personal income accounts. Accessed: February, 2014.
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). https://www.bls.gov. 1948–2012 data. Unemployment and employment tables and current employment statistics. Accessed: February, 2014.