A quasi-experiment testing a public participation process for designing and implementing an enforcement program among minorities

Article

Abstract

Objectives

The present study aimed at developing and empirically evaluating an innovative public participation process for designing and implementing a specially tailored traffic enforcement program in minority communities. During the multi-stage process, participants were actively involved in decision-making, including identifying “dark” hot spots—places where offenses and risky behavior recur but might not be known to the police—and designing a customized enforcement program and community projects.

Methods

The research employed a quasi-experimental design with experimental and control groups and two waves of data collection (before and after the intervention) using two matched pairs of randomly selected Israeli Arab localities. The intervention comprised the public participation process and implementation by police of the traffic enforcement program designed during the process. The effect of the intervention on drivers’ and passengers’ behavior and traffic violations was evaluated by systematic field observations on a total of 12,236 vehicles.

Results

A meaningful and significant reduction in traffic violations was observed in the experimental localities after the intervention. In contrast, a small increase in violations was found in the control localities.

Conclusions

The results indicate that a public participation process aimed at identifying dark hot spots in the community, followed by finding and applying tailored solutions for these problems, can positively affect drivers’ and passengers’ behavior and reduce traffic violations.

Keywords

Community policing Crime prevention Ethnic and racial minorities Experiment Hot spots Dark hot spots Legitimacy Public participation process Problem-oriented policing Traffic enforcement Traffic violations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by a grant from the Research Fund on Insurance Matters affiliated with the Israel Insurance Association, and was initiated while the author was affiliated with the School of Criminology at the University of Haifa. Thanks are due to the Israeli police, the local councils of the experimental localities, and the research team and observers, led by Mary Jabbour-Nassrallah and Nissim Galam Even Hen. Special thanks go to the participants of the public participation process who contributed their time and wisdom and produced such fruitful deliberations.

Supplementary material

11292_2018_9327_MOESM1_ESM.docx (54 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 54 kb)

References

  1. Abelson, J., Forest, P. G., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E., & Gauvin, F. P. (2003). Deliberations about deliberative methods: Issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). Ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biderman, A. D., & Reiss, A. J. (1967). On exploring the “dark figure” of crime. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 374, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D. L., Waring, E. J., Mazerolle, L. G., Spelman, W., & Gajewski, F. (1999). Problem-oriented policing in violent crime places: a randomized controlled experiment. Criminology, 37, 541–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braga, A., Papachristos, A., & Hureau, D. (2012). The effects of hot spots policing on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8.Google Scholar
  6. Braver, E. R. (2003). Race, Hispanic origin, and socioeconomic status in relation to motor vehicles occupant death rates and risk factors among adults. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Briggs, N. C., Levine, R. S., Haliburton, W. P., Schlundt, D. G., Goldzweig, I., & Warren, R. C. (2005). The fatality and analysis reporting system as a tool for investigating racial ethnic determinants of motor vehicle crash fatalities. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 641–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Central Bureau of Statistics. (2017). Annual data 2016. Jerusalem: Central Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  9. Engel, R. S. (2005). Citizens’ perceptions of distributive and procedural injustice during traffic stops with police. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42, 445–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engel, R. S., & Calnon, J. M. (2004). Examining the influence of drivers' characteristics during traffic stops with police: results from a national survey. Justice Quarterly, 21, 49–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Factor, R. (2014). The effect of traffic tickets on road traffic crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 64, 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Factor, R. (2018). An empirical analysis of the characteristics of drivers who are ticketed for traffic offences. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 53, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Factor, R., Mahalel, D., & Yair, G. (2008). Inter-group differences in road-traffic crash involvement. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 2000–2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Factor, R., Mahalel, D., Rafaeli, A., & Williams, D. R. (2013). A social resistance perspective for delinquent behavior among non-dominant minority groups. The British Journal of Criminology, 53, 784–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Factor, R., Castilo, J., & Rattner, A. (2014). Procedural justice, minorities, and religiosity. Police Practice and Research, 15, 130–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fox, J. (2008). Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Gill, C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, T. (2014). Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: a systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10, 399–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Groff, E. R., Ratcliffe, J. H., Haberman, C. P., Sorg, E. T., Joyce, N. M., & Taylor, R. B. (2015). Does what police do at hot spots matter? The Philadelphia policing tactics experiment. Criminology, 53, 23–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamilton-Smith, N., Mackenzie, S., Henry, A., & Davidones, C. (2014). Community policing and reassurance: three studies, one narrative. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 14, 160–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hasisi, B., & Weitzer, R. (2007). Police relations with Arabs and Jews in Israel. British Journal of Criminology, 47, 728–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marshall, I. (1997). Minorities, migrants, and crime: diversity and similarity across Europe and the United States. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Mastrofski, S. D. (2006). Community policing: a skeptical view. In D. Weisburd & A. A. Braga (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives (pp. 44–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mastrofski, S. D., Worden, R. E., & Snipes, J. B. (1995). Law enforcement in a time of community policing. Criminology, 33, 539–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mehozay, Y., & Factor, R. (2017). Deeply embedded core normative values and legitimacy of law enforcement authorities. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54, 151–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peterson, R. D. (2012). The central place of race in crime and justice—the American society of criminology’s 2011 Sutherland address. Criminology, 50, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: a randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12, 625–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shinar, D. (2007). Traffic safety and human behavior. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sklansky, D. A. (1997). Traffic stops, minority motorists, and the future of the fourth amendment. The Supreme Court Review, 1997, 271–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Skogan, W. G. (2006). The promise of community policing. In D. Weisburd & A. A. Braga (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives (pp. 27–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Stanojević, P., Jovanović, D., & Lajunen, T. (2013). Influence of traffic enforcement on the attitudes and behavior of drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 52, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor, R. B. (2006). Incivilities reduction policing, zero tolerance, and the retreat from coproduction: weak foundation and strong pressures. In D. Weisburd & A. A. Braga (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives (pp. 133–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Tyler, T. R. (2005). Policing in black and white: ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly, 8, 322–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van Steden, R., van Caem, B., & Boutellier, H. (2011). The “hidden strength” of active citizenship: the involvement of local residents in public safety projects. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 11, 433–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vivoda, J. M., Eby, D. W., & Kostyniuk, L. P. (2004). Differences in safety belt use by race. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 1105–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walter, L., Broughton, J., & Knowles, J. (2011). The effects of increased police enforcement along a route in London. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43, 1219–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weisburd, D. (2005). Hot spots policing experiments and criminal justice research: lessons from the field. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 599, 220–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weisburd, D., & Eck, J. E. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Criminology, Faculty of LawThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations