The missing link in image quality assessment in digital dental radiography
Digital radiography is gaining popularity among general dental practitioners. It includes digital intraoral radiography, digital panoramic radiography, digital cephalography, and cone-beam computed tomography. In this study, we focused on the methods to assess image quality of these techniques, except for digital cephalography, in the light of historical issues. We stressed on the importance of the development of a standardized phantom and quantitative analysis of diagnostic image quality using it, especially in the aspect of psychophysical properties of these digital systems. There is no missing link in the image quality assessment in digital intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in dental use. However, there are missing links between physical and diagnostic image qualities in panoramic radiography. The development of a semi-standardized phantom and the corresponding quantitative analysis method for image quality may be required in digital panoramic radiography. Quantitative image quality assessment using a standardized phantom will also be promising in the future artificial intelligence era.
KeywordsImage quality Patient dose Digital Dental Radiography
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Kazutoshi Okamura and Kazunori Yoshiura declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal right statements
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
- 1.ICRP. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–332.Google Scholar
- 9.Yoshiura K, Welander U, Kanda S. Theoretical consideration of radiological caries diagnosis: correlation between physical properties and diagnostic accuracy. Dent Jpn. 2005;41:101–6.Google Scholar
- 25.Yoshiura K, Kawazu T, Chikui T, Tatsumi M, Tokumori K, Tanaka T, et al. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in six intraoral radiography systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;87:123–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Yoshida S, Okamura K, Tokumori K, Shimizu M, Takeshita Y, Weerawanich W, et al. Development of a new method for evaluating radiographic image quality using just noticeable differences. Dental Radiol. 2016;56:27–322 (In Japanese).Google Scholar
- 29.Sabarudin A, Tiau YJ. Image quality assessment in panoramic dental radiography: a comparative study between conventional and digital systems. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2013;3:43–8.Google Scholar
- 30.Parissis N, Angelopoulos C, Mantegari S, Karamanis S, Masood F, Tsirlis A. A comparison of panoramic image quality between a digital radiography storage phosphor system and a film-based system. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010;11:E009–16.Google Scholar
- 32.Tatsumi M, Yoshiura K, Yuasa K, Tabata O, Nakayama E, Kawazu T, et al. Clinical evaluation of "Veraviewepocs" digital panoramic X-ray system. Int J Comput Dent. 2000;3:183–95.Google Scholar
- 34.Shiojima M, Naitoh M. Development of test phantom for measuring the image layer in rotational panoramic radiography. Dent Jpn. 1995;32:96–9.Google Scholar
- 44.Jasa GR, Shimizu M, Okamura K, Tokumori K, Takeshita Y, Weerawanich W, et al. Effects of exposure parameters and slice thickness on detecting clear and unclear mandibular canals using cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46:20160315. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar