Imaging of masseter muscle spasms by ultrasonography: a preliminary study

  • Kader Azlag Pekince
  • Fatma CaglayanEmail author
  • Adem Pekince
Original Article



The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of ultrasonography (USG) in locating spasm points in the masseter muscle.


Fifteen patients with TMJ dysfunction and five healthy controls were included in the study. First clinical examination of TMJ and palpation of masticatory muscles were done. Then, the masseter muscles were examined by USG. A total of 40 masseter muscles were examined within the study.


Spasm points were observed as limited isoechogenic areas within normal heterogeneous muscle tissue. Within the 30 masseter muscles of patients with TMJ dysfunction, a total of 14 spasm points were detected clinically and 18 spasm points were detected ultrasonographically. No clinic or sonographic spasm point was detected in the masseter muscles of healthy controls.


USG demonstrated in detail the internal structure of the masseter muscle in all patients and provided precise localization of the spasm points on the muscle. This is a preliminary study, showing that changes in muscle internal structure can be visualized with USG.


Ultrasonography Masseter muscle Spasm points 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no funders and no disclosure. Kader Azlag Pekince, Fatma Caglayan, and Adem Pekince declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human rights statement

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from the patients for being included in the study.

Animal rights statement

This article does not contain any studies with animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.


  1. 1.
    Neville WB, Damm DD, Allen MC, Bouquot EJ. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. Missouri: Saunders; 2009.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laskin DM, Block S. Diagnosis and treatment of myofacial pain-dysfunction (MPD) syndrome. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;56:75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ariji Y, Sakuma S, Izumi M, Sasaki J, Kurita K, Ogi N, et al. Ultrasonographic features of the masseter muscle in female patients with temporomandibular disorder associated with myofascial pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;98:337–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caglayan F, Bayrakdar İŞ. The intraoral ultrasonography in dentistry. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21:125–33.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ariji E, Ariji Y, Yoshiura K, Kimura S, Horinouchi Y, Kanda S. Ultrasonographic evaluation of inflammatory changes in the masseter muscle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994;78:797–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bakke M, Tuxen A, Vilmann P, Jensen BR, Vilmann A, Toft M. Ultrasound image of human masseter muscle related to bite force, electromyography, facial morphology, and occlusal factors. Scand J Dent Res. 1992;100:164–71.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heckmatt JZ, Pier N, Dubowitz V. Measurement of quadriceps muscle thickness and subcutaneous tissue thickness in normal children by real-time ultrasound imaging. J Clin Ultrasound. 1988;16:171–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sasaki J, Ariji Y, Sakuma S, Katsuno R, Kurita K, Ogi N, et al. Ultrasonography as a tool for evaluating treatment of the masseter muscle in temporomandibular disorder patients with myofascial pain. Oral Radiol. 2006;22:52–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reimers CD, Fleckenstein JL, Witt TN, Muller-Felber W, Pongratz DE. Muscular ultrasound in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies of adults. J Neurol Sci. 1993;116:82–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Umeki K, Watanabe Y, Hirano H, Edahiro A, Ohara Y, Yoshida H, et al. The relationship between masseter muscle thickness and appendicular skeletal muscle mass in Japanese community-dwelling elders: a cross-sectional study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018;29:18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poveda-Roda R, Moreno P, Bagán J, Margaix M. Myofascial pain: ultrasound width of the masseter muscle. J Orofac Pain. 2018;32:298–303.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sathasivasubramanian S, Venkatasai PM, Divyambika CV, Mandava R, Jeffrey R, Jabeen NAN, et al. Masseter muscle thickness in unilateral partial edentulism: an ultrasonographic study. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2017;28:44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Costa YM, Ariji Y, Ferreira DMAO, Bonjardim LR, Conti PCR, Ariji E, et al. Muscle hardness and masticatory myofascial pain: assessment and clinical relevance. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45:640–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raghunandan Iyengar A, Patil S, Guddannanavar Karibasappa G, Beloor Vasudev S, Kumar Joshi R. Evaluation of internal echogenic pattern of masseter in subjects with myofascial pain/myositis, oral submucous fibrosis, chewers, bruxers and healthy individuals—a preliminary ultrasonographic study. J Dent. 2016;17:361–6 (Shiraz).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tater P, Pandey S. Botulinum toxin in movement disorders. Neurol India. 2018;66(Supplement):S79–89.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Park G, Choi YC, Bae JH, Kim ST. Does botulinum toxin injection into masseter muscles affect subcutaneous thickness? Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38:192–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reis Durão AP, Morosolli A, Brown J, Jacobs R. (2017) Masseter muscle measurement performed by ultrasound: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46(6):20170052CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Oral Diagnosis and RadiologyKarabük University Faculty of DentistryKarabükTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Oral Diagnosis and RadiologyAtatürk University Faculty of DentistryErzurumTurkey

Personalised recommendations