Ultrasound (US)-guided salivary gland irrigation is a popular conservative treatment method that improves the success rate and reduces complications of the sialo-irrigation procedure. US is routinely used for evaluation of various salivary gland diseases because of its easy accessibility and absence of ionizing radiation. US also allows dynamic studies with real-time imaging during diagnostic or surgical procedures. However, conventional US images have limitations in salivary duct visualization. Although US images acquired with saline irrigation have improved visualization because of ductal system dilation by the pulling effect, the resultant image quality remains insufficient for diagnosis. Therefore, contrast agents are required during US-guided sialo-irrigation procedures to produce diagnostic image quality. Air bubbles in saline solution have high echogenicity and enhance image quality by acting as a US contrast agent. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical significance of US-guided sialo-irrigation with a saline–air contrast medium, to estimate its diagnostic and treatment efficacy, and to examine the procedure in two patients. In the study, two patients underwent US-guided salivary gland irrigation with air-bubble mixed saline solution. During the procedure, we were able to visualize the salivary gland duct and subsequently irrigate and clean the inside of the duct. As a result, the patients’ symptoms were relieved and saline solution mixed with air bubbles was confirmed to be an effective contrast agent.
Sialo-irrigation Ultrasound Contrast medium Ultrasound-guided Sonohysterography
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Song Hee Oh, Ju Hee Kang, Yoon Joo Choi, Bok-Yeol Kim, Sae Rom Lee, Se Hyung Lee, Yong-Suk Choi, and Eui-Hwan Hwang declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human rights statement and informed consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Animal rights statement
This article does not contain any studies with animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 5369 KB)
Marchal F, Dulguerov P. Sialolithiasis management: the state of the art. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:951–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Antoniades D, Harrison JD, Epivatianos A, Papanayotou P. Treatment of chronic sialadenitis by intraductal penicillin or saline. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:431–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Syrop CH, Sahakian V. Transvaginal sonographic detection of endometrial polyps with fluid contrast augmentation. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79:1041–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Goldstein RB, Bree RL, Benson CB, Benacerraf BR, Bloss JD, Carlos R, et al. Evaluation of the woman with postmenopausal bleeding: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound-Sponsored Consensus Conference statement. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20:1025–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Alborzi S, Parsanezhad M, Mahmoodian N, Alborzi M. Sonohysterography versus transvaginal sonography for screening of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;96:20–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sladkevicius P, Zannoni L, Valentin L. B-flow ultrasound facilitates visualization of contrast medium during hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44:221–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Lee C, Kim J-E, Huh K-H, Yi W-J, Heo M-S, Lee S-S, et al. Therapeutic effect of intraductal irrigation of the salivary gland: a technical report. Imaging Sci Dent. 2017;47:123–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Dulguerov P, Marchal F, Lehmann W. Postparotidectomy facial nerve paralysis: possible etiologic factors and results with routine facial nerve monitoring. Laryngoscope. 1999;109:754–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Marchal F, Becker M, Kurt A-M, Oedman M, Dulguerov P, Lehmann W. Histopathology of submandibular glands removed for sialolithiasis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2001;110:464–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Quinn J, Graham R. Recurrent suppurative parotitis treated by intraductal antibiotics. J Oral Surg. 1973;31:36–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Onkar PM, Ratnaparkhi C, Mitra K. High-frequency ultrasound in parotid gland disease. Ultrasound Q. 2013;29:313–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Bozzato A, Hertel V, Bumm K, Iro H, Zenk J. Salivary simulation with ascorbic acid enhances sonographic diagnosis of obstructive sialadenitis. J Clin Ultrasound. 2009;37:329–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Zengel P, Berghaus A, Weiler C, Reiser M, Clevert DA. Intraductally applied contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IA-CEUS) for evaluating obstructive disease and secretory dysfunction of the salivary glands. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1339–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Hawe W. Luft als Kontrastmittel in der Sonographie der Rotatorenmanschette (Luftsonographie). Röntgenpraxis. 1991;44:75–8 (in German).PubMedGoogle Scholar
Koski J, Saarakkala S, Heikkinen J, Hermunen H. Use of air-steroid-saline mixture as contrast medium in greyscale ultrasound imaging: experimental study and practical applications in rheumatology. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23:373–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Calliada F, Campani R, Bottinelli O, Bozzini A, Sommaruga MG. Ultrasound contrast agents: basic principles. Eur J Radiol. 1998;27:S157–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar