Advertisement

Oral Radiology

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 84–89 | Cite as

Ultrasound-guided sialo-irrigation with a saline–air mixture as the contrast medium

  • Song Hee Oh
  • Ju Hee Kang
  • Yoon Joo Choi
  • Bok-Yeol Kim
  • Sae Rom Lee
  • Se Hyung Lee
  • Yong-Suk ChoiEmail author
  • Eui-Hwan Hwang
Technical Report
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

Ultrasound (US)-guided salivary gland irrigation is a popular conservative treatment method that improves the success rate and reduces complications of the sialo-irrigation procedure. US is routinely used for evaluation of various salivary gland diseases because of its easy accessibility and absence of ionizing radiation. US also allows dynamic studies with real-time imaging during diagnostic or surgical procedures. However, conventional US images have limitations in salivary duct visualization. Although US images acquired with saline irrigation have improved visualization because of ductal system dilation by the pulling effect, the resultant image quality remains insufficient for diagnosis. Therefore, contrast agents are required during US-guided sialo-irrigation procedures to produce diagnostic image quality. Air bubbles in saline solution have high echogenicity and enhance image quality by acting as a US contrast agent. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical significance of US-guided sialo-irrigation with a saline–air contrast medium, to estimate its diagnostic and treatment efficacy, and to examine the procedure in two patients. In the study, two patients underwent US-guided salivary gland irrigation with air-bubble mixed saline solution. During the procedure, we were able to visualize the salivary gland duct and subsequently irrigate and clean the inside of the duct. As a result, the patients’ symptoms were relieved and saline solution mixed with air bubbles was confirmed to be an effective contrast agent.

Keywords

Sialo-irrigation Ultrasound Contrast medium Ultrasound-guided Sonohysterography 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Song Hee Oh, Ju Hee Kang, Yoon Joo Choi, Bok-Yeol Kim, Sae Rom Lee, Se Hyung Lee, Yong-Suk Choi, and Eui-Hwan Hwang declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human rights statement and informed consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Animal rights statement

This article does not contain any studies with animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 5369 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Marchal F, Dulguerov P. Sialolithiasis management: the state of the art. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:951–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antoniades D, Harrison JD, Epivatianos A, Papanayotou P. Treatment of chronic sialadenitis by intraductal penicillin or saline. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:431–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parsons AK, Lense JJ. Sonohysterography for endometrial abnormalities: preliminary results. J Clin Ultrasound. 1993;21:87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Syrop CH, Sahakian V. Transvaginal sonographic detection of endometrial polyps with fluid contrast augmentation. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79:1041–3.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldstein RB, Bree RL, Benson CB, Benacerraf BR, Bloss JD, Carlos R, et al. Evaluation of the woman with postmenopausal bleeding: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound-Sponsored Consensus Conference statement. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20:1025–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alborzi S, Parsanezhad M, Mahmoodian N, Alborzi M. Sonohysterography versus transvaginal sonography for screening of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;96:20–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sladkevicius P, Zannoni L, Valentin L. B-flow ultrasound facilitates visualization of contrast medium during hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44:221–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee C, Kim J-E, Huh K-H, Yi W-J, Heo M-S, Lee S-S, et al. Therapeutic effect of intraductal irrigation of the salivary gland: a technical report. Imaging Sci Dent. 2017;47:123–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dulguerov P, Marchal F, Lehmann W. Postparotidectomy facial nerve paralysis: possible etiologic factors and results with routine facial nerve monitoring. Laryngoscope. 1999;109:754–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marchal F, Becker M, Kurt A-M, Oedman M, Dulguerov P, Lehmann W. Histopathology of submandibular glands removed for sialolithiasis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2001;110:464–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Quinn J, Graham R. Recurrent suppurative parotitis treated by intraductal antibiotics. J Oral Surg. 1973;31:36–9.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Onkar PM, Ratnaparkhi C, Mitra K. High-frequency ultrasound in parotid gland disease. Ultrasound Q. 2013;29:313–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bozzato A, Hertel V, Bumm K, Iro H, Zenk J. Salivary simulation with ascorbic acid enhances sonographic diagnosis of obstructive sialadenitis. J Clin Ultrasound. 2009;37:329–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zengel P, Berghaus A, Weiler C, Reiser M, Clevert DA. Intraductally applied contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IA-CEUS) for evaluating obstructive disease and secretory dysfunction of the salivary glands. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1339–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hawe W. Luft als Kontrastmittel in der Sonographie der Rotatorenmanschette (Luftsonographie). Röntgenpraxis. 1991;44:75–8 (in German).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Koski J, Saarakkala S, Heikkinen J, Hermunen H. Use of air-steroid-saline mixture as contrast medium in greyscale ultrasound imaging: experimental study and practical applications in rheumatology. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23:373–8.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Calliada F, Campani R, Bottinelli O, Bozzini A, Sommaruga MG. Ultrasound contrast agents: basic principles. Eur J Radiol. 1998;27:S157–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Song Hee Oh
    • 1
  • Ju Hee Kang
    • 1
  • Yoon Joo Choi
    • 1
  • Bok-Yeol Kim
    • 1
  • Sae Rom Lee
    • 1
  • Se Hyung Lee
    • 1
  • Yong-Suk Choi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eui-Hwan Hwang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Graduate SchoolKyung Hee UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations