Incidental findings during head and neck MRI screening in 1717 patients with temporomandibular disorders
- 115 Downloads
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in the evaluation of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). At our institution, we perform additional head and neck screening using head coils when performing MRI screening of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) to detect lesions in areas other than the TMJ (lesions discovered by chance, or incidental findings; IFs) and to conduct a diagnosis of exclusion. The objective of this study was to determine the number and frequency of IFs detected during head and neck screening, according to sites and diseases.
Materials and methods
The study evaluated 1717 patients with clinically suspected TMDs who underwent MRI of the TMJ. IFs were assessed on horizontal sections of images of the craniofacial region obtained by the short tau inversion recovery imaging technique.
The patients undergoing MRI of the TMJ comprised 433 males and 1284 females. Among the patients, at least one IF was detected on images in 461 patients. The most common IF site was the maxillary sinus. Based on diagnostic imaging, there were 21 IFs (1.2%) associated with TMD symptoms, or for which an association with TMD symptoms could not be ruled out.
Combination of conventional MRI imaging of the TMJ with craniofacial MRI screening may allow detection of lesions other than TMDs, thereby confirming the usefulness of MRI. Detection of IFs may require development of different therapeutic strategies than those for TMDs.
KeywordsTemporomandibular disorders MRI Screening Incidental findings
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Takashi Kamio, Takashi Yakushiji, Takashi Takaki, Takahiko Shibahara, Kenichi Imoto, and Mamoru Wakoh declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human rights statement
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions.
Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
- 1.Iizuka T, Kakudo K, Kino K, Kawano M, Kobayashi K, Koyano K, et al. Concept and differential diagnosis for temporomandibular joint disorders. In: Iizuka T, editor. Tokyo: Japanese Society for the Temporomandibular Joint; 2001. p. 1–5 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
- 3.Katzberg RW. Temporomandibular joint imaging. Anesth Prog. 1990;37:121–6.Google Scholar
- 9.ICD-10 Volume-2 Instruction Manual. World Health Organization, International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10). Geneva: World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/ICD-10_2nd_ed_volume2.pdf (2010). Accessed 14 Nov 2014.
- 10.R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/ (2013).
- 22.Orhan K, Avsever H, Aksoy S, Seki U, Bozkurt P. Temporomandibular joint MR images: incidental head and neck findings and pathologies. Cranio. 2017;17:1–8.Google Scholar
- 23.Panelli SKC, Fujita M, Oliveira JX, Yanagi Y, Asaumi J. Should incidental findings in diagnostic imaging be reported? Minerva Stomatol. 2017;66:75–80.Google Scholar
- 25.Ariji Y, Izumi M, Gotoh M, Naitoh M, Katoh M, Kuroiwa Y, et al. MRI features of mandibular osteomyelitis: practical criteria based on an association with conventional radiography features and clinical classification. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105:503–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Cimino R, Steenks MH, Michelotti A, Farella M, PierFrancesco N. Mandibular condyle osteochondroma. Review of the literature and report of a misdiagnosed case. J Orofac Pain. 2003;17:254–61.Google Scholar