Oral Radiology

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 143–150 | Cite as

Root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars using cone-beam computed tomography in a Chilean and Belgian subpopulation: a cross-sectional study

  • Eugenia Pedemonte
  • Carolina Cabrera
  • Andrés Torres
  • Reinhilde Jacobs
  • Alexandra Harnisch
  • Valeria Ramírez
  • Guillermo Concha
  • Andrés Briner
  • Claudia Brizuela
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

To describe mandibular premolar root and canal morphology and its variability in Chilean and Belgian samples using cone-beam computed tomography.

Methods

A cross-sectional and descriptive study was conducted. A total of 402 mandibular premolars were examined using cone-beam computed tomography images of Chilean and Belgian patients. Premolars that met the inclusion criteria were studied in relation to the number of roots, number of canals, root canal configuration, presence of C-shaped configuration, tooth length, and root length.

Results

The mandibular first premolar frequently presented with one root (94% Chilean; 100% Belgian), as did the mandibular second premolar (99% Chilean; 98% Belgian). One canal was present in 69% of Chilean, and 83% of Belgian mandibular first premolars, and in 95% of Chilean and 91% of Belgian second premolars. A type I root canal configuration was found in 69% of Chilean and 83% of Belgian first premolars and in 95% of Chilean and 92% of Belgian second premolars.

Conclusions

The anatomical parameters analyzed in the Chilean and Belgian samples are similar. However, it should be noted that there are anatomical variations in mandibular premolars.

Keywords

Anatomy Cone-beam computed tomography Dental pulp cavity Premolar Root canal 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human rights statements and informed consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Cantatore G, Berutti E, Castellucci A. Missed anatomy: frequency and clinical impact. Endod Topics. 2009;15:3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vertucci F. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984;58:589–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Awawdeh L, Al-Qudah A. Root form and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J. 2007;41:240–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sert S, Bayirli G. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod. 2004;30(6):391–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu TY, Yang SF, Pai SF. Complicated root canal morphology of mandibular first premolar in a Chinese population using the cross section method. J Endod. 2006;32:932–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Trope M, Elfenbein L, Tronstad L. Mandibular premolars with more than one root canal in different race groups. J Endod. 1986;12:343–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim E, Fallahrastegar A, Hur Y-Y. Difference in root canal length between Asians and Caucasians. Int Endod J. 2005;38:149–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao C. Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium-enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1547–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gulabivala K, Aung TH, Alavi A, Ng YL. Root and canal morphology of Burmese mandibular molars. Int Endod J. 2001;34(5):359–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Omer OE, Al Shalabi RM, Jennings M, Glennon J, Claffey N. A comparison between clearing and radiographic techniques in the study of the root-canal anatomy of maxillary first and second molars. Int Endod J. 2004;37:291–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography. J Endod. 2007;9:1121–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. The root and root canal morphology of the human mandibular first premolar: a literature review. J Endod. 2007;33(5):509–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vertucci F. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Topics. 2005;10:3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1972;33(1):101–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Badanelli Marcano P, Martinez-Berna A. Surgical preparation of root canals. Rev Esp Endod. 1983;1(2):61–77.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang R, Wang H, Tian Y-Y, Hu T, Dummer PMH. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate root and canal morphology of mandibular molars in Chinese individuals. Int Endod J. 2011;44:990–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Velmurugan N, Sandhya R. Root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in an Indian population: a laboratory study. Int Endod J. 2009;42:54–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang R, Yang H, Yu X, Wang H, Hu T, Dummer PMH. Use of CBCT to identity the morphology of maxillary permanent molar teeth in a Chinese subpopulation. Int Endod J. 2011;44:162–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jafarzadeh H, Wu Y. The C-shaped root canal configuration: a review. J Endod. 2007;33:517–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Feijoó G. Cronología de la odontogénesis de los dientes permanentes en niños de la comunidad de Madrid. Aplicación a la estimación de la edad dentaria. Doctoral thesis. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid; 2007.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fan B, Cheung GSP, Fan M, Gutmann JL, Bian Z. C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars: part I—anatomical features. J Endod. 2004;30(12):899–903.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fan B, Cheung GSP, Fan M, Gutmann JL, Fan W. C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars: part II—radiographic features. J Endod. 2004;30(12):904–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Greco Machado Y, García Molina JA, Lozano De Luaces V, Manzanares Céspedes MC. Morfología de los conductos radiculares de premolares superiores e inferiores. Endodoncia. 2009;27(1):13–8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CCS. Anomalous mandibular premolar: a mandibular first premolar with three roots and a mandibular second premolar with a C-shaped canal system. Int Endod J. 2008;41:1005–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Robinson S, Czerny C, Gahleitner A, Bernhart T, Kainberger FM. Dental CT evaluation of mandibular first premolar root configurations and canal variations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93(3):328–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Springer Japan KK 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugenia Pedemonte
    • 1
  • Carolina Cabrera
    • 1
  • Andrés Torres
    • 2
  • Reinhilde Jacobs
    • 2
  • Alexandra Harnisch
    • 1
  • Valeria Ramírez
    • 1
  • Guillermo Concha
    • 1
  • Andrés Briner
    • 1
  • Claudia Brizuela
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EndodonticsUniversidad de los Andes, Facultad de Odontología. MonsLas CondesChile
  2. 2.Department of Imaging and PathologyUniversity of LeuvenLouvainBelgium

Personalised recommendations